A few comments, especially about the questions that came from me in the
Pleiadians thread - I think I should have been a bit more precise:
Laura said:
Can the internet be seen as a "window of opportunity"/"an experiment in human consciousnesses"?
(L) I don't exactly what the person means... I guess it would be one or the other. Is it a window of opportunity, or is it an experiment in human consciousness?
I was referring to the following parts of the channeling by B.M. as referred to by SAO:
A (P's): You're being given a warning. Stay away. When you start publishing or launching things, you draw attention to yourself. Internet won't be around for a long time anyway. Very vulnerable to hacking, and also shows the very dark side of humanity. It's an avenue for some real low lifers. We see the whole thing going down by 2025. The brownouts on the internet will grow greater starting this year due to hacking, artificial intelligence, even ET's get into this system. It's a vulnerable system, and an experiment in human consciousness.
Q: Internet won't be around much longer?
A (P's): No it has a short window
I realize that I interpreted "short window" as "short window of opportunity". What I meant is kind of - what are the P's getting at when they talk about the internet as an experiment in human consciousness, do they mean maybe that it's a "window of opportunity" for humankind to choose their side, to wake up or sleep even more soundly?
Anyway, I think the answer the C's gave is very interesting and quite spot-on!
Laura said:
A: We once told you that your computers would overpower you. Thus neither question is precisely to the point. Internet was initially manifested for practical purposes, then other applications were developed. It could be said that the "experiment" in consciousness appeared in reaction to more positive uses. At present the internet is more a source of confusion and propaganda than anything else. Thus the opening statement is fulfilled.
Q: (L) In other words, the overpowering of people by their computers would be the use of the internet for confusion and propaganda. Is that what we're getting at here?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So, people being taken over in their minds by disinformation, propaganda, lies and so forth on the computer are literally being taken over by their computers?
A: Yes
The way I understand them, they mean that the internet just developed more or less as officially recorded, then the fact that some people later started using it in a positive way (networking, countering propaganda etc.) contributed to the "experiment", as in how people share/use information and how that affects FRV/the energies on the planet. But, humanity being what it is and the psychopaths in power being what they are, they used the internet for their own purposes and thus the overwhelming function of the internet today is programming of the people. And that's the reason they won't shut it down, alternative news or not. (Maybe since most of us here dwell on the "good side" of the internet - alternative news etc. - we tend to forget the total zombification that happens all around us thanks to that technology...)
Laura said:
Q: (L) Next question:
Is the warning about not sharing too much electronically sound, or is it more a distraction that keeps us from "leaving the [frequency] fence"?
A: Again, we believe that we have addressed this in the past: "Walls have ears".
Q: (L) In other words, there really is no way to keep anything private from those powers that want or need it. If you're worried about privacy, you're only keeping things private from other individuals or from people hacking your password and getting into your bank account. But those are things that should normally be protected anyway.
Warning people to get off the grid, to not share, and to not network with each other in order to keep the PTB in the dark seems to me to be offering a false sense of security and is otherwise counterproductive, all things considered.
(Perceval)
The opportunity is there to use what the PTB are using - for nefarious purposes - to instead do some good via networking.
I was more thinking of "leaving the fence" as in "not being a fence-sitter anymore", but this is similar to "leaving the frequency fence" I guess. And the bold part was exactly my feeling - that the whole "online privacy" shtick actually keeps people from sharing and networking and using the PTB's weapons against them. Though of course it's legitimate to criticize the Orwellian survival system - as always, the PTB's use a strategy that bends the truth to suit their needs, osit.
Laura said:
(L) Okay, next questions:
Are we going to see machines integrated in the body and a divide between people refusing and people wanting this integration?
(Galatea) Like cyborgs?
(L) I guess so.
(Pierre) Transhumanism.
A: This is already being done to some extent.
Yes, take the Apple Watch for example, or this recent cooperation between Google and Levis:
_http://www.psfk.com/2015/06/google-levis-project-jacquard-smart-jeans.html
Project Jacquard textile (for denim) responds to haptic feedback, empowers consumers to keep focus on the world around them
SIMONE SPILKA
3 JUNE 2015 TECHNOLOGY
Your future pair of denim jeans just got a hell of a lot more stylish, if you choose to buy them from Levi’s. On Friday, the clothing brand announced its partnership with Google ATAP Labs team that will revolutionize wearable fashion with a material known as Project Jacquard.
Created by Google, the textile is a platform with digital connectivity that will enable the control of phone features from the surface of a garment. Levi’s consumers can expect their apparel of the future to react to haptic feedback, such as touching your jeans to silence a phone call during a meeting or pushing a button on your denim jacket to remember the location of a restaurant as you walk past.
Also, someone told me that the company he works for is working on payment systems using RFID chips, another step in the "cyborg" direction I guess...
About the music discussion, I think again what the C's say is spot-on - since finding the forum everything changed for me when it comes to music, and I became aware of the HUGE amount of programming-via-music I was subjected to and how it caused a lot of of pain for me and others in my life. And I totally agree that there is a rift in popular music between the 60's and 70's, I think it's fair to say that the process of rooting out real music that speaks truth and touches people's hearts in a positive way was begun in earnest in the 70's and has been completed recently.
There is also a
recent forum thread on the topic.