(Ark) Me. I was playing with my model of superluminal communication. I would like to know about this 'We are you in the future'. Can it be said that it's like 100-200 years in the future, or 1000-2000 years, or... Can I have an estimation of how far in the future in numbers? If it can be said. Not exact, but a range.
A: It can vary, but usually under 1k years or too much signal corruption.
Its fascinating to think about Team John von Neumanns time machine. If that 'signal/noise ratio to ==> distance' rule is valid for tech, then they can travel in time under 1K years and do stuff. However: there is a big problem, as there was a young scientist guy -
reported on RT - who
solved the time-equations required to explain time travel. Peer reviewers were nodding on his theory after preliminary examinations of his equations. Basically the young physicist stated that you can travel in time and "kill your grandfather", but - according to his calculations - any changes you make, creates a new fork in the timeline.
So You-the-Original-Version from timeline_A will travel back to your grandpa's house. But you arrive into timeline_B. Any changes you make.. I think even displacing and breathing the air there counts as change. If you do anything to poor grandpa (who is really grandpa version2.0 in timeline_B), you only change the lives of people in timeline_B. Thus you are completely unable to change your original timeline_A at all, perfectly solving the paradoxes problem.
Its even more intriguing that there were rumors in conspiracy circles - 'grain of salt'-types - that the time machine was used by the government couple times already. Curiously that rumor didn't say what was changed - which would have been interesting - but it said that they [gov./MIC] have created four timeline-forks already: meaning that there is already four different versions of Earth history running in parallel, because of botched up [gov./MIC] meddling experiments.
“
In the coronavirus patient zero example, you might try and stop patient zero from becoming infected, but in doing so you would catch the virus and become patient zero, or someone else would,” Tobar said.
“No matter what you did, the salient events would just recalibrate around you. This would mean that – no matter your actions – the pandemic would occur, giving your younger self the motivation to go back and stop it.
“
Try as you might to create a paradox, the events will always adjust themselves, to avoid any inconsistency.
“The range of mathematical processes we discovered show that time travel with free will is logically possible in our universe without any paradox.”
Where are alternate timelines in the above exactly? Well, if you traveled back in time, you have the exact order of events in your original past (version A): like how the plandemic occurred. But if you try to change it, then:
“No matter what you did, the salient events would just recalibrate around you."
Recalibration means the past that you are creating is already a changed-order past = changed timeline = a new fork,
Tobar states, that communication between the past and future is possible.
However communication will always change the past, changing the future outcome. In our case, here, with this channeling experiment for example.
But this was already our mission goal: to change what happened, so things turn out differently this time, creating a more liveable place in the future, a better one that we can build on. So this 'time-travel mission' of our group here - inserting ourselves into the past as a reincarnated group - all this suffering and what more suffering awaits us in the coming years ==> was/will be worth it, in the end.