Session 24 September 1995

[chitta]

"Apocryphon of John" and " Revelation of John" are two different texts.

Apocryphon of John - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Here you can read the summary and its quite interesting

 

[Deleted member 11729]

This session is really interesting, really.

To understand the confusion of who is the Aryans / Celts / Nordics and Illyrians is more than needed those days.

A bit of info of one of the Illyrian tribes that are the most unresearched history in Europe - Iapydes - Wikipedia

Unfortunately, there is no English versions of more relevant research done by a few enthusiasts, but the permanent war history of Balkans, compared to the geology of the place, and fact that Nikola Tesla was born there, can be related to the "replacements" mention in this session - Session 4 May 1996.

 

[goyacobol]

How you can call Gnostics, or gnostic texts, "atheists", this is totally beyond me. Did you actually read/study gnostic literature?

@Tyco,

I only gave you a reference to what the Cs said. The Cs said "A: Ancient atheists."

I have read the book of Revelation in the Bible and I certainly had to re-think after the Cs interpretation greatly differed from anything I had ever read or considered. I have not read many other Gnostic texts such as those referring to Sophia except other authors' excerpts.

This was a specific question regarding 'texts such as the apocryphon of John'.

I think @christx11 makes good point that it may not be a condemnation of all Gnostic texts but just those that have been specifically corrupted by the Lizzies.

Well, IMO you are extremely wrong here. Again, did you read the scriptures? I cant imagine anyone who did read the gnostic texts can write something so utterly obnoxious.

Would anyone with an "anthropocentric world view" study this material here for an extended period of time"?

I am not sure what you mean by "this material here". If the "material here is "apocryphon of John" it might be they read it from an "anthropocentric" point of view not realizing they are a bio-genetically engineered species. Are their gods are created in their own image or they are created in the image of their gods? Either way, they do not consider that they may have been tampered with by a 4D STS group of lesser "gods" but nevertheless highly intelligent ones even capable of time-travel. I think we could easily be influenced to think we are at a higher place in the food chain than we really are.

The Wave Chapter 62: Secret Games at Princeton :

Q: (L) How do you mean? Creating a race to replace human beings, or abducting specific humans to replace them with a clone or whatever?

A: Mainly the former. You see, if one desires to create a new race, what better way than to mass hybridize, then mass reincarnate. Especially when the host species is so forever ignorant, controlled, and anthropocentric. What a lovely environment for total destruction and conquest and replacement… see?

 

[MJF]

Until recently, I don't think there has been any evidence for there being a planet orbiting Barnard's Star, which is one of the planets the C's said in this session was a locator for the grey aliens:

A: Lyra is not inhabited. There have been homes in all places, but some were/are transitory, and some are not. Pay attention to Orion! This is your ancestral home, and your eventual destination. Here is the absolutely accurately accurate profile of Orion to follow: This is the most heavily populated region of your Milky Way galaxy! This is a region that extends across 3rd and 4th density space for a distance as vast as the distance between your locator and it. There are 3,444 inhabited "worlds" in this region. Some are planets as you know them. Some are artificially constructed planetoids. Some are floating space barges. And some are "satellites." There are primary homes, travelling stations and incubator laboratories all in 2nd, 3rd and 4th densities. There are overseer zones in 5th and 6th densities. Approximately one half is STO and one half is STS. Together, along with many other colonies, located elsewhere, this is called, in translation, Orion Federation. Orions created grays in 5 varieties, as cyber-genetic beings, and installed them on Zeta Reticuli 1, 2, 3, and 4, as well as on 2 planets orbiting Barnard's Star. The Reptilians also inhabit 6 planets in the Orion region in 4th density, and are owned by the Orion STS as slaves, and, in some cases, pets!!! The name "Orion" is the actual native name, and was brought to earth directly. Study the legend of the "god" of Orion for parallels.

See also the session dated 7 October 1995:

A: Many different groups and individuals. Now, there are indeed actual residential locators mentioned in various writings which are factual. Orion, obviously, Zeta Reticuli, Rigel, Barnard's Star, Sirius Region, though not the actual astronomic body as mentioned.

Well this may just have changed since a planet, which is half the size of Venus (which is slightly smaller than Earth). has recently been discovered orbiting Barnard's Star, which is a mere 6 light years from our solar system, almost next door in galactic terms:​

New planet discovered orbiting a star close to Earth​

Story by Hiyah Zaidi

​

​

​

Astronomers have discovered a planet orbiting the closest solo star to Earth.

The solo star, which is known as Barnard’s star, is a red dwarf which is around 80% smaller than our sun and sits around six light years away from our solar system.

The newly discovered planet, dubbed Barnard b, has half the mass of Venus, and a year on it lasts slightly more than three Earth days.

The astronomers published their findings in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Using the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (ESO’s VLT), the researchers also suggest that there could be three more exoplanets that orbit the star.

However, the researchers are sure there is no life on Barnard b as it sits twenty times closer to Barnard’s star than Mercury is to the Sun, and therefore has a surface temperature of a blisteringly hot 125°C. [MJF: Hmm ... I wouldn't be so sure about that!]

Despite Barnard’s star being the single closest solo star to us, the exoplanet is not the closest one to Earth. The closest stellar system to Earth is the three star group of Alpha Centauri, which hosts the planet Proxima Centauri b and is around four light years away.

​

Researchers were excited to find this planet, as no planet orbiting Barnard’s star has been discovered until now – and due to its proximity to Earth, it is a primary target in the search for Earth-like exoplanets.

The team are particularly interested in rocky worlds in the habitable zone around this close star.

This region, also known as the ‘Goldilocks zone’, is special because it is the area around a star that is neither too hot nor too cold for water to exist on an orbiting planet without boiling away or freezing. And if there is liquid water, among other things, there may be life.

Barnard b was discovered as a result of observations made over five years using the VLT, which is located in Chile.

Using a highly precise instrument called ESPRESSO (the Echelle Spectrograph for Rocky Exoplanet and Stable Spectroscopic Observations), the team measured the wobble of a star which is caused by the gravitational pull of one more orbiting planets to find Barnard b.

Then, when the researchers thought they had found something, they confirmed their findings by using data from the exoplanet-hunting High Accuracy Radial Velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS).

The researchers were looking for signals from possible exoplanets within the habitable or temperate zone of Barnard’s star, which is the range where liquid water can exist on the planet’s surface. Red dwarfs like Barnard’s star are often targeted by astronomers since low-mass rocky planets are easier to detect there than around larger Sun-like stars.

Lead author Dr Jonay González Hernández said: ‘Even if it took a long time, we were always confident that we could find something.

‘Barnard b is one of the lowest-mass exoplanets known and one of the few known with a mass less than that of Earth. But the planet is too close to the host star, closer than the habitable zone.

‘Even if the star is about 2500 degrees cooler than our Sun, it is too hot there to maintain liquid water on the surface.’ [MJF: Maybe not an issue for 4D cybergenetic beings]

This exciting finding offers a huge range of untapped possibilities in the search for life outside Earth. So what’s next?
Co-author Dr Alejandro Suárez Mascareño said: ‘We now need to continue observing this star to confirm the other candidate signals.

‘But the discovery of this planet, along with other previous discoveries such as Proxima b and d, shows that our cosmic backyard is full of low-mass planets.’

The answer may be to find the other planet orbiting Barnard's Star, which is also a home to the greys in this star system. As the article reveals, the researchers believe that there could be three more exoplanets that orbit this star, so we may find this other planet one day soon.

Could Barnard b therefore be one of the two planets orbiting Barnard's Star, which the C's said were a home for the greys? Although it appears to be orbiting far too close to its parent star to be in the habitable zone and has a ridiculously short year (3 days), I don't see why this might necessarily be an obstacle for cybergenetic beings like the greys. Afterall, they are 4th density beings and the C's have said that the gas giants Jupiter and Saturn are 4D worlds, suggesting 4D beings could occupy them, even though they would never be habitable for us as 3D beings.

Anyway, this discovery has at least proven that there is one rocky world in this solar system. Perhaps there are others yet to be found.

BTW: It is curious that in Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek TV shows, the Orions are usually depicted as green-coloured humanoids who also happen to be notorious galactic slave masters. This makes me wonder what exactly Roddenberry knew or whether it may just have been a case of Thor's Pantheum of Aryan psychic projectors at work.​