Session 13 June 2015

[goyacobol]

I found it hard to accept the possibility that "the internet won't be around much longer"; it has quite simply become much too important to our modern life. If the internet were to shut down, the world-wide economy would come to an instantaneous halt. Needless to say, this would be bad for business... They simply wouldn't stand for that.

How I have to interpret this is that the internet will not be around much longer as the "free exchange of ideas" medium it is today, and censorship will be widely implemented and enforced. It will probably occur as part of the "we are protecting you from terrorists" meme.

But unless you are referring to a world-wide literal return to the stone age, the idea that the internet will simply cease to function is not credible.

osit

I think that's what the C's implied when they spoke about the 'cleansing,' which would bring down the grid and internet along with it.

I agree, Don Genaro. And rs, I think you make good observations but it is the seriousness of the possibility of the grid going down that many or most are not even considering. The tendency to have normalcy bias is running rampant these days.

 

[will01]

Thanks for the new session :).

Quote

Are sinkholes being caused by underworld nuclear wars?


A: No. Sigh...

Still laughing from this one.

I used to listen to music on the radio for years while driving tractors, but stopped after reading the session that mentioned too much was bad news. Now, after trying several times, I find the music so annoying the radio stays turned off. Some songs on the radio are OK, but most are pure garbage.

 

[unkl brws]

Thanks for sharing another great session! :)

 

[Foxx]

Thanks for sharing the session!

The comments about Pope Francis are quite interesting as I was also confused by his actions as of late (recognizing Palestine, giving the medal to Putin, etc) as they did seem like genuine acts of goodwill, though I don't consider anything coming out of the Catholic church to be trustworthy so I was wondering if there were nefarious plans behind them. It's interesting that the psychopaths would put someone with a reasonably functioning conscience into such a visible position--it makes me wonder if that's a plan that will backfire on them, especially if the pope is aware of what they're up to.

The info about music was really interesting too--sometimes I feel kind of gross being out somewhere and hearing current music being played in a store or blasted from some person's car or whatever. Mind programming aside, it's just so awful that I can't believe that anyone would actually like it. Then again, it fits in perfectly with where most amerikans are at, these days; the fruits of a collapsing empire with terminal cancer.

I hope you feel better soon Laura

 

[Puma]

March 18, 1995


Q: (L) What causes some planes, people and ships to disappear in the Bermuda Triangle. Where do they go and what happens to them?

A: Already covered this.

Q: (S) Yeah, the Atlantean pyramid.

A: Yes. EM waves caused by same.

Q: (L) Where do they go when they disappear?

A: Of course some are just crashes and sinkings, but when accompanied by unusual phenomena, it is because of irregular anomalies.

Q: (L) Where do they go? (T) They don't go anywhere, they go to the bottom. (S) Fifth density.

A: To parallel reality.

[...]

Q: (L) Is there any possibility that they could fly out of this place that they are stuck in and back into our reality?

A: Absolutely, remember, the wave is approaching, and as it gets "nearer", more and more unusual events take place, witness crop circles, for example.

Q: (L) Is there anything anyone can do to release persons stuck in these parallel realities and bring them back into the reality of origin?

A: Yes, but the technology is a closely guarded secret.

Q: (L) Do you know the secret?

A: Yes, but you do too!

Q: (L) I know the secret too?...

A: Philadelphia Experiment.

[...]

Q: (L) Since you mentioned the Philadelphia Experiment, could you tell us in specific detail, how this was done? What kind of machines were used and how can we build one? {General uproar and laughter}

A: Do you intend to sit here for a day or two?

Q: (J) In other words, it would take a day or two to give us the information? (T) Yeah, we got the time. Get some paper and a pencil. (L) We will save that for another time. (T) Let's start with a diagram and send it to Thor.

A: In short, build an EM generator

[...]

It seems to me that the EM generator is a LHC and I wonder if this secret technology is being used at CERN to create a parallel reality or pocket universes... like that of the Philadelphia Experiment.

 

[BHelmet]

Session Date: June 13th 2015

..........Furthermore, it could be argued that what and who we like or dislike may even be reflective of our state of development, awareness and being.

(L) Does a person's taste in music reflect their state of awareness, development, and being?

A: Yes, more or less, though there is a range of preferences at various "levels".

Q: (L) Okay, next question:

Does a person's taste in music reflect their personal aim in life?

A: It can be strongly affected if only subconsciously.

Q: (L) Okay:

What is more important in determining a song’s value: the lyrics or the sound/mood/feeling?

A: The sound opens the door for the lyrics to enter for good or ill.

Q: (L) Does that mean that a song that sounds really horrible and mechanical and like somebody just beating on a pot or clanging on the hood of their car or something, and if that's the kind of music the person likes, but it also has good lyrics, then that's okay?

A: Not exactly. The sound can open gates at - or of - different levels and parts of the internal makeup.

Q: (L) Okay, next forum question:

Is the NSA using musical tastes and downloads to track and identify certain 'types'?

A: Of course

snip.........

A: The 70's were the time of development of such concepts and technologies. The 80's were the period when implementation became more widespread. At present 90 percent of broadcast music has corrupting elements.

Q: (Pierre) So we have to listen to old music. Music from before the 70's. Or classical music.

(L) Obviously we need to be paying much closer attention to our musical tastes, and analyzing what it is about songs that we like. And obviously, we need to pay a lot more attention to what we listen to in the background. But that means I'm safe since I only listen to old classic rock like Bob Seger, whose music is the best! [laughter]

A general comment on the 'levels' aspect to try to clarify: so, it seems

1. Different types of music and sounds can open up doorways or pathways into various levels or places of a persons psyche, (Ha, I am picturing an advent calendar) or into different areas or subjects of concern and LESSONS; maybe different chakras, if you will. (and then the topics or issues within those chakras)
AND
2. Depending on a persons level of development, different songs are going to resonate. In other words, if we use the paradigm that Mouravieff uses: Exoteric and Mesoteric and Esoteric - a beginner on the STS path might really like AC/DC, which is on that obvious, in-your-face, level and this would be appropriate for where their head is at. But then when that person advances they might 'graduate' to, I dunno, let's say Metallica, and so on. Same for STO striving people. You just have different levels of depth and intricacy and subtlety. It takes time and study to appreciate the finer details. And to let go of our sacred cows that have so hooked our emotions for years.

3. Personally, i don't idolize any one period of recent music history. I think during the 70's there was more general innocent unconsciousness, and haphazardness, whereas today there is this very controlled deception and programming going on. But, just because something was written in the 70's does not mean it gets an automatic hall pass. Muskrat Love, anyone? (my apologies for bringing that back to to the consciousness of those who remember it) And just because a performer did a few good STO oriented songs does not mean their entire catalogue is from on high. And there might be somebody with only one decent song, but it might be a great one. Picture a buffet table analogy or a box of chocolates. Don't load your plate up with a big pile of something that looks good before you sample it. You have to pick and choose with discernment and care - and if you bite a bad one (for me it would be a dark chocolate with a goopy cherry filling!), spit it out! (into a napkin, of course : )

 

[liam1310]

interesting stuff thanks to all involved for the session

 

[AnotherIdiot]

Thank you for another interesting session.

Ceressiaea of Cassiopaea. Is the name subtly alluding to the much in the news planet Ceres?

 

[rylek]

Thank you guys for another session! :)

 

[Rose7]

Thank you Laura and crew for a great session! I have been off the music of today for several years now, especially the pop music that is being put out; which to me is not even music at all. I can go on and on about why I don't like it, but I'm sure a lot of you don't need me to explain why! I rarely listen to the radio anymore and if I do, it is usually a classical music station. I agree it would be an interesting question for the C's about music videos; I've always wondered why they have such blatant "illuminati" symbolism; why is it so out there and for all to see. I also have always had a good feeling about Pope Francis and I'm happy to learn that he actually does have a conscience. Feel better Laura! :)

 

[sitting]

(L) So, what do you have to say about Putin?

A: He has a team of good and smart helpers.

This is not the first time they've highlighted the importance of Putin's advisers. Good and smart.

And it's in stark contrast to "helpers" that have surrounded American presidents. Going back to guys like "Colonel" House, Bernie Baruch, up to recent dudes like Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod. I think even in the Kennedy era, there was someone inserted into his inner circle, a hidden set of eyes & ears ... back to the Illuminati. My wild guess (and it's only a guess) is it was Frank Mankiewicz.

Surrounded by these types, American presidents basically can't even blow their noses without permission. And a few (Woodrow Wilson) have expressed deep regret just before they died. Tortured souls.

I believe Putin's advisers honestly work for the greater benefit of the people (perhaps this is the real meaning of good in "good and smart".) American advisors OTOH are there to manipulate and control--for the benefit of the few. On top of which stands the 4th D STS agenda.

FWIW.

PS
Thank you much for the session.

 

[luc]

(L) So, what do you have to say about Putin?

A: He has a team of good and smart helpers.

This is not the first time they've highlighted the importance of Putin's advisers. Good and smart.

And it's in stark contrast to "helpers" that have surrounded American presidents. Going back to guys like "Colonel" House, Bernie Baruch, up to recent dudes like Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod. I think even in the Kennedy era, there was someone inserted into his inner circle, a hidden set of eyes & ears ... back to the Illuminati. My wild guess (and it's only a guess) is it was Frank Mankiewicz.

Surrounded by these types, American presidents basically can't even blow their noses without permission. And a few (Woodrow Wilson) have expressed deep regret just before they died. Tortured souls.

I believe Putin's advisers honestly work for the greater benefit of the people (perhaps this is the real meaning of good in "good and smart".) American advisors OTOH are there to manipulate and control--for the benefit of the few. On top of which stands the 4th D STS agenda.

FWIW.

PS
Thank you much for the session.

Yes, I wondered about this before as well. I imagine that it's kind of a mutual influence between Putin and his team - Putin as a strong, good and smart leader will attract good and smart people who are willing to work extremely hard for what they see as a right cause. And maybe Putin's strength gives them motivation, inspiration and protection, maybe they would lack the courage to do what they do if it wasn't for Putin. I remember from a Putin documentary that he asks a lot from his team and that he keeps only those who show they are willing to work hard for the common cause - something not very attractive to psychopaths. That way, Putin has a dedicated team that works out his policies and strategies. Maybe Putin and team also are engaged in some serious networking so that they can come up with creative solutions as a team, being more than the sum of individual experts. Hardly what happens in the West, to be sure.

To put it another way: In the West, those guys at the top work only for themselves, and even those who are not psychopaths/have a conscience realize sooner or later that it's pointless to try to do something good in that environment and are facing the choice either to "play the game" and maybe profit from it, or face personal attacks, or leave in disgust. In Putin's Russia, it's the opposite: The guys at the top work hard for the common good, and a psychopath will realize soon that he/she can't get away with lazily enjoying his/her position while getting rich on people's backs, so they might not make it into Putin's inner circle, at least not easily. FWIW

 

[SeekinTruth]

Yeah, those are good points about Putin's team, luc and sitting. We can see the quality difference between Foreign Minister Lavrov and his Western counterparts, it's as great as Putin and all the heads of state of the Empire and its vassals.

 

[Don Diego]

Thank you all very much for this session.
What a relief/surprise about this pope...! ;)

 

[Yas]

Session Date: June 13th 2015

..........Furthermore, it could be argued that what and who we like or dislike may even be reflective of our state of development, awareness and being.

(L) Does a person's taste in music reflect their state of awareness, development, and being?

A: Yes, more or less, though there is a range of preferences at various "levels".

Q: (L) Okay, next question:

Does a person's taste in music reflect their personal aim in life?

A: It can be strongly affected if only subconsciously.

Q: (L) Okay:

What is more important in determining a song’s value: the lyrics or the sound/mood/feeling?

A: The sound opens the door for the lyrics to enter for good or ill.

Q: (L) Does that mean that a song that sounds really horrible and mechanical and like somebody just beating on a pot or clanging on the hood of their car or something, and if that's the kind of music the person likes, but it also has good lyrics, then that's okay?

A: Not exactly. The sound can open gates at - or of - different levels and parts of the internal makeup.

Q: (L) Okay, next forum question:

Is the NSA using musical tastes and downloads to track and identify certain 'types'?

A: Of course

snip.........

A: The 70's were the time of development of such concepts and technologies. The 80's were the period when implementation became more widespread. At present 90 percent of broadcast music has corrupting elements.

Q: (Pierre) So we have to listen to old music. Music from before the 70's. Or classical music.

(L) Obviously we need to be paying much closer attention to our musical tastes, and analyzing what it is about songs that we like. And obviously, we need to pay a lot more attention to what we listen to in the background. But that means I'm safe since I only listen to old classic rock like Bob Seger, whose music is the best! [laughter]

A general comment on the 'levels' aspect to try to clarify: so, it seems

1. Different types of music and sounds can open up doorways or pathways into various levels or places of a persons psyche, (Ha, I am picturing an advent calendar) or into different areas or subjects of concern and LESSONS; maybe different chakras, if you will. (and then the topics or issues within those chakras)
AND
2. Depending on a persons level of development, different songs are going to resonate. In other words, if we use the paradigm that Mouravieff uses: Exoteric and Mesoteric and Esoteric - a beginner on the STS path might really like AC/DC, which is on that obvious, in-your-face, level and this would be appropriate for where their head is at. But then when that person advances they might 'graduate' to, I dunno, let's say Metallica, and so on. Same for STO striving people. You just have different levels of depth and intricacy and subtlety. It takes time and study to appreciate the finer details. And to let go of our sacred cows that have so hooked our emotions for years.

3. Personally, i don't idolize any one period of recent music history. I think during the 70's there was more general innocent unconsciousness, and haphazardness, whereas today there is this very controlled deception and programming going on. But, just because something was written in the 70's does not mean it gets an automatic hall pass. Muskrat Love, anyone? (my apologies for bringing that back to to the consciousness of those who remember it) And just because a performer did a few good STO oriented songs does not mean their entire catalogue is from on high. And there might be somebody with only one decent song, but it might be a great one. Picture a buffet table analogy or a box of chocolates. Don't load your plate up with a big pile of something that looks good before you sample it. You have to pick and choose with discernment and care - and if you bite a bad one (for me it would be a dark chocolate with a goopy cherry filling!), spit it out! (into a napkin, of course : )

I think that, in order to understand the subject of consciousness related to music we can think of multilevelness as described by Dabrowski, where there can be elements of of "higher" levels in a "lower" level in different periods of development. I guess this would be more mixed up when a person is in what he calls spontaneous disintegration, and a cleansing starts when will comes into play, so the mixture starts getting finer and finer, so to say. Fwiw...

The info about the Pope was surprising, as I was very skeptical about him, thinking he's just giving lip service.

Yes, it was a surprise for me too... Well, it was actually a bit confusing for me and I didn't know what to think about him. Yet, even if he has the intention to do some good, it would a appear that he's not the kind of person that would go against the PTB so easily... and maybe that's an intelligent thing to do considering the risk. But well... I guess we'll wait and see how things develop in the Vatican.

BTW... the pope is coming to visit Paraguay next month, I'm kind of wondering if the Mossad (which is intimately related to our government) won't use such a huge event to do some sort of operation. They've been preparing the area for a "terrorist attack" putting fear in the population because of a typical phantom guerrilla group that hides in the forest, and we've got presidential elections next year... so, that makes a fertile ground for their usual work.