Session 24 January 2026

[echo]

I second that too, @N34! After many years of hardly listening to music (I have a spotify account, I just almost never get around to it) I ended up at a daytime concert with classical music a couple of weeks ago and I was amazed at how beautiful and almost otherworldly the music was. It was truly uplifting. The violin is my favorite as well. Going to look into buying one to see if any of the kiddos would like to learn to play it.

 

[katak]

Going to look into buying one to see if any of the kiddos would like to learn to play

Never is too late. I started to learn violin couple years ago as an adult - older adult. Classical music is amazing and beautiful. When you play an instrument, the feelings you feel about the piece can be experienced along while playing it. I believe that if the person playing on instrument does this, the people who are listening can feel the same.

When I played the violin for about 2 years, my father had a birthday coming up. I prepared a surprise for him and played Gounoud Ave Maria. Technically there were still a lot of mistakes, but I tried to play it for him with my heart. When I finished, I saw my father with tears in his eyes, my mother was crying and my sister too. It surprised me ‍

I wish you all the best with

 

[Alma.Innovadora]

That's probably wishful thinking?

Yes, trying to mitigate the effects by redirecting them to Trump.

Isn't it curious that now that they can remove Trump without needing to assassinate him, they haven't done it yet? there are still missing goals for which he is necessary and on the fly, get him dirty as much as they can.

But that short-term effect will be kicked by whoever comes after Trump seeing that the situation will only get worse.

Currently, people are again asking for change in a scenario in which with Trump involved, he will only geopolitically apparently leave the powers in a position of necessary control in which everyone will be in their respective geopolitical plot for the final confrontation in which there will no longer be apparently border countries through which to create distractions as we see now with Ukraine and Taiwan, which will be a scenario of more direct confrontation for future attacks among themselves without even depending on European leaders or organizations such as NATO that keep them divided in a certain sense that hinders important decisions for them because for example, to get oil from Venezuela, now you have to do business with the USA, there is no longer an obstacle in that sense.

So if they want things to go "right" better take care of themselves so they exploit the world in the process.

Trump would have done a whole lot better if he hadn't chosen to 'work' for them.

Well, perhaps a little of that "difference" can be observed in his way of continuing the war but being selective in the sense that he does not want there to be an unnecessary mortality. To do in Iran what he did in Venezuela, to go for the objective and try to ensure that there are no civilian casualties or as few as possible.

Something like: "Trump, you can prevent the death of 20,000 people and reduce it to 10 since collateral damage cannot be avoided, but if you do not give the order, I will make it 50,000." Trump can't choose to stop the war, but he can negotiate "how" to make war, at least he has that leeway.

So he focuses on the key figure on the board without innocent people paying the price or at least, the lowest possible price since Trump on his own has always tried to reach agreements first, but if unfortunately the opposite side does not help itself, what we are observing happens and it is no longer his direct responsibility for being a psychopath.

In addition, no matter that he has achieved "Peace" through agreements, psychopaths always manage to sabotage everything and again he is dragged to their grounds.

For some reason I feel that I should not just stay with the detestable first impressions of Trump and read him backwards in many things, coming to feel empathy for his situation. Maybe in the process it will also help him to bear that burden in terms of doing what is imposed on him. For example, in Venezuela there were no civilian deaths indiscriminately, the few that there were, were due to the fact that their homes were close to military equipment that was installed in those residential areas.

Unfortunately for people a military man is a free death, they are not counted empathically as a civilian person because a military man, even if he is a student, is already seen as just another number. So disgustingly they will not give the same importance to their lives and what matters to them is that there were no "civilians". That is the suiche/mental relief that makes maybe for Trump, it is less of an emotional burden since as they say the saying "you are going to kill or be killed in war" and most of the responsibility is of those who betrayed their own people, their own military, their own president to keep the show going.
Colloquially, it is usually said to anyone who follows the path of weapons, whether a policeman, military or antisocial, "he already has his cross on his forehead," which implies that for whatever reason, he has already assumed or should be aware that at any moment his life will end badly. Personally, I find it detestable when I hear people say "at least they were killed fighting and it would be less sound"... and people who even enjoy it making fun and morbid fun of the fact that many military personnel were just sleeping to justify that among the military there are also corrupt, ill-intentioned, opportunistic people and well, they put everyone in the same bag when they only leave evidence of the nature to which they belong, or said in a 3d way, human misery to the skin.

Although on the other hand the simple thought is "well, but if he doesn't want to do it why doesn't he just expose everything and resign the presidency?"i've heard many people say and well, it's not that simple because if you have someone who will be your tool to achieve goals in detestable ways and who serves so that at the end of the road redirecting all that responsibility to your puppet, it seems the perfect plan to let him go just like that.

Everything is uncovered and exposed to see the real state of things and the balance doing its job.

 

[Jacques]

I believe that attending a concert every week will keep the doctors at bay, even in the bioweapon era.

I totally agree with that.

There's an effect from attending a live classical music event that you don't get from recorded versions. One of my most memorable concerts was Beethoven's Ode to Joy; it left me feeling blissful for hours afterwards. Every part of my body was completely relaxed, unstressed and open to joy.

I know that feeling, and Vivaldi's Four Seasons always bring me that feeling blissful.

 

[Persej]

Why is it needed though? Why were the dinosaurs needed?

Perhaps the new landlords didn't like dinosaurs.

Q: (Brewer) What is meant by "altered reality" on the moon?

(L) Who said there was an altered reality on the moon?

(Joe & Gaby) In the last session.

A: Heavy 4D vibrations.

Q: (Brewer) Is it a "high strangeness" type?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Is that a permanent status on the moon?

A: No

Q: (Brewer) Is there altered perception also?

A: Yes

But what is the cause of those heavy 4D vibrations? Meteor impacts?

(axj) Was the V529 Orionis Nova sighting by the astronomer Hevelius in 1678 actually a sighting of the brown dwarf twin sun?

A: Yes

Q: (axj) Was it a plasma flare from Birkeland currents during its closest approach to the sun?

A: Yes

(axj) Were the Spöerer Minimum (1420-1530) and the Dalton Minimum (1790-1820) caused by the brown dwarf crossing in and out of the sun's heliosphere?

(L) Good question.

A: Yes

So, it is true. The prophecy about our future is actually something that has already happened, and we are currently living in the restoration mode. I suppose that we need to wait for new telescopes for more answers about our twin sun.

Thank you for the session.

 

[Navigator]

Reminded me of this exchange from June 13, 2015:

(Perceval) They said there are some types of music that are listened to by certain types of people... Certain types of emo music or whatever that certain types of young people listen to, like outsiders or loners and that kind of thing, and those people could be tracked as candidates for "use"...

A: The 70's were the time of development of such concepts and technologies. The 80's were the period when implementation became more widespread. At present 90 percent of broadcast music has corrupting elements.

Q: (Pierre) So we have to listen to old music. Music from before the 70's. Or classical music.

(L) Obviously we need to be paying much closer attention to our musical tastes, and analyzing what it is about songs that we like. And obviously, we need to pay a lot more attention to what we listen to in the background. But that means I'm safe since I only listen to old classic rock like Bob Seger, whose music is the best! [laughter]

Although these questions happened in the context of this question: "Is the NSA using musical tastes and downloads to track and identify certain 'types'?", we can also see that the synthesizer began to be commercially sold in 1971 (again that year!), matching perfectly with the advent and development of technologies to "track" and perhaps "use" (program and later trigger) people.

 

[Professor Chaos]

Perhaps the new landlords didn't like dinosaurs.

according to cs, dinosaurs were mostly killed by giant animals. i just asked if there was any purpose of them being here in the first place

 

[Persej]

according to cs, dinosaurs were mostly killed by giant animals. i just asked if there was any purpose of them being here in the first place

So you meant why were the animals that lived before the dinosaurs killed? In that case, perhaps the new landlords liked the dinosaurs!

Different landlords, different creatures, I suppose. Why would the dinosaurs not have a purpose?

 

[Persej]

Speaking about music, I just stumbled on this part from the book "The Ghost in My Brain":

I think of the “Quantum Symphony” device I own that does electrical line conditioning for my stereo system. It is hard to describe what this device does, but when you turn it off, all the music just gets “sad” by comparison.

And when I looked up about this device I found this:

Quantum Products has this to say about the Symphony and QRT:

We employ principles of physics and quantum theory to approach the problem of electromagnetic noise. The [QRT] technology utilizes an electromagnetic material processing method to influence the conductive behavior of electrons within electrical conductors. This process neutralizes a fundamental disorder in material structures at the subatomic level by exposing them to a "sustained resonance" of a high degree of order. "Sustained resonance" means that structures vibrate at a frequency natural to them. As a result, the efficiency and performance of the material structures increase and thereby alleviate negative side effects.

In the case of electricity, this "proprietary" technology makes coherent the random, chaotic motion of the electrons. Once made coherent, the electrons remain that way. As a result they do not become subject to random field effects such as radiated or induced EMFs, and can also sustain the flow of information at the quantum level.

It is [hypothesized] that a synergism of interaction between the atoms of the house wiring (and of connected electrical devices) and the electrons in the current stream flowing through them takes place. This should lead to fewer inelastic scattering events for the electrons and thus less emission of helical electromagnetic photons and greater fidelity of the information carried by the electron current.

In other words, certain laws of quantum mechanics predict that if the coherent electrons come into contact with the incoherent electrons in home electricity, those incoming electrons will behave coherently also. Within a few minutes, all of the electrons in your home will exhibit the coherent behavior of the electrons in the Symphony's circuitry. This coherent behavior lowers the noise floor of the electricity, and thus the noise floor of your audio/video system.

SoundStage! Equipment Review - Quantum Products Symphony Power-Line Conditioner (1/2000)

What is Coherence Technology™?

Russ has been a big fan of electromagnetic field stabilisers (Coherence Technology) since we started selling the original QRT Quantum Symphony back in 2006.

Not really a mains filter or conditioner in the traditional sense, these ‘enhancers’ are small boxes designed to sit close to your system and reduce the effect of stray electromagnetic fields. The manufacturers tell us that by generating their own, lower-frequency field, the devices effectively ‘tune’ the RF noise to improve fidelity. Our own listening tests proved to us how effective they are.

The original manufacturers of Quantum Symphony sold their business about 10 years ago, but we were pleased to find a related product, the Clarity Pro, which offered a similar approach. We’ve had very many enthusiastic users (including Russ) of the Clarity Pro until it was discontinued earlier in the year. So imagine our delight when the original manufacturer of the Symphony contacted us to say he had set up a new company to offer two new, completely re-designed Symphony models!

Enhancers like these work on the principle of ‘coils’ to generate their fields – they are the part of the component that does the work. There are two new Symphony models – the standard Symphony which features four coils, and the Symphony Pro which has six (by contrast, both versions of the older Clarity Pro had just three). The electronics are mounted in compact cases which can sit anywhere in the listening room, though we like to have them positioned close to the system, and preferably behind. Each unit comes with an antenna that can optionally be used to adjust and strengthen the effect.

We had very good results with the units on test. The music was calmer, there was more information and it was easier and more enjoyable to listen to. Both units made the sound richer, more like a live performance – there was simply more access to the music. We liked the effect of the Symphony; and we loved the effect with the Symphony Pro!

Russ Andrews - Hi-Fi mains and cable specialist

Leading manufacturer and retailer of Hi-Fi mains cables, mains conditioning products and Kimber Kable interconnects and speaker cable. Est 1986.

www.russandrews.com

Sounds crazy, but those prism glasses also sound crazy.

 

[sid]

Thank you very much for the session. Lots of questions. On the discussion that ensued at the end, I have had some thoughts on how densities can be framed to be better understood by us and wrote a substack on it as below. It might make greater sense to the technically minded. Note that it was written with ChatGPT's help.

A Virtualisation Hypothesis for Densities, Time, and the Infinite Nature of Creation

I have been in tech field for long enough to understand how systems work and in a semi-conscious way, trying to apply some of my field learnings to the reality itself.

sidho.substack.com

A Virtualisation Hypothesis for Densities, Time, and the Infinite Nature of Creation​

Introduction​

Many metaphysical and cosmological models attempt to explain reality using concepts such as dimensions, densities, timelines, and universes. These ideas are often described spatially—stacked realms, higher planes, outward expansions—because human language and intuition are deeply rooted in physical experience.

However, spatial metaphors frequently fail when applied to concepts like consciousness, time, and infinity. They create confusion, paradoxes, and unnecessary mysticism.

This essay proposes a different way of understanding these ideas, using a modern, real-world system we already understand well: virtualisation.

This is not an argument that reality is literally a computer simulation. Rather, it is an architectural analogy—a way to reason about how complex, layered experiences can exist within a coherent, non-linear system.

Using this analogy, we can reframe:

• what densities of consciousness actually are,
• why time is experienced as linear but is not fundamental,
• why “Big Bangs” may be local initiation events rather than absolute beginnings,
• and how infinite creation can exist without chaos or contradiction.

---

A Simple Explanation of Virtualisation (No Technical Background Required)​

In everyday terms, virtualisation is a way of running many independent worlds on shared resources.

A hypervisor is a layer of control software that sits between physical hardware and the systems that run on it. Instead of one physical computer running one operating system, a hypervisor allows many virtual machines (VMs) to run simultaneously.

Each virtual machine:

• behaves like a complete, independent computer,
• runs its own operating system,
• experiences its own processes and internal time,
• and has no awareness of other VMs or the hypervisor itself.

From inside a VM:

• the world feels complete,
• resources appear finite,
• time feels linear,
• and nothing outside the VM is detectable.

In larger setups, many hypervisors are grouped into clusters or farms, managed by higher-level tools. From this management layer, operators can:

• pause or resume VMs,
• copy them,
• run multiple instances in parallel,
• move them between machines,
• or adjust how much time and resources they receive.

From the outside, this is one integrated system.
From the inside, each VM experiences its own reality.

This separation between local experience and global oversight is the key to the analogy.

---

Densities Are Not Places — They Are Operating Contexts​

A common assumption is that higher densities or dimensions are places one travels to, like floors in a building. This assumption creates immediate problems:

• Where are these places located?
• How do they interact?
• Why can’t we see them?

The virtualisation analogy offers a cleaner answer.

Densities are not locations.
They are operating contexts.

Just as:

• a program can only access the information its execution context allows,
• a VM can only perceive what its configuration permits,

consciousness can only perceive and integrate reality according to its capacity for complexity.

In this view:

• 3rd density corresponds to a highly constrained context: strong individuality, linear time, limited awareness.
• Higher densities correspond to broader contexts: relational awareness, reduced isolation, expanded perception.
• 6th density represents a level where unity, polarity, time, and causality can all be understood simultaneously.

You do not move into a higher density.
You grow into a wider context.

---

Time Is Local, Not Fundamental​

Inside a virtual machine, time appears absolute:

• events occur in sequence,
• the past is gone,
• the future is unknown.

From within, time feels fundamental.

From outside, it is not.

A hypervisor can:

• pause a VM, freezing its internal time completely,
• snapshot a VM, capturing its entire state,
• roll it back, making a previous state the present,
• alter its clock, changing its internal sense of time,
• or run multiple copies in parallel, each evolving differently.

From inside the VM, none of this is visible.
From outside, time is configurable.

This maps directly to the metaphysical claim that time is a local distortion, not a universal constant. Linear time exists because it is necessary for experience, learning, and causality within a constrained context.

Time feels absolute because it must.

---

Multiple Realities, Realms, and Dimensions​

Virtualisation also provides a clean way to understand multiple realities without spatial confusion.

Many VMs can exist:

• at the same “level”,
• on the same hardware,
• following the same rules,
• yet remain completely isolated from one another.

Translated metaphysically:

• multiple realms can exist within the same density,
• multiple realities can coexist without interaction,
• multiple versions of events can unfold in parallel.

These are not stacked worlds.
They are parallel contexts.

Nothing needs to be hidden “above” or “beyond” physical reality. It simply exists outside the local frame of reference.

---

Parallel Timelines and Branching Outcomes​

When a VM is copied and run twice:

• both start identical,
• both experience themselves as the only reality,
• both diverge based on internal events.

From the management perspective:

• both timelines are valid,
• neither invalidates the other,
• both provide information.

This offers a coherent way to understand:

• parallel universes,
• branching timelines,
• “what if” scenarios,
• alternate outcomes.

Nothing mystical is required.
Only parallel execution.

---

Time Travel, Changes, and Timeline Merging​

What we imagine as “time travel” often involves:

• returning to the past,
• changing something,
• and arriving at a modified present.

In the virtualisation analogy, this is simply:

• restoring an earlier state,
• applying different inputs,
• and allowing the system to evolve again.

From inside the experience:

“The past has changed.”

From outside:

“A different branch is now active.”

Importantly, higher-level perspectives do not need to erase timelines. They can:

• observe multiple outcomes,
• integrate lessons from each,
• and retain all information.

This explains why paradoxes do not collapse reality. Timelines don’t overwrite one another; they diverge and inform.

---

Big Bangs as Local Initialization Events​

If time and space are local to a system, then the idea of a single, absolute beginning becomes questionable.

From inside a universe:

• space expands,
• time begins,
• energy erupts from an initial condition.

From outside:

• a ruleset is instantiated,
• constants are selected,
• a system begins execution.

In this model, a “Big Bang” is not the birth of everything, but the initialisation of a life system—one instance within a much larger creative process.

This naturally allows for:

• multiple universes,
• iterative creation,
• nested systems,
• and infinite variation without contradiction.

Creation has beginnings.
Creation itself does not.

---

Infinite Creation Without Chaos​

Infinity is often misunderstood as randomness or arbitrariness. In reality, well-designed systems demonstrate the opposite.

In virtualised environments:

• infinite workloads can exist,
• infinite configurations can be explored,
• yet coherence is preserved through shared principles.

Likewise, infinite creation can be understood as:

limitless capacity to express unity in coherent, meaningful forms

By higher densities—particularly 6th density—consciousness no longer experiments blindly. It understands the system deeply enough to co-create responsibly, designing experiences that preserve learning, free will, and reintegration.

Infinity does not mean “anything goes”.
It means possibility is never exhausted.

---

What Awakening Really Means​

Awakening, in this framework, is not escaping the system.

It is:

• realizing you are a process, not the hardware,
• understanding that constraints are contextual, not absolute,
• recognizing shared infrastructure,
• and aligning with the deeper purpose of experience.

You remain fully inside the experience.
But you stop mistaking the sandbox for the whole of reality.

---

Conclusion​

This virtualisation hypothesis does not claim to explain everything. What it does offer is a coherent, non-spatial framework that resolves several long-standing confusions:

• Densities are operating contexts, not places.
• Time is a local interface, not a fundamental structure.
• Big Bangs are system initialisations, not absolute origins.
• Multiple realities can coexist without contradiction.
• Infinity is coherent, not chaotic.

Most importantly, it reframes existence not as an accident, test, or punishment, but as a meaningful contribution to a much larger process of self-understanding.

Not symbolically.
Not morally.
Functionally.

And perhaps that is the most grounded way to understand what creation really is.

 

[Professor Chaos]

So you meant why were the animals that lived before the dinosaurs killed? In that case, perhaps the new landlords liked the dinosaurs!

Different landlords, different creatures, I suppose. Why would the dinosaurs not have a purpose?

I assume life on Earth was installed for a reason. But maybe it evolved, and humans were installed (for a reason). But if dinosaurs were installed for a reason, I wonder what.