I've always been interested in this aspect of things as well:
herondancer said:
What a wonderfully deep session.
seek10 said:
Laura said:
Q: (L) And what had it been corrupted to?
A: The Indian Vedas will give clues.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zurvanism
Aesthetic Zurvanism
Aesthetic Zurvanism, which was apparently not as popular as the materialistic kind, viewed Zurvan as undifferentiated Time, which, under the influence of desire, divided into reason (a male principle) and concupiscence (a female principle).
According to Duchesne-Guillemin, this division is "redolent of Gnosticism or – still better – of Indian cosmology." The parallels between Zurvan and Prajapati of Rig Veda 10.129 had been taken by Widengren to be evidence of a proto-Indo-Iranian Zurvan, but these arguments have since been dismissed (Duchesne-Guillemin, 1956). Nonetheless, there is a semblance of Zurvanite elements in Vedic texts, and as Zaehner puts it "Time, for the Indians, is the raw material, the material prima of all contingent being."
The blue- bolded part struck me a little, as the word concupiscence has a somewhat narrow meaning today, namely lust and carnal desire. The Catholic church has had a fine old time railing against it for centuries, demonizing women as a danger to men because they were it's source.
However it earlier meant 'desire' in a broader sense. From google:
Middle English: via Old French from late Latin concupiscentia, from Latin concupiscent- ‘beginning to desire,’ from the verb concupiscere, from con- (expressing intensive force) + cupere ‘to desire.’
And also
concupiscence (n.) Look up concupiscence at Dictionary.com
mid-14c., from Latin concupiscentia "eager desire," from concupiscens, present participle of concupiscere, inceptive of concupere "to be very desirous of," from com-, intensive prefix (see com-), + cupere "to long for" (see cupidity).
So it could mean any strongly felt desire. But even at Zervanism's early date there seems to be an association of the feminine principle with"desire".
The oft quoted session from the C's
Session 990828 said:
Q: Okay, so this realm changed, as a part of the cycle; various choices were made: the
human race went through the door after the 'gold,' so to speak, and became aligned with the
Lizzies after the 'female energy' consorted with the wrong side, so to speak. This is what
you have said. This resulted in a number of effects: the breaking up of the DNA, the burning
off of the first ten factors of DNA, the separation of the hemispheres of the brain...
A: Only reason for this: you play in the dirt, you're gonna get dirty.
Q: What was the motivating factor for playing in the dirt? What essential thing occurred?
You said once that it was 'desire based imbalance.' What was it a desire for?
A: Increased physicality.
Q: What was the objective sought for in this desire for increased physicality?
A: Sensate.
Q: How was sensate experienced so that these beings had an idea that they could get more
if they increased their physicality?
A: Not experienced, demonstrated.
Q: Demonstrated how, by who?
A: Do you not know?
Q: It was demonstrated by the Lizzies?
A: Basically.
Q: Demonstrated in what way? Did they say: 'here, try this!' Or did they demonstrate by
showing or doing?
A: Closer to the latter.
Q: They were doing, experimenting, playing, and saying: 'look, we are doing this, it's so
great, come here and try it?'
A: Not really. More like: "you could have this."
Q: What seemed to be so desirable about this increased physicality when they said 'you can
have this?'
A: Use your imagination!
Q: Was there any understanding, or realization of any kind, that increased physicality could
be like Osiris lured into his own coffin by Set? That they would then slam the lid shut and
nail him in?
A: Obviously, such understanding was lacking.
Q: Sounds like a pretty naive bunch! Does the lack of this understanding reflect a lack of
knowledge?
A: Of course. But more, it is desire getting in the way of...
The Zoroastrian Gathas, are sprinkled with statements that appear to view the position of men and women as fairly equal especially in
Gatha 53. The link is a pdf of a simplified translation, so you'll need to scroll down.
In the later Zervanism, women it seems women are blamed in much the same way as in Judeo-Christianity, though those ideas may have crept in from elsewhere.
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic said:
[..] classical Zurvanism's shades of Zurvan as potential and Zurvan as infinite time smells of the idea of 7th density, but of course there are other ideas not exactly corresponding to the Cs, such as some Zurvanites's denigration of women by their association with Ahriman and the Az. The way the ideas are presented though makes it appear that the anti-female ideas were a later corruption of an existing set of ideas.
Perhaps this occurred with the introduction of Aristotelian ideas which had a big effect on Zurvanism. See the new classifications of warm and moist for Ohrmazd, and dry and cold for Ahriman. With women associated with Ahriman's elements, so to flowed the idea of them as evil. This isn't to say all Zurvanism supported this idea, as there was another perspective in which women and men alike were associated with Ohrmazd, as moist and hot respectively.
I'm not really sure where I'm going with this but I thought to throw it in the mix.
In terms of the C's material, it seems to be that the female energy was out of balance with the male. "Desire based imbalance," as Laura quoted from earlier C material.
But no matter how many times I've read this passage about "going for the gold," etc., it's difficult to understand why this had to happen in the first place, when obviously there was a time when a type of balance was in place. Just why does the Serpent get to have the upper hand?
.. I just thought of God wanting/needing to "know" itself.. (this as related to Sufism, perhaps). So, mankind is locked out of heaven, as it were, in order to learn those lessons brought on by "increased physicality."
.. but what this says about the feminine principle is still.. tricky. Possibly. Or is it? Is it our personalizing the feminine as belonging to the female that's the problem, when of course we are all comprised of both? But, even so, the feminine principle, then, is largely maligned. Is it that it is a volatile aspect in itself?
I'm reminded of a book by Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae (1990) which I read portions of some years ago now. It's a polarizing book, and I won't get into all that. Wikipedia does a good run-through actually:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Personae
There's something Paglia says in her book, however, that I've always remembered. First a quote from wiki on her book:
Portraying Western culture as a struggle between phallic, sky-religion on the one hand, and chthonic, earth-religion on the other, Paglia draws on the Greco-Roman polarity between the Apollonian and Dionysian. She associates Apollo with order, structure, and symmetry, and Dionysus with chaos, disorder, and nature.
Paglia states (and I'm paraphrasing) were humankind to be (or had it remained) aligned with the chthonian we would
still be living in grass huts.
.. this came to mind when, in the interview by Kerry Cassidy, Laura talks about -- was it early megalithic times? -- but that period that sustained itself for thousands of years with small villages, no feudal fortresses or stone walls, no WAR.
.. of course, Paglia does not include the possibility of inter-dimensional reality, or deep reality, and being in tune with that. But she is positing that the chthonian -- and in that being tied more to nature -- would result in a lack of civilization as we presently know it (i.e., not necessarily a bad thing, although I'm not sure Paglia would agree!)
.. any case, if we allow for the idea of inter-dimensional or cosmic reality, aren't we talking about forces that in and of themselves would be chaotic without the knowledge (Apollonian, say) to properly harness/utilize them etc.? So, again.. (and this isn't about Paglia at this point, she just came to mind).. but, again, it's the balance of these two aspects that seems at issue.
--oh, and come the Serpent, knowledge gets hijacked and the Dionysian prevails.
Gosh, I accidentally posted this before I really meant to. And I think I lost my train of thought.. (sigh)
Anyway, thanks Laura, et. al., for all the amazing work you're doing, and I'm looking forward to receiving the crystals to see what happens from there (!)