mrtn
Dagobah Resident
I think the Q: and A: is wrong.
Session 10 December 1994
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
gnosisxsophia
Jedi Council Member
Hi Team,
Just wondering if someone could advise whether the Orion literature statement references the Ra material please?
As always any feedback much appreciated.
Cheers
J
Jo Bugman
Jedi
Reminds me of Seneca from Letters from a Stoic "...nothing, however outstanding and however helpful, will ever give me any pleasure if the knowledge is to be for my benefit alone. If wisdom were offered me on the one condition that I should keep it shut away and not divulge it to anyone, I should reject it. There is no enjoying the possession of anything valuable unless one has someone to share it with."
Problem is I rarely get into situations were I can discuss these topics, but on the rare occasion I do I'm often surprised to see that most people are willing and have an opinion on them. Thanks for this.
freigeist2.0
Padawan Learner
Always interesting. You slowly begin to get a different view of our planet and time. Thanks to Frank, Laura, Terry, Jan and Rodann for this session.
@gnosisxsophia,
I think it is reasonable to consider "Orion literature" to be a possible reference to the Ra Material unless Laura had other references that could fall under that category. The Ra Material does describe the Orions in quite some detail.
At least the Cs have said they are the source for the Ra Material.
Session 23 October 1994:
Laura includes a note in a July 1994 session how the Ra Material came to the groups' attention.
Session 16 July 1994:
gnosisxsophia
Jedi Council Member
Thanks goyacobol,
Yeah, if nothing else it did seem to tie in spatially?
The Ra material and the Cassiopaeans
Conozco el material de Ra y considero que tiene ciertas "perlas" que es beneficioso tener en consideración. Elkings estaba investigando en un "terreno" peligroso. Tenía una mente brillante pero tuvo un desenlace funesto, pero la experiencia de ese grupo marca una referencia, es una muestra de...
cassiopaea.org
Interesting isn't it, the first published C session does seem to reflect 'Ra' imo?
Coincidentally echoing 'their' Session One also - unedited;
Don't suppose you are acquainted with the 'Arcturus' channel mentioned in the session by chance?
All seems to be rubbish that I can find...
@gnosisxsophia,
Well, I wasn't acquainted with the Arcturus channel but I did some searching and found a reference in Bibliotecapleyades on The Archurians.
One of the sources was Norma Milanovich who wrote a bookcalled We, the Arcturians.
I found a video interview with her on YouTube which seems similar to the Cs sessions only she channeled by typing on a typewriter. It seems like it may have some interesting parallels with what the Cs have said. She does not seem to promote a "Love and Light" message but that we need to be aware of the duality of 3D existence and see the negative with the positive.
Although I think the main idea is that the Cs are using these celestial locators to indicate their path to arrive here I think this woman's book is probably where Laura may have gotten the reference to questions to the Cs.
Here are some references to the "Arcturians" in the sessions:
Session 10 December 1994:
It appears the book on the Arcturians does give totally accurate information according to the Cs.
Session 4 March 1995:
It seems much of other channeled work has "confused concepts" mixed into it.
Session 7 October 1995:
It is interesting to find some of the details so hopefully it will help us put things into perspective. Glad you asked the question.
gnosisxsophia
Jedi Council Member
gnosisxsophia
Jedi Council Member
Meant to add that the C's 'Stars as transition points' seemed apt after checking out the Bibliotecapleyades link 
@gnosisxsophia, maybe it just depends on how big the spiral is. It still may be a valid concept.Well that blows my nice orderly spiral theory out the window
OutSky
Jedi
It is peculiar, the Arcturians are so accentuated through the C’s and Laura’s perceptive enquiries, and so the mentioned book —We, the Arcturians by Norma Milanovich. I would suggest to the admins or anyone else to copy or move these regarding posts here to the thread Arcturians. It is a spinal subject to realize vast understanding.
Anyway, for what I’ve read of that book, its New Age language is very boring and makes to me want to drop it; however, as usual, we need to learn to be patient, humble and attentive to the clues. Yes, I saw there revealing ones.
Also, the C’s recommend the Cayce material, and the above linked Cayce material is just awesome. Very appreciated.
Anyway, for what I’ve read of that book, its New Age language is very boring and makes to me want to drop it; however, as usual, we need to learn to be patient, humble and attentive to the clues. Yes, I saw there revealing ones.
Meant to add that the C's 'Stars as transition points' seemed apt after checking out the Bibliotecapleyades link
Also, the C’s recommend the Cayce material, and the above linked Cayce material is just awesome. Very appreciated.
lilies
The Living Force
I took Japan's size as base: 145,936 sq mi. Since 145,936 x 10 = 1,459,360, about the same number, I went into photoshop and simply copied the entirety of Japan, complete with its "head" = Sapporo Island, ten times over. Then shaved off those tiny chunky areas to reduce Japan somewhat less than 10x its size.
C's said there were crystals that destroyed Atlantis for good for a third time and those crystals are still active in Bermuda:
Also C's said Atlantis broke up during its first and second destruction via cataclysms.
On Wikipedia here: Atlantis' approx location is given as west off Portugal / Spain. So I simply broke up the now estimated accurate land size of Atlantis into three parts and have drawn the Easternward part up a little, to cover the large part of the area given on above Wikipedia image.
Also I made sure that the Bermuda Triangle area is covered nicely, well within Atlantis: shown in bright orange. As some kind of "Crystal HQ" power central, main base etc..[sic]
Finally I took Japan's longest river as example and drawn in by hand some rivers and lakes. Thus the roughly guessed landmass formation of the Atlantean continent was born!
Last edited:
lilies
The Living Force
Atlantis v2.0:
Took the oceanographic map of Russian Yandex, where it shows water depth. Shallow water I presumed sunken Atlantis parts. The 'Lost Continent's location is roughly same. Kept the approx. accurate land size. But re-distributed all the reported land area of 1,354,000 square miles to those parts of the North Atlantic ocean that shows shallow water.
Thus Atlantis v2.0 was born. All known geographical locations remain intact, as you can see.
I think it shows its final state: the totally broken up and destroyed Atlantis area, as how it was sunk in three acts / cycles.
To finalize, I used some clairvoyance to:
1. query & pull in and re-distribute some land areas shown with red-brown into Yandex's shallow water map areas.
2. Positioned the "Great Atlantean Lake", shaped like a T at North-East
3. Made sure the "Large Crystal Research Facility" in the South-Western Bay Area is visible with a red-white X.
My 2cents.
Took the oceanographic map of Russian Yandex, where it shows water depth. Shallow water I presumed sunken Atlantis parts. The 'Lost Continent's location is roughly same. Kept the approx. accurate land size. But re-distributed all the reported land area of 1,354,000 square miles to those parts of the North Atlantic ocean that shows shallow water.
Thus Atlantis v2.0 was born. All known geographical locations remain intact, as you can see.
I think it shows its final state: the totally broken up and destroyed Atlantis area, as how it was sunk in three acts / cycles.
To finalize, I used some clairvoyance to:
1. query & pull in and re-distribute some land areas shown with red-brown into Yandex's shallow water map areas.
2. Positioned the "Great Atlantean Lake", shaped like a T at North-East
3. Made sure the "Large Crystal Research Facility" in the South-Western Bay Area is visible with a red-white X.
My 2cents.
Last edited:
