Re: Pete Santilli & Dr. Judy Wood - Psy-Ops - Cointelpro?
This response to Pashalis comes from the SOTT Broadcast # 15 page, but I think it best belongs here.
Pashalis said:
If it is true that Judy Wood was in a coma for 6 years (comments from her students seem to testify that) that certainly would point to the direction that she is suffering of somekind of brain damage. Since those comments from her students were posted in 2005 (If those comments are real) I think it is reasonable to suspect that this coma state was before 911 (She repeatedly stated in her interviews that she watched 911 happen on TV, wich suggest that she was not in a coma state at that time. And since those comments from her students were made in 2005, it means she was in that coma state sometime before 911). So I think there might be serious brain defect playing a role here, when she is communicating with others...
Let me repeat, her research in the book is more then compelling and good...
I don't think it is fair to through the baby out with the bathwater in Judy's case. I really think that she has made a terrific inquiry into what happened physically that day. As Laura said "Judy's book is probably one of the best collections of evidence out there" if not the best...
I think we are dealing with a very damaged person, both physically and mentally do to brain damage caused by the coma and psychopathic handlers who only worsen the situation.
I somehow get the impression that Judy Wood has made a groundbreaking scientific inquiry into what happened physically on 911 and then was quickly co-opted and intimidated by a bunch of hired Psychos...
Nothing really new...
I agree with your assessment of possible brain damage, and would add characteropathy on top of that. And, keeping in mind her mental state during the interview, I personally wonder how someone in that state of total chaos could possibly put together one of the best books on 9-11
on her own, especially when she couldn't even make a point during a lecture or an interview. I'm not saying it's not packed with information, but I'm seriously wondering how she went about doing that, especially since some claim that she's been like this since at least 2005.
Here are the students I believe Pashalis was referring to. What I draw from these is a serious question of how Judy Wood managed to write a book when she couldn't finish a sentence.
from: _http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Michael.html
and _http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=495285
12/17/05
She is an odd lady, to say the least. She is very good at what she does, but she can't always explain it well enough for students to understand. SHE TAKES FOR EVER TO GIVE EXAMS BACK!!!!! It took here 3 weeks to give an exam back once.
12/12/05
Like others said, she had good intentions and when she wasn't trying to convince us Bush blew up the WTC she was actually nice, but she wasn't a great teacher. Too many times she starts examples and doesn't finish them. And yes, she was in a coma for 6 years. How crazy is that.
11/30/05
She woke up from a coma and decided her calling was to become a professor. She did not really seem to know the material, and she was hopeless at trying to convey it to the student. She fails to be able to complete a thought if not a sentance. If it is possible at all, aviod her.
8/30/05
uh she was real easy on some tests, and horrible on others, i took one test before i even got the previous one back
4/6/05
Dr. Wood has good intentions, but she is not wound too tight. Not a good teacher if you are looking for orgainization and structure. She gives lots of real world examples and tries to illustrate topics more than most teachers. However, this will not help you are her tests. They are difficult.
A useful idiot perhaps?
Pashalis said:
Also let us not forget that Michael Zebuhr, a pretty close student of her, who also started to research 911, was murdered. The guys who shot him, were quickly realised again. (From what I've gathered from her statements it seems that Michael Zebuhr was close to Judy).
How would you feel if the murderers of one of your closest students, who happened to also research 911, were realised, even though the evidence against them was obvious?
Kind of intimidating don't you think?
At this point I think she is more of an victim than anything else.
As for the Michael Zebuhr piece, it seems to me that she did her best to spin this horrible tragedy to her advantage in a feud against fellow 9/11 Scholar Steve Jones. Whether it was conscious on her part or not is difficult to say, since her consciousness is obviously tainted by some type of characteropathy. But from what I've found the man who shot him actually went to jail, and wasn't released from custody. Lies abound here, but I'm trusting my nose on this one and I smell a rat. I hate to sound so cold, but that is what it looks like from the following:
from: _http://911blogger.com/node/18474
It turned out that there was more to Wood's problems with Jones than just allegations about his scientific method. Wood claimed that Jones showed no special sympathy toward her regarding the violent death of Michael Zebuhr. She said that instead of a long note of sympathy, Jones was more interested in adamantly defending his experiments which proved that aluminum melts long before it glows brightly in daylight conditions. She also said that Jones used this phrase in an email sent to her, "we've done it before and we will do it again if need be".
Jones was no doubt speaking of the melting aluminum experiments, which he indeed "did again" in late August of 2006;
_http://911review.com/articles/jones/experiments_NIST_orange_glow_hypothe...
However, Wood repeated Jones' comments after a long diatribe about Zebuhr, and it's clear that Wood was consciously conflating the murder of Zebuhr with Jones' words, "we've done it before and we will do it again if need be". The phrase is posted in a similar context on Wood's website, but+the+sender+is+not+identified;
Here is the picture. Believing that a colleague was involved with killing your student wouldn't probably be too big a leap for someone with such paranoia and brain damage:
and the man charged with the murder, despite numerous rumors and allegations that sneaky assassins did it:
_http://www.therecorddelta.com/V2_news_articles.php?heading=0&story_id=402&page=
A year ago, Billy Rae Deshawn Johnson, then 17, pulled the trigger on the gun that killed 25-year-old Michael Zebuhr, who had just finished dining at an Uptown restaurant with his mother, sister and her boyfriend. The killing shook Minneapolis because of the random nature of the crime in a normally safe neighborhood.
On Thursday, Johnson placed both hands on the defense table, hung his head, lifted his eyes to Zebuhr's mother across the room and said in barely discernible words: "I apologize for the loss of your son. ... I hope you will forgive me for what happened to your son."
Hennepin County District Judge Francis Connolly sentenced Johnson, now 18, to 30 years in prison with the possibility of parole after 20 years. Johnson pleaded guilty a month ago to second-degree murder. He had been charged with first-degree murder, but the charge was reduced in exchange for his guilty plea.
Mass hysteria. And obviously somewhere someone is benefiting from the mayhem and pathology that just keeps reinforcing one another in a positive feedback loop.
Pashalis said:
At this point I think she is more of an victim than anything else.
Just because someone is brain damaged doesn't necessarily make them a victim, especially if they travel with people who victimize others. I think it's important to stay sharp even when dealing with people who seem like helpless victims, especially if they evidence signs of a twisted psychology. That is my take on Judy Wood right now. You can tell a lot about a person by the people they surround themselves with. And though Judy might believe she's been doing good work, spreading the gospel of 9-11 Truth, and has seen someone close to her killed, she is a far cry from being helpless. That's my take as of now.