Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

Some people are predicting a nuclear strike has been conceived by "the planners"
Old Money Savoir Faire ...This matter is so complicated and the danger of explaining too much about it here way too high, so for right now anyway, we'll have to be satisfied with factoring in that the Polish government passed new laws relating to a 'catastrophic natural event,' last month....
Are you saying that the Poles consider a nuclear strike a "catastrophic natural event"?
 

24.10.2022 18:25​

Comment by Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova on incoming information regarding Kiev's plans to stage a provocation using a dirty bomb​


"Of the most serious concern is the alarming information coming from reliable sources"

"The West should not measure the width of the "red line".

"According to our information, the Ukrainian side has already begun to implement the plan. In particular, the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant in Zhovti Vody and the Institute for Nuclear Research in Kiev are tasked with manufacturing such a bomb. We do not rule out the provision of assistance in solving this problem by some Western countries, which, according to reports, are negotiating with Ukraine on the supply of components for the "dirty bomb". According to information available to Russia, the Kiev regime plans to detonate such a munition, disguising it as an abnormal operation of a Russian low-yield nuclear weapon, in which highly enriched uranium is used as a charge."

"Given Kiev's recent statements about the need for "preventive nuclear strikes" by NATO countries against Russia, this is categorically unacceptable and completely unacceptable. Moreover, earlier in the Ukrainian segment of the Internet there were already repeated calls to detonate a "dirty bomb" in Moscow. They even showed instructions for its assembly."

"We demand that the Kiev authorities and the Western sponsors who control them stop taking actions that lead the world to a nuclear catastrophe and threaten the lives of innocent civilians. It is foolhardy to ignore Russian warnings in this regard. It is dangerous to escalate things. The West should not measure the width of the "red line"."

 
I would love to hear from a Polish resident about what went into that new law myself.
I think what you have in mind is a draft law on civil protection and disaster relief. The government supposedly plans to implement this new law as of 01.01.2023.

Here are some controversial passages from the draft:

Restrictions on human and civil liberties and rights in a state of natural disaster:
  • the obligation to undergo medical examinations, treatment, and the application of other preventive measures and treatments necessary to combat infectious diseases and the effects of chemical and radioactive contamination;
  • use, without the consent of the owner or other authorized person, of real estate and movable property;
  • compulsory demolition and demolition of buildings or other structures or parts thereof;
  • mandatory emptying or securing of dwellings or other premises;
  • ordering evacuation at a fixed time from specified places, areas and facilities;
  • order or prohibition to stay in specified places and facilities and in specified areas;
  • the obligation to undergo quarantine;
  • prohibition of organizing or conducting mass events;
  • order or prohibition of a specific method of movement;
  • order or prohibition of business of a certain type;
  • suspension of business activities of certain entrepreneurs;
  • an order to apply fixed prices for goods or services that are essential to the cost of living of consumers;
  • the obligation to use plant protection or other preventive measures necessary to combat organisms harmful to humans, animals or plants;
  • the obligation to apply certain measures to ensure environmental protection;
  • the obligation to apply measures or treatments necessary for the control of contagious animal diseases;
  • prohibition of strikes with respect to certain categories of workers or in certain areas;
 
"We demand that the Kiev authorities and the Western sponsors who control them stop taking actions that lead the world to a nuclear catastrophe and threaten the lives of innocent civilians. It is foolhardy to ignore Russian warnings in this regard. It is dangerous to escalate things. The West should not measure the width of the "red line"."
wruler.png
rruler.png
 
Here are some controversial passages from the draft:
A perfect introduction to THE GREAT RESET. They have covered everything, Property (you will own nothing and be happy) Medical tyranny, animal control, no protests allowed, lockdowns and loss of movement.

Yep, it's all covered.!!!!!!! All under the heading CIVIL PROTECTION AND DISASTER RELIEF. :barf: It's repulsive.
 
A perfect introduction to THE GREAT RESET.
Having thought of what I said above and what it means to all of us I remembered what the C's said, No on is coming to save us and it's the soul that counts.

I still think that if a large majority of the population in each country would simply not comply then they would be stymied. This in turn exposes my wishful thinking which brings on a great sadness.
 
You gotta love this - from ZeroHedge:
[excerpt]

US Gasoline Prices Go Haywire As Stockpiles Crater... But Here Comes China To The Rescue

Last week we shared a lengthy discussion on the creeping distillate inventory crisis, which has sent diesel prices sharply higher as the administration has been narrowly focus on gas prices (which have also moved sharply higher since their summer lows), threatening to cripple freight transit just as the economy slides into a recession. But amid the ongoing scramble for refineries, it is now gasoline that is also seeing abnormal (read deeply concerning) price moves as there is just not enough processing capacity to convert all that oil into required amount of both gasoline and diesel.
[...]
So what's a formerly energy independent nation (whose energy policy is currently in the hands of radicalized 'progressive' lunatics) to do, to offset these growing gasoline shortages? Why import from China, of course.

According to Bloomberg, Chinese gasoline is making its way to the US for the first time since September 2019 as the country hikes exports at a time when global markets are scrambling for fuel.

The Torm Singapore is carrying around 300k bbl of gasoline components from Huizhou, China, with an estimated arrival in Los Angeles around Nov. 10, according to Kpler and Bloomberg vessel tracking.

According to US customers, Chinese gasoline most recently made its way to the US in September 2019, so there's that. And since Chinese gasoline is made in no small part thanks to Russian oil imports, it is safe to say that US gasoline shortages are about to be plugged - at least in part - by China, thanks to Russian oil.

:-P
 
With 100% chance the US is heading into a recession - also from ZeroHedge:

1666662225925.png
According to the pioneers of the tracker at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, the U.S. pledged a sum of close to 12 billion euros in recent weeks, while EU countries and institutions committed just 1.4 billion euros.

Christoph Trebesch, head of the team compiling the Ukraine Support Tracker states:

"The U.S. is now committing nearly twice as much as all EU countries and institutions combined. This is a meager showing for the bigger European countries, especially since many of their pledges are arriving in Ukraine with long delays. The low volume of new commitments in the summer now appears to be continuing systematically."

:mad:
 
As I was doing my nightly round of news, I came across this,

A group of democrats ask Biden to negotiate with Russia directly about Ukraine, full letter here for reference, maybe the support at home is slowly winding down as the cost becomes evident.

[...]
We are under no illusions regarding the difficulties involved in engaging Russia given its outrageous and illegal invasion of Ukraine and its decision to make additional illegal annexations of Ukrainian territory. However, if there is a way to end the war while preserving a free and independent Ukraine, it is America’s responsibility to pursue every diplomatic avenue to support such a solution that is acceptable to the people of Ukraine. Such a framework would presumably include incentives to end hostilities, including some form of sanctions relief, and bring together the international community to establish security guarantees for a free and independent Ukraine that are acceptable for all parties, particularly Ukrainians. The alternative to diplomacy is protracted war, with both its attendant certainties and catastrophic and unknowable risks.

Russia’s invasion has caused incalculable harm for the people of Ukraine, leading to the deaths of countless thousands of civilians, Ukrainian soldiers, and displacement of 13 million people, while Russia’s recent seizure of cities in Ukraine’s east have led to the most pivotal moment in the conflict and the consolidation of Russian control over roughly 20 percent of Ukraine’s territory. The conflict threatens an additional tens of millions more worldwide, as skyrocketing prices in wheat, fertilizer and fuel spark acute crises in global hunger and poverty. A war that is allowed to grind on for years—potentially escalating in intensity and geographic scope— threatens to displace, kill, and immiserate far more Ukrainians while causing hunger, poverty,

and death around the world. The conflict has also contributed to elevated gas and food prices at home, fueling inflation and high oil prices for Americans in recent months. Economists believe that if the situation in Ukraine is stabilized, some of the speculative concerns driving higher fuel costs will subside and likely lead to a drop in world oil prices.

We agree with the Administration’s perspective that it is not America’s place to pressure Ukraine’s government regarding sovereign decisions, and with the principle you have enunciated that there should be “nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.” But as legislators responsible for the expenditure of tens of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars in military assistance in the conflict, we believe such involvement in this war also creates a responsibility for the United States to seriously explore all possible avenues, including direct engagement with Russia, to reduce harm and support Ukraine in achieving a peaceful settlement.

In May, President Zelensky, despite deadlocked negotiations, reiterated that the war “will only definitively end through diplomacy,” and had previously explained that “any mentally healthy person always chooses the diplomatic path, because he or she knows: even if it is difficult, it can prevent the loss of thousands, tens of thousands...and maybe even millions of lives.”

In conclusion, we urge you to make vigorous diplomatic efforts in support of a negotiated settlement and ceasefire, engage in direct talks with Russia, explore prospects for a new European security arrangement acceptable to all parties that will allow for a sovereign and independent Ukraine, and, in coordination with our Ukrainian partners, seek a rapid end to the conflict and reiterate this goal as America’s chief priority.
 
And this is also interesting, Russia is very interested in ensuring that their involvement in the potential dirty bomb is clear... it starts to sound like it's a matter of time at this point.

Moscow sent a letter to United Nations (UN) Secretary-General António Guterres to clarify that Russia is not involved in the dirty bomb provocation in Ukraine, Russia's deputy ambassador to the international body Dmitry Poliansky said Monday.
"The purpose of the letter is to warn, to make it clear that Russia is not involved in this and to alert that Kiev has such plans," Polianski told reporters.

According to the diplomat, Russia has already sent similar letters to Guterres in connection with provocations prepared by Kiev at the Zaporozhie nuclear power plant and the Kakhovka hydroelectric power plant.

"Experience shows that this has a certain deterrent effect on Kiev, and some of the provocations we announced did not happen precisely because our partners were warned," he stressed.

The ambassador added that the UN Security Council "has a very busy work program this week," but hopes to plan something to expose the information in Russia's possession on the matter and explain "the danger of this whole situation."

In turn, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that the dirty bomb issue will be discussed at the UN Security Council in the coming days.

Sources in several countries reported Kiev's preparations for a provocation on the Ukrainian territory with the use of the so-called dirty bomb.

While at the same time, declaring that Russia would consider the use of such a device an act of terrorism, and we know how the Russians react against terrorism.
 
The use of a dirty bomb, a so-called bomb that spreads enough radioactive radiation to make a small town unlivable for decades is something the Nazis could possibly employ out of desperation.



The timing of this also equates to the next 3 weeks of Taurid meteor showers! However, when one does collide, of course Putin Did It! Luckily this time most nations have the scientific analysis knowledge of meteors. This will expose it originates off planet, leaving the Emperor with no clothes. The Gov cannot protect humanity.

The negativity of late, especially the 'dirty bomb', and intentional raising of the fear threshold becomes the ideal attractors for comets. Where is the most negativity at present? Ukraine, City of London, Washington, Israel, Australia, Canada and all Cabal nation followers!

Expecting the popcorn show anythime soon?
 
Back
Top Bottom