While I agree with your sentiments about the LGBT movement, which has been ponerised and used as a platform to push degeneracy, sexual deviancy, and normalisation of pedophilia onto the wider population, I'm not sure whether it's clear in my above post that the proverbial baby I was referring to are gay people who do not support or identify with the perversion of the LGBT. Because not all of them do, take the members of the organisation I posted about (Gays Against Groomers). They are the proverbial baby. And they end up being put in the same category as the perverts who run the movement.
Gay and Lesbian couples were originally targeted by commercial interests looking to make good profits. That come off the back of early Mardi Gras celebrations where businesses in those districts made lots of money because LG couples are mostly D.I.N.K.s (Double income, no kids) and so had higher disposable incomes on average. Then tourist strips started competing for business by catering to Mardi Gras after parties. I worked in a beachside suburb that had huge Mardi Gras after parties for around 10 years.
The following is a small extract from the text you have contributed.paris 2024. there was much discussion about the opening and closing ceremonies. i found the link below quite reasonable. is “help on the way???”
The performance was all the more acclaimed for the fact that the artist did not resort to playback. At least, that's what the members of the organising committee all agreed. On 27 July, Victor Le Masne, the ceremony's musical director, answered the question ‘Did she sing playback? No. We had foreseen this possibility, but she actually sang.’ The same goes for Thomas Jolly, artistic director of the ceremonies, who only recently explained that the performance had been made ‘without playback’.
Source : Libération