clerck de bonk said:Is this relevant or even true?While escorting them on a visit to Sarajevo a great number of people approached me on the street with congratulation for the project and expressed their hopes that the discovery of the Bosnian pyramids would bring about a positive reversal in the country’s economy. Colett and Schoch were surprised at the great number of people who recognized me and they commented that “Schoch is also known in American cities”.
If it's true, it shows that Schoch may be more interested in others' opinion of him than the truth. This would seem to be the case, seeing as how he recanted his earlier views on the Sphinx and is now a Hawass groupie.
Is that so, care to substantiate?She also shared with him that at newly found megalith K-1 in the underground tunnel “Ravne” workers carved symbols so that it would appear that we have had found remnants of very old literacy. This “important information” she represented to Schoch as a secret asking him not to say anything to me, because, allegedly, she would lose her job.
If what Sam says about Nukic later on in his article is true, it sounds like a good thing they got rid of her. The one thing that worried me about the whole project was their willingness to let anyone who wanted do work there. While this is good from one perspective, it also means the group is wide open for infiltration, divide-and-conquer techniques, and other shenanigans. Sounds like this is what Nukic was engaged in, but luckily Sam and his team saw it. Of course, this is all dependent on what Sam says being true. At this point, however, I tend to believe him.
Also we have the fourteen examples of how Dr. Schoch "does not produce any scientific evidence, sample analysis, or radiocarbon dating—just his opinions."
and this tirade ends with...
Really, how many times Dr. Robert Schoch get away with being wrong?
And his examples? Mostly opinions and true disinfo! IMO he was wrong 13 times...
I don't see it this way. He quotes and references scientists, tests, and results. While you may argue that any scientific analysis comes down to opinion or "interpretation" of evidence, this is more than Schoch has provided.
Judging by the text, Mr Sam seems the pathological one to me...
Not sure how you came to that conclusion. I could be wrong, but it seems to me that Osmanagich is simply defending himself and his team from unjustified attacks, which is understandable given the nature of the work they're doing. FWIW.