Thanks for another great session, and getting it up so quickly again.
The craziness in our world just gets more and more intense, I have to agree.
The craziness in our world just gets more and more intense, I have to agree.
whitecoast said:That was quite a packed and informative session. Kudos to you all for keeping the channel so clear and quality. :)
I thought I'd bring up a quote of the session on 21 June 2014:
(Aiming) Okay, we wondered what's up with Gurdjieff's soul?
(L) What?
(Aiming) We were wondering what he is doing right now? Where he is, or...?
A: He was attentive to earth issues for quite some time, but now has gone to full contemplation preparatory to rebirth in 4D.
Q: (L) So, you're saying that people get born in 4D?
A: Yes. When did we say otherwise?
Q: (L) Well, you didn't. I was just not sure.
(Chu) Well, with changes in physicality, you'd think people could avoid the normal human birth, with the pain...
A: It's just a bit more intense in some ways.
Q: (Data) Was Gurdjieff a "man" in the fullest sense of the word as he described it himself?
A: Close. Gurdjieff's greatest problem was that there was no one to place on the step behind him at the time, and he slipped a bit.
If the above is true, in spite of his misgivings he still managed to complete the lessons of 3D. However, the recent information the last bolded section may change if it was asked again of the C's, given the different position in terms of knowledge and awareness of the chateau crew. I wonder if that also means the first bolded section would also change (no mention of "suprise" for example)? They don't mention whether G graduated to 4D STS or 4D STO.
This is part of my theory or how I have been correlating things, the enegram refers to biorhythms and the transmutation process to all processesBluelamp said:Felipe4 said:Laura said:Q: (L) So that helps you to really understand mechanical programs. It IS very useful for that. And what about his tables of hydrogens?
A: He was onto something though again it was materialized. But you might have more success interpreting the "foods" as stimuli to the nervous system and its consequent release of neurochemicals and hormones. It was actually a quite clever description of same!
Bingo! I knew I jumped into neurology for a reason. this is what I was thinking, the table did not reach the mind, and in and of itself does not offer examples of the inreactive nature or relationships of these foods/stimuli with one another. how one hidrogen "fits" within another. H12 into H92 etc. or higher influences can actually pass through this world. from higher densities to lower densities...
The more generic "shock" idea might fit with lots of things that aren't restricted to materialism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Way_enneagram
At point 3, Mi-Fa, occurs a "shock". Air can provide this shock because it also is of density 192, and furthermore this air enters as a new Do... Point 6 being where "impressions", regarded as a type of food, are said to enter the body. "Impressions" are said to also have a "density" of 48, and can serve as a shock if they are intensified by some such means as the exercise of "self-remembering" taught by Gurdjieff, thus allowing the air and impressions octaves to proceed... A further conscious shock, requiring "a special type of control over the emotions" at point 9 would enable a new "higher" or spiritual body to begin to grow, this is represented by Gurdjieff as the aim of his and other esoteric traditions...
The six in Enneagram personality models can be counterphobic which is a looking back at a shock/fear of sorts. The self-remembering part is probably quite important for being able to take advantage of shocks to the nervous system. Finding Laura's work was quite shocking. It's either run away as fast as you can or do the counterphobic thing and look back at the shock. Gurdjieff seems to have looked back but couldn't quite see around the 4th density STS materialistic roadblocks; not that we can overly blame him, things look rather bleak out there without hints to help level the playing field.
I don't see any contradiction at all; it meshes together, expanding the view. Keep in mind that answers from Cs are most often specific to the question.
(Mikey) Which parts of Gurdjieff's teachings are still most useful to read?
A: Psychology, up to a point.
Q: (L) So that helps you to really understand mechanical programs. It IS very useful for that. And what about his tables of hydrogens?
A: He was onto something though again it was materialized. But you might have more success interpreting the "foods" as stimuli to the nervous system and its consequent release of neurochemicals and hormones. It was actually a quite clever description of same!
The chaos all around the world is overwhelming and beyond insane asylum. Turbulence ahead, so let's stay aware!
Shijing said:A couple of years ago, I tried to put his table of hydrogens and cosmoses into an easier visual format -- once I'd done so, I had to move on to other things and never really had a chance to follow up on it. Since the Cs seemed to think that it wasn't totally useless, I'm attaching the spreadsheet I created in case anyone wants to play with it.