Putin on TV: Documentaries and TV appearances by the Russian president

Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

In reading assorted commentary by publishers of different news sources, the words, "well informed and intelligent" seems to be the main terms, in which they describe - Putin. I have often wondered, if Putin possess "a photographic memory"?

He can speak on a variety of subjects, like a historian, yet is well informed on current events. I haven't come across - how many languages Putin may be versed in? In many incidences, Putin may be using "interpreter's" while also knowing the language?

During a Crimean Speech, he spoke a few sentences to the Tatars - in their own language, which elicited a loud applause and shocked many in attendance.

This article shows another example - where he spontaneously speaks in German.

Encountering a Sophisticated Putin
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/01/24/encountering-a-sophisticated-putin/

Now that I have been drawn into the discussion of the Bild interview, I propose to reconsider it using a research tool that no one so far seems to have used: textual analysis. I have compared the transcript published in the German daily with the transcript published by the Russians on kremlin.ru. There were cuts in the German publication as one might well expect given that it is a tabloid with racy photos and a readership having limited patience for serious material.

Insofar as I could tell, the cuts were fairly administered and did not affect the quality of Putin’s responses to questions. That, all by itself, is quite extraordinary in our age of dirty tricks. I contrast this upright behavior of the Bild editors with Foreign Affairs magazine’s gutting an article offered in spring 2007 by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in response to the article by Yulia Tymoshenko “Containing Russia,” cuts explained at the time with reference to limited space in the journal.

What one might not have expected from Bild was the publishers’ addition to the transcript of explanatory remarks (not carried in kremlin.ru) which reveal something important about the personal dynamics between interviewee and interviewers, and in passing illustrate why Vladimir Putin is where he is, at the apex of international politics.

Namely, the editors note repeatedly where Putin slipped into German. This made the strongest impression on them when, towards the end of the interview, the interpreter could not keep up and was given some moments to rest. In that pause, we are told: “Putin begins to spontaneously recite in German … the beginning of Heinrich Heine’s ‘Lorelei,’ written in 1824, a German classic. Then Putin abruptly and impassively continues in Russian.”

Coincidentally, in an article entitled “This is What Impressed Bild During Its Interview With Putin” published by Sputnik International we find Bild’s chief political editor Blome acknowledging: “Although I was aware of that, I was still surprised by how well [Putin] speaks German and understands the subtleties of the language.” Here, too, Blome mentioned the recitation from “Lorelei.”


As Alexander Mercouris observed, Vladimir Putin came to the interview with fresh archival material relating to the meetings that senior SPD politician, and author of Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik policy Egon Bahr had in Moscow in 1990, when the two countries were still feeling their way towards a post-Cold War security architecture for Europe.

He also came to the meeting fully briefed on a wide range of other important issues including details of the Minsk II accords and the obligations of all parties. From the transcript, it is clear that in question after question Putin was better prepared than the journalists and dealt calmly and authoritatively with each in succession.

But cold intellectual superiority would not have had the effect on his interlocutors that his going the extra mile and reaching out to them in German did, all the more so in an area of high culture that revealed his respect. This was in counterpoint to his critical words at the start of the interview about the unconstructive role played by Bild and the German media generally in the conduct of bilateral relations. With Heine, he touched them in a human way and won them over, despite themselves.

It is precisely this combination of intellectual rigor and ability to adapt his message to the mentality of his interlocutors that sets Putin apart as a consummate politician.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

World Affairs Readings Topic: Russia
Edgar Cayce's A.R.E.
Published on Jan 15, 2016
Edgar Cayce gave 29 readings from 1921 to 1944 that have been grouped together as “World Affairs Readings” (series 3976). The series deals with such topics as relationships between countries, the strengths and weaknesses of various nations, and the future possibilities for people around the world in light of the challenges that were on people's minds at the time: the Depression, growing global conflicts, and the possibilities of peace even for a world at war.

These readings twice mention that "out of Russia will come the hope of the world." But just what does that mean? In this interview with NTV Russia, A.R.E. executive director and CEO Kevin J. Todeschi, discusses the information shared by the “sleeping prophet” and some possible interpretations for these fascinating readings.

 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

angelburst29 said:
Encountering a Sophisticated Putin
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/01/24/encountering-a-sophisticated-putin/

Now that I have been drawn into the discussion of the Bild interview, I propose to reconsider it using a research tool that no one so far seems to have used: textual analysis. I have compared the transcript published in the German daily with the transcript published by the Russians on kremlin.ru. There were cuts in the German publication as one might well expect given that it is a tabloid with racy photos and a readership having limited patience for serious material.

What one might not have expected from Bild was the publishers’ addition to the transcript of explanatory remarks (not carried in kremlin.ru) which reveal something important about the personal dynamics between interviewee and interviewers, and in passing illustrate why Vladimir Putin is where he is, at the apex of international politics.

Namely, the editors note repeatedly where Putin slipped into German. This made the strongest impression on them when, towards the end of the interview, the interpreter could not keep up and was given some moments to rest. In that pause, we are told: “Putin begins to spontaneously recite in German … the beginning of Heinrich Heine’s ‘Lorelei,’ written in 1824, a German classic. Then Putin abruptly and impassively continues in Russian.”

Coincidentally, in an article entitled “This is What Impressed Bild During Its Interview With Putin” published by Sputnik International we find Bild’s chief political editor Blome acknowledging: “Although I was aware of that, I was still surprised by how well [Putin] speaks German and understands the subtleties of the language.” Here, too, Blome mentioned the recitation from “Lorelei.”

It's come to my attention, that the article above "claiming" to have "compared" the published transcript of President Putin's interview with Blid, (on Jan. 11, 2016) between the kremlin.ru. and the German publication - is another "cover-up story" to obfuscate a statement that Putin made during the interview.

Here's the back story and the important comment that Putin made - that was dropped from publication.

Putin Calls Out Obama on Big Lie Eric Zuesse
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/01/23/putin-calls-out-obama-on-big-lie.html

Jan. 23, 2016 - «In 2009, US President Obama said that the missile defense only serves as protection from Iranian nuclear missiles. But now there is an international treaty with Iran that bans Tehran from developing a potential military nuclear project. The International Atomic Energy Agency is controlling this, the sanctions against Iran are lifted – but still the US are working on their missile defense system. Only recently a treaty with Spain was signed, a deployment in Romania is being prepared, the same will happen in Poland in 2018, and in Turkey, a radar unit is being installed».

Russian President Vladimir Putin said that in an interview (part 1 and part 2) with Germany’s Das Bild, published on January 11th, but the press has ignored this very serious charge – an accusation of deception, bad faith, outright lying, on the part of the US President.

Part 1 - http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51154

Part 2 - http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51155

Here is the historical record:

On 17 September 2009, the White House issued «Remarks by the President on Strengthening Missile Defense in Europe». He said there: «This new ballistic missile defense program will best address the threat posed by Iran's ongoing ballistic missile defense program… Our clear and consistent focus has been the threat posed by Iran's ballistic missile program, and that continues to be our focus and the basis of the program that we're announcing today».

All the rest of Putin’s account is likewise entirely accurate.

US President Barack Obama lied, about a very important matter. The people calling him out on it should be more than just the Russian President. This is an issue – World War III – that affects the entire world.

There is no issue that’s more serious than this. But, where is the press on it?

Only one English-language site carried Bild’s English-language translation – the rabidly anti-Russian Business Insider, which was founded by the Wall Street fraudster, Henry Blodget. Wikipedia says of him: «In 2002, then New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer published Merrill Lynch e-mails in which Blodget gave assessments about stocks which allegedly conflicted with what was publicly published. In 2003, he was charged with civil securities fraud by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. He agreed to a permanent ban from the securities industry and paid a $2 million fine plus a $2 million disgorgement». His site’s headline for this article was «Putin defends Russia's recent aggression, blames US and Europe for rising tensions». The headline for the same article at Bild was: «PUTIN THE INTERVIEW: ‘For me, it is not borders that matter.’»

The Blodget site posted five reader-comments to the interview: all were rabidly anti-Putin, such as, «The man is a Machiavellian sociopath. Just what Russia has always had, and probably needs»; nothing was commented about the lie that Putin alleged to have been asserted by Obama. All of them ignored it.

In other words, there was no press-coverage of the US President’s lie. Obama had asserted a globally mega-important lie, which displays Obama’s building up toward a war between the United States and Russia, and doing it under the false pretext that the US is preparing for a war against Iran (instead of for a nuclear WWIII against what is actually the world’s other major nuclear power, Russia – and while constantly demonizing and lying about Russia’s leader); Putin called the US President on that single mega-lie, and the press ignored this entire mega-important matter, which could end in global annihilation.

What kind of ‘press’ is this? What kind of ‘democracy’ is this?

It’s even worse than that.

Here is another passage from the interview that Germany’s Das Bild published on January 11th, of Russian President Vladimir Putin:

BILD: In your last interview with BILD, ten years ago, you said that Germany and Russia had never been as close as in 2005. What is left today of this special relationship?

Putin: The mutual sympathy of our peoples is and will remain the foundation of our relations.

BILD: And nothing has changed?

(Before speaking the next sentence, the President starts to sneer.)

Putin: Even with the help of anti-Russian propaganda in the mass media, Germany has not succeeded in damaging this sympathy…

BILD: Do you mean BILD?

Putin: I do not mean you personally. But of course Germany’s media are heavily influenced by the country on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.

BILD: That’s news to us.

It’s not news to Udo Ulfkotte, who had for decades been a very successful journalist in Germany, working for the Frankfurter Algemeine Zeitung, and other leading media, but recently quit and went public about his having long secretly helped the CIA and worked for them as a regular propagandist against Russia. Ulfkotte said that it was the only way to get ahead in the ‘journalism’ profession in Germany.

He was heavily criticized, at the time, for having given this interview with Russian television. However, the highly respected political and economic blogger who goes under the name of Tyler Durden, headlined on 9 October 2014, «German Journalist Blows Whistle On How The CIA Controls The Media», and he explained that there was a lot more evidence, from other leading journalists, confirming Ulfkotte’s allegations, just not quite so specific to the anti-Russia angle. It seems that the same propaganda operation of which Ulfkotte had once been a part, was now aiming to smear him by means of the operation’s other ‘journalists’, but his charges can hardly be denied – they’re an undeniable part of post-WWII history, starting with the Cold War but continuing right into our own time. In fact, the CIA had (and maybe still has) an entire operation codenamed «Mockingbird», which was proud of its success in controlling virtually all international ‘news’ ‘reporting’ in the United States and, to a large extent, also in Europe.

There was even a case in which a soaring news-reporting star at CNN, who had already won three Emmy Awards, was fired and blacklisted for having reported that the US and Saudi Arabia were sending tanks and troops into Bahrain slaughtering peaceful Shiites who were demonstrating for equal rights with Bahrain’s Sunni minority, in that nation where a sectarian fundamentalist-Sunni royal family rule the country. Unlike in Syria, where a non-sectarian and anti-fundamentalist Shiite leader, Bashar al-Assad, rules (and enjoys majority support from his nation’s majority-Sunni public), and where the US President, Barack Obama had been planning his overthrow from the moment when Obama had become President in 2009, these demonstrators against Bahrain’s royal family were actually spontaneous, and the United States and its Saudi royal family ally were determined to crush it. But this CNN reporter simply refused to cover up and sugar-coat the ugly reality, that the US were working with the Sauds to crush incipient democracy in Bahrain. So, she was fired and blacklisted for that. No matter how terrific a reporter she was, she couldn’t even get a job in the field afterwards, because she had refused to deceive when and as required to, and that’s the cardinal sin in ‘journalism’, in what American PR calls ‘the Free World’ – as if, after the end of communism in Russia, any basic sense still remains to that now-lying phrase, other than to serve as a basis for the secret war that the United States has continued against Russia after the end of communism there.

Could it really be that the ‘reporters’ for Bild don’t know the score, as they were pretending?

To judge by their ‘reporting’, they know it all too well.

They know the reality; only their readers don’t – and, apparently, won’t.

What kind of ‘democracy’ is this?

Anyone who doubts that the claim to be ‘democratic’ ‘news’ media in a ‘democracy,’ is such a hoax, needs to see this (and especially its pie-chart at 18:20 on that video), from the brilliant Sibel Edmonds, explaining how profoundly corrupt it actually is, so that one can understand how the current reality really works.

Obama’s entire case against Russia, and especially his cases regarding Ukraine and regarding Syria, are lies, but they’re ceaselessly spread throughout the West. On January 17th, at the final Democratic Party Presidential Campaign Debate before voting starts in the Presidential primaries, even the least-hostile-to-Russia candidate in both of America’s political parties, US Senator Bernie Sanders, started from the assumption of Obama’s lies as being truths. For example, he said: «And we all know, no argument, the secretary [former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the leading candidate for the Democratic Presidential nomination] is absolutely right, Assad is a butcher of his own people, man using chemical weapons against his own people. This is beyond disgusting».

But actually, Obama, and his then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and the Saudi King, and President Erdogan of Turkey, and Emir Thani of Qatar, had organized that sarin gas attack so as to make it seem to have come from Assad’s forces, in order to provide an excuse for the US to bomb Syria to remove Assad from power. An MIT study of the evidence concluded: «The US Government’s Interpretation of the Technical Intelligence It Gathered Prior to and After the August 21 Attack CANNOT POSSIBLY BE CORRECT». Is it possible that even Senator Sanders didn’t know that? Or was even he lying?

Putin defends Russia's recent aggression, blames US and Europe for rising tensions
http://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-interview-bild-obama-russia-us-2016-1

PUTIN THE INTERVIEW: ‘For me, it is not borders that matter
http://www.bild.de/wa/ll/bild-de/unangemeldet-42925516.bild.html
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Just wanted to share couple of interesting stories that were told in this article (in Russian) by Alexey Dyumin, who was once a member of his "secret service"/ body guard.

It was at the beginning of Putin's road as the leader. He and his people just finished negotiations with the elders of one of the villages that was liberated from Chechen terrorists. But there was still danger. Putin walked with his guard toward the helicopters that were supposed to take them home. Dyumin pointed to Putin the leading helicopter he was supposed to take, but Putin ignored him and continued walking toward one of the convoy helicopters. Dyumin set in the leading one.

The helicopter Putin entered took off without a problem, but suddenly there was a problem and even fire in the leading one, and it landed abruptly. Later the pilot said that they were extremely lucky.

Did Putin know something like this could happen, and just listened to his ex-KGB intuition?

The second story, according to Dyumin, characterized Putin very well.

During one of the trips Putin took an opportunity to meet people on the street. According to Dyumin there was a moment when he thought that one man behaved incorrectly toward Putin by pulling his sleeve. And so Dyumin slapped slightly this man's hand to show that it's wrong. In the evening, around 10 pm, Putin called him to his office and told Dyumin: "If I'll ever see something like this again, you will never work with me again." He also said: "I saw what happened. It was a simple person. Now think about it. He saw you being all fancy and with the president. And now we left, but he for the rest of his life with be left with bad impression. Not bad impression of you, but of me."
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

This retelling by Dyumin of his impressionable times with Putin, was very interesting, thanks for sharing it.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Regardless of whether or not people like Vladimir Putin, one thing is clear – he is one of the world’s most popular leaders. When museum workers in the Serbian city of Jagodina decided to launch a series of wax figures, guess whose copy was the first one to be installed? Of course, the wax figure of the Russian president.

Putin’s Wax Figure is First Copy of World Leader to Appear in Serbia Museum
http://sputniknews.com/art_living/20160326/1037012801/vladimir-putin-wax-figure-serbia.html

Museum authorities in Jagodina, a town some 130 kilometers south of Belgrade, built the wax figure of Vladimir Putin, which became the museum's very first wax figure of a foreign leader, the German TV channel N-TV said.

As many as 2,500 people lined up to see the new wax figure, the source said.

Serbian Foreign Minister Ivica Dacic attended the opening ceremony of Putin's wax figure. Dacic said Putin is a "strong political partner" of Serbia, before noting that the Russian president's wax figure "was the best work of art in the museum" because it looks so much like the original, N-TV reported.

Together with Putin's wax figure, the museum has also put the figures of former Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic and former Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic, as well as renowned Serbian athletes — tennis player Novak Djokovic and ex-NBA player Vlade Divac, the German TV channel said.

Last year, magazine New Serbian Political Thought carried out a poll among Serbian residents, asking them whom out of all foreign leaders they trusted the most. The survey showed that Vladimir Putin had the most trust — 36.1 percent of Serbian residents, while Angela Merkel, the second most popular foreign head of state, had 7.3 percent.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

[Video] The Day Putin became Head of State - December 31st, 1999
http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/04/video-day-putin-became-head-of-state.html

"To the new Russian century!" - Putin, 1999
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPVVAy9df_Y

There is no consensus on all the reasons behind Yeltsin's resignation, however this clip features his last address to the nation on 31 December 1999. After a number of heart attacks, he was in poor health and with slurred speech. It is also believed that he left the country in worse shape than he found it in, with the collapse of the USSR; the Chechen wars had brought civil conflict and international terrorism to Russian territory, the 1998 financial crisis had destroyed the economy and personal savings, while at the same time, Russia was hugely indebted to the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.

One of the first things Putin had done in his role as President, is repay IMF loans in full, much ahead of schedule, so that no outside organisation had leverage over Russia's policies. Similarly, he had quashed the CIA/Saudi Wahhabism-influenced conflicts in Chechnya, by empowering a local leader, Akhmad Kadyrov.

Putin's address as acting President of the Russian Federation in 1999 came as a complete surprise to much of the country.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Putin’s Chef Shares Recipe of Traditional Kremlin Easter Cake
http://sputniknews.com/art_living/20160429/1038838633/vladimir-putin-kremlin-easter-cake.html

With the Orthodox Easter holiday quickly approaching, confectioners from the Presidential Property Management Department shared their special recipes for the traditional Easter cake made for Vladimir Putin and taught journalists how to make it.

The recipe of the Easter cake for Putin was developed in 2009 and since then bakers from the department have used the same, already well-established recipe.

"It's a traditional recipe we use every year. The only thing that changed is the decoration of the Easter cake, this year the cakes will be decorated with confectionary toppings," Denis Mitrokhin, the chef of the Kremlevskiy food production facility, told journalists.

To bake the presidential Easter cake, one needs to follow a very strict recipe:

437.5 grams of wheat flour

132 grams of butter

13.4 grams of dry yeast

8 grams of vanilla

134 grams of raisins (soaked in brandy)

178 grams of sugar

10 grams of salt

60 grams of candied fruit

9 milliliters of cognac

44.5 milliliters of milk with fat content of 3.2 percent


When all of this is ready, it. Knead the dough and add the melted butter, soaked candied fruits and raisins. The finished dough should be left in a warm place for 2 — 2.5 hours and it should increase in size by 2.5 times.

If all the ingredients are right and the recipe is followed correctly, in the end one should have a 1 kilogram Easter cake. If that's too much for a stomach to handle, the cake can always be cut into several smaller pieces.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something.

They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” – Woodrow Wilson, American academic, politician and the 28th president of the United States (source)

Putin: The Russian President Says Something About ISIS That Western Media Won’t Air (Video)
http://csglobe.com/putin-the-russian-president-says-something-about-isis-that-western-media-wont-air/

What are politics today, and how do they relate to what’s happening on the planet? On the surface, it seems to be nothing more than the ‘political leaders’ of one country using their media outlets to ‘bash’ the ‘political leaders’ of another country.

A great example right now is the ongoing situation between the United States and Russia.

Here in Canada, newly elected Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently called Putin, Russia’s President since May of 2012, a bully, and the United States did the same.

HERE is what Putin had to say after Russia was accused of being a bully.

On the other side of the pond, you have millions of people listening to Russian and Chinese media outlets saying something completely different.

Apart from mass propaganda that’s dished out to us regarding political issues via the mainstream media, where are we to turn to get more information on this subject when global media outlets are basically supporting the interests of their own country?

On some issues it seems a little clearer, for example, what is the United States doing with regards to their infiltration of so many countries across the world? Why have they established so many military bases? What is going on here?

That being said, are these matters really in the hands of these politicians, or are they governed by a hidden hand that’s rocking the cradle mixed with corporate influence?

A power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves, consisting of many, and various, and powerful interests, combined into one mass, and held together by the cohesive power of the vast surplus in the banks. (source) – John C. Calhoun was the 7th Vice President of the United States.

Is there a hidden hand that is controlling countries like Canada, the United States and Israel (to name a few) that is run by an international group of people who are using their politics to establish a New World Order.? I believe this hidden hand is and has been bullying other countries and using deceptive means to accomplish their goals, and I am obviously not alone in my thoughts.

Recently, a number of politicians and academics gathered at the International Conference on the New World Order to discuss matters that are in light with the quote below from one of the speakers:

“We are dealing with a criminal undertaking at a global level … and there is an ongoing war, it is led by the United States, it may be carried out by a number of proxy countries, which are obeying orders from Washington …The global war on terrorism is a US undertaking, which is fake, it’s based on fake premises.

It tells us that somehow America and the Western world are going after a fictitious enemy, the Islamic state, when in fact the Islamic state is fully supported and financed by the Western military alliance and America’s allies in the Persian Gulf. …They say Muslims are terrorists, but it just so happens that terrorists are made in America.

They’re not the product of Muslim society, and that should be abundantly clear to everyone on this floor. …The global war on terrorism is a fabrication, a big lie and a crime against humanity.”
(source) (source) – Dr. Michel Choissudovsky, Canadian Economist & Ottawa’s Professor of Economics.

Putin: Who created ISIS?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbZDyr2LkdI


If you want something to do, just grab a microphone and start interviewing anyone you meet in the streets and ask him/her a simple question: “Have you ever heard of the bombing of the USS Liberty?” The answer may surprise you.

Vladimir Putin Declares War on the Zionist Media
http://csglobe.com/vladimir-putin-declares-war-zionist-media/

Putin is still stretching his political muscle. He has recently declared that there is an information war going on.

He said that for the past two years or so, the “Anglo-Saxon media” has done its best to demonize him.

In 2014, the Telegraph had an article entitled, “Europe should punish Vladimir Putin, not the City of London.”[1]

In the same article, we were told ad nauseam that Putin’s action is a stench to much of Europe.

Russia has finally got a chance to respond.

Putin’s spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, said:

“They say that Russia has a bad public image. Do you know who else now has a bad image – the United States. We are currently in a state of information warfare with the trend-setters in the information space, most notably with the Anglo-Saxons, their media.”[2]

Peskov is far more logical than his enemies and detractors here. He moves on to say:

“Look at the pressure on our media in some European countries. I’m not talking about the states that recently joined the EU, like the Baltic States with their strong anti-Russian sentiment. It’s a different story, time heals all the wounds.

“Now, take the Brits. They put a lot of pressure on RT for [the channel’s] editorial policy – that actually amounts to nothing but indirect censorship. We constantly come under fire for alleged censorship in our country, but when we come under pressure in other countries, one simply turns a blind eye to it.”[3]

In other words, when will the Zionist media tell the truth about Israel’s history of terrorism?[4] When will they tell the masses that Israel deliberately bombed the USS Liberty?

We have interviewed Merlin Miller several times, and he is a graduate of West Point, one of the most prestigious military schools in the U.S. He admits:

“Strangely, as a military academy graduate, I had never heard of it [the bombing of the USS Liberty]…”[5]

The man went through an entire rigid school and this important event in American history was not even remotely discussed in any of his classes. If you think that is quite strange, then here is an easy homework.

Just grab a microphone and start interviewing anyone you meet in the streets and ask him/her a simple question:

“Have you ever heard of the bombing of the USS Liberty?”

The answer may surprise you. They probably would not even know if there was such a thing.[6]

But the same media wants us to believe that Russia is censoring important news! We keep beating a dead horse here, but we must say again that the New World Order is very easy to disprove because it is simply irrational.

I never thought that deconstructing the New World Order and its agents would be an easy task when I first started to study these issues. But it has progressively become a piece cake precisely because I soon realized that NWO agents could never follow practical reason all the way.

In fact, one of their main goals is to attack and deconstruct practical reason and the way things really are in the moral and the political world.

What I also quickly discovered over the past six years was that NWO agents cannot attack reason without colossal lies and fabrications. They have to adopt an essentially Satanic philosophy, which presents evil as good and good as evil.

In that sense, NWO agents are no different than John Milton’s Satan, who said: “Evil, be thou my good.”[7]

Throughout Milton’s Paradise Lost, we see Satan desperately trying to create a new world and a new man, free of morality and practical reason. He talks to his followers “of a new world and new kind of creature to be created…”[8]

In order to create this “new world,” then the “old world” has to be dismissed and abandoned. Sadly, NWO agents are directly or indirectly following that principle. In that sense, NWO agents are Satanists in disguise.

Greek dramatist Aeschylus said that “In war, truth is the first casualty.”

For the New World Order and its agents, truth is the main enemy and therefore the first thing that needs to be ignored or attacked.

This is one reason why NWO agents have spent countless hours in the media and in books perpetuating one lie after another.

This is why they have created a sort of “science” of thought control in academe, in politics, and in research institutions so that they can fire or persecute people they do not like.

Ask Denis Rancourt, and he will tell you what happened to him at the University of Ottawa.

We have already seen how this has played out in the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya.[9] And we have already seen how NWO agents have used the so-called war on terror to bludgeon virtually every country in the Middle East and to deceive the American people.

This is why Putin should get two cheers again for telling New World Order agents that they ain’t seen nothing yet.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

I wasn't sure exactly where to post this but recently I have been following a you tube channel called Inessa S, a Russian born Kiwi, who has done an amazing job translating Russian videos about Vladimir Putin into English.

I recommend anyone looking to gain a better understanding of Putin and Russia to watch all of her videos and, as an example, here is her most recent video on how Putin has handled corruption in Russia in the past:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=co8s0egftsc
 
Documentary about Vladimir Putin



I find this documentary really good. What a remarkable, brave and HUMAN this man is...Respect...


https://youtu.be/ecEK6llcucA
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Emmanuel said:
I find this documentary really good. What a remarkable, brave and HUMAN this man is...Respect...


https://youtu.be/ecEK6llcucA

Yes, a very good documentary... Highly recommended.
 
Re: The Unknown Vladimir Putin

Pashalis said:
Emmanuel said:
I find this documentary really good. What a remarkable, brave and HUMAN this man is...Respect...


https://youtu.be/ecEK6llcucA

Yes, a very good documentary... Highly recommended.

Third that.

There was a number of situations, as the head of state, whereby he faced such unbelievable handling of projects, utilities and finances. He is trying to pull the country up against those who are thwarting it at every turn while enriching themselves in the process.
 
Back
Top Bottom