Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

'NATO wants to establish full control over the undersea infrastructure. In that case if Türkiye (NATO member) becomes a gas hub for Europe, the Turkish (undersea) pipelines will be under the NATO control, and the agreement between Türkiye and Russia would be null and void.'

13 Feb, 2023
 
Now it is official: Brazil informs that it is aligned with Ukraine -that is, with NATO- in the current world war. The foreign minister was sent to say so to spare "Lula" da Silva the shock of informing his followers that Brazil is kneeling before the United States.

From the same publication, following the thread:

We have been saying this for months, that "Lula" da Silva was Washington's candidate in last year's elections. Few wanted to believe it, although we also gave this news of "Lula" da Silva's meeting with the State Department to "stop Bolsonaro".

 
The Danish newspapers are 100% behind Ukraine and the Anglo-Saxon narrative as @thorbiorn has shown a few times. I looked at one of the main papers and they mentioned the losses taking it from the Ukrainian side and possibly inventing as they go along:

According to the figures of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, about 100,000 people have died. 135,000 Russian soldiers were killed in the war, while about 400,000 were wounded. Considering that Russia began the invasion by about 1000 years, it was necessary to stop the invasion. 190,000 men under arms, that would be equivalent to approx. 70 percent. of the original invasion force has now been killed.

The well-oriented Russian-language analysis service Volja also estimates on the social media Telegram that around 135,000 Russians have been killed, while about 100,000 Russians have been killed. 300,000 are injured.
The above must have been written without any thinking. Going with those figures, 70% of Russia's 190000 men under arms died, meaning 55000 Russian soldiers didn't die. Yet, they say that 400000 Russian soldiers were wounded, which means 345000 ghost soldiers are wounded. Why didn't the journalist not appear puzzled by writing that. On top of it, Russia is still fighting and beating Ukraine back, but with what force?

They mention that Western analysts are more conservative and are operating with lower numbers:
Western analysts more cautiously estimate the total Russian casualties-dead, wounded and captured – at around 200,000. If you count three to four wounded per killed, a rough rule of thumb in this kind of morbid arithmetic, there will be 40,000-50,000 Russian soldiers killed. However, some sources estimate that the ratio of killed and wounded among Russians is rather one to two, in which case there is talk of about 20%. 65,000 killed.
Still a very large number but closer to reality.

As for the Ukrainian losses, then the numbers appear to be less than 20% of the real numbers:

But the losses of the Ukrainians are colossal anyway. Western estimates place the country's total losses north of 100,000, of which perhaps 20,000-25,000 killed.
It is almost criminal to hide the real numbers to such an extent and I wonder if people would react differently if they knew that the real numbers are closer to 150000 killed/missing and close to half a million wounded. Even von der Leyen blurted out a couple of months ago, that Ukraine had 100000 killed and Arestovich while he was an advisor to Zelensky mentioned 157000 dead.

I guess the West has to keep the illusion of Ukraine winning or capable of winning, going so as to have the backing of people and thus has to downplay losses. If people (not the rulers) in the West knew the real numbers and facts of this war, would they then still support this endless financial and military support of Ukraine?
 
'NATO wants to establish full control over the undersea infrastructure. In that case if Türkiye (NATO member) becomes a gas hub for Europe, the Turkish (undersea) pipelines will be under the NATO control, and the agreement between Türkiye and Russia would be null and void.'

13 Feb, 2023

This story is a great example of the truth hidden in plain site. The blowing up of the NordStream Pipeline was the establishment of a business model. Now they have demonstrated their capability to the world, time to call in the chips! NATO being but the war and bluster end of the deep state apparatus, like any extortion racket, they model all their policies on mafia models. This time its pipelines - if you don't want your infrastructure to mysteriously blow up, you'd better sign up for our protection. We're specialists! Explains a lot as to why the Seymour Hersch story doesn't exist - his publication was bad timing - can't spoil our launch (note how not one journalist at this press party asked a single question on the matter. Plenty of champagne handed out all round!)
 
This story is a great example of the truth hidden in plain site. The blowing up of the NordStream Pipeline was the establishment of a business model. Now they have demonstrated their capability to the world, time to call in the chips! NATO being but the war and bluster end of the deep state apparatus, like any extortion racket, they model all their policies on mafia models. This time its pipelines - if you don't want your infrastructure to mysteriously blow up, you'd better sign up for our protection. We're specialists! Explains a lot as to why the Seymour Hersch story doesn't exist - his publication was bad timing - can't spoil our launch (note how not one journalist at this press party asked a single question on the matter. Plenty of champagne handed out all round!)

I've been thinking about the Hersh story - and I think your mafia point is a good one.

Both Pepe Escobar and John Helmer ask the 'cui bono' question about Hersh's piece, and they both think that its a scapegoat operation of some kind.


Arguably the most incandescent nugget in Hersh’s narrative is to point ultimate responsibility directly at the White House. The CIA, for its part, gets away with it. The whole report may be read as the framing of a scapegoat. A very fragile, shoddy scapegoat – what with those classified documents in the garage, the endless stares into the void, the cornucopia of incomprehensible mumbling, and of course the whole, ghastly, years-long family corruption carousel in and around Ukraine, still to be completely unveiled.


Who gains from this? Russia and its allies don’t. Biden, Sullivan, and their unidentified White House associates and allies don’t. CIA Director William Burns doesn’t – he is targeted for issuing the unlawful “Do it!” order, and for covering up the unlawfulness. Still, without mainstream media endorsement of Hersh’s story, there is no damage to any of them. Hersh makes a personal gain for himself, and for those investigative journalists who support him and themselves.

Who comes out of this story squeaky clean? They are the US Navy’s deep-sea divers, the Norwegian Navy’s “superb sailors and divers”, as Hersh calls them, “a hand-picked team of Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency operatives”; and those party politicians who want to call out Biden for Hersh’s last line – they are Biden’s opponents in the election next year.

Is there infighting within the PTB power structure? Was Hersh was fed some choice information by one side as part of that infighting - to raise suspicion of certain people and sectors of the globalist mafia, and exempt others?

On the other hand, maybe it was a disgruntled whistleblower acting on his own. I lean more towards the former.

I'm reminded of this post from around the time of the explosions:
I wonder what will happen when the Danish and Swedish governments and their societies find out that in today's summary report to the White House and the US Congress there is an open report that British divers from the Royal Navy have been conducting drills in the Bornholm depression for the third day already?

And what will be the consternation of the European bureaucrats in Brussels when they, too, see at NATO headquarters the response of a secret US research institute, part of the Pentagon, that they sold two state-of-the-art underwater robots to operate in depths of up to 150 metres on 23 August? And how will relations between the United Kingdom and the European Union be affected by the fact that two sailors of HIS Majesty's Navy will be honoured today for their services in combat and for conducting important activities in foreign territorial waters, scheduled for 7pm Moscow time?

And how will the entire civilized Western world survive if the Israeli government publishes yesterday's report of the Mossad on the successful sabotage of the Russian energy infrastructure by the PMCs under the command of the U.S. 6th Fleet?

I haven't a clue whether or not this information is accurate or not. But the mention of the Mossad reminded me that there's a massive precedent for acts of industrial terrorism to become a battleground for different gangs within the PTB. from 9/11: The Ultimate Truth:

What if there was someone - or something - in the Pentagon that someone wanted to destroy?

We notice that the Navy lost its new command center.

We wonder, of course, if the Navy ONI was one agency that had not been compromised by the Neocon invasion of Washington. Could that be one of the reasons that the Naval Command Center was destroyed? Consider the following:

“It’s easy to imagine an infinite number of situations where the government might legitimately give out false information”, the Solicitor-General, Theodore Olson, told the court on Monday. “It’s an unfortunate reality that the issuance of incomplete information and even misinformation by government may sometimes be perceived as necesssary to protect vital interests.”

Al Martin’s book The Conspirators is a secret history of the late 20th century and an uncensored version of what really goes on in the back rooms of realpolitik brokers and gofers. In his book, Al writes that contrary to popular belief, ONI is the most powerful US intelligence agency.

“The ONI already had a deep existing covert illegal structure. They had a mechanism before the CIA even existed. They had contacts in foreign intelligence services and in foreign governments that the CIA never could have hoped to obtain.

“The only people the CIA wouldn’t step on to accomplish their aims was ONI. They would easily subvert an FBI or DEA investigation, but never ONI, because they were frightened of them....

“ONI is where the real deep control is. It’s where the real deep secrets are kept. That was what ONI always did the best. Keeping secrets. Accumulating secrets. Warehousing secrets for the purposes of control.”

When I asked him “what secrets?” he replied, “one thing I can tell you is the ONI was instrumental in dethroning former Mexican President Louis Portillo. Portillo got very friendly with George Bush and the CIA, and ONI had never aligned with the Bush faction. I know what people think, but that’s not true. From what I can tell, it has never been aligned, but has always been hostile to that Eastern Country Club Bush Cabal and their friends in the CIA. The Bill Casey faction is the George Bush-Allen Dulles Faction”.

We notice that George H. W. Bush was a Navy man – a pilot – but that the ONI never admitted him to their club. In 1945 George H. W. Bush and 44 other agents from the OSS joined what was then known as the Super program, which later be- came the CIA. We ought to also note that the CIA is taking the “blame” for 911, which is actually a very good cover. It could very well indicate that the CIA is, in fact, more involved in the conspiracy than we are led to believe.

So we can speculate, therefore, that the targeting of the ONI offices in the Pentagon on 9/11 was an act of internal warfare against the ONI, either by some section of the U.S. intelligence agencies, or by Israeli intelligence. Not a very nice idea, is it? That the United States has been taken over by a coup d’état, that the secrets of the ways and means of keeping “American Freedoms” may have been destroyed in the WTC and in a few selected rooms of the Pentagon.

So the mafia does a big job, and then some of them spread the dirt over some other fellas in the crew in order to maintain their own public face.
 
I've been thinking about the Hersh story - and I think your mafia point is a good one.

Both Pepe Escobar and John Helmer ask the 'cui bono' question about Hersh's piece, and they both think that its a scapegoat operation of some kind.







Is there infighting within the PTB power structure? Was Hersh was fed some choice information by one side as part of that infighting - to raise suspicion of certain people and sectors of the globalist mafia, and exempt others?

On the other hand, maybe it was a disgruntled whistleblower acting on his own. I lean more towards the former.

I'm reminded of this post from around the time of the explosions:


I haven't a clue whether or not this information is accurate or not. But the mention of the Mossad reminded me that there's a massive precedent for acts of industrial terrorism to become a battleground for different gangs within the PTB. from 9/11: The Ultimate Truth:



So the mafia does a big job, and then some of them spread the dirt over some other fellas in the crew in order to maintain their own public face.

A little bit more speculation on this point.

A while back, about two weeks ago, the Duran guys discussed a major split they saw growing in the US with regards to the war in Ukraine - basically, there was a 'political reality' at war with the 'military reality'.

The fantasy of NATO dominance over Russia is the 'political reality' being projected by the neocons. However, there is some group in the Pentagon who know the 'military reality', calculate the losses of continuing, and want nothing more to do with the conflict - they've had enough.


I also recently watched Scott Ritter and Garland Nixon discuss the Hersh article. The main point that came through is that the article targets some main players of the neocon 'political reality' core - Nuland, Biden, Sullivan, Burns and Blinken. Ritter also states that he's known Hersh for 25 years, and that Hersh is not a single-source kinda guy, even if that's the claim in his article. Somebody leaked, and the question is - why now, and with this specificity?


So is it likely that there is someone - or a group - in the Pentagon who contacted Hersh and dropped him some info in order to target the neocons? Is Hersh's piece is a piece of internal information warfare? The Pentagonzos see the military reality, and see that Ukraine can't possibly stand against Russia for much longer, leading to NATO's humiliation and even eventual breakup, which will only accelerate the overall trend towards multipolarity and all that this means for the US as hegemon.

Maybe these Pentagon dudes want to keep their jobs, their power, and continue on as before... or maybe even quickly drop the Ukraine project and start focusing on China. And maybe they didn't count on the neocons' tight grip on the mainstream media, and so the story hasn't got as much airtime as they would have liked?

After listening to Nixon and Ritter, I thought that it may be the case that dropping the Ukraine project may also mean dropping Biden as President. The Hersh piece could provide some ammo in that regard (to add to the growing pile). Ritter says that Biden is technically or legally responsible for an act of war against a NATO ally - essentially a frontal assault on the constitution - and that he should resign.
 

"President Vladimir Putin showing 'no sign' of relenting his brutal offensives in Ukraine as the war creeps up to one-year mark"

NATO 'Bleak Outlook'.png

NATO's chief has delivered a bleak outlook about the situation in Ukraine and urged the military alliance to ramp up support as President Vladimir Putin prepares another brutal attack.

[Clearly these people don't have full comprehension or even an 'inkling' of Putin's potential to be 'brutal' or how much restraint and care he and his military forces have demonstrated.]

“We see no sign whatsoever that President Putin is preparing for peace, or ready to negotiate something, which will respect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine,” he said. He said if President Putin was successful in Ukraine, it would send a message “to him and other authoritarian regimes that force is rewarded”.

Mr Stoltenberg pushed the intergovernmental military alliance to work together to address “Ukraine’s urgent needs” of ammunition and other weaponry.

“It is clear that we are in a race of logistics,” he said. “Key capabilities like ammunition, fuel, and spare parts must reach Ukraine before Russia can seize the initiative on the battlefield.” [Whoops, looks a little late for that, chaps!]

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been imploring NATO members for fighter jets to replace their ageing fleet, alongside long-range missiles to help counter an impending offensive from Russia.

The country’s defence minister said air defences, a tank coalition and training troops would be top of the agenda during Tuesday and Wednesday’s NATO talks in Brussels.

NATO members have long been concerned about supplying fighter jets to Ukraine, given President Putin’s repeated assertions that the move would mark a severe escalation in the war.

Secretary-General Stoltenberg sought to put those fears to rest, assuring NATO members and allies they were not “party to the conflict”.

What we do as NATO Allies and NATO, is to provide support to Ukraine,” he said.

Ukraine is defending itself, we need to understand what this is.”

Holy moley.
 
German Federal Ministry of Defense:

"Dear trainees from Ukraine!
In Germany, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment or a heavy fine can be imposed for demonstrating swastikas or other symbols associated with fascism (e.g. SS-signs) can be obtained".


In other words - The German Army severely warns Ukrainian trainees to not display the swastika or fascist symbols on German grounds, or else they'll be eligible for a large fine or 3 years in prison.

It is kind of funny-sad, when I think about it... That the German Ministry for Defense goes out with these kinds of papers, in order to remind the Ukrainian (Nazi oriented) Trainees, that "hey, don't show off too openly - we have to keep it nice and clean here in Germany".

While the show goes on through statements, declarations, and state-media; kind of like '(heil) the heroes, we must save democracy, we must support Ukraine, at all costs'.

Man. What a world.

IMAGE 2023-02-15 07:01:58.jpg
 
German Federal Ministry of Defense:

"Dear trainees from Ukraine!
In Germany, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment or a heavy fine can be imposed for demonstrating swastikas or other symbols associated with fascism (e.g. SS-signs) can be obtained".


In other words - The German Army severely warns Ukrainian trainees to not display the swastika or fascist symbols on German grounds, or else they'll be eligible for a large fine or 3 years in prison.

It is kind of funny-sad, when I think about it... That the German Ministry for Defense goes out with these kinds of papers, in order to remind the Ukrainian (Nazi oriented) Trainees, that "hey, don't show off too openly - we have to keep it nice and clean here in Germany".

While the show goes on through statements, declarations, and state-media; kind of like '(heil) the heroes, we must save democracy, we must support Ukraine, at all costs'.

Man. What a world.

View attachment 71186
Volohodomyr from Zitomyr: can I keep this tiny tiny totenkopf? I wouldnt show it to anybody. Pretty please!? :lol:
 
NATO wants to establish full control over the undersea infrastructure. In that case if Türkiye (NATO member) becomes a gas hub for Europe, the Turkish (undersea) pipelines will be under the NATO control, and the agreement between Türkiye and Russia would be null and void.'
To quote military expert Andrei Martyanov from yesterday, he reacted to how NATO wants to do massive preparations to defend the EU from Russian invasion:
In related news--I want to fly as a bird and sing as Freddy Mercury (or Marc Martel). And why not? Nobody forbids us from wanting things. Those wants are called dreams. So, dream on me and NATO. But, as I discussed it today with James Kunstler and Thomas--Washington completely lost the ability to calculate anything, from economics to military operations. But a dramatic change of tone in Western media is telling.
 
How do you say : Scrape drawer bottoms ?
From RT

"

US wants to send ‘Iranian’ weapons to Ukraine – WSJ​

US wants to send ‘Iranian’ weapons to Ukraine – WSJ

Assault rifles and missiles seized by the French navy lay on the deck of a ship at an undisclosed location, February 1, 2023


With NATO stocks running low, Washington eyes loot from the Yemen blockade

The US government is trying to find a legal way to send Ukraine weapons allegedly sent to Houthis in Yemen by Iran but which were confiscated en route, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday.
Citing anonymous US and European officials, the WSJ said the White House is looking for “wiggle room” in UN regulations so that the rifles, rockets, and ammunition seized on the high seas can be redirected to Kiev.
Though the number of weapons seized is small compared to what the US and its allies have sent Ukraine over the past year, the unnamed officials say it would be a symbolic punishment for Iran supplying Russia with drones – which both Tehran and Moscow have denied.
“It’s a message to take weapons meant to arm Iran’s proxies and flip them to achieve our priorities in Ukraine, where Iran is providing arms to Russia,” one unnamed US official told the WSJ.

According to the Journal, the cache amounts to 5,000 rifles, 1.6 million rounds of ammunition for them, a score of anti-tank rockets, and around 7,000 proximity fuses. The loot came from three fishing boats boarded by US and French sailors over the past several months in the Gulf of Oman.
“What change can this make to war?” the Houthi deputy information minister, Nasr al-Din Amir, told the Journal when asked about the idea of sending the weapons to Ukraine. “They’ve been sending much heavier weapons.”
Washington, Berlin, and London announced last month they would deliver heavy tanks to Kiev. As of this week, according to the Pentagon, the US alone has provided Ukraine with over 100 million bullets.

At Monday’s meeting of NATO defense ministers in Brussels, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg admitted that “the current rate of Ukraine’s ammunition expenditure is many times higher than our current rate of production,” which he said was putting a strain on the West’s military industry and “depleting allied stockpiles.”

Russia has warned the US and its allies that continuing to send weapons to Ukraine risks involving them in the conflict directly and only delays the inevitable. "
 
Everything is going according to plan there. According to the fascist plan
Ukrainian Nazis urge to stigmatize Russian soldiers
A video is being distributed online in which a man praises his products in Ukrainian — brands in the form of a trident. According to him, it is intended for the "re-education" of Russian prisoners.

The author of the video is ready to send his "products" to the front line for free to all Nazis who are ready to use them against captured servicemen of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

"Branding prisoners is not a new practice for them. They know history very well and systematically repeat the experience of their teachers. The Supreme Command of the Wehrmacht (OKW) issued an order on the branding of Soviet prisoners of war on January 16, 1942.

"In view of the fact that Soviet prisoners of war mostly take off their identification marks when escaping and cannot be identified as prisoners of war, in particular as Soviet prisoners of war, I order: to put a brand on the inside of the left forearm with lapis lazuli," Soviet publicist Lyudmila Chernaya quotes the document in the book "Empire of Death", — emphasized the Telegram channel "Pool No. 3".

"During the Great Patriotic War, the fascists did this when they carved stars on our soldiers, partisans, prisoners of concentration camps. This humiliating fascist inhumane practice is now perceived by the Ukrainian authorities. Everything is going according to an absolute fascist scenario, this is another answer to the question of whether there is fascism in Ukraine," Ivan Solovyov, Doctor of Law, Honored Lawyer of Russia, commented on the "Paragraph".

He pointed out that in the West, information about the torture of Russian prisoners of war is tactfully hushed up, instead of a proper reaction, the office of the UN High Commissioner limited itself to the wording "this needs to be paid close attention."

"Therefore, the only response to such torture of prisoners of war, contrary to all the laws of military operations and international law, can only be the destruction of these fascist Ukrainian units that arrange such inhumane actions," the lawyer expressed his opinion.

"If anyone gets captured by assholes with such devices, I think our guys know what to do with them," the Kovpak Detachment Telegram channel noted.

Recall that the head of the Kiev regime, Vladimir Zelensky, by his decree renamed the 10th separate mountain assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine into "Edelweiss". Now the AFU have become the official heirs of the eponymous 1st Mountain Infantry Division of the Wehrmacht Edelweiss, which during the Great Patriotic War as part of the army group "South" participated in the storming of Lviv, fought in Kharkov, in the Donbass and committed atrocities in the North Caucasus.
Украинские нацисты призывают клеймить российских солдат
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom