BHelmet
The Living Force
As a general response to the incredulousness:
While the disbelief is more than likely warranted, I think if we look, there are many things we believe and many hypotheses we entertain that can be regarded the same way as McCartney being replaced etc. I do know that I do not know what is true regarding all the various theories above. It is also not really of major concern what the real answers are. The easy thing is to say "absolute rubbish", but why be closed minded and come to a definite conclusion about something that makes no difference and about which we have so little real information? Doing so might reinforce the behavior of making snap judgements that may or may not be accurate.
"Any and all things are possible" So I think it is important to maintain an open mind. Why close off possibilities?
Many people must look at the C's multi-density portrayal of reality with a "higher" level 4D STS "Boss" that manipulates and controls humanity (as well as "time") for it's own ends as impossible rubbish. Not to mention the very existence of the C's communicating through a ouija board from some incomprehensible strata of reality. Same goes for the immaculate conception and many, many religious dogmas.
I can easily understand and imagine how a great many people could lump the C's hypothesis and the McCartney hypothesis and the Christian hypothesis all in the same bin labelled "Outlandish ideas that couldn't possibly be true." So, just because something sounds outlandish doesn't necessarily mean anything. All it really means is that it sounds far-fetched to the person to whom it sounds far-fetched to. Vaccinations to create GMO humans; EM frequency fences; Supermen incubating beneath the surface of the earth; Nephilim enforcers, Nazi bases in Antarctica and the possibility to graduate to a different density of existence and on and on. I prefer to try to keep an open mind about all of it, especially since there is so little I REALLY KNOW of any of it.
While the disbelief is more than likely warranted, I think if we look, there are many things we believe and many hypotheses we entertain that can be regarded the same way as McCartney being replaced etc. I do know that I do not know what is true regarding all the various theories above. It is also not really of major concern what the real answers are. The easy thing is to say "absolute rubbish", but why be closed minded and come to a definite conclusion about something that makes no difference and about which we have so little real information? Doing so might reinforce the behavior of making snap judgements that may or may not be accurate.
"Any and all things are possible" So I think it is important to maintain an open mind. Why close off possibilities?
Many people must look at the C's multi-density portrayal of reality with a "higher" level 4D STS "Boss" that manipulates and controls humanity (as well as "time") for it's own ends as impossible rubbish. Not to mention the very existence of the C's communicating through a ouija board from some incomprehensible strata of reality. Same goes for the immaculate conception and many, many religious dogmas.
I can easily understand and imagine how a great many people could lump the C's hypothesis and the McCartney hypothesis and the Christian hypothesis all in the same bin labelled "Outlandish ideas that couldn't possibly be true." So, just because something sounds outlandish doesn't necessarily mean anything. All it really means is that it sounds far-fetched to the person to whom it sounds far-fetched to. Vaccinations to create GMO humans; EM frequency fences; Supermen incubating beneath the surface of the earth; Nephilim enforcers, Nazi bases in Antarctica and the possibility to graduate to a different density of existence and on and on. I prefer to try to keep an open mind about all of it, especially since there is so little I REALLY KNOW of any of it.