Yeah the trip code/ID thing is interesting. Been seeing it discussed but haven't tried it, does look like a more interesting list than what you would get if it was to do with something like random ISBN numbers. Could be Google shenanigans, or, particularly since Eric Schmidt's departure, does Google have operatives more free to engage in "white hat" activities?
In case anyone missed it, at the Trump rally last night in Tampa, Florida (shout out?) there were all kinds of Q signs on display, some of them shown prominently in FOX's footage, and Q was of course making hay of it. Leading up to this was some incident with a mysterious person photographed outside the offices of Michal Avenatti (Stormy Daniels' lawyer). After Q posted it, Avenatti tweeted about it and demanded an investigation of who this person is. This combined with coverage of the rally last night seems to have increased Q's mainstream coverage exponentially. At a press briefing earlier today, we sort of got what some of us had been waiting for when David Martosko of the Daily Mail asked Sarah Huckabee Sanders about the Qanon supporters at the rally:
Not a very direct question or answer. He lumps it in with Blacks for Trump as a "fringe group" (Why?? besides that they also had signs?) and her response is basic boilerplate that the White House doesn't support anything that promotes violence. Understandable, since pretty much every MSM mention of Q correlates it with an armed man blocking Hoover Dam after the release of the IG report and then by extension, the guy who went into Comet Ping Pong and shot their server or whatever (they don't mention the server/hard drive part. I don't know how verified that is but it constantly gets brought up). Interestingly the Daily Mail recently covered the Q-Avenatti spat in a fairer tone than most Q hit pieces:
Michael Avenatti seeks police help after QAnon posts photo of man in black near his office | Daily Mail Online
My impression of the Daily Mail is that it is sort of considered MSM, basically right-leaning, can often have good info but also contain misinformation/sensationalism. Anyway, Q's response to the press briefing:
Q # 1788
Aug 1 2018 13:06:23 (EST)
>>2392766
Who is the one person who can answer?
POTUS.
[Less than 10].
Q
Less than 10 is speculated to mean that fewer than 10 people are completely in the loop as far as the master Q plan, based on an early Q post. So the buck is passed for someone to ask POTUS directly about Q specifically, but Sanders' response certainly did not seem like an outright denunciation of the Q phenomenon in its entirety (although MSM articles are certainly trying to spin it that way). Perhaps we are at some sort of tipping point? How much longer can this dog-and-pony show continue? Through the mid-terms?
Oh, and in the early hours of this morning, Q posted this image:
where Tom Steyer of billionaire-trying-to-impeach-Trump-at-all-costs fame is CC'd in this Podesta email where Tom's brother(?) or some relation is using Pizzagate language to heavily imply they are pedovores. Q posts this Breitbart article and mentions Haiti:
Democrats' Impeachment Army: $110 Million, 1000 Staff, 2000 Volunteers | Breitbart
Then Q posts this:
Aug 1 2018 00:55:23 (EST)
Please remove all posts across all boards re: last 2.
Reddit, Twitter, FB, etc will ban and remove.
Sensitive.
Error made.
Article influenced drop.
Improper sequence.
Q
and those messages/images get deleted, apparently voluntarily, across all the platforms including the archiving sites. So mods, if you feel this poses a danger to this site or me or us or whatever, I guess edit out the image and this portion of my post, please? But it sure is interesting! And of course speculation is rampant that, along with being a warning, Q is going for some sort of Streisand Effect by posting the email then deleting it.
