(Joe) But that's a paradox. You might think that if I had a time travel machine, I wouldn't be abridging anybody's free will if I just limited it to talking to myself in the past and telling myself in the past stuff. But the problem is that the person you are today is dependent on all of the experiences that you had in the past. If you messed up...
Already a scientist proved time travel is possible without creating the paradox. (The Universe built on Free Will readily can accommodate a time-travel event.) Peer reviewers agreed the young man's theory looks sound.
I posted the RT link last year. Important to note, as the C's said, with time travel, you create alternate histories. Branching timelines.
So, according to
the new, no-paradox theory:
When you go back using a time-machine to kill your grandfather:
1. You leave Timeline_A , where you cease to exist, as you are no longer there, you left..
2. You go back into the past and when you [arrive there] and kill your grandfather, instantly you create a Timeline_B fork = another alternate history.
Then you_From_Timeline_A dwell there in Timeline_B, with your killed grandfather_from_Timeline_B. History goes on with You_from_Timeline_A living out your life in Timeline_B.
That's it. Your grandfather_from_Timeline_A is happy and alive, as nothing happened to him there.
When you attempt to get back to the present, you [probably] arrive to [creating] a new Timeline_C.
So there is no paradox at all. But a lot of alternate histories created.
Consequently: As each Session is a time travel, this new influx of future-information has already changed our old timeline that we had - before Laura posted this session. Therefore we are now communicating on a new branched / forked timeline. Cascading consequences apply.
My research - the (Hypothesis of Timeline Parallels) - also proves, that on a personal level - one can change timelines - somewhat how you drive your car and change lanes on a superhighway - by
Will.
Via assertively and 'in an aware manner' choosing a specific geopolitical timeline, which is hypothetical-not-yet-realized, where one wishes to live in the future. I think, because
this Universe is designed on the Law of Free Will, it very readily accommodates anybody's personal choice and it places persons onto different Timeline Parallels, based on each person's Free Will / Purity / FRV / Being.
{capital letters in this post are to emphasize a state and to signify the significant effort required to maintain same}
Then by applying / pushing for
a Special Pure State via a quite difficult to maintain process of applying
'Will + Abstinence_from_Sin' - such person/time-traveler
definitely gravitates to other main timeline-branches - and on there, onto better Timeline Parallers with better geopolitical turnouts, I found.
Simply because the FRV goes through a hard-shock-change as a result of the New Purity State. Which is your Anchor!
You arrive - into
a new Timeline Parallel - where in some form the wished geopolitical event is realized: together with the cascading [
+- polarized] consequences as the C's said.
All depends on the purity of the individual. I call it
Maintaining Anchor. Its like a circus acrobat balancing high on a rope. Maintining anchor is a hard task. Gurdjieff talked about purity a lot. How with progression you get more difficult lessons.
Knowledge and awareness component:
How much awareness do you have
right now about sea travel? Compare that with how much awareness did the captain of the Krakatoa movie have about sea travel?
Same with traveling Timeline Parallels. How much Awareness / information / knowledge does a person traveling have [like an airline pilot] to safely land on target on the new timeline? To get bearings [awareness, knowledge], where to go, how to land safely and how to maintain Anchor there: on that a new, Higher Timeline Parallel, where
a higher number of geopolitical events turn out positive and a lower number of geopolitical events turn out negative. This one, where we are communicating right know, I call it: Timeline Parallel 7/10.
How you veer off target / lose Anchor:
Any [significant enough] contamination in the individual's soul-psyche and the well known movie-scene plays out: the ladder rung breaks and the time-traveler / movie actor falls down -- off target -- to worse Timeline Parallels. Very slippery slope! IIRC Fulcanelli recounted he was at the edge of the Abyss with arms flailing, when he finally succeeded.
Anchoring:
I think this is why the C's expressly warned us what content we should watch / take in: music, movies, books, internet. I think anything can and the Hollywood movies and modern music definitely
does contain Wetiko-satanic information which immediately corrupts / defiles one's purity.
Ark's 'Observer Time Machine' I think still changes the Observer's timeline.