As for the Morebunkt thing... I thought of "moribund".
That was the word I thought of as well. "Inert, or depressively quiescent." Interesting how there's an association there with the correlation you made of the economic depressions of history with speed of light/gravitational fluctuations.
Q: (Pierre) Does this variation in the speed of light affect our connection to the information field?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So it suggests that in 1929, there was a variation in the density subjugation. Does that imply an increased control of...?
A: Gravity wave.
Q: (Joe) Does it have anything to do with the 1929 Great Depression? That's the question.
A: More or less, yes.
[..]
Q: (Pierre) How do variations in the speed of light affect/modulate the connection between us and the information field?
A: Gravity is the key.
Q: (L) So once you said that gravity is a binder. And you said that gravity is collecting information - or collecting knowledge is like collecting gravity.
A: Yes
Q: (L) Is sharing it like dispersing it?
A: Yes
This brings to mind the difference between knowledge and awareness:
Cs Session 30 March 2002 said:
(L) This is what they've said before: They've said that light is produced by utilization of knowledge. That light is an energy expression of gravity. They've also said that light is an expression of the utilization of knowledge. So we come to the idea that knowledge is gravity in a certain sense. In other words knowledge consists of all things that could or could not be in all contexts, in all realms, in all dimensions, in all universes, that the sum total of everything is like this non-existent, non-dimensional point of everything that could ever exist. It's almost like this zero point from which all potential could erupt given the proper circumstances.
We're getting into something where there's not many words to describe it. There's a huge limitation here that if you don't know math, your words can only take you so far because as precise as you can get with your words, you can't get as precise as you can get with numbers. Numbers say things that words cannot, and they say it in a way that communicates directly to some part of the mind that bypasses this word processing organ. Well I don't want to say bypasses, I mean it goes to a place that's higher than a word processing organ, so to speak.
Another interesting thing is all the knowledge that we can gather is like gravity, and collecting gravity is like becoming heavier. But then when you utilize it, you share it and there is a burst of light and this is the utilization. In other words utilizing your knowledge is doing something with it. And that goes back to that thing that Gurdjieff said that for those in the higher esoteric circles, at that inner level their understanding is immediately expressed as action. Understanding and action are like two sides of the same coin.
And then of course there's other levels where they have understanding but they have no action. We've all seen that in the gurus who sit around and contemplate their navels saying they understand everything but they're not doing anything. They just sit there contemplating their navel. Until one can do and act based on their understanding it is not utilized and they then have not produced light unto the world.
A simple example is - We can sit here and collect 700 pages of gravity of information, or knowledge and until we utilize it, until we do something with it, until we share it, it's not light... we've just collected it and it's gravity. But the minute we start writing it, the minute we start processing it through us into our reality in some way, we write web pages or we do some activity or we do as the C's say, "You will do what you will do" and that's entirely a function of your understanding.
So, extrapolating this to humanity, we could speculate that the increased gravity is reflective of the knowledge/awareness balance of the density. There's been a large increase in the amount of information, but that information has not been applied fully - humanity "knows much more than it
does", as Gurdjieff might say.
This also brings to mind the excerpt from
Secret History that Laura posted in the
Christopher Langan thread, about the observer having a direct influence upon what is observed. Not applying knowledge may amount to 'turning inward' whereas utilizing it/developing one's Being "
flows outward and touches all including point of origin".
Cs Session 23rd July 1995 said:
The Service to Others orientation involves an outward flow of energies, the focus being from within to without. Therefore, the passage of information, or dissemination is very helpful and is of Service to Others orientation. But, one must also be aware of the dangers involved. One must not lose control of the flow and the possibilities that can result. This is where you need to be more careful. You need to regulate.
I think "regulating" in the current context would mean realising that:
Q: (Joe) In other words, there's nothing imminent.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Which is, was in response to you saying dollar deflation or de-dollarization, wheelbarrows full of money, that kind of stuff.
(L) So it's not gonna be that bad that soon.
A: Yes
A: Ask better questions. A lot depends on the aim, goal, and intent of the question.
The thing that stood out to me most here was that the Cs emphasised three aspects of questioning: Aim, Goal and Intent.
Surely aim, goal and intent are interchangeable terms, right? Well, the Cs made this differentiation for a reason. What is the difference between one's aim and one's intent? What is the difference between one's goal and one's aim? Here's one way to think about this:
Aim: this is HOW you are asking the question - the process you follow to produce the question.
Goal: this is WHAT the question should achieve - the specificity of the answer from among unlimited potential answers.
Intent: this is WHO you are asking the question for - yourself, or others?
The books, "
7 Habits of Highly Effective People" by Stephen Covey and "
Atomic Habits" by James Clear have some useful information in them regarding Aims, Goals and Intent.
(Ryan) The abilities of a new AI language model, GPT-4, seem very impressive. Some years ago, Putin emphasized the importance of AI in the development of societies. What is the level of Russia and China's AI capability compared to the west?
A: About equal but different philosophy and approach.
SistemmaGPT is the Russian ChatGPT that can perform various tasks useful for businesses and even normal consumers.
techboilers.com
Увеличение эффективности бизнеса с помощью ИИ
sistemma.ru
Q: [..] (Adobe via Zoom) Where are we when we are dreaming, what, where exactly is that state of our being? Is it in a dimension, is it in a density or somewhere else? Where, in other words, am I seeing and learning from: a density, a dimension or somewhere else? Where is our dream state?
A: As has been said, it taxes the soul to be embodied. As to where "consciousness" goes, it can vary according to need and capacity. As to a "location" there is no real restriction. But imagine an inner space coordinate.
Q: (Joe) Same place you go when you meditate.
(Adobe) So it's essentially anywhere.
(L) I guess so. According to need and capacity.
This brought the following to mind:
Cs Session 27th August 2022 said:
Q: [..] (Ark) I have question. It's not about hyperdimensional being, but about hyperdimensional physics. I am coming to the session of 14 November 1998 where I was asking about the relation between 4th density and 4th dimension. And the answer was that yes indeed, 4th density is experienced in 4-dimensional reality. So, I got curious about this 4-dimensional reality. I was asking if it was any kind known in physics under the name of Kaluza-Klein theory. But the answer was that no, it's related to visual spectrum. And then there came the term this is related to a prism. Now, visual spectrum, I am associating with the frequency of light. And so, my question - which I should have asked then, but didn't - is: Is 4th dimension indeed a frequency?
A: Yes
Q: (Ark) If it is a frequency, I would like to know what kind of geometry has this 4th-dimensional reality? Is there such a concept of a distance there, for instance?
A: No
Q: (Ark) Well, there is something more general than distance. For instance, there is a degenerate metric. Is there a metric there? Metric tensor?
A: Yes
Q: (Ark) Well, if it is not a distance but it is a metric tensor, does it mean it is degenerate so that there is zero distance between two different points?
A: Yes
Q: (Ark) Okay, that's what I was suspecting. But the next question is whether 5th density requires 5-dimensional reality?
A: No
Q: (Ark) So 5th density requires what?
A: No space, no time.
Q: (Ark) If there is no space and no time, what is there?
A: Pure information in units.
(ryu) Will EU countries manage to regain their sovereignty before the density change?
A: No dice.
I found this answer quite interesting, because it hints that the outcome is very much open at this point. How to reconcile this with the absolute lockstep that EU governments have displayed so far with the US regarding Russia? Will the US try to push the EU "too far" regarding expanding the conflict in Ukraine, to the point where sheer self-preservation interest will force them to break their alliance? I guess we need to "wait and see!"
I take this to mean that it is working on your system in a completely different way to HBOT?
Depends how you define "completely", as the Samozdrav is based on the principle of the Bohr effect (see the
Samozdrav thread for more information) which regulates O
2 uptake by cells via CO
2, even in conditions of higher atmospheric pressure. Theoretically, one could use the Samozdrav inside HBOT and it should enhance the effects of HBOT even more. But the Samozdrav cannot increase the perfusion of oxygen into all the vessels and tissues of the body like HBOT, as that's a function of pressure gradient, not CO
2 levels, so they are different therapies with
some degree of similarity because they both increase cellular O
2 uptake.
You could say that they're different in that they're "apples and oranges", similar in that they both satisfy hunger.