Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

'John Bolton is announcing color revolution in Russia.'

5 Oct, 2022
Imagine if an influential Russian political figure was calling for Russia to meddle in US internal politics 💥. Better yet, imagine if they were saying they were pushing for "regime change" in the US. 💥💥
 
Nord Stream gas leak investigation
6 Oct, 14:19

Moscow notified it will not take part in Nord Stream pipeline accident probe — Kremlin​

Moreover, the Kremlin believes that an impartial probe into the accidents at the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines cannot be held without Russia’s participation

MOSCOW, October 6. /TASS/. Russia has been notified through diplomatic channels that there are no plans to invite it to take part in the probe into the accidents at the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Thursday.

"We received information through diplomatic channels that currently there are no plans to involve the Russian side in the probe in any way," the Russian presidential spokesman said.

For its part, Russia delivered a message through diplomatic channels that "right now, we are disappointed," Peskov said.
Moreover, the Kremlin believes that an impartial probe into the accidents at the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines cannot be held without Russia’s participation, he pointed out.

"We do not consider any impartial probes [into the accidents at the natural gas pipelines] to be possible without the participation of the Russian side," the Russian presidential spokesman stressed.
 
It's bubbling...

Joint US-Norway THOR-ER Hypersonic Rocket Engine Completes Critical Test - Pentagon​

Muhammad Irfan Published October 06, 2022 | 01:50 AM
Joint US-Norway THOR-ER Hypersonic Rocket Engine Completes Critical Test - Pentagon



WASHINGTON (UrduPoint News / Sputnik - 06th October, 2022) A hypersonic rocket engine jointly created by the United States and Norway known as the Tactical High-speed Offensive Ramjet for Extended Range (THOR-ER) completed an important developmental test in August, the US Defense Department said on Wednesday.

And

MBDA (German/French/Italian missile manufacturer) disputes its exclusion from the European hypersonic missile interceptor project (link in french)

"Leader of the ambitious European project TWISTER [Timely Warning and Interception with Space-based Theater surveillance], retained under the Permanent Structured Cooperation [CSP or PESCO] in order to develop a defense capability against hypersonic missiles, MBDA was given favorite to take the reins of the “European Hypersonic Defense Interceptor” [EU HYDEF] program, which is the logical continuation.

However, when it unveiled the list of projects to be financed by the European Defense Fund [FEDEF] in July, the European Commission announced that, to everyone's surprise, the coordination of the EU HYDEF project would be entrusted to the Spanish group SENER Aeroespacial, whose experience in the field of air defense is not obvious, and that the German Diehl Defence, which has some assets to put forward in this field, was going to take over the general technical direction.

And, among the countries involved in the EU HYDEF project, endowed with a budget of 110 million euros, we find, in addition to Germany and Spain, Belgium [via Sonaca], Norway [not a member of EU], Poland, the Czech Republic and Sweden. Yet stakeholders in the TWISTER program, France and Italy were therefore excluded.
And only 18 years behind Russia! What a speedy development.
 
Now that anti-colonialism is so fashionable, he thinks he can convince with such a trite discourse .... 🙄 He must not know very well the history of Latin America and the USA.

"Who would Simón Bolívar, José de San Martín and Miguel Hidalgo support in the war in Ukraine, asks Volodomir Zelensky at the OAS General Assembly in Lima.

Now we have people from abroad speaking for our Latin American heroes."

 
Here is the most recent (October 4th) Thierry Meyssans's article and as is often the case, his analysis, based on facts-and historical ones in particular-of the United States' desire to maintain its hegemony in Europe at all costs for more than seventy years, is very enlightening.

The United States declares war on Russia, Germany, the Netherlands and France


While the international press treats the sabotage of the Nord Stream gas pipelines as a news item, we analyze it as an act of war against Germany and the European Union. Indeed, the three gas supply routes to Western Europe have been cut off simultaneously, while at the same time a new gas pipeline has been opened to Poland.

Just as Mikhail Gorbachev saw in the Chernobyl disaster the inevitable break-up of the USSR, so we believe that the sabotage of the Nord Stream gas pipelines marks the beginning of the economic collapse of the Union.

This article is available in several languages:

DEUTSCH - ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΆ - ESPAÑOL - FRANÇAIS - ITALIANO - NEDERLANDS - PORTUGUÊS - РУССКИЙ

218154-1-c1b47.jpg

Russian satellite photograph of the boiling water after the sabotage of Nord Stream.

The United States’ fight to maintain its global hegemony has reached its third stage.

After the expansion of Nato to the East in violation of Western commitments not to station US weapons in Central Europe, Russia, which cannot defend its huge borders, is under direct threat.

In violation of its World War II commitments, Washington has put "hardcore nationalists" ("Nazis" in Kremlin terminology) in power in Kiev. They banned their Russian-speaking compatriots from speaking their native language, deprived them of public services, and ultimately bombed those in the Donbass. Russia had no choice but to intervene militarily to put an end to their ordeal.

The third round is the authoritarian change of energy supply to Western and Central Europe. On the same day, the Baltic Pipeline came into operation, the two Nord Stream pipelines were shut down, while the maintenance of Turkish Stream was interrupted.

This is the most destructive sabotage in history. An act of war against both Russia (51%) and Germany (30%), co-owners of these huge investments, but also against their partners, the Netherlands (9%) and France (9%). For the moment, none of the victims has reacted puclicly.

To carry out this considerable destruction, it was necessary to have submarines in the area, which the powers that be in the region have identified. If there are officially no clues, in the police sense of the term, the "surveillance cameras" (sonar) have already spoken. The states concerned know with certainty who the culprit is. Either they do not react, and they will be politically wiped out, or they prepare their reactions to this secret action in secret, and they will become real political actors when they do.

Let us remember the coup d’état in Algiers in 1961 and the subsequent assassination attempts against the President of the French Republic, Charles de Gaulle. De Gaulle pretended to believe that they were carried out by the Secret Army Organization (OAS), a group of Frenchmen opposed to Algerian independence. But his Minister of Foreign Affairs, Maurice Couve de Murville, publicly mentioned the role of the Spanish Opus Dei and the U.S. CIA in organizing and financing them. De Gaulle sought out and identified the traitors, reorganized the police and the army, and suddenly, five years later, announced France’s withdrawal from the integrated command of NATO. He gave the latter two weeks to close its headquarters in Paris-Dauphine and move to Belgium; a little more time to close the 29 NATO military bases in the country. Then he began traveling abroad to denounce U.S. hypocrisy, especially the Vietnam War. France instantly became a leading power in international relations. These events have never been explained in public, but all political leaders of the time can confirm them [1].

Since the disappearance of the Soviet Union, the United States has developed a map of the world that disrupts international relations, leading it to overthrow governments and wage wars in order to build transportation routes for energy sources. This was the main activity of Vice President Al Gore for eight years, today it is the activity of Special Advisor Amos Hochstein. We remember the war in Transnistria to get hold of a pipeline hub [2], then the war in Kosovo to build a communication route through the Balkans, the « 8th corridor ». Now all the other pieces of the puzzle are coming to light.

It is particularly difficult to understand the evil that has just hit the European Union and will, in all likelihood, cause its economic collapse, because the Union itself has made some of the decisions necessary for its bankruptcy.


Until September 26, 2022, the Union was mainly supplied with gas by Russia. This was delivered either through the Brotherhood pipeline through Ukraine, the Nord Stream pipeline or the Turkisch Stream. The United States, which guarantees the security of the Union, has just cut off these three routes in succession. Of course the Brotherhood pipeline is still functioning, but it can be interrupted at any time by Kiev’s will, Nord Stream has been sabotaged and Turkisch Stream can no longer be maintained because of the sanctions that the Union has taken at the request of the USA.

218154-2-02110.jpg

Eleven years ago, Europeans were celebrating their union with Russia. They believed they were building a peaceful and prosperous world.

Until September 26, the economy of the Union was mainly based on the production of German industry. By cutting off Nord Stream, the United States destroyed German industry. In the famous words of Lord Ismay, the first Secretary General of NATO, the aim of the Anglo-Saxons was "to keep the Americans in, the Russians out and the Germans under control".

218154-3-ab797.jpg

Ronald Reagan opposed the delivery of Russian gas to France and Germany. After imposing unsuccessful sanctions against companies in both countries, he ordered William Casey, the director of the CIA, to sabotage the Yamal gas pipeline in Poland. This was done.
This policy has been pursued by all US administrations without interruption since the 1950s. Nord Stream was built by 9 states, 4 of which own it. It started operating in 2011. Starting with Donald Trump’s term in office, in 2017, the US Congress threatened sanctions against the companies involved in the operation of Nord Stream 1 and those involved in the Nord Stream 2 project. President Trump himself has mocked Germany’s vassalage of Russian gas. A number of legal obstacles have been put in place to block Russian gas to Western Europe, not only by the United States, but also by Poland. From this point of view, the new US administration has not changed anything. Germany was wrong to believe that it was more benevolent.

It is true that in July 2021, an agreement was reached whereby Nord Stream 2 would have been replaced by hydrogen produced in Ukraine and transported, from 2024 (the date of the end of the Russian-Ukrainian contract), through the converted Brotherhood pipeline.

Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who was elected in December 2021, has made two serious mistakes in a few months. On December 7, he went to the White House where he tried to resist the United States’ demand that he stop accepting Russian gas. Back home, he chose to maintain Nord Stream and block Nord Stream 2, while seeking renewable sources. He thought, wrongly, that he was balancing the warmongering of US strategic thinking, the needs of his industry and the doctrine of the Greens, members of his government coalition.

The Chancellor had had a close call: during his press conference with the US President, Joe Biden said that his country could destroy Nord Stream 2 and that if Russia invaded the Ukraine, he would do so. It was absolutely frightening for Scholz to hear his overlord spit in his face that he could destroy a tens of billions of dollars investment if a third party acted without regard to his dictates. We do not know whether President Biden also mentioned the destruction of Nord Stream 1 during the closed-door talks, but it is not impossible. In any case, according to the German journalists who followed him, the chancellor returned to Germany pale.

His second mistake was made on September 16, 2022. His country wanted to get out from under the Anglo-Saxon umbrella and ensure its own security as well as that of the entire European Union. « As the most populous nation, with the greatest economic power and located at the center of the continent, our army must become the pillar of conventional defence in Europe, » the chancellor said. By specifying that he was only talking about "conventional defence", he intended to spare the susceptibility of his French neighbor, the only nuclear power in the Union. He did not realize that he was violating the Straussian doctrine by imagining that he was escaping from the US military protectorate. In 1992, Paul Wolfowitz signed the Defense Policy Guidance, excerpts of which were published in the New York Times. He indicated that the United States would consider any desire for European emancipation as a cassus belli [3].

Six days later
, Navy Seals blew up the two gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea, setting Germany back eleven years.

218154-4-64711.jpg


At the same time, the Baltic Pipe pipeline was inaugurated with great fanfare, a few hours after the sabotage, by the Polish president, the Danish prime minister and the Norwegian energy minister. It does not have at all the same capacities as Nord Stream, but it will be enough to change the times. Once the European Union was dominated by German industry using Russian gas, now it will be dominated by Poland using Norwegian gas. Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki triumphantly declared at the inauguration ceremony: "The era of Russian gas domination is coming to an end; an era that was marked by blackmail, threats and extortion. »

The act of war committed against Russia, Germany, the Netherlands and France forces us to rethink the events in Ukraine. It is much more important than what has gone before insofar as the United States has attacked its allies. I have explained at length in previous articles what the Straussians were looking for with their provocations in Ukraine. What has just happened shows us why Washington, as a state, supports the Straussian project, and that its "grand strategy" has not changed since the 1950s.

218154-5-d1a35.jpg

In 2017, a U.S. president, Donald Trump, came to participate in the launch of the Three Seas Initiative. Washington often wins because it sees further ahead than its allies.

In practice, the European Union will collapse economically, with the exception of Poland and its eleven Central European allies, members of the Three Seas Initiative (Intermarium) [4]. The tide is turning. From now on, Warsaw is running ahead.

The big losers will be Western Europe and Russia, but also Ukraine, which will have been destroyed only to allow this game of massacre.
 
Interesting interview with Joseph Farrell. One hour long.

Farrell can speak fluidly back and forth from the silk road days through the WWI & WWII to present, as if it’s all one movement.

Points of discussion:

What Russian is doing is opening up the Neo-post-post-modern world, which is a return back to human culture. And we should follow their lead.

The hydraulic world. One built on rivers and oceans and the law of the sea. The land world, one built on the silk road, built on the law of the land. Take your camel take a train but stay away from the sea law. If Germany, Russian and China could ever get together, and avoid the seas, the west/US would be sunk. At any cost, keep Germany and Russia apart!

Sea law, and land law soon to be superseded by “space law.”

Russia assisted the United States in both its revolutionary war, and its civil war to keep it away from French and British colonialism.

Skepticism for the new BRICS financial system. Manufactured by Goldman Sachs and the world bank.

A moral revolution could buy a few more years for the west, but it’s still going down.

 
Imagine if an influential Russian political figure was calling for Russia to meddle in US internal politics 💥. Better yet, imagine if they were saying they were pushing for "regime change" in the US.

Actually the US just had a 'regime change' in 2020 but that was an event the Russians didn't push for.
It just proved that the American neocons are good at toppling elected governments.
 
The main contender for the Nobel Peace Prize Zelensky:
NATO must deliver a preventive nuclear strike against Russia. He stated this during an online conference at the Australian Lowy Institute.

“Preemptive strikes are needed so that they (Russia) know what awaits them if they use nuclear weapons. Not vice versa - wait for Russia's nuclear strikes, then to say: "Oh, you are so, then get this," Zelensky said.

:shock:
 
“Preemptive strikes are needed so that they (Russia) know what awaits them if they use nuclear weapons.
The guy simply got too deep into the drugs and his statements lack any logic whatsoever. It is mad wishful thinking as opposed to just normal wishful thinking.

Striking Russia with nuclear weapons preemptively so that Russia knows what comes if they use nuclear weapons, will for sure mean a response back which will ensure that no such thing will be repeated by the West.

Clearly the battlefield news are not so great as the Ukrainian flag-twitterati claims and such statements sound pretty desperate. Ukraine despite small land grabs in their offensive is obviously losing massively in terms of people, equipment and ammunition, which means Zelensky nosedives into his drug supply, causing him to make unhinged statements.

Amazing that the collective West keeps talking about this guy as if he is the second coming and shares its values. Perhaps the values of the leaders but not of its people and not the values which openly are proclaimed.

Russia is correct in alerting the whole world to this dangerous talk of nuclear weapons which is coming from Ukraine and the West.

May the whole world see for real what madness Russia is fighting against and may cooler heads prevail.
 
CNBC reporter Hadley Gamble asked Saudi Arabia’s energy minsters questions and made statements. Here are some of them. Not "exact" quotes, but close. This woman must have some backers, because her smugness is over the top. (2-minute tweet)

Are you using energy as a weapon? Like V. Putin!

The US and the WH are saying you are a cartel and acting aggressively!

I have to tell you; that there is a huge narrative coming from the west that you are a cartel and attempting to hold the world hostage, just as V. Putin has done!

Why is this union, that they call a cartel, moving against the US and Europe?

Are you holding the world hostage like Mr. Putin?

By these cuts you are endangering the world economies.

The ministers handled it pretty well.

Tweet below:

 
Novak: Russia is ready to supply gas via the undamaged Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

What will Germany choose? War against Russia or an alliance against the USA?
Unfortunately, this is a rhetorical question. :-(

Second string of Nord Stream 2 under review – Gazprom says gas deliveries may be possible​


The mainstream media in Germany have not mentioned it, but the Nordstream 2 pipeline apparently consists of two strands.

It appears that the other of the two strands has remained undamaged, a fact that (if ever published) will imbue the leading German politicians with uneasiness since there had already been many demonstrations with people shouting: "Nord Stream 2".

Latest news (October 3) from Gazprom is that "the pressure in string A of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and in both strings of the Nord Stream 1 pipeline has stabilized after the ruptures and there are no more gas leaks,” the company announced on its Telegram channel.

Gazprom is currently working on reducing the pressure in the undamaged second line of Nord Stream 2 and pumping the natural gas out of it in order to then be able to check its integrity and rule out possible damage.

“Should a decision be made to start natural gas supplies through Nord Stream 2 Line B, natural gas will be pumped into the pipeline again after the integrity of the system has been checked and the monitoring authorities have confirmed a possible transit,” Gazprom informed.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov had previously said that if it is possible to restore the Nord Stream pipelines, it must be done. However, it is not yet clear how quickly they can be repaired. Asked if Russia would repair the pipelines in cooperation with other countries, he said:
“It’s not clear what kind of international cooperation we can count on in this situation, given the hysterically antagonistic position of the entire collective West towards our country.” [Source: detv.us]


Interestingly there are still 5,000 pipes stacked at Lubmin on the Baltic coast. Denmark had refused to allow Nord Stream 2 to be built in its waters. The builders rescheduled and wanted to bypass Danish territorial waters extensively. They ordered additional pipes from the producer Europipe in Mülheim (Ruhr). In January 2021, under pressure from Germany, Copenhagen finally gave the go-ahead after Russia gave its assurance that it would continue to pipe natural gas through Ukraine to Central Europe even after completion of the second Baltic Sea pipeline. But by then the additional pipes had already been delivered and, to make them even more durable: encased in concrete, which now makes them difficult to sell or melt down.
 
Interesting interview with Joseph Farrell. One hour long.

Farrell can speak fluidly back and forth from the silk road days through the WWI & WWII to present, as if it’s all one movement.

Points of discussion:

What Russian is doing is opening up the Neo-post-post-modern world, which is a return back to human culture. And we should follow their lead.

The hydraulic world. One built on rivers and oceans and the law of the sea. The land world, one built on the silk road, built on the law of the land. Take your camel take a train but stay away from the sea law. If Germany, Russian and China could ever get together, and avoid the seas, the west/US would be sunk. At any cost, keep Germany and Russia apart!

Sea law, and land law soon to be superseded by “space law.”

Russia assisted the United States in both its revolutionary war, and its civil war to keep it away from French and British colonialism.

Skepticism for the new BRICS financial system. Manufactured by Goldman Sachs and the world bank.

A moral revolution could buy a few more years for the west, but it’s still going down.


Sergei Glazyev talks about this distinction between 'land law' and 'sea law', in his book The Last World War: The US to Move and Lose. According to him, it's an abstract construction used mostly to fill political science textbooks and create what Gurdjieff might call 'lucrative opportunities to wisacre'.
For an inexperienced reader, geopolitics seems to be an intricate juggling with familiar words furnished with a meaning hidden and incomprehensible to the uninitiated. Let us mention, for example, the opposition of land and sea that has become classical in Western political science textbooks. More precisely, the opposition of landlocked and seafaring countries allegedly doomed to rivalry between each other. For Russia, a country located between three oceans, this contraposition seems at most an entertaining mind game, just as the concept of the Heartland – the Middle Earth, the control over which supposedly gives dominance over the world[1]. Being geographically the true Heartland of Eurasia,


[1] Heartland is the "middle" or "core" land currently occupied by Russia, a part of Eurasia which, according to the theory of the English geographer Halford Mackinder, is the "geographical axis of history."


Russia was vitally in need of access to the ice-free seas for international trade. For a normal, self-sufficient development, it needed both land and sea. To protect itself against greedy neighbors, it needed both the army and the fleet.

Russian geopolitics has always been substantive and was determined either by internal needs ("to cut a window through to Europe") or by external threats (to accept the oppressed fraternal peoples under the protection of the White Tsar). Therefore, the abstract constructions of Western political thought seem enigmatic and obscure to the Russian mind. The same applies to its practical embodiment in the foreign policy of the Western powers. For example, their obsession with Drang nach Osten invariable for centuries, an unrestrained desire to seize our lands and destroy our people[1]. It would seem that the famous biblical dictum "all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword" used to be repeatedly tested by the Western European aggressors the hard way, so that they could have calmed down by now. But over again, even in the third millennium after Christ they continue to violently violate the commandments "thou shalt not kill" and "thou shalt not steal" that He gave.


[1] For example, Mackinder, the author of the "Heartland" concept, wrote: "Russia replaces the Mongol Empire. Her pressure on Finland, on Scandinavia, on Poland, on Turkey, on Persia, on India and on China replaces the centrifugal raids of the steppe-men. In the world at large she occupies the central strategical position held by Germany in Europe. She can strike on all sides..." And the British Prime Minister M. Thatcher (no matter how later they tried to interpret these words) said "...by estimates of the world community, accommodation in the territory of Russia of 15 million people is economically expedient..."
The first female U.S. Secretary of State, M. Albright dropped a remark, the essence of which was that sole possession of Siberia by Russia is "unfair" and Siberia should be placed under international control. Siberia is too large a territory to belong to one state.

I haven't watched the vid you linked, but the idea that Germany, Russia and China need to 'avoid the seas' makes no sense to me at all.

China is incredibly busy organizing the Maritime Silk Road and building up its navy, inaugurating the aircraft carrier 'Fujian' recently. The South China Sea is perhaps the most sensitive area in which China needs to assert sovereignty, I'd say. Either that, or make concessions to the mad dog American elites.

Russia has also been busy prepping some fancy arctic icebreakers (nuclear powered) for polar shipping, and also has quite the navy (including a certain Poseidon torpedo that might have some Pentagon staffers losing sleep). Russia has also recognized the vital strategic economic importance of a Southern ice-free port for hundreds of years.

Put them both together, and you have:

 
Back
Top Bottom