Reading your post, I recalled some parallels between Cherokee and Egyptian myths that Graham Hancock mentioned in his new book, "America Before." As Hancock himself said, this relationship does not have to mean actual physical contact or communication between cultures, but is rather evidence of a highly advanced global culture of great antiquity. So, who were those who ruled over North and South America (often in such a cruel fashion)? Those cultures seem to have vanished due to climate change in many cases. Climate change was helped along by the encrochament of the Europeans via war and disease. Not much of a conflict, more like a slapdown.
I drilled down in a bit in ChatGPT about the Osiris - Cherokee myth similarities"
Insofar as I am aware, Hancock never calls this highly advanced global culture of great antiquity Atlantis but leaves his readers/listeners to make that connection if they wish to. However, the C's have clarified the matter for us and have told us who the Atlantean survivors were:
Q: (L) Where did the Egyptians come from?
A: Atlantis.
Q: (L) Which came first, the Sumerians or Atlanteans?
A: Atlanteans.
Q: (L) Were the Sumerians a high civilization at the same time the Atlanteans were?
A: After.
Q: (L) Did the Atlanteans go to Sumeria and afterwards go to Egypt?
A: Travelled.
Q: (L) The Atlanteans travelled to Sumeria?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Did they set up outposts in Sumeria?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Then did the main Atlanteans move to Egypt when Atlantis was destroyed?
A: Yes. And elsewhere.
Q: (L) Where else did the Atlanteans go?
A: Americas. Inca. Aztec. Maya. Hopi Tribe. Pima tribe.
You will note that they did not mention the Cherokee tribe in the list quoted above. This could mean that the ancestors of the Cherokee were amongst the Native American Indian tribes who were airlifted from Asia to North America by the Greys in 5,200 BC:
Q: (L) What is the source of the Native American Indians?
A: Asia.
Q: (L) Across the Bering Strait?
A: No. Rescued. Transferred.
Q: (L) By whom?
A: Grays.
Q: (L) What were they rescued out of?
A: Cataclysm.
Q: (L) When did that cataclysm occur?
A: 7200 years ago approx.
Q: (L) What was the nature of that cataclysm?
A: Comets.
Q: (L) Where do the Basques come from?
A: Atlantis.
As Asiatics or Orientals, rather than Atlantean "red men", the Cherokees' Asian ancestors would ultimately have been Lemurians not Atlanteans:
A: Orientals come from a region known in your legends as "Lemuria," and are a previous hybridization from 7 genetic code structures from within Orion Union, designed to best fit the earth climate and cosmic ray environment then existent on earth.
But just to confuse things, the C's followed this up by saying:
Q: (L) What genetic type were the Atlanteans?
A: They were the same as the "Native Americans."
Whether they meant by "Native Americans" solely the Hopi, Pima and their associated North American tribes, I don't know. In any case, if the Hopi and Pima, and the tribes who descended from them, reached North America some time after the Deluge in 10,622 BC, there could subsequently have been large scale intermixing over the centuries with the Native American tribes brought over from Asia in 5,200 BC. This certainly would have allowed for the exchange of cultural myths including the Atlantean Flood myth in what Hancock describes as "shared archaic knowledge". I guess the other possibility is that some Native Americans could have used the Bering Strait to migrate to Asia where they may have mixed with the Asiatic peoples until they had to be rescued by the Greys from the cataclysm in 5,200 BC. This alternative possibility seems unlikely though.
But this begs the question of which particular Atlanteans reached Anatolia and Egypt directly after the Deluge. Were those who went to Anatolia purely white Aryan types or was there a mixture of Aryans and "red men"? Conversely, were those who went to what today we call Egypt mainly "red men" rather than white Aryans or were they again a mixture of both races? Indeed, how much interbreeding had gone on within the Atlantean Empire prior to the Deluge?
Could, for example, the Basque people who today occupy Northern Spain and Southern France along the Pyrenees have been a cross-bred race? Basques have the highest incidence of Rh negative blood of any people in the world, significantly higher than the rest of Europe, even significantly higher than neighbouring regions of France and Spain. Linguists have also determined Euskara, the Basque language, to be a language isolate, pre-Indo European and unrelated to any other language in the world. Some hint that this may be the case was given in the following exchange in a recent session:
But this begs the question of which particular Atlanteans reached Anatolia and Egypt directly after the Deluge. Were those who went to Anatolia purely white Aryan types or was there a mixture of Aryans and "red men"? Conversely, were those who went to what today we call Egypt mainly "red men" rather than white Aryans or were they again a mixture of both races? Indeed, how much interbreeding had gone on within the Atlantean Empire prior to the Deluge?
Could, for example, the Basque people who today occupy Northern Spain and Southern France along the Pyrenees have been a cross-bred race? Basques have the highest incidence of Rh negative blood of any people in the world, significantly higher than the rest of Europe, even significantly higher than neighbouring regions of France and Spain. Linguists have also determined Euskara, the Basque language, to be a language isolate, pre-Indo European and unrelated to any other language in the world. Some hint that this may be the case was given in the following exchange in a recent session:
(Altair) Why do Basques have the highest incidence of RH negative blood of any people in the world?
A: Less mixing with outsiders. But also consider the indigenous people of South America and the Western hemisphere.
Q: (L) So I perceive, perhaps wrongly, that there was something more to that question than you actually put into it. Am I correct that you wanted to know
something about HOW DID THEY GET the high percentage of negative blood? Yeah?
(Altair) Yes. I thought it was connected to Atlantis in some way, but I wasn't sure how.
(L) Okay. He thought it was connected to Atlantis. Was he in fact, correct in that assumption that was latent in the question and not perfectly expressed?
A: Close
Q: (L) Well, you know, the one thing that's always bothered me has been the fact that there was so much RH negative blood in Central South America. I mean among the indigenous peoples of the Americas plus this little group of Basques, and yet somehow they are vastly different in some respects. I mean very different physically and otherwise. So that's something that deserves some research, and maybe some genetic studies.
So, the C's seem to be suggesting here that the Basques had a link with the indigenous people of South America and the western Hemisphere, who are presumably the Inca, Aztec, Maya, Hopi and Pima who were all Atlanteans of the "red race". Could this link explain the Basques distinct appearance amongst the Caucasian peoples of Western Europe? Subsequently, the C's said this link went off-planet:
(Altair) Was RH negative blood originally the result of some genetic manipulations?
A: Yes
(Altair) If so, for what purpose?
A: Those most connected to off-world bloodlines.
Q: (L) So was it genetically manipulated off-world in an older time and place? Is that what you're suggesting?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And it's more closely connected. Are these bloodlines negative bloodlines?
A: Some but not the way promoted by the ignorant.
Q: (L) You mean all those people who say if you've got RH negative, you're reptilian. Is that it?
A: Yes.
BTW: Has anyone looked into this matter as Laura suggested?
I would ask though whether the Basque Atlantean survivors went directly to the Pyrenees after the Deluge (unless they were already located there) or did they travel there as part of a westward migration from Anatolia or even Egypt. Whatever the case, they seem to have kept themselves very much to themselves until relatively modern times.
Incidentally, when the C's speak of "Those most connected to off-world bloodlines", this makes for a confusing remark as we are all supposed to be connected to off-world bloodlines. Does this remark in any way connect with what the C's said here about the Nordic Covenant:
Incidentally, when the C's speak of "Those most connected to off-world bloodlines", this makes for a confusing remark as we are all supposed to be connected to off-world bloodlines. Does this remark in any way connect with what the C's said here about the Nordic Covenant:
Q: Well, let me get to some of these other questions. Previously you said that the central thing about the Nordic Covenant was that there were bloodlines that extend off the planet. From what I understand, all humans on the planet have bloodlines that extend off the planet. In what sense did you mean this about the Nordic Covenant; that the bloodlines extend off the planet?
A: Not all so recent, not all so “pure.”
Q: In the sense of recent, how recent do you mean?
A: Speculate, using your transcripts.
Could the Basques in some way be connected to the Nordic Covenant since their bloodline appears to be not so recent and not so pure vis-à-vis the Aryans?
As to your statement "So, who were those who ruled over North and South America (often in such a cruel fashion)? Those cultures seem to have vanished due to climate change in many cases", I would point out that many of these cultures were subject to reptilian domination given the serpent gods these people worshipped and served:
As to your statement "So, who were those who ruled over North and South America (often in such a cruel fashion)? Those cultures seem to have vanished due to climate change in many cases", I would point out that many of these cultures were subject to reptilian domination given the serpent gods these people worshipped and served:
Q: (L) Who was Arajuna of Tiahuanaco?
A: Well, we believe that you are referring to one of approximately eight hybrids that ruled the area currently referred to as Central America. Hybrids being a 4th density to 3rd density transfer experiment from the Lizard race to the human race, which was abandoned after approximately 240 years of experimentation by the Lizard Beings, due to the lack of success for sustaining physical duplication, or reproduction of the race. It was one of several attempts by the Lizard Beings to directly transmit their souls into 3rd density environment for permanent placement there. And, of course it is no longer perceived as necessary by them because their intention is to rule 3rd density beings in 4th density when they arrive there.
Q: (L) Who built the city of Tiahuanaco?
A: The Lizard Beings in cooperation with humans.
Q: (L) When was it built?
A: Varying time frames since it seems to have been destroyed at two points. We have to estimate an average of 8,000 years prior to the current time, as you measure it.
This domination especially applied to the Mayan people of Central America the bulk of whom appear to have been abducted by the Reptilians and taken off planet:
Q: (L) What happened to the Mayans?
A: Taken by Lizard beings to cosmos in 4 D. "Lizzieland."
However, the Mayan civilisation was supposedly linked to the older Olmec civilisation, who judging from the statues and head sculptures that remain of them, appear to have been negroes, possibly from Africa. Quoting from Wikipedia:
The Olmecs (/ˈɒlmɛks, ˈoʊl-/) or Olmec were an early known major Mesoamerican civilization, flourishing in the modern-day Mexican states of Veracruz and Tabasco from roughly 1200 to 400 BC during Mesoamerica's formative period. They were initially centered at the site of their development in San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán, but moved to La Venta in the 10th century BC following the decline of San Lorenzo. The Olmecs disappeared mysteriously in the 4th century BC, leaving the region sparsely populated until the 19th century.

Could the Olmecs have also disappeared to Lizzieland or were they taken back to Africa by the Lizards? The Olmecs certainly seem to have achieved quite a high level of civilisation including the building of large pyramids. However, were they used as enforcers over the native Mayans by the Lizards in the same way that they had previously used the Nephilim? If so, it could explain the following comments by the C's:
Q: (L) Now, relating to what we have been discussing lately. Did any groups of the black race, on their own, ever create a high civilization as has been reported by several archaeologists or other individuals.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) On their own without assistance?
A: No.
Q: (L) Who did they have assistance from?
A: Lizards.
Q: (L) Why have black people, in general, for most of recorded history, been living in such primitive conditions with such primitive mind set?
A: Isolation from modern interaction.
Q: (L) Why is this?
A: Karma. Punishment for past society which was cruel master hierarchical.
Rather than Africa, could that high civilisation have been located in Central America?
What this proves though is that until we start to take into account the influence of alien or intra-terrestrial groups on humanity, we shall never get close to understanding our true history.
What this proves though is that until we start to take into account the influence of alien or intra-terrestrial groups on humanity, we shall never get close to understanding our true history.