Re: Pete Santilli & Dr. Judy Wood - Psy-Ops - Cointelpro?
I listened for a short while and it was just a lot of self-referential nonsense with no mention of the SOTT broadcast.
Very true. This reminds me of what Lobaczewski wrote about paranoid characteropathy:
It is characteristic of paranoid behavior for people to be capable of relatively correct reasoning and discussion as long as the conversation involves minor differences of opinion. This stops abruptly when the partner's arguments begin to undermine their overvalued ideas, crush their long-held stereotypes of reasoning, or forces them to accept a conclusion they had subconsciously rejected before. Such a stimulus unleashes upon the partner a torrent of pseudo-logical, largely paramoralistic, often insulting utterances which always contain some degree of suggestion.
Utterances like these inspire aversion among cultivated and logical people, who then tend to avoid the paranoid types. However, the power of the paranoid lies in the fact that they easily enslave less critical minds, e.g. people with other kinds of psychological deficiencies, who have been victims of the egotistical influence of individuals with character disorders, and, in particular, a large segment of young people.
A [working class person] may perceive this power to enslave to be a kind of victory over higher-class people and thus take the paranoid person's side. However, this is not the normal reaction among the common people, where perception of psychological reality occurs no less often than among intellectuals.
Guardian said:Robin said:Hesher Sesher says (15:38:20): "You guys should all tune into The Pete Santilli Show on Monday, The Guerilla Media Network is going to expose Lisa to a real world wide audience"
I saw that, but I don't think he did? I listened for awhile, but then the broadcast quit and I couldn't get it to reload. I tried on my computer, and my phone, so it was something on his end.
Does anyone know if he trashed Lisa? Does anyone even listen to his show? LOL
I listened for a short while and it was just a lot of self-referential nonsense with no mention of the SOTT broadcast.
Pashalis said:Notice that she also is much more calm and understandable in that interview. And she lets others speak. So it might very well be that she was indeed awaiting an attack and/or redicule of her work when she was interviewed by SOTT.
Very true. This reminds me of what Lobaczewski wrote about paranoid characteropathy:
It is characteristic of paranoid behavior for people to be capable of relatively correct reasoning and discussion as long as the conversation involves minor differences of opinion. This stops abruptly when the partner's arguments begin to undermine their overvalued ideas, crush their long-held stereotypes of reasoning, or forces them to accept a conclusion they had subconsciously rejected before. Such a stimulus unleashes upon the partner a torrent of pseudo-logical, largely paramoralistic, often insulting utterances which always contain some degree of suggestion.
Utterances like these inspire aversion among cultivated and logical people, who then tend to avoid the paranoid types. However, the power of the paranoid lies in the fact that they easily enslave less critical minds, e.g. people with other kinds of psychological deficiencies, who have been victims of the egotistical influence of individuals with character disorders, and, in particular, a large segment of young people.
A [working class person] may perceive this power to enslave to be a kind of victory over higher-class people and thus take the paranoid person's side. However, this is not the normal reaction among the common people, where perception of psychological reality occurs no less often than among intellectuals.