Session 26 April 2025

Reading your post, I recalled some parallels between Cherokee and Egyptian myths that Graham Hancock mentioned in his new book, "America Before." As Hancock himself said, this relationship does not have to mean actual physical contact or communication between cultures, but is rather evidence of a highly advanced global culture of great antiquity. So, who were those who ruled over North and South America (often in such a cruel fashion)? Those cultures seem to have vanished due to climate change in many cases. Climate change was helped along by the encrochament of the Europeans via war and disease. Not much of a conflict, more like a slapdown.

I drilled down in a bit in ChatGPT about the Osiris - Cherokee myth similarities"

Insofar as I am aware, Hancock never calls this highly advanced global culture of great antiquity Atlantis but leaves his readers/listeners to make that connection if they wish to. However, the C's have clarified the matter for us and have told us who the Atlantean survivors were:​

Q: (L) Where did the Egyptians come from?

A: Atlantis.

Q: (L) Which came first, the Sumerians or Atlanteans?

A: Atlanteans.

Q: (L) Were the Sumerians a high civilization at the same time the Atlanteans were?

A: After.

Q: (L) Did the Atlanteans go to Sumeria and afterwards go to Egypt?

A: Travelled.

Q: (L) The Atlanteans travelled to Sumeria?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Did they set up outposts in Sumeria?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Then did the main Atlanteans move to Egypt when Atlantis was destroyed?

A: Yes. And elsewhere.

Q: (L) Where else did the Atlanteans go?

A: Americas. Inca. Aztec. Maya. Hopi Tribe. Pima tribe.

You will note that they did not mention the Cherokee tribe in the list quoted above. This could mean that the ancestors of the Cherokee were amongst the Native American Indian tribes who were airlifted from Asia to North America by the Greys in 5,200 BC:​

Q: (L) What is the source of the Native American Indians?

A: Asia.

Q: (L) Across the Bering Strait?

A: No. Rescued. Transferred.

Q: (L) By whom?

A: Grays.

Q: (L) What were they rescued out of?

A: Cataclysm.

Q: (L) When did that cataclysm occur?

A: 7200 years ago approx.

Q: (L) What was the nature of that cataclysm?

A: Comets.

Q: (L) Where do the Basques come from?

A: Atlantis.

As Asiatics or Orientals, rather than Atlantean "red men", the Cherokees' Asian ancestors would ultimately have been Lemurians not Atlanteans:​

A: Orientals come from a region known in your legends as "Lemuria," and are a previous hybridization from 7 genetic code structures from within Orion Union, designed to best fit the earth climate and cosmic ray environment then existent on earth.

But just to confuse things, the C's followed this up by saying:

Q: (L) What genetic type were the Atlanteans?

A: They were the same as the "Native Americans."

Whether they meant by "Native Americans" solely the Hopi, Pima and their associated North American tribes, I don't know. In any case, if the Hopi and Pima, and the tribes who descended from them, reached North America some time after the Deluge in 10,622 BC, there could subsequently have been large scale intermixing over the centuries with the Native American tribes brought over from Asia in 5,200 BC. This certainly would have allowed for the exchange of cultural myths including the Atlantean Flood myth in what Hancock describes as "shared archaic knowledge". I guess the other possibility is that some Native Americans could have used the Bering Strait to migrate to Asia where they may have mixed with the Asiatic peoples until they had to be rescued by the Greys from the cataclysm in 5,200 BC. This alternative possibility seems unlikely though.

But this begs the question of which particular Atlanteans reached Anatolia and Egypt directly after the Deluge. Were those who went to Anatolia purely white Aryan types or was there a mixture of Aryans and "red men"? Conversely, were those who went to what today we call Egypt mainly "red men" rather than white Aryans or were they again a mixture of both races? Indeed, how much interbreeding had gone on within the Atlantean Empire prior to the Deluge?

Could, for example, the Basque people who today occupy Northern Spain and Southern France along the Pyrenees have been a cross-bred race? Basques have the highest incidence of Rh negative blood of any people in the world, significantly higher than the rest of Europe, even significantly higher than neighbouring regions of France and Spain. Linguists have also determined Euskara, the Basque language, to be a language isolate, pre-Indo European and unrelated to any other language in the world. Some hint that this may be the case was given in the following exchange in a recent session:
(Altair) Why do Basques have the highest incidence of RH negative blood of any people in the world?

A: Less mixing with outsiders. But also consider the indigenous people of South America and the Western hemisphere.

Q: (L) So I perceive, perhaps wrongly, that there was something more to that question than you actually put into it. Am I correct that you wanted to know

something about HOW DID THEY GET the high percentage of negative blood? Yeah?

(Altair) Yes. I thought it was connected to Atlantis in some way, but I wasn't sure how.

(L) Okay. He thought it was connected to Atlantis. Was he in fact, correct in that assumption that was latent in the question and not perfectly expressed?

A: Close

Q: (L) Well, you know, the one thing that's always bothered me has been the fact that there was so much RH negative blood in Central South America. I mean among the indigenous peoples of the Americas plus this little group of Basques, and yet somehow they are vastly different in some respects. I mean very different physically and otherwise. So that's something that deserves some research, and maybe some genetic studies.

So, the C's seem to be suggesting here that the Basques had a link with the indigenous people of South America and the western Hemisphere, who are presumably the Inca, Aztec, Maya, Hopi and Pima who were all Atlanteans of the "red race". Could this link explain the Basques distinct appearance amongst the Caucasian peoples of Western Europe? Subsequently, the C's said this link went off-planet:
(Altair) Was RH negative blood originally the result of some genetic manipulations?

A: Yes

(Altair) If so, for what purpose?

A: Those most connected to off-world bloodlines.

Q: (L) So was it genetically manipulated off-world in an older time and place? Is that what you're suggesting?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And it's more closely connected. Are these bloodlines negative bloodlines?

A: Some but not the way promoted by the ignorant.

Q: (L) You mean all those people who say if you've got RH negative, you're reptilian. Is that it?

A: Yes.

BTW: Has anyone looked into this matter as Laura suggested?

I would ask though whether the Basque Atlantean survivors went directly to the Pyrenees after the Deluge (unless they were already located there) or did they travel there as part of a westward migration from Anatolia or even Egypt. Whatever the case, they seem to have kept themselves very much to themselves until relatively modern times.

Incidentally, when the C's speak of "Those most connected to off-world bloodlines", this makes for a confusing remark as we are all supposed to be connected to off-world bloodlines. Does this remark in any way connect with what the C's said here about the Nordic Covenant:​
Q: Well, let me get to some of these other questions. Previously you said that the central thing about the Nordic Covenant was that there were bloodlines that extend off the planet. From what I understand, all humans on the planet have bloodlines that extend off the planet. In what sense did you mean this about the Nordic Covenant; that the bloodlines extend off the planet?

A: Not all so recent, not all so “pure.”

Q: In the sense of recent, how recent do you mean?

A: Speculate, using your transcripts.

Could the Basques in some way be connected to the Nordic Covenant since their bloodline appears to be not so recent and not so pure vis-à-vis the Aryans?

As to your statement "So, who were those who ruled over North and South America (often in such a cruel fashion)? Those cultures seem to have vanished due to climate change in many cases", I would point out that many of these cultures were subject to reptilian domination given the serpent gods these people worshipped and served:
Q: (L) Who was Arajuna of Tiahuanaco?
A: Well, we believe that you are referring to one of approximately eight hybrids that ruled the area currently referred to as Central America. Hybrids being a 4th density to 3rd density transfer experiment from the Lizard race to the human race, which was abandoned after approximately 240 years of experimentation by the Lizard Beings, due to the lack of success for sustaining physical duplication, or reproduction of the race. It was one of several attempts by the Lizard Beings to directly transmit their souls into 3rd density environment for permanent placement there. And, of course it is no longer perceived as necessary by them because their intention is to rule 3rd density beings in 4th density when they arrive there.
Q: (L) Who built the city of Tiahuanaco?
A: The Lizard Beings in cooperation with humans.
Q: (L) When was it built?
A: Varying time frames since it seems to have been destroyed at two points. We have to estimate an average of 8,000 years prior to the current time, as you measure it.​

This domination especially applied to the Mayan people of Central America the bulk of whom appear to have been abducted by the Reptilians and taken off planet:
Q: (L) What happened to the Mayans?

A: Taken by Lizard beings to cosmos in 4 D. "Lizzieland."

However, the Mayan civilisation was supposedly linked to the older Olmec civilisation, who judging from the statues and head sculptures that remain of them, appear to have been negroes, possibly from Africa. Quoting from Wikipedia:
The Olmecs (/ˈɒlmɛks, ˈoʊl-/) or Olmec were an early known major Mesoamerican civilization, flourishing in the modern-day Mexican states of Veracruz and Tabasco from roughly 1200 to 400 BC during Mesoamerica's formative period. They were initially centered at the site of their development in San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán, but moved to La Venta in the 10th century BC following the decline of San Lorenzo. The Olmecs disappeared mysteriously in the 4th century BC, leaving the region sparsely populated until the 19th century.

1749235535788.png

Could the Olmecs have also disappeared to Lizzieland or were they taken back to Africa by the Lizards? The Olmecs certainly seem to have achieved quite a high level of civilisation including the building of large pyramids. However, were they used as enforcers over the native Mayans by the Lizards in the same way that they had previously used the Nephilim? If so, it could explain the following comments by the C's:
Q: (L) Now, relating to what we have been discussing lately. Did any groups of the black race, on their own, ever create a high civilization as has been reported by several archaeologists or other individuals.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) On their own without assistance?

A: No.

Q: (L) Who did they have assistance from?

A: Lizards.

Q: (L) Why have black people, in general, for most of recorded history, been living in such primitive conditions with such primitive mind set?

A: Isolation from modern interaction.

Q: (L) Why is this?

A: Karma. Punishment for past society which was cruel master hierarchical.

Rather than Africa, could that high civilisation have been located in Central America?

What this proves though is that until we start to take into account the influence of alien or intra-terrestrial groups on humanity, we shall never get close to understanding our true history.

 
Could the Olmecs have also disappeared to Lizzieland or were they taken back to Africa by the Lizards?

Session October 22 2022

(irjO) Archeology related question: Teotihuacan, is known as "The city of the gods", is an ancient Mesoamerican city located in the valley area of Mexico, with pyramids and all that. It's impressive and nobody knows who built it. The Mayans occupied the city when it was already abandoned. There is the theory of the Olmecs, who were an ancient civilization, being the original builders. Were the Olmecs the original builders? If yes, what happened to them and the city?

A: Close enough. Died out due to famine and disease.
 
Session October 22 2022
(irjO) Archeology related question: Teotihuacan, is known as "The city of the gods", is an ancient Mesoamerican city located in the valley area of Mexico, with pyramids and all that. It's impressive and nobody knows who built it. The Mayans occupied the city when it was already abandoned. There is the theory of the Olmecs, who were an ancient civilization, being the original builders. Were the Olmecs the original builders? If yes, what happened to them and the city?

A: Close enough. Died out due to famine and disease.

Thank you for clarifying this. The question remains though, were the Olmecs an indigenous people or were they brought in to Central America, perhaps from Africa, by the Lizards? One could dismiss this idea out of hand but then we know that the Greys airlifted Native Americans from Asia to North America, so it is not out of the question. Indeed, there are still mysteries surrounding the origins of some of the peoples of the Americas as this recent article demonstrates:​
Scientists have uncovered genetic traces of a previously unknown group of ancient hunter-gatherers. See: MSN

Scientists have uncovered genetic traces of a previously unknown group of ancient hunter-gatherers who lived approximately 6,000 years ago near the region where North and South America converge.

The discovery, made through DNA analysis of ancient remains found in the high plateaus of present-day Bogotá, Colombia, sheds new light on the complex patterns of human migration across the Americas. Researchers have long known that humans entered the Americas via the Bering land bridge, gradually dispersing southward [MJF: Did they?]. However, the newly identified population appears to represent a distinct lineage, not closely related to known ancient Native American groups from either North or South America.

The findings were published on Wednesday in the journal Science Advances.

“This is unexpected,” said archaeologist Andre Luiz Campelo dos Santos of Florida Atlantic University, who was not involved in the study. “Until now, we didn’t believe there was any other lineage that might appear in South America.”

Remarkably, this ancient group seems to have vanished within 4,000 years, replaced by a genetically distinct population. The reasons for their disappearance remain uncertain. Scientists are now working to determine whether the group was absorbed into another, larger population or displaced entirely.

Further genetic research across South America may help clarify whether this lineage truly disappeared or left descendants whose traces have yet to be identified, Campelo dos Santos added.

Understanding the genes of these early inhabitants is crucial to building a fuller picture of the continent’s human history. Since ancient populations would have passed through this corridor while migrating south, the region around Bogotá is considered a key waypoint.

“The area is the gateway to the South American continent,” said study co-author Andrea Casas-Vargas of the National University of Colombia.
This makes me wonder just how frequently the Lizards/Greys were shifting human populations around or seeding new groups in specific regions who had been specially adapted for the location concerned, as the C's mention below:​
A: Each time a new flock was "planted," it was engineered to be best suited to the environment where it was planted. Aryans are the only exception, as they had to be moved to earth in an emergency.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for clarifying this. The question remains though, were the Olmecs an indigenous people or were they brought in to Central America, perhaps from Africa, by the Lizards?
What about Atlantis? Didn’t the Cs said that during a long time Atlantis was a huge empire composed by 3 races that shared part of a huge island, the Paranthas, the indigenous type and the newer race coming from Kantek.
Olmecs, Mayans, Aztecs, Native America, Incas and perhaps others still unknown to us, etc. Would come from the Atlantean race that ruled one of the part of that empire, and had colonies in the americas, perhaps the Paranthas had colonies in Africa at some point, and kantekkians had colonies on the rest of the continent. Why do you assume that lizards transported Africans to the Americas when they also could have just easily travel to there.
 
The question remains though, were the Olmecs an indigenous people or were they brought in to Central America, perhaps from Africa, by the Lizards?

Technologically the Olmecs seem to have been no slouches.

Olmec colossal heads vary in height from 1.47 to 3.4 metres, or from 4.8 to 11.2 feet, and weigh between 6 and 50 tons. (from wikipedia)

If you can lift 50 tonnes (by acoustic levitation?) you might be able to build some sailing vessels, but it's not clear what the motive for such a venture could have been. So I think they were resettled 'on order from above'.

What about Atlantis? Didn’t the Cs said that during a long time Atlantis was a huge empire composed by 3 races that shared part of a huge island, the Paranthas, the indigenous type and the newer race coming from Kantek.

I don't see the Paranthas from Australasia entering into Central America, really.

This is roughly 4,000 years after the downfall of Atlantis which probably left the P.'s pretty much disassembled.

Somehow I like the idea of the Olmecs having been inserted into the area as enforcers.
 
I don't see the Paranthas from Australasia entering into Central America, really.

This is roughly 4,000 years after the downfall of Atlantis which probably left the P.'s pretty much disassembled.
Too many assumptions, first, the assumption of them being black is because of the carvings and the face factions similar to nowadays Africans. But not necessarily they were Africans type. there are many indigenous people who can also match those characteristics. Could be even a race that we don’t know much about, that were sort of a genetic combination.
Let’s have in mind also, that Ancient Egyptians traveled back and forward to the americas, thousands of years ago, why another civilization from a similar period wouldn’t back then?

Another thing, the Australian reference about aboriginals, is just for us to know or have an idea on how Paranthas might have looked like, not that they were in that region alone. If the island empire was in the Atlantic, thats where their home base was supposed to be located. And since they were extinct, modern African people might be the result of a genetic combination of that civilization with others types.

Remember that the planet how we see it nowadays was different. There and more land and islands that even existed 1000 years back and nowadays are under waters.

And last one, official dates are most of the time, if not always, wrong, Olmecs could have been much much older than the official timeline they stated. There is almost zero knowledge when it comes to them, and if it wasn’t because of the discovery of the heads, no one would have known about their existence. Could I be wrong? Sure, but the data given so far by the Cs, can sort of give us a clue on this.
 
Last edited:
Too many assumptions, first, the assumption of them being black is because of the carvings and the face factions similar to nowadays Africans. But not necessarily they were Africans type. there are many indigenous people who can also match those characteristics.
Indeed. There is some evidence of Australian Aboriginal DNA in the ancient Americas:


However, as far as I know there is no evidence whatsoever of ancient African DNA there. Which suggests that the Olmecs were most likely descendents of one of the three Atlantean groups that was similar to Australian Aboriginal people.
 
Too many assumptions, first, the assumption of them being black is because of the carvings and the face factions similar to nowadays Africans. But not necessarily they were Africans type. there are many indigenous people who can also match those characteristics. Could be even a race that we don’t know much about, that were sort of a genetic combination.
Let’s have in mind also, that Ancient Egyptians traveled back and forward to the americas, thousands of years ago, why another civilization from a similar period wouldn’t back then?

Are you actually referring to my post?

I haven't even mentioned the terms black or African, and I have acknowledged that sailing vessels might have been built by the Olmecs.

Another thing, the Australian reference about aboriginals, is just for us to know or have an idea on how Paranthas might have looked like, not that they were in that region alone. If the island empire was in the Atlantic, thats where their home base was supposed to be located. And since they were extinct, modern African people might be the result of a genetic combination of that civilization with others types.

I'm having difficulties understanding what regions and islands you're referring to.

We know that Atlantean civilization was pretty much worldwide so the Paranthas would not have to be located on the assumed imperial island in the Atlantic. When the descendents of the Paranthas are said to be located in the Southern India and Australasian area why not conclude that their forebears had probably lived there as well?

Since Africans have indeed different features there could have been some genetic combinations performed, but I would wait for some reliable evidence before thinking that African civilization did not develop on its own.
 
Are you actually referring to my post?
Yours, but also bringing context about what was mentioned about the Olmecs by MJF:

However, the Mayan civilisation was supposedly linked to the older Olmec civilisation, who judging from the statues and head sculptures that remain of them, appear to have been negroes, possibly from Africa. Quoting from Wikipedia:
Sorry if I made it confusing.

I'm having difficulties understanding what regions and islands you're referring to.

To give you some examples: Doggerland (North Sea, Europe), Sundaland (Southeast Asia), the were more islands from the Bahamas area still above waters around 1000 to 900 years ago. Low-lying atolls and islands in the Pacific (like parts of Micronesia, Polynesia) and Indian Ocean (like around the Maldives, Chagos Archipelago), in front of Africa and near nowadays Canaria’s islands Etc. Lots of places that were above waters until very recently in our timeline.

We know that Atlantean civilization was pretty much worldwide so the Paranthas would not have to be located on the assumed imperial island in the Atlantic.

Right, that’s why I mentioned a home base:

Session 31 may 1997

Q: The Atlanteans? Were the Celts of India at war with the Atlanteans in the Atlantic?

A: Atlantis was merely a home base of an advanced civilisation of 3 races of humans occupying different sections of a huge Island empire, which, in itself, underwent 3 incarnations over a 100,000 year period as you would measure it.

Q: The 3 races were the Celts... and who were the second and third?

A: Or Kantekkians.

Q: Are the Kantekkians different from the Celts?

A: Only in the sense of long term racial and genetic blending.

Q: So, Atlantis had the Kantekkians and who else?

A: Race you would call "Native Americans," and a third, no longer existing race, somewhat resembling Australian or Guinean aborigines, only lighter in complexion.

Q: Was this third group destroyed by the other two?

A: One of the 3 cataclysms.

Q: Paranthas. Who were the Paranthas?

A: Nation of race mentioned above.

Q: So, the Paranthas were the antecedents of the Abos of Australia?

A: Yes, and compare to now existing peoples of India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Australia, and New Guinea for similarities, bearing in mind genetic mixing and dilution.

When the descendents of the Paranthas are said to be located in the Southern India and Australasian area why not conclude that their forebears had probably lived there as well?
Sure, but then, if there was more landmass above waters on different part of the planet, and knowing Egyptians traveled across oceans why would that be difficult to think that any Paranthas descendant either from Africa (if there were descendants of such there) or pacific islands, couldn’t travel to the Americas at any point?
But I think I doubt they did anyways, I don’t think Olmecs had any relation (at least directly) with the African people.

Also there is this:
Session 13 January 2024
Q: (irjO) In a previous session, the C’s answered "close" when I asked if Teotihuacan was built by theOlmecs. What would make it closer, or what detail is missing? Who built it?

A: Group you wouldn't recognize even if named. The previous answer is as close as you can get.

So that also could be something that is out the equation… I suspect it has to do with the giants that are mentioned in the Aztec legends, but that would be another different subject.
 
What about Atlantis? Didn’t the Cs said that during a long time Atlantis was a huge empire composed by 3 races that shared part of a huge island, the Paranthas, the indigenous type and the newer race coming from Kantek.
Olmecs, Mayans, Aztecs, Native America, Incas and perhaps others still unknown to us, etc. Would come from the Atlantean race that ruled one of the part of that empire, and had colonies in the americas, perhaps the Paranthas had colonies in Africa at some point, and kantekkians had colonies on the rest of the continent. Why do you assume that lizards transported Africans to the Americas when they also could have just easily travel to there.
I seem to recall that the C's said that the roots of the negro race (who were the Nubians to the ancient Egyptians) lay in a mixing of Caucasian and Dravidian Indian genetics. This admixing may have taken place in Africa but not necessarily, as it could have been within the India sub-continent:​
Q: What is the origin of the Nubians?

A: Caucus range.

Q: How come they are so terribly black?

A: Genetic mixing.

Q: With what? Anything particularly special about them?

A: East Indian aborigines.

These East Indian aborigines had in turn a Paranthas genetic inheritance judging from what the C's said here:

Q: So, the Paranthas were the antecedents of the Abos of Australia?

A: Yes, and compare to now existing peoples of India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Australia, and New Guinea for similarities, bearing in mind genetic mixing and dilution.

And here:

Q: (seek10) The C's mentioned that the Vedas are written by "descendants" of Paranthas. Where were those "descendants" of Paranthas from? Inside the Indian region (archaic ancestors of Tamilians/Dravidians) or outside the Indian region?

A: The former.

Q: (L) And they are also most strongly represented in the Australian Aborigines, is that correct?

A: Yes

However, I would not rule out your idea that the Paranthas had colonies in the Horn of Africa, the Sudan etc. which is not far from India, given that we know from the C's that the Celts/Kantekkians were at war with the Paranthas in India 50,000 years ago:
Q: As I understand it, Atlantis was already quite a developed civilization at that time, is that correct?

A: Yes, but regions change with waves of immigration, or conquest... witness your own lands.

Q: You also said once that there was a nuclear war in India and that this was what was being discussed in the Vedas when it talks about the 'blue-skinned' people who weren't really blue because they were Celts, and they were flying in aircraft, and they were engaged in this war, etc. Who were the Celts at war with?

A: The Paranthas.

As to when the Nubian/Negro race emerged is impossible to say from the clues we have been given but it could be more than 50,000 years ago judging from the above.

You asked why I assumed that lizards transported Africans to the Americas when they also could have just easily travel to there. Could they so easily have travelled there in antiquity though? Archaeologists believe that the Olmecs (if they were Negros from Africa) emerged as a distinct civilisation in Central America some time between 1400 BC and 1200 BC. If we take the earlier date, that is 2,900 years before Columbus discovered the Americas. There is no archaeological evidence to suggest that any known civilisation had the technology in 1400 BC to sail across the Atlantic Ocean, although the Phoenicians (and possibly the Egyptians) could have done so in theory, as the former were the great mariners of the ancient world and were exceptional seafarers. Hence, it is highly unlikely that an African group could have sailed unaided to Central America in 1400 BC. Could they have been helped by the Lizards though? This question assumes a Negro group did have links with the Lizards but is there any support in the transcripts for this? Well there is:
Q: (L) Now, relating to what we have been discussing lately. Did any groups of the black race, on their own, ever create a high civilization as has been reported by several archaeologists or other individuals.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) On their own without assistance?

A: No.

Q: (L) Who did they have assistance from?

A: Lizards.

So, could the Lizards have helped a group of Negros from Africa to travel over to Central America (today's Mexico) and establish an advanced civilisation there? If so, why may they have done so? Perhaps it was for rubber production, which was certainly conducted in that area in antiquity. The other possibility is mining since the Nubians of antiquity were skilled miners, especially gold mining as Nubia (Sudan) was a prime source of gold for the Egyptian pharaohs and we know that the Lizard beings have a penchant for gold.

The later Lizard dominated cultures of Mesoamerica encouraged bloodletting and human sacrifice. However, the C's said that the Maya did not conduct human sacrifice rituals. What is interesting though is that the Olmec seemed to be the first society to practice ritual bloodletting (later adopted by the Maya) and played the Mesoamerican ballgame, hallmarks of nearly all subsequent Mesoamerican societies. Could this be evidence of Lizard influence perhaps since these beings certainly encourage bloodletting, if only for their feeding purposes at 3rd density?

If the Olmec were used as the Lizards' enforcers over the Maya, is there any evidence of a Mayan rebellion or resistance to their rule? It appears that the first Olmec centre at San Lorenzo, was all but abandoned around 900 BC at about the same time as that at La Venta rose to prominence. Widespread destruction of many San Lorenzo monuments also occurred around the 950's BCE, which may indicate an internal uprising or, less likely, an invasion. However, current thinking is that environmental changes may have been responsible for this shift in Olmec centres, with certain important rivers changing course.

I accept that the 'out of Africa' origins for the Olmec is a controversial view as is discussed on the Wikipedia entry for the Olmec:
The flat-faced, thick-lipped heads have caused some debate due to their resemblance to some African facial characteristics. Based on this comparison, some writers have said that the Olmecs were Africans who had emigrated to the New World. But the vast majority of archaeologists and other Mesoamerican scholars reject claims of pre-Columbian contacts with Africa. Explanations for the facial features of the colossal heads include the possibility that the heads were carved in this manner due to the shallow space allowed on the basalt boulders. Others note that in addition to the broad noses and thick lips, the eyes of the heads often show the epicanthic fold, and that all these characteristics can still be found in modern Mesoamerican Indians. For instance, in the 1940s, the artist/art historian Miguel Covarrubias published a series of photos of Olmec artwork and of the faces of modern Mexican Indians with very similar facial characteristics. The African origin hypothesis assumes that Olmec carving was intended to be a representation of the inhabitants, an assumption that is hard to justify given the full corpus of representation in Olmec carving.

Ivan Van Sertima claimed that the seven braids on the Tres Zapotes head was an Ethiopian hair style, but he offered no evidence it was a contemporary style. The Egyptologist Frank J. Yurco has said that the Olmec braids do not resemble contemporary Egyptian or Nubian braids.​

However, once you factor in the possible assistance of the Lizards, it becomes harder to dismiss the possibility of pre-Columbian contacts with Africa. To say that modern Mexican Indians have very similar facial characteristics does not rule out the possibility of interbreeding over the centuries with the local indigenous populations and these genetic characteristics being preserved in later generations. Afterall, the C's have said that the Nubians themselves were a cross between Caucasians and East Indian aborigines.

As a case it is certainly not overwhelming but it still raises the possibility.

P.S. I see that my post has now crossed with your posts responding to Ursus Minor. However, this post is intended to address the points that you raised in your original post responding to mine. It is now 2.45 AM in England so time for sleep but happy to pick the matter up later today😩.​
 
Last edited:
So, could the Lizards have helped a group of Negros from Africa to travel over to Central America (today's Mexico)
Assistance could be multiple things, like the Atlanteans who also had assistance from lizards beings to develop their tech (Cs could also have referred to the same Atlantean era), our own modern civilization also had one way or another help from lizard beings or 4D STS to develop the current tech we have. If the sole idea that negroes we’re transported by lizard beings because of this:

Q: (L) What is the source of the Native American Indians?

A: Asia.

Q: (L) Across the Bering Strait?

A: No. Rescued. Transferred.

Q: (L) By whom?

A: Grays.

Q: (L) What were they rescued out of?

A: Cataclysm.

Q: (L) When did that cataclysm occur?

A: 7200 years ago approx.

Then I think its answered already by Cs that Native American were the ones transferred and perhaps some others moved by themselves from other areas prior to that cataclysmic event 7200, which would explain why some indigenous people look a bit different to others native Americans. For example, there are Peruvian natives with green and blue eyes that have no connection with any other culture, just to put an example. Which by the way, according to the Cs Machu Picchu (in Peru) was build 12009 BC way older than any mesoamerican known culture.

But genetically speaking all indigenous in the americas have zero connection to African people across the continent prior to the colonial period, official archeologist said that Mayans among other civilizations were direct descendants of these Olmecs because of the timeline, but I highly doubt it, beside there is no direct proven connection, only to the fact of being older culture, and that Mayans were inspired by them through stories, astronomical systems and art.
 

What this proves though is that until we start to take into account the influence of alien or intra-terrestrial groups on humanity, we shall never get close to understanding our true history.​
Such an amazing collection of both alien and human characters in the true history of Earth. Maybe we could ask the C's what happened to the Olmecs.

There have been a lot of reports recently of areas of tropical forest being much more populated in the past than thought, with vast city infrastructures. Too bad Cortez and others destroyed so much, there would have been some interesting stories.

Q: (L) Who built the city of Tiahuanaco?
A: The Lizard Beings in cooperation with humans.

Q: (L) When was it built?
A: Varying time frames since it seems to have been destroyed at two points. We have to estimate an average of 8,000 years prior to the current time, as you measure it.

What about the relationship between Lizzie guides and human workers? Did they actually share a 3D existence that was slightly different 2,000 years BC... but nevertheless, 3D? I wonder about the nature of that relationship. When did the Lizzies leave third density entirely? What are the real differences between all the Atlantean factions? Or are we seeing mostly the same global group through different cultural perspectives? What was the relationship between the Atlanteans and the Lizzies? Interesting stuff!
 
Assistance could be multiple things, like the Atlanteans who also had assistance from lizards beings to develop their tech (Cs could also have referred to the same Atlantean era), our own modern civilization also had one way or another help from lizard beings or 4D STS to develop the current tech we have. If the sole idea that negroes we’re transported by lizard beings because of this:



Then I think its answered already by Cs that Native American were the ones transferred and perhaps some others moved by themselves from other areas prior to that cataclysmic event 7200, which would explain why some indigenous people look a bit different to others native Americans. For example, there are Peruvian natives with green and blue eyes that have no connection with any other culture, just to put an example. Which by the way, according to the Cs Machu Picchu (in Peru) was build 12009 BC way older than any mesoamerican known culture.

But genetically speaking all indigenous in the americas have zero connection to African people across the continent prior to the colonial period, official archeologist said that Mayans among other civilizations were direct descendants of these Olmecs because of the timeline, but I highly doubt it, beside there is no direct proven connection, only to the fact of being older culture, and that Mayans were inspired by them through stories, astronomical systems and art.
I agree with you that it is very difficult to tie down who was doing what and when in Central and South America based on current archaeological knowledge. It helps that researchers like Graham Hancock have been prepared to challenge the current historical model and to propose that there was an earlier worldwide civilisation (Atlantis) that collapsed during the Younger Dryas Event but left behind shared archaic knowledge. As you say, there are perhaps unknown civilisations in the Americas that have come and gone that we know nothing about. Indeed, in my earlier post, I posted an article on one that has only recently been discovered in Colombia.

Although I have proposed that the Lizards or Greys could have transported a group of Negros from Africa to Central America to establish the Olmec civilisation and act as enforcers over the local Amerindians, my theory is not set in concrete. Thank you for posting the follow up extract where the C's provided further clarification on who built the mysterious city of Teotihuacan. Where they said it was built by a group you wouldn't recognize even if named, shows that there are whole chapters missing in the history of Central America. However, when you had previously asked them whether the Olmecs were the original builders of Teotihuacan they had said "close enough." This leaves me wondering whether the Olmecs had assisted the Lizards and this other human group in its original construction or were they involved in its later reconstruction given what the C's said in the extract below:
Q: (L) Who built the city of Tiahuanaco?
A: The Lizard Beings in cooperation with humans.
Q: (L) When was it built?
A: Varying time frames since it seems to have been destroyed at two points. We have to estimate an average of 8,000 years prior to the current time, as you measure it.

If the Olmecs did play a part in its original construction, this suggests that their presence in Central America dates back to at least 6,000 BC.

I am glad you mentioned the city of Machu Picchu in Peru, which the C's said was built in 12,009 BC and thus before the Deluge. This makes it one of the oldest cities in the world if not the oldest. Although historians attribute its building to the Inca, they themselves have never claimed that their ancestors built it, although no doubt they may have occupied it at some stage prior to the Spanish conquest. What strikes me though is that it is built in stone. If it was an Atlantean city (built by one of the three Atlantean races) it seem to be a bit crude for a civilisation that was supposedly more advanced then our own. Sure you can see towns in our own age built from stone or brick but most modern cities feature skyscrapers made from steel and concrete etc. Machu Picchu looks rather primitive by comparison. It hardly looks space age even though the C's said the Atlanteans were a spacefaring society.

As to the Egyptians visiting South America, there is not much in the way of proof for this in the historical records, although there are certainly tales of Egyptian princes having conducted long range voyages of exploration. The Egyptians gave names for some of the destinations of these voyages but it is not easy to recognise which countries or even continents they were referring to. There have even been claims that they may have reached North America (including the Grand Canyon in Colorado) and Australia (see the Gosford Glyphs: Gosford Glyphs - Wikipedia) but none of these claims are are sustainable and are rejected by Egyptologists as hoaxes. That being said, Laura once asked the C's about white men visiting South America in ancient times and they confirmed that it had been Egyptians and Atlantean descendants:
Q: What white men were seen in South America and talked to the tribes there and promised to return one day and were worshipped as Gods.

A: Egyptians and Atlantean descendants.

Q: What did the Atlanteans do to bring this karma on us such that the Grays and Lizzies...​

A: Worshipped and served self to extreme.

Now I am not sure which timeframe Laura had in mind here and the C's also refer to Atlantean descendants, which is a bit vague as most of us can be viewed as being Atlantean descendants. Their answer may mean though that we are talking about two different groups visiting at different times. The Egyptians did, of course, have Nubian slaves, some of whom could have gone on these transatlantic voyage with them and some may possibly have remained behind. This would be long before the Spanish and Portuguese colonisation of South America where black slaves were transported to the new colonies to work plantations.

As to "Atlantean descendants", they could have had the Celts and Phoenicians in mind here since there is increasing evidence that the Celts and Phoenicians had visited North America in ancient times (perhaps as far back as 800 BC), including establishing trading networks with the Native American Indians and long term settlements. I have written about this subject before on different threads and would refer people to the work of Professor Barry Fell and his ground breaking book America BC (see: Barry Fell - Wikipedia) in which he proposed that translations of inscriptions found on rock surfaces and artifacts in North and South America were written in Old World scripts and languages including Ogham script (used by Irish and Iberian Celts) and Phoenician. Although his works were dismissed by accredited historians and archaeologists, he did find support in some academic quarters:
David H. Kelley, an archaeologist at the University of Calgary who is credited with a major breakthrough in the decipherment of Mayan glyphs, complained about Fell in a 1990 essay: "Fell's work [contains] major academic sins, the three worst being distortion of data, inadequate acknowledgment of predecessors, and lack of presentation of alternative views." In the same essay, however, Kelley went on to state that "I have no personal doubts that some of the inscriptions which have been reported are genuine Celtic ogham." Kelley concluded: "Despite my occasional harsh criticism of Fell's treatment of individual inscriptions, it should be recognized that without Fell's work there would be no [North American] ogham problem to perplex us. We need to ask not only what Fell has done wrong in his epigraphy, but also where we have gone wrong as archaeologists in not recognizing such an extensive European presence in the New World."​

If anyone is interested in Fell's thought provoking book, you can access a pdf copy of it at this link: America B.C. : ancient settlers in the New World : Fell, Barry, 1917-1994 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

If Fell is correct, the presence of Celts in America as far back as 800 BC, if not earlier, could readily explain the extensive copper mine workings in North America that Laura discussed with the C's here:
Q: What group mined the copper in northern Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan, like in Isle Royale?
A: Aryans.
Q: What did they want the copper for?
A: Weapons.
Q: Wouldn't iron make better weapons?
A: Not in 4th density.

The Aryan Celts were (and are) renowned throughout history as skilled miners with known ancient mine workings in the Iberian Peninsula and Great Britain (especially Tin in Cornwall and Devon).

Ursus Minor made us aware in his last post of evidence of Australian Aboriginal DNA in the ancient Americas (see: Session 26 April 2025).

As usual, the archaeologists and anthropologists are still clinging to the Bering Land Bridge theory, even though there is no evidence of any Australasian or Oceana DNA amongst North America Indian peoples living on the west coast of America. The archaeologists cannot bring themselves to consider that ancient people could have undertaken long distance sea voyages, even though Polynesians have been known for their seafaring skills without reliance on modern navigation methods and technology.

However, is it possible that South America was influenced by even more easterly influences, as far east perhaps as the Indian Sub-continent? The answer to this question may be found at the San Agustín Archaeological Park in Colombia:

The San Agustín Archaeological Park (Spanish: Parque Arqueológico de San Agustín) is a large archaeological area located near the town of San Agustín in Huila Department in Colombia. The park contains the largest collection of religious monuments and megalithic sculptures in Latin America and is considered the world's largest necropolis. Belonging to San Agustin culture, it was declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1995. The dates of the statues are uncertain, but they are believed to have been carved between 5–400 AD. The origin of the carvers remains a mystery, as the site is largely unexcavated.

1749316475923.png

On the Alton Towers thread, I was made aware by Forum member N1mTzo of some incredible Hindu-related stone carvings at the Temple of Candi Sukuh located in Berjo, Ngargoyoso district, Karanganyar Regency, Central Java, Indonesia (see: Sukuh - Wikipedia) . Quoting N1mTzo:​
This is a very strange place, which is several stone buildings, including a pyramid similar to the Mayan pyramid (from Mesoamerica, but we are in INDONESIA). In addition, there are stone statues and stone bas-reliefs that contain interesting scenes.
Here is all we have there:
- people with elongated skulls, including giants.
- reptilian creatures with elongated skulls.
- scenes of hybrid creatures. Hybrids of pigs and cows (pigs with horns and tails of cows). Hybrids of people and reptiles.
- a weird guy with a big head (and the appearance of a gray alien) and the beard of an Egyptian pharaoh (let me remind you, we are in Indonesia).

1749317577159.png

This prompted me to respond:

You also mention that there are several stone buildings, including a pyramid similar to the Mayan pyramids from Mesoamerica, at Candi Sukuh. This might suggest there was some cross contact in ancient times (certainly pre-Columban) between Indonesia and South America. Is there anything in South America, on the other side of the Pacific, which might back this up?

Well yes there is and, interestingly, Praveen Mohan has been there and investigated it. The site concerned is the San Agustín Archaeological Park, which is a large archaeological area located near the town of San Agustín in Huila Department in Colombia, South America. So, yet again we encounter a reference to St Augustine, quoting the C's:
"And who was Saint Augustine/San Augustin... Augustus, Augustine Monks, etc?".​

For more see: San Agustín Archaeological Park - Wikipedia

In another episode of Ancient Aliens, Praveen Mohan was invited by David Hatcher Childress to join him at the Park to look at the strange statues unearthed there. Mohan immediately recognised that many of these statues of the gods had counterparts in Hindu tradition. He had examples on his cell phone which he was readily able to show Childress for comparison sake.

The statues present both anthropomorphic and zoomorphic features (from crocodiles, bats and jaguars), having short legs. There were found approximately 300 statues. They were painted in bright colours, mainly yellow, red, black and white, but today only a few of them are still coloured.

The statues vary in height, the tallest being 23 feet (7.0 m) tall. In other regions of the archaeological site where large burial mounds are located, you will see more intimidating figures such as snakes, frogs, and birds strategically place to stand guard for increased protecting during the afterlife. Statues of deities or carving on the ground, of both solar gods, males, and lunar gods, females. These figures and statues provide researchers with some limited insight into the civilization's perception of life and death (see examples below).
1749317791150.png

You will note that the statue above bears something of a resemblance to some of the anthropomorphic stone statues discovered at Göbekli Tepe.​

1749317900222.png
The statue above may be depicting the same fanged deity as the previous statue but this time the figure is covered by a dolmen, a megalithic structure commonly seen in Celtic Western Europe but also in North America too. The dates of the statues are uncertain, but they are believed to have been carved between 5–400 AD. The origin of the carvers remains a mystery, as the site is largely unexcavated.

The statues at Temple of Candi Sukuh could not have been carved any earlier than the 1st century AD, so there is the chance that the statues at San Agustín Archaeological Park may be fairly contemporary. If Praveen Mohan is correct in his assertions, then the similarity with Hindu iconography suggests there may well have been some cultural contact between Hindus from either India or Indonesia (or elsewhere) and the native peoples who then inhabited this part of Colombia.

I am also intrigued by the birdman statue discovered at Candi Sukuh for in Hindu mythology the birdman (a symbol also frequently seen in MesoAmerica) the birdman usually signifies the Hindu deity Garuda. Garuda is usually shown either in a zoomorphic form (a giant bird with partially open wings) or an anthropomorphic form (a man with wings and some ornithic features). Below is an Indian depiction of Garuda for comparison purposes:

1749318074702.png

Throughout the Mahabharata, Garuda is invoked as a symbol of impetuous violent force, speed, and martial prowess. I therefore suggest that the Indonesian statue is most probably an Indonesian stylised version of Garuda. Perhaps a link may also be found here with Central and South American flying serpent gods such as Quetzalcoatl in Aztec Mexico and Kukulkan, who was revered by the Yucatec Maya.
1749318159661.png

For the whole exchange with N1mTzo see the link: Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians

If the links between these two cultures based on different continents is valid, then it drives a coach and horses through the archaeologists claims that there was no cultural exchanges between these lands in ancient times.

I have made references to the Lizards' involvement in the lives of Central and South American peoples in the guise of Quetzalcoatl and Kukulkan for example, which mirrors their involvement with the peoples of the Middle East where they hid behind the guise of deities such as Baal and Yahweh but what about Indonesia? Perhaps the most interesting photo of Candi Sukuh posted by N1mTzo was the one shown directly below:
1749318949960.png

Tell me if you think the image second from the right doesn't remind you of a Grey alien. Is the image immediately to the alien's right also not that of an upright reptilian? Contrast the above image with the images of the Egyptian god Ptah shown below on the right:
1749327468373.png
As to the influence of the Lizards on these cultures, I am reminded of what the C's said here:

A: If you were living in the desert, or jungle, about 7,000 years ago, as you measure time, would you not be impressed if these Reptoid "dudes" came down from the heavens in silvery objects and demonstrated techno-wonders from thousands of years in the future, and taught you calculus, geometry and astrophysics to boot?!?

Q: Is that, in fact, what happened?

A: Yup.

And, of course, the island of Java is not a million miles away from the Lizard built Temple in the Cambodian city of Angkor Wat that was lost in the jungle until it was rediscovered in the 16th century by Portuguese traders and missionaries:
Q: (L) Who built the city of Angkor Wat?

A: That was built by the Lizard Beings themselves. Built approximately 3108 years ago.

Q: (L) Who built the city of Mohenjo Daro?

A: That also was built by the Lizard Beings directly.

Q: (L) Did they live in these cities?

A: No, as stated before, they did not live there, they visited or occupied on a temporary basis, but did not live there.

Q: (L) Who did they build the cities for?

A: They built the cities for themselves and their worshippers amongst humans.

Now the construction of Angkor Wat in Cambodia in 1100 BC is closer both geographically and in time to the construction of Candi Sukuh in Indonesia than to Mohenjo Daro in Pakistan in 4000 BC. Could the Lizards have had, therefore, a similar involvement with the Indonesians, which might explain the discovery of the elongated skulls of reptilian beings (who presumably died in 3D to have left their physical remains behind)? We should recall here how the C's once described the Lizard beings to Laura:​
Q: (L) And could you tell us what the Lizzies look like?

A: Upright alligators with some humanoid features in face.
What this shows is just how active and how involved the Lizards were at this time with the peoples of these countries, which are located on different continents.

Now you mentioned the Peruvian natives with green and blue eyes that seemingly have no connection with any other culture. This makes me think immediately of the strange elongated Paracas skulls found in that region of Peru, which have much larger jaws than those of normal human beings. and a larger brain capacity, where recent DNA studies suggest a Middle Eastern Link (and even a potential link to Scotland) and thus possibly a connection to the human hybrid that history remembers as Queen Nefertiti, the wife of Pharaoh Akhenaten and later of Abraham/Moses, who the C's described as a "deep level punctuator" with links to the Aryan subterranean or underworld civilisation known as the Nation of the Third Eye.
1749320719509.png

Quoting from an article posted on the Archaeology Worlds website - see: New DNA Testing on 2,000-Year-Old Elongated Paracas Skulls Changes Known History - Archaeology Worlds

New DNA Testing on 2,000-Year-Old Elongated Paracas Skulls Changes Known History​

From the samples, only the mitochondrial DNA (DNA from the mother’s side) could be extracted. Out of four hair samples, one of them couldn’t be sequences. The remaining three hair samples all showed a Haplogroup (genetic population group) of H2A, which is found most frequently in Eastern Europe, and at a low frequency in Western Europe.

The bone powder from the most elongated skull tested came back as T2B, which originates in Mesopotamia and what is now Syria, essentially the heart of the fertile crescent. “It rewrites history as we know it,” said Marzulli.

“If these results hold,” writes Brien Foerster on his website Hidden Inca Tours, “the history of the migration of people to the Americas is far more complex than we have been told previously.”

If these results are confirmed through further tests, it means that people from Europe and the Middle East migrated to the Americas long before it is conventionally believed.

However, mention of the Nation of the Third Eye brings us back to the Olmecs again, since according to the C's they seemed to have had their own link to the Nation of the Third Eye, a link depicted in artwork as a cleft carved into the forehead.
Session 12 April 1997:

Q: … Now, I would like to know who the Olmecs were.

A: Be more specific.

Q: Okay, what is the genetic origin of the Olmecs?

A: Basically the same as yours.

Q: In some of the ancient carvings of the Olmecs, they were always carved with a cleft in their foreheads. Did this represent an actual physical cleft?

A: Designation in the art work is for "The Nation of the Third Eye."

So, although up to now we have focused on the connection between the Olmecs and the Lizard beings, they may also have had a connection to the Nation of the Third Eye, thus bringing another Orion affiliated group into the mix. Does this suggest the Olmec had direct contact with representatives of the Nation of the Third Eye or was it merely a psychic link? And where the C's tell Laura that the Olmecs genetic origin was basically the same as hers, does this suggest a Caucasian connection, as with the Nubians, rather than an Atlantean "red man" connection as with the Maya?

I have to confess, I find it chilling that this human interaction with the Lizzies acting as our would be gods could be resurrected again soon according to the C's if we are not careful:
Q: (L) Did any aliens at all, and specifically the Lizzies, ever live among mankind and receive worship?

A: They did not live among mankind, but they did interact directly with human beings, at various points in the past. It was at those points when human beings were ready, willing and able to accept deities appearing directly from outside sources and then worship them. Such things would not have occurred in the recent past. But, beware, it may very well occur very soon.​

 

Attachments

  • 1749320879967.png
    1749320879967.png
    259.8 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
I am glad you mentioned the city of Machu Picchu in Peru, which the C's said was built in 12,009 BC and thus before the Deluge.
It was Tiwanaku near Lake Titicaca that was built in 12,009 BC wasn't it? It was built at a high elevation and low population density with advanced tech ; Machu Picchu is from the 15th century, I believe - at least that's the current mainstream history.
 
If the Olmecs did play a part in its original construction, this suggests that their presence in Central America dates back to at least 6,000 BC.
Teotihuacan (Mexico) and Tiahuanaco (Bolivia) are two different sites, although similar sounding.

If it was an Atlantean city (built by one of the three Atlantean races) it seem to be a bit crude for a civilisation that was supposedly more advanced then our own.
There are quite a few possibilities why Machu Picchu looks relatively 'primitive':

1) Only the lowest megalithic parts are from the original construction, all the smaller stones on top are from later reconstructions, including by the Inca.

2) Since the city was clearly destroyed by earthquakes or something similar, maybe the more 'advanced' parts of it were destroyed as well - leaving basically only the megalithic foundations.

3) Atlantean technology seems to have been completely different from ours, eg. crystals for all sorts of tasks including power, flying, genetic engineering, etc.

4) There is the possibility that Atlantean technology reached its peak before the first of three cataclysms (before 48000 BC). The C's mentioned that Atlantean structures on Mars were built around 50000 BC, which means that the interplanetary capabilities were present before the first cataclysm. Maybe much of that Atlantean technology had already been lost by the time of the last cataclysm around 10000 BC.
 
Back
Top Bottom