Session 1 November 2025

[Benjamin]

Joke apart, has anyone ever seen this illustration? I was wondering if it's a real image. The character could be a "fish-god" (cf this session); moreover, it looks like it's carrying a "purse," and it also has the "device" on its wrist.

It's an image of an actual relief, as Evan mentions, of Oannes. It was posted about here. Have a look at Gaby's post here. Then have a look at Ruth's post here and Gaby's response here.

 

[palestine]

It's an image of an actual relief, as Evan mentions, of Oannes. It was posted about here. Have a look at Gaby's post here. Then have a look at Ruth's post here and Gaby's response here.

I am sorry for the double posting. I feel compelled, now, to search more about this topic and provide something of value for the community researching this topic. You guys have been unearthing quite a lot, I hope that I can find something.

 

[Persej]

Wasn't the Philadelphia experiment happening in 1943 ? When was it when Laura witnessed the air raid? 1983 maybe? When the ship appeared ?

Philadelphia experiment happened in Philadelphia, USA, so it's not connected with bombers in Europe. We are talking here about natural piercing of the veil of time, which happens during some major EM events on the planet. I mentioned previously on the forum that during the last big aurora, somebody ate my bread. There was also this discussion:

(L) Let’s go back to EgyptAir 804: this charge that took down the Egypt airliner, was it so intense that it could vaporize most of a plane and the people on board?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Considering that sort of charge in the atmosphere kind of leads to the idea that we could be entering a period where some of those things described by the ancients like these giant plasma figures in the sky could begin occurring. Is that correct?

A: Yes. Holy Grail!

Q: (Pierre) The chalice shape of the Z pinch phenomenon.

A: Sheets of rain! Transiting realities?

Q: (L) That's a reference to a previous session where "sheets of rain" and "holy grail" were mentioned in the same session I think... Is the basic idea of the Holy Grail actually some kind of memory or record of the manifestation of some gigantic plasma phenomenon that opens a portal into another reality? Like the strange tale of the castle of the Fisher King where time stopped? And possibly something that can be utilized…?

A: Close!

Q: (L) So in other words, those things you talked about many times before – time travel and interdimensional transport - where it took like mega or gigavolts of electricity to open portals or operate... the Philadelphia Experiment type things...

A: Yes, now you are tracking well!

Q: (L) So we're onto something here.

Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search

cassiopaeatranscripts.org

 

[MJF]

MJF said: reply 376:
see America BC: Ancient Settlers in the New World -

John Rutherford for the Indianapolis News said that "Fell castigates American archeologists for their lack of interest in possible prehistoric artifacts that would presume a migration to America from any direction other than from the Bering Strait passage from Asia. He blames this on the strong influence of the Roman Empire on subsequent Western thought. ... Fell's sweeping conclusions are painted with a broad brush. They add up to a fascinating picture of what might have been."[10]

-----------------------------------------
What it says about "the strong influence of the Roman Empire on subsequent Western thought" is very interesting.
I have thought that what is said about the Roman Empire in official history is very dubious / inaccurate.

That book must be full of suggestions and things to think about regarding the true connection between the inhabitants of America and Europe.

Perhaps the spirit of the western Roman Empire never truly died but was carried on by its former colonies in Britain, France (Gaul), Spain and Portugal who all were involved in the exploration and colonisation of the New World. You could indeed put forward a good argument that the Popes of Rome effectively replaced the Roman Caesars. We should recall here that although the Roman legions abandoned their colonies, there place would be taken by legions of Roman monks such as St. Augustine of Canterbury who was sent by Pope Gregory the Great in 597 AD to bring Christianity to the English people (N.B. the British had already been evangelised by Celtic monks). These monks were, of course, steeped in Greek and Roman philosophy and were the great teachers of that age and would go on to create the first universities in Europe. It was inevitable, therefore, that Romano-Greek thinking would prevail in these places of learning and dominate western philosophy for centuries afterwards.

You could argue that this monk-led process would result in a subtle re-Romanisation of these peoples and a strong admiration for the achievements of the Romans. To illustrate this point, the greatest Anglo-Saxon King of England was Alfred the Great, who was for that age a very learned and pious monarch. In his childhood and youth he made several visits to Rome in the company of his father and brothers. There is no doubt that he would, have been in awe of what he saw in Rome and something of the grandeur and opulence of the former Roman capitol would have rubbed off on him.

There has even been a case made out by Italian journalist and author Ruggero Marino for Christopher Columbus having been the illegitimate son of the Pope Innocent VIII who backed his son's voyages of discovery, which, if true, puts a whole new twist on the discovery of America - see: Did pope fund Columbus' voyage to America?

As to Barry Fell's book America B.C.: Ancient Settlers in the New World, this is well worth reading. I have referred to it in several posts on the Forum in recent years. Although his arguments are not necessarily conclusive from an archaeological perspective, they are worthy of further investigation as it is hard to ignore the evidence found in stone inscriptions.

As one accredited American archaeologist David H. Kelley has said of his work in a 1990 essay:
​

"Fell's work [contains] major academic sins, the three worst being distortion of data, inadequate acknowledgment of predecessors, and lack of presentation of alternative views." He added that "We need to ask not only what Fell has done wrong in his epigraphy, but also where we have gone wrong as archaeologists in not recognizing such an extensive European presence in the New World."​

The problem was that Fell was by profession a professor of invertebrate zoology at the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology. However, he was also a self taught epigrapher, which is the study of inscriptions, or epigraphs, as writings. Quoting from his Wikipedia entry:
​

His interest in inscriptions began early in his career with a study of Polynesian petroglyphs published in 1940, but his most famous work came much later, starting in 1976 with his publication of America B.C., in which he proposed translations of inscriptions found on rock surfaces and artifacts in North and South America which he believed to be written in Old World scripts and languages. He followed up this work in 1980 with Saga America and in 1982 with Bronze Age America.

Fell's epigraphic work was not well received in academia. Critics of Fell's work routinely dismissed him as an amateur, pointing out his lack of formal training in ancient scripts and languages.​

Interestingly the C's have given support to Fell's views of a possible Celtic presence in North America in ancient times:
​

Q: Was Rock Lake also a necropolis?
A: No.
Q: Where did the people come from who built the structures in Rock Lake?
A: Have come from many places.
Q: (T) Is the "M" mound a natural formation?
A: No.
Q: (L) Who made it?
A: F 353535
Q: Is it worthwhile to keep studying these clues?
A: Yes.
Q: What group mined the copper in northern Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan, like in Isle Royale?
A: Aryans.
Q: What did they want the copper for?
A: Weapons.
Q: Wouldn't iron make better weapons?
A: Not in 4th density.

The C's often use the term Aryan and Celt interchangeably, so whether these Aryans were Celts as we know them today or their pre-cursors is open to debate. However, the mining of copper in the Great Lakes region is meant to date back to between 6,500 - 5,400 years ago, which is the early Bronze Age. Many historians/archaeologists attribute such mining operations to Native American Indians who were themselves descended from Atlanteans. However, you will note that the C's specifically refer to "Aryans" here, which rules out the Native American Indians.

It is noticeable that this period arises long before the age of the Old Kingdom in ancient Egypt. Barry Fell did not push the Celtic presence in North America much beyond 800 BC but this timeline suggests that Celtic contact with America long predated Fell's own estimates.

Quoting selectively from a short article by Gerard Leduc of Potton, Quebec entitled 'The exploitation of copper mines in the Great Lakes 6500 years ago' (See: file:///C:/Users/micha/Downloads/Leduc%20%208.5.2017.pdf):​

According to P. David Pompeani et al. (2015), the mining of native copper nuggets on Isle Royale, located on Lake Superior, took place 6500-5400 years ago. During that time, tons were removed from the island, and the past mining operations are attributed to Amerindians by North American archaeologists/historians. On the other hand, other researchers have repeatedly brought up the argument that the tons of native copper removed cannot be accounted for in the museums of the Continent as prehistoric artefacts of the copper cultures. They propose that it was most likely exported to meet the needs of the Bronze Age countries across the Atlantic. It is also estimated that over 10 000 people during one thousand years worked in these mines. All of them needed to be housed and fed in this northern climate. Pompeani et al. pointed out that mining ended around 5400 years ago when the area experienced a severe drought lasting thousands of years

Prehistoric North America is extraordinarily rich with ruins and archaeological artefacts of all kinds, and out there to be seen. However, the Establishment is blinded by prejudices against their antiquity.​

So, it is possible that the Megalithic ruins found in many northern US states may be much older than even Barry Fell believed. Gerard Leduc's proposal would take the timeline for contact between Western Europe and North America much further back in time than any mainline historians and archaeologists are prepared to accept. However, it makes sense from our point of view since if the Aryans/Celts had occupied the northern part of the Atlantean island empire, they would have retained a memory of North America which they took with them to the Eastern Mediterranean when they regrouped at Göbekli Tepe after the Deluge. Quoting Laura here:
​

This description basically says that the city of Atlantis was both in the middle of the island, as well as being near the sea. But, this problem disappears when we think that Plato was an initiate and was speaking in code about a literal, global civilization. The ancients often referred to a nation by its "chief city." In the upcoming excerpt, the C's make the comment that "Atlantis was merely a home base of an advanced civilisation of 3 races of humans occupying different sections of a huge Island empire, which, in itself, underwent 3 incarnations over a 100,000-year period as you would measure it. [...] [The Celts] took over the Northern section. "

Now, "different sections" of a "huge island empire," put together with the idea that this "empire" was global, leaves the possibility open for all of the America's to be part of this empire, and for North America to be the "northern section" that was almost utterly destroyed in a cataclysm. When we consider such things as the Badlands, the Grand canyon, the Carolina Bays, the nuclear evidence of the Great Lakes region, we come to the idea that something truly dreadful happened to North America and that it may have been a combination of war and cometary bombardment. There is also evidence that there was a massive shift of the earth crust raising the western coast of South America, and a similar raising of the Western part of North America could have been involved in that scenario. In short, much of what is Western America could have formerly been under the Pacific. And the raising of this Western portion most definitely could have sunk the Eastern seaboard of North America as the evidence of the Bimini wall, and other remains suggest.

In short, such a scenario would fit Plato's description of the destruction of Atlantis in a "single day and night."

What is more interesting, however, is the hyperdimensional manipulations that occur during such cataclysmic upheavals. We can even think of this as the moving of the "playing pieces" in the Secret Games of the Gods.

Well it is possible that the creation of the Grand Canyon and the massive shift of the Earth's crust raising the western coast of South America, and a similar raising of the Western part of North America, could have been caused by the close passage of the planet Mars at the time of the Deluge. An earlier poster mentioned how the immense Valles Marineris, the vast canyon system that runs along the Martian equator, could have been caused by a massive plasma discharge caused, for example, by two electrically charged planets approaching each other. However, the same methodology could also have been true of the Grand Canyon, albeit on a much smaller scale.
​

Q: (L) Was Noah's flood caused by the close passage of another celestial body?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Which body was that?

A: Martek.

Q: (L) Do we know this body in our solar system now?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) What name?

A: Mars.

Q: (L) Was Martek an inhabited planet at that time?

A: No.

Q: (L) Did it have water or other features?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) When it passed close to the earth did it, in fact, overload our planet with water we did not have prior to that time?

A: Yes.

As to battles between 4D STS forces and human forces, one place the C's hinted that such a conflict took place is Stonehenge in England:
​

Q: Was Stonehenge ever complete, with all the stones there? This author suggests that it was never completed because there are missing stones...

A: Of course.

Q: What happened to the stones that are missing? The books suggests that it was never finished because the architect must have died.

A: Nonsense. Multiple shocks registered throughout the ages.

Q: Was Stonehenge built in stages as this author suggests? Did it start out as a circular ditch, at the time of the so-called Aubrey holes?

A: No.

Q: Was it built all at once, complete?

A: Yes.

Q: The legend was that the god, Phoebus Apollo, danced at Stonehenge every nineteen years. What does this relate to ?

A: Symbolic. Tides, moon eclipses, that sort of thing. Think of Wiccans entubed on the information superhighway!

Q: I mean, there are stones just plain missing! Who could haul off such big pieces of rock?! . (A) You asked about these missing stones, and the answer was the multiple shocks registered. (L) Right. What about these multiple shocks. What, in particular?

A: Some were earthquakes; mini-cataclysmic in nature. Some were EM generated smashes, when terran forces clashed with outside "forces."

Q: Are you suggesting that some of these rocks were vaporized, as it were, by some sort of particle beam weaponry?

A: EM activity.

The C's did not say when these clashes between terran forces and outside "forces" occurred [you will note they put the word "forces" in quotation marks here, obviously for a reason]. The clashes could therefore have been in the same timeframe as the mining of copper in the Great Lakes region, which the C's said was for the making of weapons to fight 4th density forces. You will also note that the C's said Mars was not occupied at the time of this close approach, suggesting that the Atlantean colonies on Mars had either been evacuated by the time of the Deluge or they had already been destroyed by the close passage of Venus to Mars or by a nuclear war of annihilation thousands of years earlier (ref. Dr John Brandenburg's book Life and Death on Mars (2010)).​

 

[MJF]

To me ,,time lock ,, sounds like what in Dr Who would be called a fixed point in time meaning it can not be avoided or altered by any means not even Time travel

Sounds like you may be a Dr Who fan. I certainly was until it went all woke. Indeed, I actually watched the first episode when it aired on BBC Television in November 1963 (i.e., long before the BBC became the 'British Brainwashing Corporation' and the inventor of "fake news" as Donald Trump contends ). Fans may be in for a pleasant surprise soon as a professional film archive company, Film is Fabulous, may soon be announcing that a number of old episodes of the show that have been missing for over 60 years may have been discovered in a late film collector's cache of films (legal issues apparently are currently holding up the announcement).

During the early years of the show (which was created, inter alia, to be an educational programme for children by showing historical adventures rather as the 1960's show The Time Tunnel did in the USA) the Doctor always warned his travelling companions not to change history as it could have dire results for the timeline. Well from what we know, this proposition seems to have no fear for the time travelling Grey aliens:
​

Q: (L) Yes. Okay. How "long", and I put long in quotes, because we know, as you say, there is no time, but how long, as we measure it, have the Grays been interacting with our race? The Grays, not the Lizards, the Grays, the cybergenetic probes?

A: No.

Q: (L) What do you mean, "No"?

A: Time travellers, therefore, "Time is ongoing."

Q: (L) Okay, recently I read a couple of books Jan gave me, "Knight in Shining Armor" and "Replay". Both of these books described time travel.

A: No, not finished with answer. Do you understand the gravity of last response?

Q: (L) They are time travellers, they can move forward and backward in time, they can play games with our heads... (T) They can set up the past to create a future they want. (D) They can organize things so that they can create the energy that they need... (L) They can also make things look good, make them feel good, make them seem good, they can make you have an idea one minute, and then the next minute, create some sort of situation that confirms that idea...

A: When you asked how long, of course it is totally unlimited, is it not?

Q: (L) That's not good. If they were to move back through space time and alter an event in our past, would that alteration in the past instantaneously alter our present as well?

A: Has over and over and over.

Q: (D) So they do it over and over and over, constantly? (L) So, at each...

A: You just are not yet aware and have no idea of the ramifications!!!​

I guess they wont be travelling with Dr Who any time soon then. Hmmm .. I wonder if we could persuade them to go back in time though and change the result of the Australia v England First Test at Perth the other week. That would certainly be a good move from an English perspective .

In a previous post concerning the Philadelphia Experiment, I mentioned that I would follow up on the issue of "Time Locks". I have recently read a new book by David Hatcher Childress (of Ancient Aliens fame) called Project Rainbow and the Philadelphia Experiment. His book looks at the premise whether at the outset the experiment was devised by the scientists, but not necessarily the unwitting US Navy, to be a teleportation experiment - hence the title 'Project Rainbow', which may have been intended to tie in with the Wizard of Oz movie released in 1939 and the hit song Somewhere Over the Rainbow, that was still quite contemporary in 1943.

I intend to do a longer summary of the book for the Alton Towers thread but I will concentrate on the topic of time locks for the present.

The Philadelphia Experiment was supposedly based on Albert Einstein's unified field theory of gravity and electricity. Einstein published his theory in a Prussian scientific journal in Germany between 1925-27, but he had not tried or even fully developed his theory. However, the C's beg to differ with this last statement:​

Session 7 June 1997:
Q: Ark did some reading on the Einstein thing, the letters to Kaluza, and there did not seem to be anything that E did in the period mentioned that would make one tend to think that there was a UFT from him in that time. But, Kaluza DID have an interesting idea about a 5 dimensional cylinder UFT which Einstein thought was quite startling. Yet, it seems that Einstein somewhat delayed Kaluza's presentation. What struck me was the word 'cylinder' which reminded me of the earlier session where I asked if the Germans had developed a time machine and you said 'yes,' and that it was in Antarctica, and that 'they' were 'exploring the loop of the cylinder.' You said that the loop of the cylinder was a 4th thru 6th density profile. Could you give me some elaboration on this cylinder, the loop of the cylinder, and whether it was Kaluza who did the UFT and not Einstein?
A: Cylinder is really a double loop, is it not? And meditate if you will on the true meaning of this!

Q: Is it true that Kaluza had the theory and Einstein didn't?

A: Maybe it is that Einstein first hypothesized, and others were then commissioned for the purpose of completion in order to lead to application.

It is a curious coincidence that this same session touched on teleportation when discussing the transportation of the statue of the Virgin of Candelaria to Tenerife and the properties of iron:​

A: What about iron as an element?

Q: Okay, let's see: {consults dictionary} Iron –derived from early Celt 'iserno,' via Illyrian 'eisarno' from the IndoEuropean base 'eis,' which means to 'move vigorously; strong, holy.' It is a white, malleable, ductile, metallic chemical element that can be readily magnetized, rusts rapidly in moist or salty air, and is vital to plant and animal life; it is the most common and important of all metals, and its alloys, as steel, are extensively used. Symbol: Fe; atomic weight:55.847; atomic number: 26; specific gravity: 7.86; melting point: 1535 degrees Centigrade; boiling point 3,000 degrees C. The electron shells are thus: 2,14,8,2. Iron is an element of blood, hemoglobin, and is easily magnetized... there is some new work about iron and magnetite in the brains of people who are psychic or have 'abduction' experiences... is it the magnetism?

A: Yes....

Q: Is it something that holds one more firmly in 3rd density, and the elimination of it enables one to switch densities... or...

A: Tis magnetite that acts as a conduit, and perhaps, just perhaps, allows for transference back and forth at will?!?

It is worth noting here that the superstructure of the USS Eldridge was made of steel that is a highly refined form of iron. Furthermore, Irish Celts are renowned for having very high levels of iron in their blood leading to a condition known as Hemochromatosis or the “Celtic Curse”. The disease is especially prevalent among the Irish and other Celtic people. One in 400 people in Europe has the chance to develop the condition, whereas in Ireland the chances of getting it are much higher. As many as one in 83 Irish people are predisposed to iron overload while one in five is a carrier of the gene. Well, I guess that's what comes from drinking too much Guinness .​

And then there were the C's comments in the Session dated 17 August 2000:

Q: (A) Okay. UFT. This is one of these things that I don't know what it is good for, because the Wave will erase everything and make everything new. Yet, it is in me, so let me ask. I don't know what it is good for, but I want to do it. Einstein was working on his UFT for like 30 years. Maybe more. He was changing his methods. At some point, did he realize that he found a solution? During all these thirty years, was there a point where he came upon the right solution?

A: Yes, but sadly, his solution for UFT largely erased TOR. [Theory of Relativity]

Q: (A) Once he found this solution, did he reject it because it erased TOR?

A: No. His progenitors sealed it, in order to keep intact the status quo.

Q: (L) His progenitors? Isn't that your parents?

A: Other definitions apply. [A source from which something develops.]

Q: (A) Can we have an idea of which year Einstein found the solution that erases TOR?

A: Sure, it was 1938.

Q: (A) According to what I know, between 35 and 38 there was a period in which Einstein published nothing. In 38, he published a paper with Bergman which was a revival of Kaluza Klein theory. That was exactly 1938. So, I guess that was the paper that was close.

A: Can you obtain a copy?

Q: (A) Yes, I have a copy.

A: Good!!! Clues abound within.

Q: (A) What I do not understand is why, a few years later, he completely abandoned that and started working very hard on a completely different solution. If he knew...

A: Was under control.

Q: (A) Can you control somebody and make him spend years.... Oh! Mind control! They got him! [MJF: Was he "Greenbaumed"?]

A: Why do you think he emigrated to the United States in the first place?

Q: (A) Well, that is not a surprise. He was a Nobel Prize winner and America was getting together every possible Nobel Prize winner, and also there was the persecution of the Jews, so it was natural.

A: More to it than that. What about Freud?

Q: (L) I guess they didn't want Freud! He didn't know anything about UFT! (A) Now, aparently Von Neumann was also involved in application of UFT. But Von Neumann was, as far as we know, doing a completely different kind of mathematics. He didn't even really know geometry, differential geometry. He was doing completely different things. So how come the UFT that was discovered by Einstein, involved Von Neumann. What did Von Neumann contribute to this project?

A: Von Neumann was one of three overseers at Princeton with level 7 security clearance, and a clear budget request permittance.

Q: (L) My question is, about Von Neumann, as I understand it, Von Neumann was supposed to have been involved with the creation of a time machine, right?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Did he succeed in such a project?

A: Yes.

Apart from John Von Neumann there may have been another mathematician involved in helping to flesh out the UFT, an American called Henry Levenson, a professor of mathematics at the University of Wisconsin in the 1930's. Levenson said that time is concentrated around a central field and works with the codes by which all existence is and will take place, creating a "Time Lock". Levenson added that “Everything living is inside the codes". All material existence on Earth is according to the world clock or time. The Earth is adjusted according to the Sundial, and the Sun is according to the Galactic Time. If the time lock is broken by a high and powerful energy field, various kinds of time and space imbalances will result until time corrects itself and finds its balance. One could argue that this situation occurred for some of the sailors onboard the USS Eldridge who went insane after being trapped in zero time for what to them was millions of years.

Levenson specialised in time studies and apparently developed a time variant equation. Supposedly, he co-authored two books and wrote one himself. However, none of these books are available, which might in itself arouse suspicions unless they were deliberately being kept under lock and key rather like the C's suggested some of James Clerk Maxwell's original work is.

Now the problem here is that the only reference to Professor Henry Levenson's work seems to derive from public statements made by a certain former US sailor called Al Bielek, who the C's indicated was not a completely reliable source for information on the Philadelphia Experiment:
​

Session 7 October 1994:
​

Q: (L) Is Al Bielek a phony?

A: Semi.

Q: (L) Did he work on the Philadelphia project?

A: No.

Q: (L) Was he brainwashed to have fake outrageous memories?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is he lying deliberately?

A: Instructed by government for disinformation dissemination.

This is what Laura said about Al Bielek:
​

Al Bielek is, apparently, a convincing speaker in the eyes of some people. He presents a wide range of popular references during his talks and weaves quite a tale in the telling. However, the information available prior to the 1983 movie, "The Philadelphia Experiment" did not concern the prospect of time transport. The stated focus of the "Philadelphia Experiment" project was to "achieve radar invisibility". Mr. Bielek states that his "memories began coming back AFTER seeing the movie in 1988."​

Many people get the impression that he incorporates new topics into his storyline as fast as he hears them, claiming that his "memory suddenly came back on that." One major flaw in his story is the statement that Nikola Tesla was in association with and in charge of the Philadelphia project. This is highly incredible since the experiment supposedly occurred in July, 1943 and Tesla died on January 7, 1943 in New York City. Dr. Von Neumann (of computer fame) was supposedly involved in the "Philadelphia Experiment" with Tesla, Einstein and LeBon. Bielek says he is recorded to have died in 1953 or 1957.

In Phoenix, 1986, Bielek's memories recalled a site in Montauk which, according to Bielek, "might be where Von Neumann currently resides in obscurity". Another major discrepancy, records indicate the original manned experiment occurred on October 28, 1943, NOT the 12th of August, 1943. Despite the irregularities, there were some interesting comments made in regard to time. The two most outstanding things about the public lecture was the showing of a slide purported to be a "Zero Time Reference Generator" which looks strangely similar to an old Army field kitchen refrigeration unit, according to Chuck Henderson's military experience. No technical details were given or offered. This device was purported to be the oscillator which drove the coils of the experiment. Mr. Bielek claimed that the unit shown was used to synchronize two separate signals (one for each coil).

The literature of the "Philadelphia Experiment" is replete with descriptions of the technology. If you get the chance to hear Mr. Bielek, it is highly recommended if only for entertainment. However, if you want usable data, good luck!

Laura retuned to the subject of Al Bielek in a later session:
​

Session 31 December 1994:

Q: (L) Susanne K. talked to me about Al Bielek. Previously you had said that Al was an agent of the government disseminating disinformation for one thing, number two: that he knew that he was an agent of the government; there's a little confusion about his participation in the Philadelphia Project; I found a reference to him in an Ivan Sanderson book published some time ago. Susanne says that this poor guy just lives from hand to mouth, and she finds it hard to believe that he is an agent of the government since he lives such a poverty-stricken existence. Could you comment, please, on Al Bielek and his activities. (T) Is Al an agent for the government?

A: Al Bielek is many faceted. Poverty is subjective.

Q: (L) Is he an agent for the government. (T) They say he is many faceted.

A: Yes. But he is involved in activities.

Q: (T) In one session you talked about Al Bielek you indicated he was, um, not actually involved in the Philadelphia Experiment, that he was a technician on shore, and that he is now feeding out information that is provided to him, or that he had knowledge above and beyond his involvement with the experiment...

A: Close.

Q: (T) Okay, if he is working partly with the government and then partly for his own purposes, what is it that he expects to get out of this?

A: Exposure.

Q: (T) What does he want from the exposure?

A: He wants people to know.

Q: (L) Is it possible that he is giving out some true information along with disinformation, so that the information itself can be gotten out, could it be that his intentions might be...

A: Confused thought pattern.

Q: (L) Is that my thoughts or Al's thoughts?

A: Bingo! Laura's.

Q: (T) Does Al know that he is giving out false information... does he know that the information the government is giving him is false?

A: He is so involved you would not believe.

Q: (T) He is involved with the government cover-up?

A: With all of it. He knows that what he is saying is false but he has no choice because he is entangled in the web. They are using him.

So, was Professor Henry Levenson and his time variant equation just a figment of Bielek's rather vivid imagination or, as is the case with most disinformation agents, was their a grain of truth in what he said on this particular matter? Perhaps someone with a bit of time on their hands can do a deep dive into Henry Levenson to see whether he really existed and, if so, whether he did any work on time studies. Since the term "Time Lock" is one the C's themselves have used, I am minded to think there may still be something in the Levenson story.

Coming back to the subject of the Grey aliens rewriting history, if you buy into the concept that we live in a universe that is really a complex digital computer program, where time does not really exist, then it might suggest that the STS aliens by changing timelines have some capacity to hack in and rewrite the program. If time locks really do exist, this is where the concept might become critical. The idea of program changes and program rewriters got mentioned in the following exchange with the C's
​

Q: Our little egroup discussion list is growing. Everyone is talking about the Wave: what does it mean, what is it, when is it coming, how are we going to be able to tell, and so on. I have been collecting the material and getting it in shape. I have been learning a lot as I go along as well. It isn't finished, but as I go along, I do have some questions. We would like to have a little bit of a clue about the progress of the wave. I would also like to know if this Wave is sort of like the recompiling of a computer program, with the universe as the program? What is the progress and is it going to recompile the program of our universe?

A: So many questions rolled up into one. But one way it might go is that all of a sudden, everything that ever was is new, everything that IS is new, and everything that will be is new. Programs change, oh we suppose, what an awesome event indeed! [MJF: this sounds like a complete reboot]

Q: Is it important for the information about the potential making new of everything and the awareness of the state of the planet as it is now, or the state of the universe, be shared and spread so that as many people as possible will be aware at the point of the arrival of the wave so that it makes it more likely that beneficial changes will occur, that the universe will change in a positive way? Or is that simply not even important. It will change the way it is going to change no matter what anybody does?

A: Closer to 2nd criterion.

Q: In other words, we are doing what we are doing, and it doesn't really matter what we are doing. The Wave will happen, everything will change, become new, and that's that?

A: What matters most is what others are doing, have done and will do.

Q: Who are these others that it matters most what they have done, are doing and will do?

A: Program rewriters, i.e. you and us in the future.

Q: So, what we have done, what we are doing, what we will do - WE - is important? I think that I missed something. I thought you said that what we were doing simply didn't matter.

A: You are/will be others.

Recall here that Henry Levenson was supposed to have said that “Everything living is inside the codes", which if we do live in a digital computer simulation or program would mean that he was correct. If Levenson (assuming here he actually existed) worked with other mathematicians to flesh out Einstein's UFT, could they have stumbled upon the fact that we are part of a computer program long before it was hypothesised in more recent times that the material universe might be just a computer-like code, indicating that gravity might be a by-product of this informational law.

If the C's are right, there is hope though since it would seem that the Greys may not be the only ones who have the capacity to rewrite the program.​