One thing that's been nagging me, and that has been pointed out previously elsewhere (can't remember where/who), is the gaping hole in this recently popularized concept of 'mass formation psychosis' – namely not taking into consideration the central role of psychopathology and ponerology. At least, as I have listened to many interviews with prof. Mattias Desmet who is the 'father' of this concept, I haven't heard him say anything related to psychopathy. As Fuellmich is apparently using him as one of his expert witnesses, I think it's very unfortunate that psychopathology isn't entering the discussions. I don't think this gaping hole is deliberate but it will act as a form of whitewashing of the real culprits, like "Oh, everyone just got into this mass psychosis...just one of those random things."