Session 7 May 2016
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
lara4unow
Jedi
Hi
I am very thankful and appreciate your gifts to me and others who are open to receive your service to all humans who are in resonance with your enormous physical efforts to advance our collective energy to evolve.
I have many crystals and have been pondering how to connect them to you rather than you connecting them to me. They are very large and precious to me, so I will not send them and they have been with me many years.
I think they are in tune with you all and me. I will send pictures when I figure out how to at some point. I am at peace with all you have done for me over the last 10+ years now.
I am very grateful to you all
I am very thankful and appreciate your gifts to me and others who are open to receive your service to all humans who are in resonance with your enormous physical efforts to advance our collective energy to evolve.
I have many crystals and have been pondering how to connect them to you rather than you connecting them to me. They are very large and precious to me, so I will not send them and they have been with me many years.
I think they are in tune with you all and me. I will send pictures when I figure out how to at some point. I am at peace with all you have done for me over the last 10+ years now.
I am very grateful to you all
lunar7
The Force is Strong With This One
From the transcript:
This was a key bit of information I had been anxiously waiting for. Thank you C's for sharing it and thank you team for being the medium!
The interaction between analog and digital systems is a very fascinating one indeed as a topic of research.
There are specific combinations of both types of systems that can in fact be used to achieve a kind of "bridging" effect between 3rd density and higher/other realms. This is a topic that has interested me greatly for the past 15 years.
It is true, however, in relation to the original quote which was the point of discussion in the transcript, that music intended for an analog medium which has been translated into the digital domain, is losing some of the critical aspects of the signal in the resultant waveform, and so we have made music more benign than ever, or even harmful, by all but abandoning analog music playback in favor of digital.
You are on to something, but have the details a bit off. Imagine the following scenario. You record an acoustic music instrument or the human voice singing with a microphone, which retains the signal in analog. From this point you can amplify it a little and then immediately translate it to digital audio, or store it on an analog device like tape.
When you play that stored audio back, if it was recorded digitally you must change it back to analog, but if it's played back from tape, it can play directly to the loudspeaker.
In the case of digital recording and playback, the waveform you recorded, even if it was only a singer or a monophonic (one note at a time) instrument, is made up of much more than simply the frequencies of the notes in the order they were performed.
There are no instruments to do the following, so you must imagine it.
Imagine you had a waveform visualizer (like an oscilloscope) with infinite resolution. You could keep zooming in and in on the waveform, and for the x axis the time would keep getting finer, into the milliseconds and nanoseconds and so forth.
Once you've zoomed in far enough, you reach the sample rate of the digital recorder. The digital system will capture the exact measurements of the sample at regular time intervals.
Now, imagine if the waveform, during the time span between one sample point and the next, does not actually travel directly from one measurement to the other. Instead, it ripples around, due to some kind of distortion, or even some kind of fractal harmonics that are impossible to hear but are nonetheless felt by the body.
Now, when this recorded audio is played back, the system that puts it back into analog has forgotten all about that additional detail in the signal I just mentioned. It will draw a straight line from one sample to the other, so that the signal will play back "smoothly" (no square wave), but in fact, a little too smoothly, smoother than it was before.
The waveform has been robbed of all the additional detail between all of the individual sample points!
Why do those who strongly believe in the equivalence of digital audio disagree with what I propose?
Because of
The idea is that so long as the sample rate is twice the highest frequency, we won't lose any of the information.
But as we know about tapes and vinyl, those formats definitely strip away some of the high frequencies, and it's not really a big deal. It's not those extremely high frequencies that are important here!
What's important is all of the nuances in the travel of the waveform as it primarily constructs what *sounds like* the frequencies we hear even as the instrument is playing live, or the singer is singing, but is in reality much more than that.
The additional content in the waveform is not a matter of the fundamental pitches of the notes, or even the first few harmonics that are still in the audio spectrum.
Although we cannot measure it, there is all kinds of additional information there, relating to some rather complex equations involving audio acoustics of the room, the ability of a given sound source to generate subharmonics or harmonics that go way past the threshold of hearing, and all of the distortions introduced to the sound.
Goyacobol, as the C's hint towards, digital synthesis for its own sake is a completely different ballgame than trying to capture analog sounds digitally, and then play them back saying it's the same thing.
It's true that old digital chips like 8-bit synthesizers made a very "jagged sounding" kind of sound, which was in fact kind of endearing and is for many people nostalgic.
But there is also something powerful in the capabilities of advanced digital synthesizers that sets them apart from even the best analog synthesizers. More so, the capabilities of digital graphics, which have much less of a crossing-over Venn diagram with what we can see in real life than digital sound has with analog sound.
Taking from what the C's have suggested regarding the matter, confirming a long held hypothesis that should have been easier not to doubt, it should be possible to provide some extremely convincing evidence that this is true.
There is a real purpose for mastering media creation across both the analog and digital domains... exclusively one or the other when it makes sense, and combining them when it makes sense. Not wasting time (or harming ourselves) crossing from one to the other when it does not make sense.
Crystals, for example, could be charged to a great capacity if positioned at the center of a room of particular physical proportions matching the resonant frequency of that crystal, and then irradiated with sound of wavelengths proportionate to the dimensions of the room (and various ratios), lightwaves of color wavelengths also proportionate, and mechanical vibrations (like the ones produced by subwoofers) that were proportionate as well.
These irradiation sequences could hypothetically wind up making use of fibonacci sequence to tune the harmonics over time intervals as well, or Phi for speaker and light source placement relative to the center.
More importantly:
This would be a potent enough method in order to get measurable results in order to have proof. The highly structured state of the quartz crystal can then act as a medium to benefit the individual who possesses it, bringing their biostate into far greater internal alignment.
Now if misaligned humans were to go directly into the room mentioned above, it might actually be too much for them. Either the intensity of the irradiation would have to be lessened (making it more benign), or the crystal can be used to bring them into better alignment over extended periods of time more gradually.
If fully aligned humans were to go in? Well, the design of higher states of consciousness using reproducible scientific approaches would have dramatic consequences on the path that mankind took thereafter, because finally everyone would be forced to believe in it... knowing the difference between when it works, and when it doesn't, and the science behind it. These higher states can be verified by biofeedback sensors such as the EEG, EMG, and EKG.
All a matter of pervasive laws of wave physics that have been sadly ignored by mainstream science especially since 1927 after the 2nd Solvay Conference. I felt badly for de Broglie, Bohm, John Keely, the victims of the herd of scientists being pulled in a very strong way in the direction of particle physics.
We had advanced so far in one aspect of physics while nearly completely neglecting the other.
This was a key bit of information I had been anxiously waiting for. Thank you C's for sharing it and thank you team for being the medium!
The interaction between analog and digital systems is a very fascinating one indeed as a topic of research.
There are specific combinations of both types of systems that can in fact be used to achieve a kind of "bridging" effect between 3rd density and higher/other realms. This is a topic that has interested me greatly for the past 15 years.
It is true, however, in relation to the original quote which was the point of discussion in the transcript, that music intended for an analog medium which has been translated into the digital domain, is losing some of the critical aspects of the signal in the resultant waveform, and so we have made music more benign than ever, or even harmful, by all but abandoning analog music playback in favor of digital.
Ghostdoghaiku said:
You are on to something, but have the details a bit off. Imagine the following scenario. You record an acoustic music instrument or the human voice singing with a microphone, which retains the signal in analog. From this point you can amplify it a little and then immediately translate it to digital audio, or store it on an analog device like tape.
When you play that stored audio back, if it was recorded digitally you must change it back to analog, but if it's played back from tape, it can play directly to the loudspeaker.
In the case of digital recording and playback, the waveform you recorded, even if it was only a singer or a monophonic (one note at a time) instrument, is made up of much more than simply the frequencies of the notes in the order they were performed.
There are no instruments to do the following, so you must imagine it.
Imagine you had a waveform visualizer (like an oscilloscope) with infinite resolution. You could keep zooming in and in on the waveform, and for the x axis the time would keep getting finer, into the milliseconds and nanoseconds and so forth.
Once you've zoomed in far enough, you reach the sample rate of the digital recorder. The digital system will capture the exact measurements of the sample at regular time intervals.
Now, imagine if the waveform, during the time span between one sample point and the next, does not actually travel directly from one measurement to the other. Instead, it ripples around, due to some kind of distortion, or even some kind of fractal harmonics that are impossible to hear but are nonetheless felt by the body.
Now, when this recorded audio is played back, the system that puts it back into analog has forgotten all about that additional detail in the signal I just mentioned. It will draw a straight line from one sample to the other, so that the signal will play back "smoothly" (no square wave), but in fact, a little too smoothly, smoother than it was before.
The waveform has been robbed of all the additional detail between all of the individual sample points!
Why do those who strongly believe in the equivalence of digital audio disagree with what I propose?
Because of
Divide By Zero said:
The idea is that so long as the sample rate is twice the highest frequency, we won't lose any of the information.
But as we know about tapes and vinyl, those formats definitely strip away some of the high frequencies, and it's not really a big deal. It's not those extremely high frequencies that are important here!
What's important is all of the nuances in the travel of the waveform as it primarily constructs what *sounds like* the frequencies we hear even as the instrument is playing live, or the singer is singing, but is in reality much more than that.
The additional content in the waveform is not a matter of the fundamental pitches of the notes, or even the first few harmonics that are still in the audio spectrum.
Although we cannot measure it, there is all kinds of additional information there, relating to some rather complex equations involving audio acoustics of the room, the ability of a given sound source to generate subharmonics or harmonics that go way past the threshold of hearing, and all of the distortions introduced to the sound.
goyacobol said:
Goyacobol, as the C's hint towards, digital synthesis for its own sake is a completely different ballgame than trying to capture analog sounds digitally, and then play them back saying it's the same thing.
It's true that old digital chips like 8-bit synthesizers made a very "jagged sounding" kind of sound, which was in fact kind of endearing and is for many people nostalgic.
But there is also something powerful in the capabilities of advanced digital synthesizers that sets them apart from even the best analog synthesizers. More so, the capabilities of digital graphics, which have much less of a crossing-over Venn diagram with what we can see in real life than digital sound has with analog sound.
Taking from what the C's have suggested regarding the matter, confirming a long held hypothesis that should have been easier not to doubt, it should be possible to provide some extremely convincing evidence that this is true.
There is a real purpose for mastering media creation across both the analog and digital domains... exclusively one or the other when it makes sense, and combining them when it makes sense. Not wasting time (or harming ourselves) crossing from one to the other when it does not make sense.
Crystals, for example, could be charged to a great capacity if positioned at the center of a room of particular physical proportions matching the resonant frequency of that crystal, and then irradiated with sound of wavelengths proportionate to the dimensions of the room (and various ratios), lightwaves of color wavelengths also proportionate, and mechanical vibrations (like the ones produced by subwoofers) that were proportionate as well.
These irradiation sequences could hypothetically wind up making use of fibonacci sequence to tune the harmonics over time intervals as well, or Phi for speaker and light source placement relative to the center.
More importantly:
Cleo said:
This would be a potent enough method in order to get measurable results in order to have proof. The highly structured state of the quartz crystal can then act as a medium to benefit the individual who possesses it, bringing their biostate into far greater internal alignment.
Now if misaligned humans were to go directly into the room mentioned above, it might actually be too much for them. Either the intensity of the irradiation would have to be lessened (making it more benign), or the crystal can be used to bring them into better alignment over extended periods of time more gradually.
If fully aligned humans were to go in? Well, the design of higher states of consciousness using reproducible scientific approaches would have dramatic consequences on the path that mankind took thereafter, because finally everyone would be forced to believe in it... knowing the difference between when it works, and when it doesn't, and the science behind it. These higher states can be verified by biofeedback sensors such as the EEG, EMG, and EKG.
All a matter of pervasive laws of wave physics that have been sadly ignored by mainstream science especially since 1927 after the 2nd Solvay Conference. I felt badly for de Broglie, Bohm, John Keely, the victims of the herd of scientists being pulled in a very strong way in the direction of particle physics.
We had advanced so far in one aspect of physics while nearly completely neglecting the other.
Its so good to see pictures of this wonderful project. Thanks so much for your thoughtful work. I've been thinking about how this may play out in the future with connections strengthened, very awesome! 
Divide by Zero
The Living Force
lunar7 said:
Tapes and vinyl strip frequencies, and they are also not fully accurate even in the mid range, depending on the condition of the media. How would they capture more than digital?
Also, keep in mind that there is an encoding process with analog too, it's never like the true sound is direct to tape/vinyl.
With digital, let's say 44,100 hz (samples per second), a mid range tone of 5000 hz would have 10 samples... lower the frequency, even more samples. Between the samples of the wave, yes you miss out info. The dac would just average out in between to make a smooth line. But I really doubt that a normal physical instrument would have jumps within those 2 samples anyway.
In terms of the acoustics of the room, I do find that the music of the 70s most interesting with that. When stereo became big, they manged to make the sound surround you. It felt like you were "in the song" sometimes.
Stereo these days is more tweaked around to create effects instead. Sometimes they get lazy and put a single instrument on one channel, to sound "cool". It feels imbalanced, because in a real performance, while the guitar may be on one side, it still has a sound that echoes through the room. I guess the mastering is key when it comes to the issues of digital these days.
It's like comparing old school movie special effects to computer graphics (cgi). The old school effects sometimes looked almost real, where CGI looks "too real" (I think they could make it better but they try too hard to make it perfect, which reality is not).
Update: We've mailed out the first packages. We can't mail a bunch at once without raising questions and maybe having to pay a higher shipping rate, so we'll be sending out every day.
Meanwhile, we spend time every day making selections and getting them packed up. We are almost out of the first batch and will be starting the second on in a few days.
I'm trying to get the special needs situations taken care of first so ya'll please be patient! This is a process!
Meanwhile, we spend time every day making selections and getting them packed up. We are almost out of the first batch and will be starting the second on in a few days.
I'm trying to get the special needs situations taken care of first so ya'll please be patient! This is a process!
Charade
Jedi Master
Fluffy said:
I was wondering exactly what the C's meant when they said that crystals can be taught. After your monumental efforts to program batches of crystals and gemstones, could it be possible to place crystals we already have or might choose intuitively, place these in water with the ones we receive from Laura and have the properties and energies shared with additional crystals. In such a way it might be possible to share these crystals with friends or family members without always having to task Laura's and the girls time and energy for future requests, as well as expanding the energy of the crystal network and healing potential were this a viable energy exchange.
I too am deeply grateful for your work efforts and , as yet, untold possibilities this project may provide.
Please pace yourselves, dear ladies.
Thank you for this session, the amazing Cassiopaean Crystal Project and all of your back-aching efforts. I'm looking forward to receiving my crystals although I was late in putting in my request. The new lyrics for I come to the garden are beautiful and thank you for the energy put into re-writing.
WIN 52
The Living Force
My hat is off to you ladies and crew for doing this.
This may be symbolic of what we can/will have from within, eventually. We are on the way already. I have lost the taste for physicality. Definitely a signal to me.
While walking a local beach this evening, I found some purple quartz, with flecks of black quartz, crystals below the tide line. There was one in particular that spoke out to me, so I picked it up and put it in my pocket.
Thank you!
This may be symbolic of what we can/will have from within, eventually. We are on the way already. I have lost the taste for physicality. Definitely a signal to me.
While walking a local beach this evening, I found some purple quartz, with flecks of black quartz, crystals below the tide line. There was one in particular that spoke out to me, so I picked it up and put it in my pocket.
Thank you!
