LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Jacob Skaarenborg
Former employee of the Defence Intelligence service
The Danish government owes answers to why Denmark engages in Ukraine
Just like with Afghanistan and Iraq, I miss a political statement about what the goal of the war is. And so I miss a discussion to weigh the instinctive support for Ukraine against the economic problems and the threat of global nuclear war, we face
DEBATE
24. August 2022
This is an opinion piece. The post is the expression of the writers own position.
Read more here
As an enthusiastic part of the crew on the American led chariot, I was even in the wars in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq, and has maybe just become a lot more cautious.
I am also [cautious] in relation to the Danish engagement in Ukraine, for
I miss like in Afghanistan and Iraq a clear political statement about what the goal is and an understanding of the realism of this goal.
We have thrown our support behind the policy, the Americans has led to Russia in Ukraine.
The Russians have complained since the first NATO enlargement, and
the perception has been that NATO's activities were aimed at them. As the saying goes,
Perception is reality.
The excess of the
stated Russian red lines and
their arguments to attack the Ukraine is no justification for the use of military power, but
the devil's lawyer could probably find parallels to (and inspiration for) our military activities in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Kosovo, Syria, Somalia, and so on.
The price is high. 400 million USD to Ukrainians and the rise in the prices of common
food and energy.
Famine is expected in several places, and then there is the perhaps worst of all: We have moved closer to an
apocalyptic nuclear war than we were during the cold war.
It is cynical realpolitik to calculate, what we get out of it, when there is a situation like the one in Ukraine, but it is likely not completely unimportant?
So where is the political debate, weighing the instinctive support for Ukraine against the economic problems, the famine, and the increased threat of global nuclear ragnarok and ties it all together with the realism of our ill-defined objective?
Is the goal that the Russians must leave all Ukrainian territory, including Crimea? Then it is time to come to a
reconsideration, for it will probably not happen.
Is the goal just that it should be as expensive as possible for the Russians to force the Ukrainians to the negotiating table, then we should perhaps consider our moral standing. It is not us who
die on the battlefield.
Jacob Skaarenborg is a trained historian and geographer, and have been employed for 26 years by the Danish Defence Intelligence service.