CelticWarrior said:
miharo said:
January 7, 1996
...
A: The forces at work here are far too clever to be accurately anticipated so easily. You never know what twists and turns will follow, and they are aware of prophetic and philosophical patterning and usually shift course to fool and discourage those who believe in fixed futures.
So, maybe better no anticipation. For what it's worth.
I have to wholeheartedly agree here. The future is quite uncertain in such a chaotic realm we live in as it is.
A: No haste for that which comes to bring balance to your realm
***
A: Nothing, however, will stop the balancing. The only question is where the disasters fall and that is partly determined by the observers.
A: 4 months will reveal dramatic change.
Q: (Pierre) June. Dramatic change in what field?
A: All you get!
(Scottie) Yeah, I could have told you that some dramatic changes were coming over the next 4 months. I mean, just look at the world...
Still from the above, I'm somewhat curious about the degree of
dramatic change that will, in whatever way, enable balancing. I'm reminded of the Wave;
The idea of a cosmic event taking place in the early 21st century has been seeping into increasingly general circulation ever since the late 19th century. Gurdjieff, for instance, makes veiled references to such a thing when speaking of a time allotted for certain preparation to take place on Earth.
And
The QFS suggests that in the specific volatile circumstances corresponding to the waterfall, the quality of observation contributed to the process by the participants may make a large change in the outcome. This outcome may involve passage between densities, for example. Another example may be a split in timelines, as in the many worlds interpretation of quantum physics. Thus persons embracing one mode of being may literally end up in a different reality than other persons.
The processes in question are not strictly physical, although physical chaos is one likely reflection of the wider process. The process is seen as a macrocosmic quantum jump, determined by conscious observation. Just like the observation event is needed to force a quantum system to a specific state, observation is needed to guide the events inside the Wave.
So, the question remains... where the disasters fall. The results may reveal harmony between certain densities for a limited period or some other form of quantum shift after such chaos has been endured and observed critically. OR... a mass vision to the Western population that has Putin's head on a an angelic entity revealing his true colours in contrast with psychopathic agenda (uhh nah). But, in seriousness I'd say
preparation is key, and what better way to be prepared than the journey we continue to participate in, in which this forum among other priorities keeps hope alive.
Thank you all, for the transcript first, and for you comments. And thank you Celtic Warrior, for summing up the above info.
I thought a lot about these sentences - maybe it is just the way of transmitting the different meaning of time into this linear world of ours, where we are so keen to have schedules, predictions, etc.
I think that four months could be anytime not just the following months. And I further think that as long as we have fears we will try to find a good excuse for doing or not doing something, so we will be anticipating (even if we swear we don't).
What do I fear? I think pretty much it is the same thing for everyone, like this quote would state:
”Only after disaster can we be resurrected. It's only after you've lost everything that you're free to do anything. Nothing is static, everything is evolving, everything is falling apart. Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
And what is a disaster? I think is like meeting with a discontinuity where you were used to find continuity (that is a routine by which all we experience could be deemed as our own (real or adopted, material or spiritual: believes, property, friends, family,physical health, etc).
Impermanence is not obvious, yet there is. And it scares me, now and then, to see that things I think I own/know, could become a problem. For example, if I think that a client has a case similar to another I already dealt with, well then, I would fail to perform as good as I would do when I would be taken by surprise. I don't mean I'm not on a continuous learning spree, but sometimes I am facing pretty dire situations and sometimes I can handle these situation much more inspired, than those which seemed to be repeating. I guess these are due to an attitude of "sleeping", as I was not fully there, so I missed the great opportunity of being open and empty to receive the so called "wu vei - non action" benefits.
By the way, non-action means not doing nothing - instead, all you do is inspired, natural and whole - nothing can disturb you precious peace of mind, nothing can throw you into emotional upheavals. You are serene, alert, yet relaxed and your consciousness is expanded beyond known limits.
How comfortable predictability is! We need some kind of predictability, faith, memories, things we could rely on. Perhaps that's why we were advised by the C's to act by anticipating and taking action. I also think that after preparing for worse and taking preventive actions, we shall not anticipate that those things anticipated will not happen.
And yet" fear not, and be true to yourself" - I thing this
yourself needs a lot of work done before we could relate to "us" properly. It is us who decide that what we're just facing is an "opportunity or a disaster".
FWIW. Joy