That's probably wishful thinking?
Yes, trying to mitigate the effects by redirecting them to Trump.
Isn't it curious that now that they can remove Trump without needing to assassinate him, they haven't done it yet? there are still missing goals for which he is necessary and on the fly, get him dirty as much as they can.
But that short-term effect will be kicked by whoever comes after Trump seeing that the situation will only get worse.
Currently, people are again asking for change in a scenario in which with Trump involved, he will only geopolitically apparently leave the powers in a position of necessary control in which everyone will be in their respective geopolitical plot for the final confrontation in which there will no longer be apparently border countries through which to create distractions as we see now with Ukraine and Taiwan, which will be a scenario of more direct confrontation for future attacks among themselves without even depending on European leaders or organizations such as NATO that keep them divided in a certain sense that hinders important decisions for them because for example, to get oil from Venezuela, now you have to do business with the USA, there is no longer an obstacle in that sense.
So if they want things to go "right" better take care of themselves so they exploit the world in the process.
Trump would have done a whole lot better if he hadn't chosen to 'work' for them.
Well, perhaps a little of that "difference" can be observed in his way of continuing the war but being selective in the sense that he does not want there to be an unnecessary mortality. To do in Iran what he did in Venezuela, to go for the objective and try to ensure that there are no civilian casualties or as few as possible.
Something like: "Trump, you can prevent the death of 20,000 people and reduce it to 10 since collateral damage cannot be avoided, but if you do not give the order, I will make it 50,000." Trump can't choose to stop the war, but he can negotiate "how" to make war, at least he has that leeway.
So he focuses on the key figure on the board without innocent people paying the price or at least, the lowest possible price since Trump on his own has always tried to reach agreements first, but if unfortunately the opposite side does not help itself, what we are observing happens and it is no longer his direct responsibility for being a psychopath.
In addition, no matter that he has achieved "Peace" through agreements, psychopaths always manage to sabotage everything and again he is dragged to their grounds.
For some reason I feel that I should not just stay with the detestable first impressions of Trump and read him backwards in many things, coming to feel empathy for his situation. Maybe in the process it will also help him to bear that burden in terms of doing what is imposed on him. For example, in Venezuela there were no civilian deaths indiscriminately, the few that there were, were due to the fact that their homes were close to military equipment that was installed in those residential areas.
Unfortunately for people a military man is a free death, they are not counted empathically as a civilian person because a military man, even if he is a student, is already seen as just another number. So disgustingly they will not give the same importance to their lives and what matters to them is that there were no "civilians". That is the suiche/mental relief that makes maybe for Trump, it is less of an emotional burden since as they say the saying "you are going to kill or be killed in war" and most of the responsibility is of those who betrayed their own people, their own military, their own president to keep the show going.
Colloquially, it is usually said to anyone who follows the path of weapons, whether a policeman, military or antisocial, "he already has his cross on his forehead," which implies that for whatever reason, he has already assumed or should be aware that at any moment his life will end badly. Personally, I find it detestable when I hear people say "at least they were killed fighting and it would be less sound"... and people who even enjoy it making fun and morbid fun of the fact that many military personnel were just sleeping to justify that among the military there are also corrupt, ill-intentioned, opportunistic people and well, they put everyone in the same bag when they only leave evidence of the nature to which they belong, or said in a 3d way, human misery to the skin.
Although on the other hand the simple thought is "well, but if he doesn't want to do it why doesn't he just expose everything and resign the presidency?"i've heard many people say and well, it's not that simple because if you have someone who will be your tool to achieve goals in detestable ways and who serves so that at the end of the road redirecting all that responsibility to your puppet, it seems the perfect plan to let him go just like that.
Everything is uncovered and exposed to see the real state of things and the balance doing its job.