Show #15: No Ordinary Inside Job: The 9/11 Psy-Ops

[sitting]

It would have been cool if she could have listened to Ark a few minutes, had a real discussion about the topic,

Absolutely! It was truly an immense opportunity missed.

 

[ggen]

I also felt that since not having read Dr. Wood's book,

You really ought to read her book.

I guess I didn't clarify the point I was trying to make in regards to Dr. Wood's book. I had viewed the 2 hours of 'Where Did the Towers Go' on YouTube, but I hadn't the chance to read her book. Because of how poorly she came across on yesterday's show, her erratic disposition (lack of any self awareness), and total disregard for the hosts and Ark she was an absolute put off for me. Now of course, I've read enough (forum threads) to understand why she may have behaved the way she did. It's too bad if what is coming to light is true, that Dr. Wood may have been on to something and TBTB sent in their minions to 'handle' her. I cannot say I'm surprised though.

I'm undecided as to whether I'll read her book. I have many I'm currently reading and another stack waiting.

EDIT: Clarity

 

[StrangeCaptain]

It would have been cool if she could have listened to Ark a few minutes, had a real discussion about the topic,

Absolutely! It was truly an immense opportunity missed.

Ditto that... For a second there, I was really excited about the conversation I thought was about to happen. But she just could not get over that defensive attitude that she had... It was strange. She just could not stop and listen.

It seems a primary point in control systems rather speaking of them at grand worldwide political scales or the scale of personal psychological struggles or even more speculative hyper-dimensional scales is the need to prevent open communication and dissemination of information.

 

[Gwenllian]

What an interesting day it was yesterday. This show together with the discussions on the Boston bombings thread. Most interesting. I was pretty tired afterwards. Some big lessons presented themselves, OSIT. This is certainly a steep learning curve for me. :D

I still don't know what to say about the show, am keeping an open mind for the time being, especially after Pashalis' post.
Thanks all the same to you all.

If it is true that Judy Wood was in a coma for 6 years (comments from her students seem to testify that) that certainly would point to the direction that she is suffering of somekind of brain damage. Since those comments from her students were posted in 2005 (If those comments are real) I think it is reasonable to suspect that this coma state was before 911 (She repeatedly stated in her interviews that she watched 911 happen on TV, wich suggest that she was not in a coma state at that time. And since those comments from her students were made in 2005, it means she was in that coma state sometime before 911). So I think there might be serious brain defect playing a role here, when she is communicating with others...

Let me repeat, her research in the book is more then compelling and good...
I don't think it is fair to through the baby out with the bathwater in Judy's case. I really think that she has made a terrific inquiry into what happened physically that day. As Laura said "Judy's book is probably one of the best collections of evidence out there" if not the best...
I think we are dealing with a very damaged person, both physically and mentally do to brain damage caused by the coma and psychopathic handlers who only worsen the situation.

I somehow get the impression that Judy Wood has made a groundbreaking scientific inquiry into what happened physically on 911 and then was quickly co-opted and intimidated by a bunch of hired Psychos...

Nothing really new...

Also let us not forget that Michael Zebuhr, a pretty close student of her, who also started to research 911, was murdered. The guys who shot him, were quickly realised again. (From what I've gathered from her statements it seems that Michael Zebuhr was close to Judy).
How would you feel if the murderers of one of your closest students, who happened to also research 911, were realised, even though the evidence against them was obvious?

Kind of intimidating don't you think?

At this point I think she is more of an victim than anything else.

 

[Hesper]

I still don't know what to say about the show, am keeping an open mind for the time being, especially after Pashalis' post.

I have responded to it in what I believed was the appropriate thread here.

Yes, I was very exhausted after the show too. I can only imagine what it was like for everyone in the studio

 

[Gwenllian]

I still don't know what to say about the show, am keeping an open mind for the time being, especially after Pashalis' post.

I have responded to it in what I believed was the appropriate thread here.

The learning curve gets steeper and steeper! Thanks a lot, Hesper. Very interesting, your response, OSIT. You make some valid points.

Yes, I was very exhausted after the show too. I can only imagine what it was like for everyone in the studio

Yes, having to contain a big drain like Wood, can't be easy.

 

[sitting]

I'm undecided as to whether I'll read her book. I have many I'm currently reading and another stack waiting.

Got it!

 

[Mikey]

What disappointed me immediately about Ms Wood was that she said that you mustn't listen to anything being said but only look with your eyes. While this is certainly good advice, the devil is in the details. EVERYTHING is evidence, also the lies being told about an event. And she said that there are some problems we never can solve. And Atreides caught that pretty quickly and called her unscientific. I totally agree.

 

[aragorn]

I just wanted to thank you for this latest, very hectic show, as well as for the previous shows. I've been particularly impressed by Pierre's calm, clear and rational way of talking about things (in this latest episode he "saved" the situation a few times, IMO).

I'm almost through listening to yesterday's show the second time, and I completely agree with what has been said here. Wood's work is interesting, but at the very least, it's been manipulated by some very strange and close minded individuals. Not to mention this creepy Santilli-guy. Having a background in studying engineering and being interested in mechanics since a kid, I still think I'm gonna get Wood's book and read it.

 

[AndrewJohnson]

Hmmm - looks like my all important link did not get posted properly, for some reason.


_http://tinyurl.com/911ftb - which links to this: _http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=238&Itemid=60

All the information is there for those that want to look. And it's getting more and more difficult, now, to muddle it up and cover it up.

Time for a screenshot, for my own purposes! :) [no need for a screenshot, there, Andrew, the links were deactivated by a moderator since the site is unknown]

Folks can write to me through my website if they wish.

 

[ggen]

I was kind of shocked to learn what had transpired on the SOTT broadcast - bearing in mind what SOTT is supposed to be doing.

Hi Andrew,

Why were you shocked, or what shocked you?

Also, what is it that SOTT.net is supposed to be doing that you feel it is not doing?

Hi Andrew. Are you going to answer Kniall's question? Or are you just here to drop off yet another link to 9/11 information without reading anything here?

Also, new members are asked to write a small introduction in the Newbies thread. Tell us a bit about yourself and how you found the Forum. You don't have to disclose anything personal. Since you're registered, I hope you make a sincere effort to look around.

 

[jasstnhawk]

Hmmm - looks like my all important link did not get posted properly, for some reason.

[..]

Time for a screenshot, for my own purposes! :)

Andrew, if you take the time have a 'look around' as BrightLight11 has invited you to do, you might find/understand that there is a reason for the placement of an underscore in front of the link you originally posted, i.e. there is no mystery or conspiracy about the underscore placement.

Most of us, who have been here for a bit, know that if we want to 'visit' a website that is posted here on the Forum with an included underscore, we can just simply cut & paste the link (without the underscore of course) into the address bar above or in a new window. So rest assured, Andrew, if someone here wants to 'visit' the website you are promoting, most know how and are free to do so.

 

[seek10]

Hmmm - looks like my all important link did not get posted properly, for some reason.

_http://tinyurl.com/911ftb - which links to this: _http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=238&Itemid=60

All the information is there for those that want to look. And it's getting more and more difficult, now, to muddle it up and cover it up.

Time for a screenshot, for my own purposes! :)

Folks can write to me through my website if they wish.

andrew,
Are you reading the discussion going on here ?. We have no intention of working in black and white thinking.
In short,

documenting the material evidence: No body challenging it. infact it is done well .

conclusions : we are not comfortable to the conclusions that

1. Motive behind the " Ignore the culprits" argument- this argument gives the planet on a silver plate to the culprits.
2. the evidence shown to prove that it is free energy technology is weak and highly speculative. too new agey to shot down the documented evidence defeating the entire purpose of investigation.

Of course, we will look for answers to the behavioral anomalies observed by certain people during the radio show and its fallout.

 

[QuantumLogic]

Hmmm - looks like my all important link did not get posted properly, for some reason.

_http://tinyurl.com/911ftb - which links to this: _http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=238&Itemid=60

All the information is there for those that want to look. And it's getting more and more difficult, now, to muddle it up and cover it up.

Time for a screenshot, for my own purposes! :)

Folks can write to me through my website if they wish.

andrew,
Are you reading the discussion going on here ?. We have no intention of working in black and white thinking.
In short,

documenting the material evidence: No body challenging it. infact it is done well .

conclusions : we are not comfortable to the conclusions that

1. Motive behind the " Ignore the culprits" argument- this argument gives the planet on a silver plate to the culprits.
2. the evidence shown to prove that it is free energy technology is weak and highly speculative. too new agey to shot down the documented evidence defeating the entire purpose of investigation.

Of course, we will look for answers to the behavioral anomalies observed by certain people during the radio show and its fallout.

I concur with seek10. After a brief look, the websites you linked pay homage to the likes of Alex Jones, Jim Marrs, "free energy", and Judy Wood. In light of recent events concerning Judy Wood, And knowing the history of Alex Jones, Jim Marrs, and the "free energy" movement, The links provided are dubious at best- psyop at worst. The behavior and possible intent of such people and movements must be carefully analyzed, and no place on the net does it better than this forum. I know- I used to follow all of that stuff- until I found this place, and truly learned how to apply knowledge of science and psychology to what you are exposed to on a daily basis.

I know the sites seem sensational- and that is the point. They are made to lure you in to redirect your thinking to infertile lines. As suggested by others, you should really read the vast majority of important topics across the entire site to understand what the purpose here is. It is a lot of work, far more than what I anticipated here when I found this place, but it is well worth it in the end, OSIT.

 

[Lisa Guliani]

For what it's worth, in every instance where I've seen exchanges between Dr. Wood and other 9/11 researchers, it was my impression that she was quite able to convey her meanings to others if she chose to. What I saw was someone who could communicate very effectively ( via group emails) and what was communicated was quite clear: vicious, pointed, sharply worded emails.
In each instance, Dr. Wood was the aggressor and the instigator of hostility, from what I could determine. If perhaps she had tried to be a little nicer to other people over the years, instead of verbally attacking them, things might have gone a little differently for her.

I'm sorry, but from what I've seen out of this person over the years within the 9/11 research 'community', it's really difficult for me to see her as some sort of 'victim'.
I saw her victimize others in these exchanges. She even chewed me out once years ago for asking to be removed from the email exchanges.
A very nasty individual. Last night was nothing.