Re: Pete Santilli & Dr. Judy Wood - Psy-Ops - Cointelpro?
Take DNA for example. It is complex (i.e., highly improbable sequence of genetic 'letters') and highly specified (i.e., this sequence isn't just complex--a random sequence of DNA is just as complex--but it has 'meaning' in the sense that it codes for functional proteins). If we take a protein that's 200 amino acids in length, there are a ton of possible amino acid sequences of that length. But only a tiny fraction of them will produce a functional protein. There aren't enough 'probabilistic resources' (i.e. time and opportunities) in the universe to randomly generate such a protein. So information of this type is highly improbable. Of course, the same goes for human knowledge and culture: impossible to come about by chance. But the same also goes for physics. For example, there's the so-called fine-tuning of the constants. Theoretically, the four 'forces' could have different values. But if any of these values (and others besides) were different by more than a small fraction, our universe would either be so unstable as to collapse or at the very least not be able to produce life. Our universe is very 'special' in this regard.
So in this sense, the 'laws' of the universe are like another set of complex, specified information. (Roger Penrose calculated that the chances of a habitable universe is something like 1/10^10^122.) Paul Davies and others argue that information is fundamental to the universe. In other words, the physical 'laws' (like strong and weak nuclear forces, gravity, etc) are 'informational statements,' i.e., it's like saying, "Let's do it this way, not these other quadrillion possible ways."
So I guess theoretically, if you could access that information, you could monkey around with it. This seems possible, e.g. in parapsychological research. There are case studies about materialization, objects bending and changing their shape, transforming, teleporting, etc. Perhaps these are phenomena where consciousness (at some level) accesses the information field and 'edits' the information at its most basic level. Like a hacker who hacks a website and replaces useful information with cuss words...
(I'm no expert, though, so any corrections to the above are welcome!)
Tigersoap said:Thanks Mr Scott & Ark :)
I am not sure I get it all though but the way I understand this for now, is that if you're capable of manipulating the "information" as its fundamental level, then you can create/bend events at will if you're so inclined, hence the weird things that happened for 9-11 ? right ? or is that not even what it means ?
Guardian said:ark said:When there is information flow, you can be either interested in reading this information (physics, intelligence) or in disrupting this information (whoever for whatever purposes).
So in theory, someone/thing could just "tell" the building that it's not a building anymore?
Take DNA for example. It is complex (i.e., highly improbable sequence of genetic 'letters') and highly specified (i.e., this sequence isn't just complex--a random sequence of DNA is just as complex--but it has 'meaning' in the sense that it codes for functional proteins). If we take a protein that's 200 amino acids in length, there are a ton of possible amino acid sequences of that length. But only a tiny fraction of them will produce a functional protein. There aren't enough 'probabilistic resources' (i.e. time and opportunities) in the universe to randomly generate such a protein. So information of this type is highly improbable. Of course, the same goes for human knowledge and culture: impossible to come about by chance. But the same also goes for physics. For example, there's the so-called fine-tuning of the constants. Theoretically, the four 'forces' could have different values. But if any of these values (and others besides) were different by more than a small fraction, our universe would either be so unstable as to collapse or at the very least not be able to produce life. Our universe is very 'special' in this regard.
So in this sense, the 'laws' of the universe are like another set of complex, specified information. (Roger Penrose calculated that the chances of a habitable universe is something like 1/10^10^122.) Paul Davies and others argue that information is fundamental to the universe. In other words, the physical 'laws' (like strong and weak nuclear forces, gravity, etc) are 'informational statements,' i.e., it's like saying, "Let's do it this way, not these other quadrillion possible ways."
So I guess theoretically, if you could access that information, you could monkey around with it. This seems possible, e.g. in parapsychological research. There are case studies about materialization, objects bending and changing their shape, transforming, teleporting, etc. Perhaps these are phenomena where consciousness (at some level) accesses the information field and 'edits' the information at its most basic level. Like a hacker who hacks a website and replaces useful information with cuss words...
(I'm no expert, though, so any corrections to the above are welcome!)