Show #15: No Ordinary Inside Job: The 9/11 Psy-Ops

[Approaching Infinity]

I put Jim Marrs in the list due to some of the experiences I had on ATS. Many of the same people who were trashing Laura on that site were the ones putting Jim Marrs on a pedestal. I also found it curious that his book "The Terror Conspiracy" was distributed by a publisher named "The Disinformation Company". Even back then that raised somewhat of a red flag to me. I understand publishers can have interesting names, but "The Disinformation Company"?

Yeah, it's a strange name, but I think they mean it in a kind of tongue-in-cheek way. They publish books which ostensibly expose disinformation, e.g., a lot of books with titles like, "Everything you know about ____ is wrong." I don't think they're much different than any other 'alternative' press: the publish some good books and some bad ones, e.g., they published Naomi Klein's first book.

Perhaps he has changed,or perhaps I am misreading him altogether, but he seems like he is more interested in selling books and DVDs. It was the material in his book "Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy" that was the basis for the film "JFK", which after seeing "Evidence of Revision" makes me think his book and the JFK film were a purposeful misdirection. I am also skeptical of his work and motives due to the sheer coverage he has been given by mainstream media over the years, OSIT.

Crossfire was basically the book that made him famous, since it sold so well. Marrs himself thinks that's the main reason he still has a mainstream publisher: he makes them money. The reason Disinfo published his 911 book is that his normal publisher, after agreeing to publish it, bailed on him and cancelled the project. I think overall Marrs is a good journalist. Crossfire is pretty widely regarded among JFK researchers as an essential work because it's so encyclopedic (it deals with the LBJ connection, introduced important witnesses who hadn't had any mainstream coverage until then, and triggered a renewal of sorts of skepticism among the public about the official story). Stone's movie may have been based on it in part (Stone also used Prouty's material), but there's really a lot more to Marrs's book than what was in the film. Not saying he had (or has) the whole banana, but he definitely presents some interesting and often pretty comprehensive information (e.g., I found a lot of useful stuff in his "Rise of the Fourth Reich"). He seems to have a more level head than most of the people writing about the same topics, IMO. I could be wrong, of course!

 

[Gwenllian]

When Wood responded favorably, she seemed relieved that we had reached out to her because she "was told by someone that you were planning to have someone else on to present her work."

Which was strange because the show had been announced less than 12 hours before. Wonder who the tout was...

Kind of gives the impression that someone is watching what SOTT Talk Radio is discussing very closely. I mean, someone supposedly saw the blurb on it and immediately started to manage the situation - immediately. Nice to be noticed, eh? ;)

That was to be expected, OSIT. Our radio hosts are doing something fabulous here. They are talking about topics where (almost) no-one else dares to go. And they don't mince words, either.

 

[AndrewJohnson]

I have no intention of discussing anything with anonymous posters. Especially when my posts are edited to deactivate the links to the evidence and information I am offering.

What a complete waste.

Good luck.

 

[Guardian]

I have no intention of discussing anything with anonymous posters. Especially when my posts are edited to deactivate the links to the evidence and information I am offering.

Bye bye Dr. Cheeto shill

 

[Mountain Crown]

I have no intention of discussing anything with anonymous posters. Especially when my posts are edited to deactivate the links to the evidence and information I am offering.

What a complete waste.

Good luck.

 

[jasstnhawk]

I have no intention of discussing anything with anonymous posters. Especially when my posts are edited to deactivate the links to the evidence and information I am offering.

What a complete waste.

Good luck.

I was one of the "posters" who replied to your post yesterday, see: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,31251.msg414011.html#msg414011

"Robin" is my REAL name by the way, so your above statement concerning "discussing anything with anonymous posters" seems more like an excuse or avoidance, OSIT.

Andrew, did you ever stop to think: Maybe - just maybe - (like most forums) some forum members here choose to remain anonymous for personal or other reasons, while others choose to use their real names for whatever reason. With that said, I will venture 'out on a limb' and guess that you chose to join the Cass forum and use your real name because your ultimate goal here is/was to solely promote your book (as evidenced by your postings ) ... which, after a cursory reading/look-over, is basically a collection/compilation of articles in which "much of the key 9/11 research, understanding and most of the pictures collected" within your book are from DOCTOR Wood's work.

Anyway, good-bye and "good luck" to you, Andrew.

 

[Lisa Guliani]

Who says that's HIS real name? Maybe it is and maybe it isn't.

 

[jasstnhawk]

Who says that's HIS real name? Maybe it is and maybe it isn't.

Good point! :D

Whatever his/her real name is, based on what they have posted here and my cursory read of their book (PDF), they clearly joined the forum solely to promote their "book of compiled articles".

 

[Voyageur]

That was to be expected, OSIT. Our radio hosts are doing something fabulous here. They are talking about topics where (almost) no-one else dares to go. And they don't mince words, either.

Indeed, and it is intelligent minded research, including good feedback and overall networking. Others so often seem to suffer the "Right" complex and cannot be questioned.

 

[Guardian]

Whatever his/her real name is, based on what they have posted here and my cursory read of their book (PDF), they clearly joined the forum solely to promote their "book of compiled articles".

Yeah, I did a brief search and he's just another "Oh Oh Oh I want to be famous" azzhat riding Dr. Cheeto's coattails. I agree their primary focus is to sell books since both Dr. Cheeto and Semper Fido appear to be total deadbeats who owe money all over the place.

 

[sitting]

their primary focus is to sell books since both Dr. Cheeto and Semper Fido appear to be total deadbeats who owe money all over the place.

You really ought to read her book.

 

[Guardian]

You really ought to read her book.

Now why would I want to waste my time reading a book written by a disinfo puppet? I can't believe anything that's in it, since I already know she and her handler are liars.

 

[griffin]

You really ought to read her book.

Now why would I want to waste my time reading a book written by a disinfo puppet? I can't believe anything that's in it, since I already know she and her handler are liars.

She might not have pursued her inquiry initially with the intent to derail 9/11 research, and her basic question is a good one, "Where did the towers go?" Though it seems that she has since fallen under the influence of self-promoting charlatans, zero-point energy enthusiasts and disinformation agents working to disrupt and discredit the 9/11 truth community, they seem quite desperate to control and deflect her research and theories and thus prevent her work from being taken seriously and gaining credence. That last point seems significant to me, and makes her line of inquiry worth investigating.

The evidence she uncovered, the facts that she pulled together, and the curious anomalies that she has called attention to deserve consideration, even if her wild-eyed theories stray from the realms of reasonable, scientific explanation.

Disinformation efforts take many forms, and one of them is to corrupt, pollute and otherwise discredit honest investigations and good researchers. It's called "poisoning the well" and is taught and practiced by all clandestine services. If her instincts and reasoning are correct, dismissing her work lets them win.

 

[Niall]

She might not have pursued her inquiry initially with the intent to derail 9/11 research, and her basic question is a good one, "Where did the towers go?" Though it seems that she has since fallen under the influence of self-promoting charlatans, zero-point energy enthusiasts and disinformation agents working to disrupt and discredit the 9/11 truth community, they seem quite desperate to control and deflect her research and theories and thus prevent her work from being taken seriously and gaining credence. That last point seems significant to me, and makes her line of inquiry worth investigating.

The evidence she uncovered, the facts that she pulled together, and the curious anomalies that she has called attention to deserve consideration, even if her wild-eyed theories stray from the realms of reasonable, scientific explanation.

Disinformation efforts take many forms, and one of them is to corrupt, pollute and otherwise discredit honest investigations and good researchers. It's called "poisoning the well" and is taught and practiced by all clandestine services. If her instincts and reasoning are correct, dismissing her work lets them win.

Couldn't agree more. Letting personal bias lead us to throw the baby out with the bathwater is a mistake. I'm not sure how this thread got to the point where Wood's book is being described as disinfo. As far as SOTT.net is concerned, it is not.

 

[Laura]

Couldn't agree more. Letting personal bias lead us to throw the baby out with the bathwater is a mistake. I'm not sure how this thread got to the point where Wood's book is being described as disinfo. As far as SOTT.net is concerned, it is not.

Absolutely. It is a MUST READ, for sure. The whole point of Judy Wood being at the center of a psy-op is to discredit her work (ostensibly hers).

That's what has happened over the years to many good researchers. Paul Bennewitz is a prime example. He was definitely on the right track, and then the psy-ops boys went to work on him to drive him crazy and discredit himself. Hell, they've tried it on us for years. I could rightfully be paranoid as heck and do tend to have a bit of a knee-jerk reaction sometimes, but thankfully, the network usually straightens that out.