Putin on TV: Documentaries and TV appearances by the Russian president

Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Putin turns the tables on Poland Sep 20, 2016
How does one piss off Putin? Why, be historically inaccurate of course! Every educated person knows that before the USSR invaded Poland in 1939 [Molotov-Ribentropp pact] - Poland invaded Czechoslovakia, in cahoots with Hitler [Munich Agreement, 1938.]

The Molotov-Ribentropp pact has been publicly condemned by the modern Russian parliament, and brought down to being a personal pact between Hitler and Stalin themselves, rather than any will of the people.

Yet Russia continues to serve the "Russian aggression" myth to this day - without recourse to the fact that Poland had sided with Hitler beforehand.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

c.a. said:
Putin turns the tables on Poland Sep 20, 2016

Debating history with Poles is tricky!

That visit to Poland is actually from about 8 or 9 years ago - that copy of it was only uploaded to YT yesterday
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Found a treasure trove of videos from and about Putin in this channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeix8jbmQnS6FprsJIsjVyQ/videos

Most of the videos I haven't seen anywhere else before. Might be worthwile to copy some, if not all of those videos into a private sever or something. I'm saying this, because I found a similar german youtube channel a few years ago, that also had very interesting videos from an about Putin, that I couldn't find anywhere else on the net, after the channel vanished from youtube...

For example there was a video in that german youtube channel back then, where Putin talked about the murder of Gaddafi and was moved to tears. Since the channel vanished from youtube, I couldn't find that video anymore anywhere else on the internet.

I'll present a few of the videos in the channel above (there are more!), in chronological order from the time before Putin became president [1996], until the day he was put into office, shortly after that and the history before and after that. It is a historic must watch IMO (as well as the description of those videos).

Very interesting stuff in there in regards to his knowledge even then, his way and means of handling things, his personal and professional live, talks about his time in the KGB/FSB, a visit to his family and what they told him, and behind the scenes footage before he won and shortly after it.

Since Inessa (the girl who put up/created those videos and translated them) obviously made her homework, it is well worth to quote her descriptions of the videos as well (by the way this is her website: https://www.patreon.com/InessaS):

Putin warns against totalitarianism - 1996:

Only in a Western publication will you read about the "21st century tyrant" that is Putin. Back in 1996, he clearly stated that he believes in democracy. This statement does not equate to the US model or idea of democracy. Putin would go on to create a uniquely Russian system, a tri-partite Presidential system, where the President is its own entity in the separation of powers doctrine, and not part of the executive/legislature branches. Russia's governance structures are most similar to that of France, but with its own constitutional particularities



Putin knew what to do! His first interview, 2000:

On New Year's Eve, 1999, Putin succeeded the Russian Presidency from Boris Yeltsin. This is his first interview inside the Kremlin.



Who framed Putin? Moscow apartment blasts, 1999:

It is common sense that by 1999, the CIA could not have been unaware that the Director of the FSB was onto them.

In September of 1999, deadly blasts rocked apartment blocks in Moscow, killing 300 people and wounding over 1000. In the aftermath, Western media was quick to point the finger at Putin, while echoes of this claim remain to this day. After the explosions, the Federal Security Bureau (FSB) identified the masterminds of the attacks as two Arab mercenaries linked to Osama bin Laden, Al-Khattab and Abu Umar [note, this is before 9/11, when the worldwide public generally did not know of Osama bin Laden.] Like other mercenaries of the Chechen Wars, they were trained in Chechnya but taught by Saudi clerics, and funded by Western dollars. The two terrorists were subsequently killed in Chechnya by Russian forces.

Western media claimed that it was Putin who masterminded the attacks, who was largely unknown at the time. Among their many claims, they posited that Putin needed to “solve” a serious problem to gain widespread popularity from the Russian public, in order to win the presidential election.

They failed to mention that the Chechen wars had been raging from the early 1990s, with horrific acts of terrorism being committed much earlier than that, such as the 1995 Budyonnovsk hostage crisis.

It is important to know that Vladimir Putin was the Director of the FSB (former KGB) up until the point of becoming Prime Minister in 1999. This is, perhaps, the only position of sufficient power that could have fully understood the rotting system from the inside out, as well as negotiated with the then-President Boris Yeltsin, to give up his tenure. Retrospectively speaking, Boris Yeltsin was a puppet instrument of the West within Russia, whether or not he knew it himself.

After Putin came to power, a number of the “downtrodden” agents of the West within Russia’s Parliament, as well as the oligarchs, would escape to the West. There, they would speak loudly on CNN and BBC of the “oppression” they experienced due to “Putin’s regime”, such as suddenly having to pay taxes off of overtly public goods, like natural resources. Others would begin their own political “opposition” parties, funded by the US State Department – see former Prime Minister Kasyanov, and current political party, PARNAS.

Given what we know now – the 16 year “removal of Putin at any cost” programme is quite evident; the murder of minimal 'opposition' figures such as Nemtsov (conveniently, outside the Kremlin – it did make for great photographs), the many heinous acts of “Islamic” terrorism that smeared the Russian state, and even disasters outside of Russia. The MH17 catastrophe, that overtly and without any real evidence (nor, any real purpose for the President) blamed Putin.

The fingerprints over this historical collection of unexplained events, shrouded in anti-Putin hysteria, seem quite identical to one another. It leads us in only one direction when it comes to the masterminds of the 1999 Moscow apartment bombings.

[By popular demand – this is the latter part of the “Unknown Putin” documentary, released in 2000. To see the first part, go back one video, “Putin knew what to do! His first interview, 2000”. This film follows “a day in the life of” documentary style, therefore there are many scenes of just walking or just driving. I have edited out the video to contain just the key points, unless the long silences added to nuance. I have also added captions, where the location or the context of the event got lost through editing.]



Putin predicts the Islamic State, 1999:

ISIS, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (Daesh) is not a novel phenomenon. It is a salafi-jihadist cult, propped up by the Saudi state and seasoned with US dollars. It achieves certain foreign policy objectives, and is largely out in the open in the modern day. Russia has previously fought off its predecessor- Al Qaeda. Both of the Chechen wars of the 1990s were funded and aided by Saudi Arabia and the US. NGOs such as Medicins Sans Frontiers were documented to have been smuggling supplies to the Chechen rebels, at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives on both sides of the conflict.

On New Year’s Eve 1999, Vladimir Putin would inherit the Russian presidency. With it, he inherited a very damaged and weary country. Given that the previous President, Boris Yeltsin, was in no physical state to rule – it is evident that Putin’s work started long before his inauguration. In the 1990s and early 2000s, Russia was plagued by horrific acts of terrorism (Beslan, Nord-ost, etc), which in Western media were packaged as acts of “Chechen freedom fighters."

Should the rebels prevail, Putin envisaged the extensive loss of Russia’s territories and the possibility of an ‘Islamic State’. Not only was the Russian government successful in their military campaign, despite a crumbling economy at the time, but they were able to mend ties with Chechen leaders, who today staunchly oppose radical Islam. With this understanding in mind, Putin's decision to engage in the 2015 Syrian campaign was completely logical. He knows where it leads and doing nothing is not an option.

Russia has cut off the group’s revenue (illegal oil extraction, freely taking place under the ‘Western alliance’), and disrupted the partitioning of Syria. It curbed the creation of an extremist 'Islamic State', with the self-proclaimed 'ISIS capital' in Raqqa.

The 'jihadist breeding programme' in Syria was almost identical to the one in Chechnya. Having paid a very high price in the 1990s, Russia will never again fight jihadists on its own soil. However, will Europe?

For closer discussions on this and other topics, join me on my Patreon platform - www.patreon.com/InessaS



How Putin exposed the West: Part 1 (IMF/World Bank):

At which point did Putin become the big, bad wolf? Was it Crimea, the alleged MH17 airliner disaster, or another fabricated story on behalf of Western mainstream media? I guess there was that one time when he told Mr. McCain where his place was at the Munich Security Conference (2007) - as well as repay all of Yeltsin's IMF / World Bank loans much ahead of schedule, so that the international financial terrorists no longer had leverage over Russia.

You be the judge...



How Putin exposed the West: Part 2 (Economic Hitmen):

If you haven’t read the book “Confessions of an Economic Hitman” by John Perkins – I encourage you to head on over to Amazon and buy it. In quite some detail, it describes the way US “economic hitmen” plunder the world, and financially enslave the developing world. It reads like a thriller except it is entirely real – not even Hollywood could come up with a ‘baddie’ more sinister. Unless you are an unempathetic sociopath, I can guarantee you will lose sleep after reading the book.

Putin, of course, showed such hitmen the door and immediately became ‘baddie’ #1. By extension of this logic, almost everything you read in Western mainstream media (part of the “cabal”) is a self-projection. They accuse Putin of everything they take part in and create themselves.

If I were in Mr Putin’s shoes I would have plonked an “anti missile defense system” along the US border with Canada. But alas, his diplomatic skills are a lot more intricate than my own. :o)

There is a part 1 to this doco, find it in my list of videos – and Part 3 is to come.



How Putin exposed the West: Part 3 (Georgian aggression):

The West needs Russia more than Russia needs the West" - relocate while you still can! Just kidding, but take your country back from the international cabal of terrorists. And very importantly - do not give your vote to Hillary. That is all, hope you enjoyed the doco!



How Russia was framed in Georgia, 2008:

On the night of August 7, 2008 Georgian troops opened fire on the capital of South Ossetia, Tskhinvali, killing Russian peacekeepers and civilians in the area. Peacekeepers were permanently stationed in the region due to inter-ethnic tensions that exist over disputed territories (South, North Ossetia and Abkhazia.) Russian and South Ossetian forces entered the territory en masse, where heavy fighting against Georgian, US-funded forces lasted until August 12th.

The 5 day conflict played an important role for those who had orchestrated it, one which would guarantee the demonisation of Russia for the years to come. The footage of Russian tanks rolling in to Tskhinvali, in order to defend the territory from its attackers, was put on ‘repeat’ to play across mainstream media, never disclosing the cause of the narrative.

Mr Saakashvili, then President of Georgia, was eventually held to account for his actions, but gave up his Georgian citizenship to escape prosecution. Georgian authorities inquired with Interpol to place Saakashvilli on the international criminal search list, however Interpol refused. Instead, the US puppeteers installed Saakashvilli, a wanted criminal in his own country, as Mayor of Odessa in the Ukraine. The laughing stock of the world has very little to do with the Ukraine, but the Columbia University graduate is too useful of a pawn for the US to cease working though him.

A number of years after the Georgian conflict, a similar scenario was recreated in the Donbass region, Eastern Ukraine. The Russian military had learnt some lessons in regard to how damaging distorted media attention can be. The “Russian invasion” that was so insatiably awaited by Western mainstream media vultures never took place. Instead, pro-Russian citizen militias formed within Eastern Ukraine, who continue to defend themselves to this day against the US-funded Kiev junta.

In 2017, South Ossetia plans on holding a referendum to join the Russian Federation. Eastern Ukrainian regions also plan a referendum in 2017. Watch this space for externally-initiated unrest closer to the time.

For closer discussions on this and other topics, join me on my Patreon platform - www.patreon.com/InessaS

 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Just a note that tomorrow is Putins birthday and it might be a good idea to push the dearputin letter on all avenues possible:

- dearputin.com

Considering the situation in syria and demonization of Putin and Assad, the letter is as relevant, current on to the point as ever...

Here are a couple of english articles that can be shared along with "Happy birthday Putin!" (or something to that extent):

- Dear Putin: A letter of support to Russia's president for countering the U.S. and ISIS in the Middle East

- Dear Putin: A letter from Westerners apologizing for their corrupt governments and media

Here are two german SOTT articles that can be shared:

- Offener Brief: Danke Putin - Einer für alle, alle für einen! Menschen der Welt bedanken sich mit einer Unterschrift, auch wenn es den Qualitätsmedien nicht passt

- Ein offener Brief an Präsident Putin und die Bürger Russlands für den Frieden und gegen das Fehlverhalten unserer westlichen Regierungen und Medien

I'll share it tomorrow as far and wide as I can... :v:

PS: I guess there are also articles available on the other SOTT languages since the letter is available in 21 languages...
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Any of our German peeps heard of this? A German documentary "Das is Putin" is mentioned in a recent Fort Russ article:

http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/10/putin-west-doesnt-like-me-because-they.html

Russian President Vladimir Putin explained just what’s behind the West’s negative attitude towards him.

“Fear,” he stated, responding to the question why the West is negative towards him.

Putin stated this to a German journalist who was allowed to follow the president everywhere for several years to film the story “Das ist Putin.”

During the interview, Putin also stated: “I have to be the person that the people want to see me as.”

This might be a link to it (video won't load for me): _https://www.myvideo.ge/?video_id=249936

If the doc exists, it might be worth checking out.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Approaching Infinity said:
If the doc exists, it might be worth checking out.

For those who know Russian, today NTV posted the following documentary about the movie and about the journalist that did "Das ist Putin". I only started watching it, so can't comment much. The only comment so far, that NTV likes to do their documentaries in an over-sensational manner. ;) From the first 12 minutes I was only able to learn that this German journalist is a close friend of Putin and was allowed to follow him for awhile in order to document his life.

 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Keit said:
Approaching Infinity said:
If the doc exists, it might be worth checking out.

For those who know Russian, today NTV posted the following documentary about the movie and about the journalist that did "Das ist Putin". I only started watching it, so can't comment much. The only comment so far, that NTV likes to do their documentaries in an over-sensational manner. ;) From the first 12 minutes I was only able to learn that this German journalist is a close friend of Putin and was allowed to follow him for awhile in order to document his life.


It is this this documentary and they guy that was together with Putin and made the documentary is called Hubert Seipel:


It was first aired in 2012 and was mentioned on SOTT a couple of times:

https://www.sott.net/article/289086-Putin-The-Wests-support-of-Russophobia-in-Ukraine-will-lead-to-catastrophe
https://www.sott.net/article/289088-Putin-on-sanctions-Western-leaders-must-have-something-switched-off-in-their-brains
https://www.sott.net/article/284087-Vladimir-Putins-top-secret-family-life

All in all not all that bad of a documentary, although I've seen better ones (mainly coming from russia...). It follows somewhat the propaganda line (otherwise it would probably not have been aired by the major TV channels in germany), but other then that, it gives a pretty interesting insight into Putins everyday life.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Vladimir Putin has rocketed to the top of the TIME Person of the Year poll and is on course for a landslide victory, proving that his determination to destroy the New World Order has started to resonate with Americans of all stripes.

Putin Winning TIME Person Of The Year In A Landslide
http://www.topinfopost.com/2016/11/28/putin-winning-time-person-of-the-year-in-a-landslide

Putin has opened up a huge lead in the 2016 poll, currently sitting on 38% of the vote. Donald Trump is in second place with 13%, Julian Assange has 3% and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama both have less than 1%. The Russian president, who has a massive 25% lead over second place, appears certain to win the public poll in a landslide. But will the establishment allow TIME to crown Putin as the Person of the Year for 2016 – or will they disregard the voice of the people and choose their own winner?

Russian President Putin, a judo enthusiast who can bench 230, has been hitting the New World Order where it hurts, outgunning, outflanking and all-round out-maneuvering the Illuminati. He’s got them running scared, which is why they are in propaganda overdrive, pumping the mainstream media full of scare stories and untruths in an attempt to blind the masses to what is really happening before their very eyes.

But the TIME Person of the Year poll results shows that Americans have started to wake up and notice, and they are not falling for the propaganda. Real people, unswayed by mainstream media, are backing Putin in their droves.

Do not be surprised if the mainstream media attempt to convince you of something deeply disturbing in the near future. We’ve had the Clinton campaign’s desperate attempt to blame Russia for their own failings, and the mainstream media’s attempt to smear Putin and Russia with allegations of interfering in the US election – despite the fact they cannot produce any evidence to back up their fake narrative.

Never in history has the New World Order had such a firm grip on Western media operations. At the same time the New World Order has never had such a committed and formidable enemy as they have in Vladimir Putin. This situation cannot continue. Something has to give.

Putin ignored the New World Order’s siren calls and decided to follow his conscience. They promised him a prominent role at their high table, but he recognized their agenda and vowed to destroy them. Putin’s whole life, from his childhood in a rat-infested tenement building, to his calm and powerful presidency, has been a demonstration of his pitiless resolve and determination to do what he knows he must for the sake of his people.

The way the cards are being dealt, his people are now the world.

VOTE - This is your chance to cast your vote: Who do you think influenced the news the most this year, for better or for worse?

Who Should Be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2016?
http://time.com/4570237/person-of-the-year-poll-2016/

Voting on the reader’s choice poll ends Dec. 4, at 11:59 p.m. ET.

TIME’s Person of the Year will be revealed on Dec. 7.


Vladimir Putin: PERSON OF THE YEAR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRVmVIihh2s (8:05 min.)
Uploaded on Dec 22, 2007

VLADIMIR PUTIN TRIBUTE, THE RUSSIAN PRINCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FUKRLdQILA (14:44 min.)
Published on Feb 28, 2014
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

angelburst29 said:
Who Should Be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2016?
http://time.com/4570237/person-of-the-year-poll-2016/

Voting on the reader’s choice poll ends Dec. 4, at 11:59 p.m. ET.

TIME’s Person of the Year will be revealed on Dec. 7.

I noticed something odd about the votes. The first time I looked at it many days ago the most votes went to Assange, Trump, and Putin in that order with each having under 10%. Then some time after that I went back to look again and India's leader was way out in front by a long shot, I forget the percentage but it was big based on the bar graph. Then I went back yet again a day or so later and that time Putin was way out in front by a long shot, at that point he had 60% of the votes! Now I go look again and the India leader is once again way out in front with 21% and Putin has 6%.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

m said:
angelburst29 said:
Who Should Be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2016?
http://time.com/4570237/person-of-the-year-poll-2016/

Voting on the reader’s choice poll ends Dec. 4, at 11:59 p.m. ET.

TIME’s Person of the Year will be revealed on Dec. 7.

I noticed something odd about the votes. The first time I looked at it many days ago the most votes went to Assange, Trump, and Putin in that order with each having under 10%. Then some time after that I went back to look again and India's leader was way out in front by a long shot, I forget the percentage but it was big based on the bar graph. Then I went back yet again a day or so alter and that time Putin was way out in front by a long shot, at that point he had 60% of the votes! Now I go look again and the India leader is once again way out in front with 21% and Putin has 6%.

After I voted, Putin was around 7% and Assange was leading with around 10% (if I remember correctly). Trump had a good count too. And there were quite a number of people, I found hard to believe that they got so many votes. So my overall impression was, that this can't reflect reality.

Here is the poll:
http://time.com/4570237/person-of-the-year-poll-2016/

And here are the current end results:
http://time.com/4570597/person-of-the-year-readers-poll-results-2016/

Also after you give your vote for each person, you shortly see how many percent of the people who voted, voted with a "yes" or "no" for that particular candidate (I assume). I noticed that Putin got by far one of the highest "yes" counts there and later the poll showed him on 7%. So if you give the vote for each person in the first link and then note every one of those counts, then calculate the "yes" and "no" counts at the end for the whole, you should be able to get the same result as the official poll indicates. Unfortunately I didn't do that at the time I voted, so I couldn't calculate later if it corresponds with the official poll result. So that didn't correspond to the end result either (feeling wise, since I didn't calculate it). You can only give the vote 1 time.

So maybe it might be worthwhile for somebody here (that hasn't voted yet), to give the vote and then note the results of each person? Then we could compare it with the end result at that time and see if it corresponds or not.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Pashalis said:
So maybe it might be worthwhile for somebody here (that hasn't voted yet), to give the vote and then note the results of each person? Then we could compare it with the end result at that time and see if it corresponds or not.

Just voted: Putin 6% (attached a screen shot of the standings).
 

Attachments

  • Vote.jpg
    Vote.jpg
    67.7 KB · Views: 97
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

m said:
angelburst29 said:
Who Should Be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2016?
http://time.com/4570237/person-of-the-year-poll-2016/

Voting on the reader’s choice poll ends Dec. 4, at 11:59 p.m. ET.

TIME’s Person of the Year will be revealed on Dec. 7.

I noticed something odd about the votes. The first time I looked at it many days ago the most votes went to Assange, Trump, and Putin in that order with each having under 10%. Then some time after that I went back to look again and India's leader was way out in front by a long shot, I forget the percentage but it was big based on the bar graph. Then I went back yet again a day or so alter and that time Putin was way out in front by a long shot, at that point he had 60% of the votes! Now I go look again and the India leader is once again way out in front with 21% and Putin has 6%.

Looks like India's Modi got Times Person of the Year....

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi beat US President Barack Obama, US President-elect Donald Trump and WikiLeaks whistleblowing website’s founder Julian Assange in a poll of readers of the Time magazine for the 2016 Person of the Year, according to the magazine's statement.

Indian Prime Minister Modi Wins Time Person of the Year Readers’ Poll
https://sputniknews.com/world/201612051048180555-modi-time-person-2016/

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi won a poll of readers of the Time magazine for the 2016 Person of the Year, the magazine said on Monday.

Modi got 19 percent of votes beating US President Barack Obama, US President-elect Donald Trump and WikiLeaks whistleblowing website’s founder Julian Assange, who gained 7 percent.

Russian President Vladimir Putin got 6 percent of votes.

The magazine's editors will officially announce the 2016 Person of the Year on December 7. For the first time the magazine selected the Man of the Year (the Person of the Year since 1999) in 1927 when US pilot Charles Lindbergh won the title following the first ever solo non-stop flight across the Atlantic. In 2015, German Chancellor Angela Merkel was named the Person of the Year.

I wonder if Modi's "winning" has anything to do with this - a ‘less-cash’ society to a cashless society?

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that small traders in India, in particular, should move with the times and switch to mobile banking apps and digital payment systems.

Modi Calls for ‘Less-Cash’ Society in India as Banknote Crisis Continues
https://sputniknews.com/asia/201611271047898873-india-demonetization-modi/

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged the nation on Sunday to embrace digital payments, in a monthly radio address that promoted a less-cash society.

"By embracing technology, we can build a cashless society… We can gradually move from a ‘less-cash’ society to a cashless society. Youth can play a major role in this," Modi said.

Small traders, in particular, should move with the times and switch to mobile banking apps and digital payment systems, the prime minister said.

Millions of Indians were forced to stand long queues to deposit the invalid notes at banks and post offices after the ban was announced on November 8. They have until the end of the year to get rid of useless cash. Modi admitted the decision to ban 500-rupee and 1000-rupees notes "wasn’t easy," but he defended the demonetization policy, saying it helped fight "evils of black money and corruption."
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

angelburst29 said:
Modi Calls for ‘Less-Cash’ Society in India as Banknote Crisis Continues
https://sputniknews.com/asia/201611271047898873-india-demonetization-modi/

Just a note: While checking out news on Modi's "Less Cash" Society - came across this interesting article:

In case you haven’t known, there have been reports up to not one, not two, not three, but FOUR different “cyber attacks” in just this week alone — primarily this past weekend.

http://investmentwatchblog.com/something-so-big-yet-hardly-any-attention-a-worldwide-event-taking-storm/

First there’s Russia. As of Friday, December 2nd, 2016, hackers reportedly stole more than 2 billion rubles ($31 million) from correspondent accounts at the Russian central bank. According to Reuters, “Russia said on Friday that it had uncovered a plot by foreign spy agencies to sow chaos in the country’s banking system via a coordinated wave of cyber attacks and fake social media reports about banks going bust.”

But Russia’s not the only one. Because on the same day, TalkTalk and other internet providers stopped providing connections to users after they were hit by a huge cyber attack. The troubled internet provider has said that it – along with the Post Office and other internet providers across Europe – were hit by the worm dubbed “Mirai worm,” and had their connections taken offline. Primarily affecting the U.K., a spokesman for TalkTalk said in a statement: “Along with other ISPs in the UK and abroad, we are taking steps to review the potential impacts of the Mirai worm” (See Independent Report Below).

Then there’s Germany. Initially reported in the Hamburger Abendblatt, on Monday, November 28th, 2016 around 900,000 routers were hit by Deutsche Telekom’s customers. This cyber attack, affecting close to 1 million routers, made headlines after The German Office for Information Security, or BSI, conducted a series of investigations, and found the attacks to be “worldwide.”

And finally, Saudi Arabia. New York Times reports that Saudi Arabia’s aviation agency was attacked last month by an aggressive computer virus intended to disrupt high-profile government targets, officials and experts said on Thursday.

The attack, which experts say emanated from outside the country, used a version of Shamoon, malware used to target the Saudi energy sector four years ago.

Not to mention the “cyber attack” along the U.S. East Coast back on Friday, October 21st, 2016 — an attack affecting multiple mainstream websites such as PayPal, Twitter, along with many others.

With all of these “cyber attacks” occurring simultaneously, especially around the weekend, one has to wonder if these are really “attacks” at all…

But the “attacks” don’t stop there! Now that India has become a cashless society, with many other nations, riots and protests will soon follow… And so will Answers.

LEARN MORE!
Cyber Attacks
Russia (Reuters): http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-cenbank-cyberattack-idUSKBN13R1TO

U.K. (Independent): http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/internet-down-talktalk-cyber-attack-mirai-worm-routers-not-working-offline-a7451506.html

Germany (Abendblatt): http://www.abendblatt.de/ratgeber/multimedia/article208805877/Massive-Stoerung-bei-der-Telekom.html

Saudi Arabia (NYT): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/01/world/middleeast/saudi-arabia-shamoon-attack.html

Propaganda (Bloomberg): https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-02/russia-says-foreign-spy-agencies-preparing-cyberattacks-on-banks

U.S. East Coast (10/21/16 — Reuters): http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-idUSKCN12L1ME

Cashless Society India Reuters: http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-india-modi-digital-payments-idUKKBN13M083

Zerohedge: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-30/angry-mobs-lock-indian-bankers-cash-chaos-escalates-we-are-fearing-worst

YNW: http://yournewswire.com/india-millions-protest-new-world-order-ban-cash/
 
Back
Top Bottom