"Puzzling People" by Thomas Sheridan - a puzzling person

Guardian said:
Manille said:
I found this. Dunno know if you are aware of, so in any case:
_http://mrsgrimm.blogspot.fr/2012/08/thomas-sheridan.html

Yeah, that's Deborah Harvey aka "Mrs Grimm" aka "Kate Saunders" and she appears to be totally besotted with Sheridan. Evidently she didn't learn her lesson with "Steve" :rolleyes:

I don't understand everything... Steve Buscemi? Mc Queen? Is she looking for recognition being with a famous crap?

How many women are now playing hypocrites around the Lash for not discovering the truth... though they can feel it. They just don't want to see the man as he is. Thus, they go well together.
 
Manille said:
I don't understand everything... Steve Buscemi? Mc Queen? Is she looking for recognition being with a famous crap?

No, she refers to her ex-husband as "Steve" on her blogs. I have no idea if that's his real name or not, I never did a deep dig on her.

BTW, I did want to mention that I knew Deborah Harvey was "Mrs. Grimm" longgggg before she was mentioned in this thread. I don't want that woman from the other group getting blamed.

I looked into who was behind the "Breadcrumbs" blog when I was researching Michelle Cornford Jones (aka "Katherine Jones" "Catherine99" etc.) as I thought it might belong to her and/or Barbara Camwell... but it didn't.

Harvey was rather easy to identify as the author of Breadcrumbs since there can only be so many 50 year old women in the UK who were married to a 'path for 23 years, with four children, two of whom are autistic, and a really cute Border Collie named "Ted" No shortage of keywords there :rolleyes:

I actually spend about 75 % of my time proving who someone isn't, but people don't usually hear about that. There just happens to be a crossover here, which is pretty normal since the writer pool on pathology is relatively small.

Harvey's a fairly good writer, but there is a LOT of wishful thinking going on. I think she's a classic caretaker, and most of her experience seems to be with narcissists, so a pro 'path like Sherridan can just bowl her right over.

It's sad because I know as sure as I'm sitting here that Sheridan is going to trash her eventually, probably the first time she tells him "no" osit
 
Guardian said:
Harvey's a fairly good writer, but there is a LOT of wishful thinking going on. I think she's a classic caretaker, and most of her experience seems to be with narcissists, so a pro 'path like Sherridan can just bowl her right over.

It's sad because I know as sure as I'm sitting here that Sheridan is going to trash her eventually, probably the first time she tells him "no" osit

Thank you for this explanation. I was joking of course for the names and maybe I should have not. My apologize if I did badly.

Yes it's sad, indeed. I am in the same situation of sadness regarding some women from Lash. Though I tell to myself now that they look for hugging a bend.
Don't you think there would always be women to fall into their trap? Men as Sheridan drove tough gears of secrecy very well-oiled. And new heads are coming periodically not knowing about all the stuff on them.

It could appear as quite pessimistic, but I may ask.
 
'Corvo' sent me a message on FB recently:

"I'm sorry, I have to remove you. If Alison feels that strongly about adding you back to the group - it's her group. I stand by her decision. However, I have to think about our members and what a breach of trust this is on our behalf to add a reporter to such a sensitive group. I agree with what you're doing - but in my opinion we must find a better way to get you information."

Thing is, I didn't receive any invite, although the other lady, 'A' said she would send me an invite. Now 'corvo' is requesting that I delete her account her. Sorry, but since her posts are part of a topic that others responded to, we can't just delete her account because it would delete those posts too and make a mess of the topic.
 
I called up the Labour Club in Cambridge (00441223247119) and spoke to a lady there. She basically told me that his talk has nothing to do with their club, he has just rented the hall. I asked if there was anyone I could contact, but she said that only his "followers" would be attending.
So any Tom, Dick or Harry can talk about whatever they like, as long as they pay for the hall.
 
cassandra said:
I called up the Labour Club in Cambridge (00441223247119) and spoke to a lady there. She basically told me that his talk has nothing to do with their club, he has just rented the hall. I asked if there was anyone I could contact, but she said that only his "followers" would be attending.
So any Tom, Dick or Harry can talk about whatever they like, as long as they pay for the hall.

I wonder if they would rent the hall out to the national front?

Sheridan is much worse than the National front in a sense because with them you know what to expect.Whereas he is camouflaged in supposed truth and knowledge.
Hopefully I will get a reply from the folks I sent information to yesterday.
 
Another thing that worried me was, what if they read the SOTT article, read the part about chanelling, and then instantly dismiss the entire piece as ridiculous, which, sadly many would. It's very hard to get the truth out there, ain't it?

I'm hoping Sheridan's audience will find him as repellent and suspicious as I do. When was the last time he had a shower? Surely it takes a real lack of humiliation to talk before an audience looking that terrible (be as plain as you like, but take a look in the mirror first if you want to be a messenger of truth.) What are his credentials? Too many thing don't add up with him.
Same with David Icke, I mean, he also has that repellent quality IMO, although he at least looks clean.
 
They won't unfortunately as he is a very good speaker as evidenced at the ARC Convention I attended in Bath earlier this year. However if any of them join him in the pub afterwards they will see how much he loves his beer and then his truths come out as he starts slagging off his rivals.
 
What is his tactic regarding the flirt? Is he putting someone on a false pedestal before the other?
 
Here is an interesting and possibly "telling" video, "Labyrinth of the Psychopath 7 - Smear Campaigns", posted by T.S. a couple of days ago on Aug 28, 2012: _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hobtTUJI-n4&feature=channel&list=UL ...

I wonder, in T.S.'s mind, just who "plays" the role of the psychopath(s) and who "plays" the role of "Billy" in this video??? :huh: I think we can all take an educated guess as to who he is referring to with the term "useful idiots" (though he is clearly unsure of the source of this term... surprise :shock:... NOT :cool2:).

In the words of T.S. ... "eh, 'stay cool' and 'stay beautiful' ... and eh, ya know, enjoy life, it's ya know, we're gonna win! 'Cause we always have won in the past and we''ll always keep winning in the future." :scared:
 
Skanky skanky.
He's using a lot his hands. And for sure, I never saw someone with one of the pupils, bigger than the other.

If psychopaths are born like that because apparently, the scientific pulpits do concur on, why talking and talking? And so? What's next?
I tried to count how many times he said the word psychopath/thy...But he wore me down.
 
Robin said:
Here is an interesting and possibly "telling" video, "Labyrinth of the Psychopath 7 - Smear Campaigns", posted by T.S. a couple of days ago on Aug 28, 2012: _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hobtTUJI-n4&feature=channel&list=UL ...

First time i´ve seen or heard the guy. I´m sorry did some one say this guy is good at speeches , and getting his message across ? I felt uncomfortable watching and listening to him , and I dont think it is down to what I now know of him.
 
Away With The Fairys said:
Robin said:
Here is an interesting and possibly "telling" video, "Labyrinth of the Psychopath 7 - Smear Campaigns", posted by T.S. a couple of days ago on Aug 28, 2012: _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hobtTUJI-n4&feature=channel&list=UL ...

First time i´ve seen or heard the guy. I´m sorry did some one say this guy is good at speeches , and getting his message across ? I felt uncomfortable watching and listening to him , and I dont think it is down to what I now know of him.

No, it probably isn't. Listening to and watching him is uncomfortable, I cannot understand why anyone would find him at all compelling, unless it's down to the fact that they have never read any material on psychopathy, so it's the subject they find fascinating.
Of course he says a lot of interesting things, most of which he has stolen from others, he just takes all the credit.
 
cassandra said:
No, it probably isn't. Listening to and watching him is uncomfortable, I cannot understand why anyone would find him at all compelling, unless it's down to the fact that they have never read any material on psychopathy, so it's the subject they find fascinating.

He VERY good at grooming prior victims of narcissists and 'paths. When I watched this one, I thought of Ms Harvey. She's one of Sheridan's strongest supporters, and this is what he thinks of autism.

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeUnR5stxvU&feature=channel&list=UL

This is a woman who's dedicated a large portion of her life to her autistic children, and it appears she's done an excellent job of giving them a great start in life.

Now she's hooked up with a guy like Sheridan? It's so sad!
 
He's put up another video about smear campaigns in the office but I can see he was hinting at smear campaigns against him on the internet. He looks quite different to what he normally looks like. Like a rabbit caught in the headlights but also revengeful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hobtTUJI-n4&feature=relmfu
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom