Session 1 August 1998

My understanding about gravity waves, unstable gravity waves and permanent unstable gravity waves, is as follows.

The vast immensity of creation is gravity (gravity waves), then these gravity waves become unstable because they are configured in something (planets, suns, beings in all their configurations, etc...).

And these unstable gravity waves can be permanent, because that configuration in "something" (said suns, planets and beings and more) remain in that form permanently (although they evolve and vary from time to time).

At the moment I interpret it that way.

Q: (L) Then, is there also specific sound configurations involved?
A: Gravity is manipulated by sound when thought manipulated by gravity chooses to produce sound which manipulates gravity.
Q: (L) Now, did the fellow who built the Coral Castle spin in his airplane seat while thinking his manipulations into place?
A: No. He spun when gravity chose to manipulate him to spin in order to manipulate gravity.
Q: (L) Does gravity have consciousness?
A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is it ever possible for the individual to do the choosing, or is it gravity that IS him that chose?
A: The gravity that was inside him was all the gravity in existence.
Let's try to make sense of the following statement:
Gravity is manipulated by sound when thought manipulated by gravity chooses to produce sound which manipulates gravity.
The arrow (->) means "manipulates". For example, X -> Y, X manipulates Y.
Sound -> Gravity
Gravity -> Thought
Thought -> Sound

There is a loop, a circuit handling wavy disturbances! An "instability" is created, corresponding to "utilization" which provokes the desired gravitational response. But for this happen, gravity must be aware of what "someone" wants to do. In other words, gravity makes choices! Isn't that what consciousness does too? Both are intertwined, as if they were contained inside each other.
Q: (L) Well, I am just trying to get a grip on some ideas here...
A: Then change the thought pattern. Gravity is the "stuff" of all existence, therefore it has an unchanging property of quantity.
Q: (L) So, gravity is not being "used," per se?
A: Close.
Q: (L) You said that light was an energy expression of gravity. Then you said...
A: You can utilize gravity, but you cannot "use" it. You cannot increase or decrease that which is in perfectly balanced static state.
Q: (L) So, gravity is in a perfectly "static" state. Yet, it can be "utilized." Can you make clear for me the transition from the static state to transition. What occurs?
A: There is no transition, just application.

There is a loop, a circuit handling wavy disturbances! An "instability" is created, corresponding to "utilization" which provokes the desired gravitational response. But for this happen, gravity must be aware of what "someone" wants to do. In other words, gravity makes choices! Isn't that what consciousness does too? Both are intertwined, as if they were contained inside each other.
Problem here is we have no oversight what is running under the hood of the Universe. I call it Ethero-Mechanics. C's can see what is under the hood. Like how a repairman opens up the car's engine hood and sees what's what, what lines go where, what currents are running under, so he can tell why everything works under the hood of the car.

All your bolded sentences, with how people describe their cloud-busting activity. What I described in the weather thread, creating rain, causing storms and making heavy overcast skies. Gravity - conscious - apparently is just hanging-out there, reacting-interacting to human consciousness. It requires intent and energy: I had to literally force my mind to focus on the sky, expend energy by 'Imaginating' / manufacturing a series of mental images about the exact steps of the changed weather. I described the sky-presence, the sky behaving (what I felt) as reactive cattle. If aware gravity was-is in the sky, then it reacted as intelligent-clay or reactive cattle. Resulting in clouds amassing, rains, lightning storms.

Gurdjieff described travel via spaceship as Falling. So if you know, how to ask gravity in order for gravity to allow you to fold space, then gravity - like intelligent cattle - gets out of your way and creates a hole-fold, through which you can fall through. But you folded space and ended up at your desired location, because gravity allowed it. You teleported.

Connected to this is:
1. why the cloaking of UFO motherships were said to fail during EM disturbances and they get de-cloaked and become visible. (Conscious Gravity threw a hissy-fit / got cranky with all that Humanity's Creative Energies just trashing around, maybe poking Conscious-Gravity?)
2. Reading this post I followed the reddit links and someone there mentioned another rumored whistleblower with liver cancer: They were visiting and looting/cataloguing non-public-access crash sites and his team was the second or the third one sent out.
Couple of things he said corresponds to what we gathered here:
> What allows them to fly so fast, what technology?
Gravity manipulation and the materials they are constructed from.
>How have they come to the conclusion the UAP being released are ET? If they don't know what the UAP are to begin withm, or if there is nothing inside them, its a pretty big jump to go right to ET...
They crash sometimes, parts fail and gravity engines near the surface of the planet can be like crossing an intersection. We recover these and sometimes find passengers. We mostly see drones now, back in the earlier days we saw a lot more piloted craft.
>What were the main reasons for the crashes? I'd think random lightning or freak accident seeing how advanced they are
You'd be surprised how many mistakes they make, especially the further back you look. One area they seemed to avoid like the plague we suspect is due to issues with gravity and flight. Before they figured it out we collected quite a few mishaps there. They've tried to shoot some down mostly over nuclear incidents but failed miserably.
Mistakes:
We encountered and reported them a lot here.

I think a lot of alien activities in this solar system what the C's commented on - resurrecting abduction victim who accidentally died from UFO-engine exhaust (on command from Higher Ups), tunnel drilling, copper, gold, etc.. mining and especially the past 300K year stretch time-bracketings are only undertaken, when they profit very well from it, so the energy-expenditure is very much worth it.

Otherwise they spend minimal amount of energy and do NOT do time-bracketing to FIX the mistakes on simple accidents, simple abductions, etc.. So a lot of mistakes are made in specific low-priority tasks. They simply do not deem it necessary to fix their crappy work.

That might explain multiple unreported crashes. Also the recent crash in the session with the young guy doing videos on his phone, how his family saw aliens waltzing around in the backyard and the police telling them they don't want anything to do with it if its real tall aliens..

So essentially gravity = consciousness = God has big problems with Orion STS, I imagine. :) And anybody poking around with Gravity.
Imagine you are God. You try to rest = gravity lies around everywhere. Then Orion STS starts building engines, which squeeze and distort gravity = God. Can it not feel like as if Orion STS is poking your back constantly, while you (God) are trying to sleep?

Despite Lizzies having hi-tech ships with gravity-manipulating engines, if the area they travel contains Cranky Gravity, which is trigger-happy, then gravity can cause all kinds of EM-disturbances to make the Lizzies fail, decloak, crash, etc..
Why not? Does it mean then STO respects gravity? If STO wants to travel somewhere, they respectfully pray to the Universe = Gravity = God with gratitude, so God = Gravity may Kindly Allow them to travel through space?
Q: (L) Does gravity have consciousness?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Now, did the fellow who built the Coral Castle spin in his airplane seat while thinking his manipulations into place?

A: No. He spun when gravity chose to manipulate him to spin in order to manipulate gravity.

Q: (L) Does gravity have consciousness?

A: Yes.

So essentially gravity = consciousness = God has big problems with Orion STS, I imagine. :) And anybody poking around with Gravity.
Imagine you are God. You try to rest = gravity lies around everywhere. Then Orion STS starts building engines, which squeeze and distort gravity = God. Can it not feel like as if Orion STS is poking your back constantly, while you (God) are trying to sleep?
Well, Orion STS is part of gravity. Darkness is necessary for balance. If not, who would be there to close the loop? There must be some obstruction, some challenge for learning to be worthwhile. Objectively, there is nothing wrong with being STS; it's a choice. But since there is such a thing as "ultimate truth" independent of anyone's perspective, at some point facing it will be unavoidable. When a being actively refuses to face it, disintegration follows. gravity is there to allow consciousness to express itself, whether that "little unit" of consciousness likes gravity or not.
Despite Lizzies having hi-tech ships with gravity-manipulating engines, if the area they travel contains Cranky Gravity, which is trigger-happy, then gravity can cause all kinds of EM-disturbances to make the Lizzies fail, decloak, crash, etc..
Why not? Does it mean then STO respects gravity? If STO wants to travel somewhere, they respectfully pray to the Universe = Gravity = God with gratitude, so God = Gravity may Kindly Allow them to travel through space?
Wishful thinking is a great source of mistakes (lessons). When you see reality as it is, you merge with collective consciousness and you are granted deeper access into Creation. No need for fancy guns, lasers, time machines; you are technology and technology is you—which is why learning is about "knowing thyself." All the information is already there for you to access.
Q: (L) So we just have to stay on our toes at all times?

A: Absolutely don't let others distract you. You have suffered many attempts at distraction away from truth. Now follow some proclamations: Pause. All there is is lessons. This is one infinite school. There is no other reason for anything to exist. Even inanimate matter learns it is all an "Illusion." Each individual possesses all of creation within their minds. Now, contemplate for a moment. Each soul is all powerful and can create or destroy all existence if know how. You and us and all others are interconnected by our mutual possession of all there is. You may create alternative universes if you wish and dwell within. You are all a duplicate of the universe within which you dwell. Your mind represents all that exists. It is "fun" to see how much you can access.

Wow. I thought disintegration would be reflected as primal matter, not as anti-matter! This means that there is another cycle which transforms matter into anti-matter and possibly vice versa! It makes me think of the famous Möbius strip, a continuous motion with a twist that you can't even feel.
View attachment 79987

More evidence that there is a perfect, dynamic symmetry between matter and anti-matter. More matter here, less anti-matter there; more anti-matter here; less matter there. But the global net change is zero, i.e. there is a 'substance' which doesn't really change.

Q: (L) Just reverse everything. Light is gravity. Optics are atomic particles, matter is anti-matter... just reverse everything to understand the next level... it can't be that easy. (J) Wait a second: gravity equals light, atomic particles equals optics, anti-matter equals matter?
It is all about balance. (L) And the answer must always be zero.
A: And zero is infinity.
How is "zero" depicted? It's a closed structure... a circle!

As you go around it, there is no beginning and no end, or if you will, the beginning is the end and vice versa. Moreover, there is no intrinsic concept of time—if you want to measure your "progress" or how "quickly" you make turns, it is totally up to you!

Just as "zero" is depicted as a closed circle, so is infinity depicted as a lemniscate (see below), after the lemniscate curves of a similar shape studied in algebraic geometry, which the C's have hinted at as being the key to UFT.​

Is it therefore more than coincidental that this shape looks like a 2D mobius strip on its side? Could this again be why the C's said "zero is infinity"?

The lemniscate symbol was created by John Wallis, an English mathematician who lived and worked in the 17th century, which was the age that saw the emergence of the Rosicrucians. Metaphysically, it represents the concept of eternity, endless and unlimited. Curiously, Wallis did not explain his choice of this symbol. It has been conjectured to be a variant form of a Roman numeral, but which Roman numeral is unclear. However, the lemniscate has been a common decorative motif since ancient times; for instance, it is commonly seen on Viking Age combs.

In modern mysticism, the infinity symbol has become identified with a variation of the ouroboros, an ancient image of a snake eating its own tail that has also come to symbolize the infinite, and the ouroboros is sometimes drawn in figure-eight form to reflect this identification—rather than in its more traditional circular form.

In the works of the Russian novelist Vladimir Nabokov, including The Gift and Pale Fire, the figure-eight shape is used symbolically to refer to the Möbius strip and the infinite, as is the case in these books' descriptions of the shapes of bicycle tire tracks and of the outlines of half-remembered people. Nabokov's poem after which he entitled Pale Fire explicitly refers to "the miracle of the lemniscate".​

Attachments

• 1721662994093.png
40.3 KB · Views: 0
Just as "zero" is depicted as a closed circle, so is infinity depicted as a lemniscate (see below), after the lemniscate curves of a similar shape studied in algebraic geometry, which the C's have hinted at as being the key to UFT.

Is it therefore more than coincidental that this shape looks like a 2D mobius strip on its side? Could this again be why the C's said "zero is infinity"?​
Our 3D linear thinking prevents us from joining the beginning to the end. It's hard for us to conceive that a line becomes a circle when extended infinitely. And when we try to reason about it, we go around... in circles.

Interestingly, the C's drew a figure eight when asked about the representation of 7D as a math symbol.
Q: (SV) I have a book on the Brotherhood... I get all kinds of things in the mail... one is from a guy who is supposed to be an extraterrestrial... I'll have to bring it... (L) What could we use to represent 7th density as a mathematical symbol?

A: Try this: [draws figure eight on side in ellipse]
Q: (L) What emerges from what?
A: The beginning emerges from the end, and vice versa.

Q: (L) And what is the beginning and what is the end?
A: Union with the One.

Q: (L) What is the One?
A: 7th density, i.e.: all that is, and is not.
Q: (RS) Transverse oscillation of the ether... the medium that fills up the entire universe. No wave can exist unless there is a medium to propagate it. Transverse oscillations fill up the entire universe.
A: Light, gravity, optics, atomic particles, matter, anti- matter... unify, please.
Two sides (yin-yang) of the same coin (the One):
• STO / STS
• Matter / Anti-matter
• Consciousness / Gravity
And unifying thoughts:
Q: (L) Whose thoughts are they?
A: Thoughts unify all reality in existence and are all shared.

Q: (Susy) You travel on a wave of energy created by all thought forms?
A: Thought forms are all that exists!

Has anyone asked, do the C’s consider themselves antimatter, they transmit through Cassiopeia, stars as windows, one side is matter the other antimatter ? I am assuming, I don’t really know, it’s just a perception, I have zero knowledge of physics, but when I read transcripts like this one I have a notion that antimatter is pure thought which is gravitational, gravity is the collection of this pure thought as energy (the more thought the more energy) that binds and creates everything from visible light all the way to solid matter. It’s something I have thought about, the fact that we are here in 3D and are so deeply imbued in our solid reality, every time we see it we reaffirm it, believe it, add energy to it by labelling (thats a chair a table or whatever) and thus creating the structure of our environment by identifying with it constantly giving it gravity, pulling particles of matter into sold form by constant, unconscious, repetitive affirmations. We make it real only by our perception of it, hence creating an illusion.

I know this is simplistic but I don’t know how else to say it without understanding any more than I do.

Has anyone asked, do the C’s consider themselves antimatter, they transmit through Cassiopeia,
There you go:
Q: (Susy) You travel on a wave of energy created by all thought forms?
A: Thought forms are all that exists!
I guess anti-matter also means non-material, purely ethereal, astral, mental, spiritual and being a 6thD Light-Being, they said they have no physicality. So it probably means that 5thD being objectively not physical, the C's are anti-matter, so are dead people and our higher selves must be also anti-matter. Our thoughts and minds are also anti-matter. While our brains are matter.

Popular science still tries to tell everybody the Anti-matter fairytales, but I think Deep State scientists are already clued in, what is real physics.

There might have been a popular mis-[Errable]-understanding on Anti-Matter from sci-fi books, where our heroes fly into a black-hole and cross over into an Anti-Universe - filled with anti-matter people -, where everything is comparable to ours, except the "polarity of matter" is totally reversed. 'Anti-Universe matter' is antimatter and if it ever comes into contact with our matter, there is an explosion. Yeeeah! Lots of energy released! Let's create Anti-Matter Engines! Aliens must have succeeded doing it, right? That could be a total misunderstanding in the scientific sphere right now. For example Bob Lazar never said Lizzies use anti-matter drives. But pretty normal matter anti-gravity engines. Fueled by Elerium-115. Plentifully available in Zeta Reticuli, probably.

CERN and Raytheon-Boeing certainly should have already created an anti-matter drive, yet they only ever succeeded LEGO-ing together dismantled parts of UFOs, like Cuba did with junk cars.

On antimatter:
Q: (L) Can you tell us what was the cause of this disappearance of the solar wind?
A: Rotating cyclical wave of cosmic energies.
Q: (L) What was the source of this wave?
A: Deep space "winds," relating to clusters of antimatter particles. Particulate, as in a mirror reflection of matter.
This not necessary says what CERN scientists mean: that in our normal matter universe there exist manufacturable antimatter particles, which CERN manufactures. C's might have meant the real thing, the mirror reflection of matter being.. non-material densities? But they said its particulate. So it suggests physical antimatter as a mirror reflection of matter. Which CERN manufactures.. But manufacturing puny anti-particles VERSUS what the C's mean the whole hidden hyperdimensional reality is incomparable.

Antimatter universe sounds exciting and magnetically attractive thus mysterious , but it still doesn't mean that there exist a - popularized in Sci-Fi books and movies -, a mysterious Anti-Matter Universe with antimatter people living in reverse and antimatter civilizations.. Only in jest.

They must have meant: 4th Density
4thD is expanded enough to encompass alien dimensions, parallel dimensions, wormhole-destinations and anti-matter "universes":

Q: (A) Well, now you are leading me somewhere else. I asked about the anomalies in the path of Pioneer 10 and now you are talking about matter and anti-matter. The issue is the acceleration of Pioneer 10 TOWARDS the Sun.

A: Towards the Sun... Not from...

Q: (A) Well, I don't see any connection between this problem and this matrix you keep mentioning...

A: Yes, so now we see why one goes: "What?!?"

Q: (A) Okay, I will think about it and try to figure it out.

A: No, you will not escape that easily! We are trying to get you to put your "thinking cap" on and you won't even go near the hatrack!

Q: (A) Okay, as you repeatedly mention this 'matrix,' I want to know exactly what your definition of 'matrix' is?

A: Picture a perfectly symmetrical three dimensional parallelogram.

Q: (A) It's a cube.

A: Yes, now convert to 4 dimensions, and you have the mathematical representation of the matter-antimatter matrix.

Q: (A) In mathematics, by a matrix we understand a cube with slots to put numbers in. How many slots do we include?

A: Try inserting phi or an infinite number.

Q: (A) The number of slots must be an integer like one, two or three, not a decimal like phi.

A: Four dimensional, Arkadiusz, 4th Density, see?
Here the C's mean non material:
Q: (L) What does hyperkinetic sensate mean?
A: Your being merging with hyperspatial energy.
Q: (L) Cool!
A: Matter/antimatter. One features atomic particle based matter, the other features pure energy in conscious form. Gravity is the balancing binder of it all.
Here they mean that antimatter naturally exists in 4th Density, as it does on 3rd Density too. But since As Above So Below, I guess, 4D has naturally more antimatter..:
Q: (L) You said that changing the unit involves movement to another density. You also said that antimatter realm is the door to, or the pathway to, ethereal existence. Is 4th density, therefore, an antimatter universe?

A: No.

Q: (L) Do the beings in 4th density manifest in an antimatter state?

A: Both.

Q: (L) Is 4th density a density where both matter and antimatter are in balance?

A: Not in balance, in evidence.
Point:
Q: (L) So matter and antimatter are both available for utilization by individuals according to will and awareness?
A: Close. Antimatter and matter are balanced everywhere.
So this means the C's are truly AntiMatter Beings. :D Being not physical is the anti-thesis of matter. :D We all become truly AntiMatter Beings in a similar manner, when we die. :)

That doesn't mean there exist the sci-fi Anti-Matter Universe and supremely powerful godlike beings - Anti-Matter Bosses - from there are playing games with us, like the mighty gods of the Greeks. Or Thor and Loki from Marvel Cinematic Universe. :D

It rather means you will get a very personal experience with true Anti-Matter, when you go into 4th Density.
Definitely possible there to create the Sci-Fi Antimatter Universe, our famous sci-fi book authors dreamed up. :)

Last edited:
A: What do you suppose the opposite of gravity is?

Q: (L) Antigravity?
A: Yes.
The C's suggested to "invert" gravity in order to represent consciousness.
Q: (A) I asked a question long ago about mathematically modelling consciousness, and the answer was "visualise the inverted representation of the gravity geometric model" and that this would lead me to the geometric model of consciousness. But I couldn't find what inverted representation means. So what is it?

A: Do you have an equation for that model for gravity?

Q: (A) No. I don't have any equation. The model is a model and can have many different equations. Equation is something additional that makes the model work one way or another.
A: Find the equation, and then "invert."

Q: (A) Okay, so say I found the equation; I still don't know how to invert the equation. Read it backward? Upside down?
A: Gravity is consciousness "expressed."
(Ark) Gravity. I was wondering again and again how to include consciousness... how to extend mathematics and physics to deal with consciousness. And the answer was that it's necessary to invert mathematical representation of gravity. And I have no idea how to invert equations for gravity. But it occurred to me today that maybe I know. And so, I wanted to ask whether my ideas that it's something similar to what is called conformal inversion in mathematics, whether this idea that occurred to me today may be the right one. Invert like conformal inversion inverts, like, here into infinity.

A: Close enough!
If gravity has an opposite, i.e. antigravity, and gravity can be "inverted," does that mean that consciousness is antigravity?

Inversive Geometry
In geometry, inversive geometry is the study of inversion, a transformation of the Euclidean plane that maps circles or lines to other circles or lines and that preserves the angles between crossing curves. Many difficult problems in geometry become much more tractable when an inversion is applied. Inversion seems to have been discovered by a number of people contemporaneously, including Steiner (1824), Quetelet (1825), Bellavitis (1836), Stubbs and Ingram (1842–3) and Kelvin (1845).[1]

The concept of inversion can be generalized to higher-dimensional spaces.
As mentioned above, zero, the origin, requires special consideration in the circle inversion mapping. The approach is to adjoin a point at infinity designated ∞ or 1/0 . In the complex number approach, where reciprocation is the apparent operation, this procedure leads to the complex projective line, often called the Riemann sphere.
The Riemann sphere:

"And zero is infinity."
Q: (T) The illusion is that there is not a link. In third density... (L) I got it! (T) Don't disappear on me now! [Laughter] The relationship is that consciousness is matter.

A: Close. What about vice versa?

Q: (L) Just reverse everything. Light is gravity. Optics are atomic particles, matter is anti-matter... just reverse everything to understand the next level... it can't be that easy. (J) Wait a second: gravity equals light, atomic particles equals optics, anti-matter equals matter? It is all about balance. (L) And the answer must always be zero.

A: And zero is infinity.

Last edited: