Session 24 January 2026

[Anthony]

I wonder if there's significance that the C's chose to end the session with the remark "Pray without ceasing. The universe is very aware."

I remembered the session where they mentioned that the optimal time to pray would be before dawn:

Q: (Artemis) Is there an optimal time for people to pray?

A: Early morning before dawn.

Q: (L) Just before, or as the sun rises?

A: Yes

Q: (Artemis) Why is that time preferable?

A: Energy of Earth has quieted and there is a gap just before the energy of the sun returns.

Q: (L) So there's like a gap that you can escape through into the cosmos.

(Artemis) So it's kind of like the internet. When everyone's sleeping, the internet is faster!

A: Yes

So does that mean that there's something happening currently cosmically that's more favorable to the practice of praying, or that it's now needed more than ever? I don't know, maybe that's trying to read too much into their remark. As far as I understand it, the Universe itself is always aware, and doesn't become less or more so, unless we're talking about individuals like us who are like fragments of the whole learning to become more aware.

The only other reference to praying in their closing remarks happened on 24 June 2023:

A: Pray and meditate and build your network in the hyperdimensional spaces. Much turmoil coming. Be awake, alert, aware, and utilize knowledge. It really does protect if you can set limiting emotions aside. Goodbye.

The warning that much turmoil is coming does seem to relate to the current session when they said:

Q: (Joe) And speaking of things we might think: two sessions ago they said things were going to get stranger than we can imagine. Have we been seeing that over the past couple of months? Is that what they meant by that?

A: Some but you ain't seen nothing yet!

And on the subject of prayer, I often remember the words of the Danish philosopher Kierkegaard:

The earthly minded person thinks and imagines that when he prays, the important thing, the thing he must concentrate upon, is that God should hear what he is praying for. And yet in the true, eternal sense it is just the reverse: the true relation in prayer is not when God hears what is prayed for, but when the person praying continues to pray until he is the one who hears, who hears what God is asking for.

Prayer does not change God, it changes the one who offers it.
In proportion as one becomes more and more earnest in prayer, one has less and less to say, and in the end one becomes quite silent. Indeed, one becomes quite a hearer. And so it is; to pray is not to hear oneself speak, but it is to be silent, and to remain silent, to wait, until the one who prays hears God.

 

[Wandering Star]

A: Life experiences reflect how one interacts with God. Those who are asleep are those of little faith in terms of their interaction with the creation. Some people think that the world exists for them to overcome or ignore or shut out. For those individuals, the worlds will cease. They will become exactly what they give to life. They will become merely a dream in the "past." People who pay strict attention to objective reality right and left, become the reality of the "Future."

I just realized that this excerpt from the sessions provided by you is the same as the following one provided by Gaby:

You will see that in life you receive exactly what you give. Your life is the mirror of what you are. It is in your image. You are passive, blind, demanding. You take all, you accept all, without feeling any obligation. Your attitude toward the world and toward life is the attitude of one who has the right to make demands and to take, who has no need to pay or to earn. You believe that all things are your due, simply because it is you! All your blindness is there! ...

You live exclusively according to "I like" or "I don't like," you have no appreciation except for yourself. You recognize nothing above you-theoretically, logically, perhaps, but actually no. That is why you are demanding and continue to believe that everything is cheap and that you have enough in your pocket to buy everything you like. You recognize nothing above you, either outside yourself or inside. That is why, I repeat, you have no measure and live passively according to your likes and dislikes.

Yes, your "appreciation of yourself" blinds you. It is the biggest obstacle to a new life. You must be able to get over this obstacle, this threshold, before going further.

This test divides men into two kinds: the "wheat" and the "chaff." No matter how intelligent, how gifted, how brilliant a man may be, if he does not change his appreciation of himself, there will be no hope for an inner development, for a work toward self-knowledge, for a true becoming. He will remain such as he is all his life.

The first requirement, the first condition, the first test for one who wishes to work on himself is to change his appreciation of himself. He must not imagine, not simply believe or think, but see things in himself which he has never seen before, see them actually. His appreciation will never be able to change as long as he sees nothing in himself. And in order to see, he must learn to see; this is the first initiation of man into self-knowledge.

... If he sees one time he can see a second time, and if that continues he will no longer be able not to see. This is the state to be looked for, it is the aim of our observation; it is from there that the true wish will be born, the irresistible wish to become: from cold we shall become warm, vibrant; we shall be touched by our reality.

Today we have nothing but the illusion of what we are. We think too highly of ourselves. We do not respect ourselves. In order to respect myself, I have to recognize a part in myself which is above the other parts, and my attitude toward this part should bear witness to the respect that I have for it. In this way I shall respect myself. And my relations with others will be governed by the same respect.

You must understand that all the other measures - talent, education, culture, genius-are changing measures, measures of detail. The only exact measure, the only unchanging, objective real measure is the measure of inner vision. I see - I see myself - by this, you have measured. With one higher real part, you have measured another lower part, also real. And this measure, defining by itself the role of each part, will lead you to respect for yourself.

But you will see that it is not easy. And it is not cheap. You must pay dearly. For bad payers, lazy people, parasites, no hope. You must pay, pay a lot, and pay immediately, pay in advance. Pay with yourself. By sincere, conscientious, disinterested efforts. The more you are prepared to pay without economizing, without cheating, without any falsification, the more you will receive. And from that time on you will become acquainted with your nature. And you will see all the tricks, all the dishonesties that your nature resorts to in order to avoid paying hard cash. Because you have to pay with your ready-made theories, with your rooted convictions, with your prejudices, your conventions, your "I like" and "I don't like." Without bargaining, honestly, without pretending. Trying "sincerely" to see as you offer your counterfeit money.

Try for a moment to accept the idea that you are not what you believe yourself to be, that you overestimate yourself, in fact that you lie to yourself. That you always lie to yourself every moment, all day, all your life. That this lying rules you to such an extent that you cannot control it any more. You are the prey of lying. You lie, everywhere. Your relations with others - lies. The upbringing you give, the conventions - lies. Your teaching - lies. Your theories, your art- lies. Your social life, your family life - lies. And what you think of yourself - lies also.

But you never stop yourself in what you are doing or in what you are saying because you believe in yourself. You must stop inwardly and observe. Observe without preconceptions, accepting for a time this idea of lying. And if you observe in this way, paying with yourself, without self-pity, giving up all your supposed riches for a moment of reality, perhaps you will suddenly see something you have never before seen in yourself until this day.

You will see that you are different from what you think you are.

You will see that you are two.

One who is not, but takes the place and plays the role of the other. And one who is, yet so weak, so insubstantial, that he no sooner appears than he immediately disappears. He cannot endure lies. The least lie makes him faint away. He does not struggle, he does not resist, he is defeated in advance. Learn to look until you have seen the difference between your two natures, until you have seen the lies, the deception in yourself. When you have seen your two natures, that day, in yourself, the truth will be born.

 

[Celestial Marriage]

Another day, and we're still here.

Incredible.

Thank you.

There is a book "Franny and Zooey" from Salinger basically about this (pray without ceasing) phrase.

Huge thanks about music part. I recently went to a Jacob Collier concert and felt miserable. Now I know why.

 

[Evan]

Let’s take pink Floyd for example, majority of their songs are drums, bass, guitar and vocals, ( non electronic) with some electronic elements as well, how does that balance out? Or does any electronic element make it “anti human”?

I think I can break this down by using Welcome To The Machine from the Wish You Were Here album. The foundation of the music is heavily reliant upon synthesizers, which are intended to set an ominous, soulless setting representing industry “Machine” that consumed founding member Syd Barrett. Conversely Roger Waters’ lyrics are a heartfelt observation of Syd’s mental decline and loss of self. I feel that this fits your question: human versus machine-generated music, and what constitutes balance. IMO

 

[Gaby]

They were recently talking about this on Rogan’s podcast.

I made a summary of that online conference he gave a few years back, so as to be careful not to put words into his mouth. But overall, yes, he had access to satellite data and was aware of non-linear plasma physics dynamics. Veiled truths as the Cs said.

Apparently, worth killing him for it, through "human agents of chaos". The later being a response from the Cs as to the untimely deaths of mathematicians focusing on "hyperdimensional physics" and the untimely death of the astronomer studying binary stars, who might have concluded that our sun has a companion. For which axj got the Cs confirmation in this session that it lighted up and was seen by Helvetius in 1670s. We practically come full circle on this.

Here's the relevant post with the conference summarized.

SpaceWeatherNews report an audio extract where he was warning about the incoming ice age. Can it be a reason?

"And it reverses sometimes. And those reversals of the Earth's magnetic field, so you know, reversal meaning the North Pole becomes the South Pole and vice versa. So those happen and there's even interesting stories you can tell about how those reversals of the Earth's magnetic field correlate with many ice ages and things like this."

Let's have a closer look to Loureiro's research.

From the above video:

View attachment 115437

And if Earth's magnetic field is weakening, the dynamo might have to do something soon in order to preserve the magnetic field's strength at long term.

Loureiro's entire presentation quoted above, is available here, thanks to Plancks2021:

Plasma physics is a diverse and exciting field of research, whose applications span a broad spectrum – from fusion energy to astrophysics to fundamental aspects of non-equilibrium statistical thermodynamics. This talk aims to provide an overview of some of these questions to a broad audience, and discuss some of the outstanding research challenges.

Starting from minute 38:20, he talks about the plasma universe and how it could generate a magnetic field, which is present everywhere: sun, earth, galaxy, galaxy clusters, etc.

There's the interesting question by Alex at the end of the presentation where he asks how come the overall data shows a stable magnetic field when for the last 150 years, data shows that Earth's magnetic field is weakening?

That's when he says his answer above: at long time scales, the magnetic field is constant. It varies, it reverses at a short scale and that correlates with Ice Ages. On average, and at a long scale of time, the amplitude of the field is constant. It there would be no dynamo, none of us would be here right now.

The other relevant question comes at the very end, by the Indian guy about quantum computing. Loureiro explains what he's researching. He says that we can't use quantum computing to solve the problems. It's a mistake to wait 20 years to learn how to use it. It would take 20 years to map our problems that we can feed it to the quantum computer. Loureiro says he's working in a "math long" (sp?) transformation which is a transformation you do to the Schrodinger equation that maps it into fluid-like equations. In short, a not so non linear problem that can be used to solve non linear problems. "It has limitations but it's interesting "because our mhd equations are similar to those." That gives you an idea of the type of mapping you can do to some problems that might make them easier to solve on a quantum computer (in 20 years time). He adds, "It's a completely different way of thinking through what we do currently with conventional computing"

He had access to satellite data monitoring the sun and was working on his theories to better match that data. His smart students might pickup the lead. So all is not lost.

So he was possibly aware of the increasing cosmic changes AND he was aware of non-linear plasma physics. It might have been the case that he was, as the Cs put it, "You are dancing on the 3rd density ballroom floor. "Alice likes to go through the looking glass" at the Crystal Palace".

Here are some relevant slides. Those who are math lovers can take a look at the equations and the rest of the presentation.

View attachment 115442
View attachment 115443View attachment 115444View attachment 115445

 

[pkostov2]

A: Some but you ain't seen nothing yet!

Look what is in the menu.

Astrological Analysis: Likelihood of KhargIsland Attack and Global Radiation Event(January-February 2026)

 

[Gaby]

(Gaby) The X1.9 solar flare on January 19th was associated with very high proton energies exceeding red level thresholds by a thousand times, and the indicators of the strongest flares of the current solar cycle by 20 times. In terms of high proton energies, this was the second largest storm in the entire history of reliable measurements since 1976, with the largest one occurring on March 24th, 1991. Why was it so strong?

A: Weaker magnetic field.

Q: (Gaby) During the beginning of the resulting geomagnetic storm on January 19th, a couple of witnesses located at the epicenter of the South Atlantic Anomaly saw a strange purple band. The data shows that auroras are relatively weak in the anomaly, and this effect is more pronounced during high geomagnetic activity. What did they see and why?

A: Aurora and SPA.

Now, for the real good news here

A recently published paper (January 2026) describing the wildness of the storms that should be milder by standard data alone. This is a study for a storm which took place in November 2023.

SpaceWeather.com -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids

A new study just published in the journal Space Weather describes a "super plasma bubble" that appeared in Earth's upper atmosphere during a minor geomagnetic storm. Normally, plasma bubbles stay near the equator. In this case, a surprising surge of electric fields lifted the ionosphere, allowing the bubble to grow and spread. The result was a widespread GPS disturbance in Europe and Africa. Minor storms, the authors concluded, can produce major effects.

If you see all the signs, what could explain all the factors of these storms? This past X flare was a minor one by this sun cycle's standard. It's a weaker magnetic field that could explain the phenomenon observed though, including blue auroras in the Northern Hemisphere and purple auroras in the South Atlantic Anomaly, which by scientific observations thus far, should not have auroras during a geomagnetic storm.

The CME that reached Earth on Jan. 19th struck with a velocity in the top few percent of all CMEs ever observed. This caused more than 12 hours of severe (G4-class) geomagnetic storming with conditions that favored bright blue.

"We were looking south on Jan. 19th when this strange purple band appeared," says Filter. "At the time, the planetary K-index was 7.6."

The South Atlantic Anomaly is a weak spot in Earth's magnetic field centered on Brazil. There, the planet’s protective magnetic shield is thinner than elsewhere, allowing energetic particles from the inner Van Allen radiation belt to dip unusually close to Earth.

You might suppose that auroras would be strong in the South Atlantic Anomaly because solar storms can penetrate Earth's defenses there. In fact, the opposite is true. Multiple studies show that auroras are relatively weak in the Anomaly.

This data will pile up until someone will have to admit it, adding then to the C's hit track record.