January 24
We publish a comment by Evgeny Viktorovich:
“The task of taking Bakhmut is to destroy the Ukrainian army in the vicinity of the city and prevent any offensive actions in any direction of the front. All of their combat-ready units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are sent to Bakhmut. And the Wagner PMC destroys them, opening up operational opportunities in other areas.”
JANUARY 24
Consider refreshing your browser. It is now the end of march. Read what he has said since then. Here, I provided a nice summary for you:
Prigozhin's Most Explosive Interview Yet Confirms Everything That This Blog Has Been Saying For Months Now
>Specify the source according to which we can see that elite Russian units are fighting in Bakhmut.
Wagner isn't fighting in Bakhmut?
>Standard narratives of the West. Nazism does not exist, the USSR did not liberate Europe from Nazism. Have you heard about the Ukrainian Insurgent Army?
The West is not Nazi. Blood and soil nationalism is banned for all Europeans. The West is neoliberal and run by Jews. You use the term "Nazi" to refer to anything that you do not like. You must be a sovok.
>Absolutely agree. Only you forgot to point out that the "Nazism" tool is used by these aligarhs, bandits in order to brainwash the youth and use it in their own interests. Or where do you think the nationalist battalions came from?
Azov came from Kharkov and was created by Russian-speaking Ukrainians who were pan-slavists and who equally hated Kiev and Moscow. Then, Kholomoisky (the most powerful Jewish oligarch of Ukraine) showed up with bags of money and they changed their tune. I cover this all here:
The Worrying State of Neocon-Critical Discourse in the Slavlands
As for Bandera, he was imprisoned by the Nazis. He was only released when the Nazis retreated to cause problems for the Soviets.
You seem to know very little about Ukraine, friend. I hope you don't get offended if I point this out. It's OK to admit that you're not an expert on these topics.
>Do you think that Abrams tanks will swim across the Dnieper? Air defense systems, artillery? Will Russia be watching this slow process? Or is it more logical for the Ukrainian Army to retreat beyond the Dnieper when it is left without supplies?
They will cross the bridges or they will build new pontoon bridges or they will make a crossing. They have been seen preparing and training to do just that. They have successfully done so in the past I might add.
>Great, and then Russia will be able to defeat the Ukrainian army in the Donbass? And then what?
Russia is not going to be able to defeat the Ukrainian army in the Donbass. Russia is on the defensive, the last attacks on Ugledar were a complete disaster. It is Ukraine that stands a good chance of defeating Russia in the Donbass. Please read what I write more carefully.
>Bandits now militarized all over the world, to whom Ukraine resells these weapons. And where does it come from? NATO supplies? Isn't Russia solving another problem - the demilitarization of NATO? I will not write about Stoltenberg's tantrums, with his statements about running out of ammunition in Ukraine by the summer.
???
Ukraine's army is bigger, more equipped and getting more and more NATO supplies. Russia's "demilitarization" strategy failed. Fact.