Show #15: No Ordinary Inside Job: The 9/11 Psy-Ops

[Guardian]

Well I can see why Woods is trying to sell her book any way possible...it appears she owes a lot of money to the IRS according to BeenVerified.

Just so yawl know, I just use BeenVerified as a starting point, I will get the original records from the original sources before I start posting and feeding the data to the submissions bot. You have to do each one individually, and there's usually a fee. I'm just getting the preliminary out of they way while I'm working one handed ('cause I'm still eating my breakfast)

So Judykins and SemperFido, you trash my friend, and as I said, I will redefine your entire concept of "expose" Anyone doing a google search on either of your names will see the TRUTH about your pathetic histories on the splash page. The info will be on EVERY board and forum that mentions your names, and quite a few that don't.

Lisa did NOTHING to you, she just tried to get her opinion regarding WHO committed the 9-11 atrocity in sideways between your rabid, azzkissing followers.

Can you tell I REALLY hate loudmouthed bullies?

 

[Oxajil]

From this thread (AI's post) I got to this website: _http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Michael.html

Which may give some more info on Wood. Also, her being in a coma for 6 years (as a result of some car accident, or so it seems) could explain the way she behaved during the talk show which I personally found to be kinda chaotic. Perhaps some possible brain damage that occurred during that time contributed to her out-of-the-ordinary behavior. Well, just a possibility. On traumatic brain injury: "TBI may cause emotional, social, or behavioral problems and changes in personality.[115][116][117][118] These may include emotional instability, depression, anxiety, hypomania, mania, apathy, irritability, problems with social judgment, and impaired conversational skills.[115][118][119]" (Wikipedia)

I also found this article on Santilli, fwiw: _http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/01/20/lunatics-r-us-the-santilliwoodsunstein-gambit/

 

[anart]

Mods, will you move the Pete Santilli discussion to it's own thread so we can stick to Judy's book here?

That's been done - the Santilli thread is here - http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,31273.msg413766.html#msg413766 - though there is a lot of overlap with this thread (since he's her handler it's hard to really separate them easily) - but his thread is where further information on him should go from here on out.

 

[sitting]

Judy's book is probably one of the best collections of evidence out there and that is probably why she has a coterie of "handlers" collected around her - to try to make sure that her work gets sidelined.

And that's what happened...although I must say she herself deserves some blame for bringing a ton of assumptions (of the personal kind) to the show. It's clear sincere attempts were made to allow her real freedom of expression, but she just did not or could not see.

That said, her engineering analysis of the mechanics of the WTC event is impeccable. With her background in civil engineering, structural analysis, stress deformation of materials, thermodynamics, and a host of other related disciplines, she could pick out things most will miss. She deserves credit for shinning light on this subject. She does not merit our scorn.

As for limiting the scope of her investigation, it could be as simple as life preservation. And in fairness, one person should not be expected to carry the ball the full distance. Additionally, she may simply be unaware. Her technical background can be her shortcoming as well as her strength. Unless you're a 6th density being, you haven't got the full picture, no matter how hard you try.

On a different note, I like to mention 2 points of interest for me in her work. One is her concept of non self-quenching. She mentioned regarding the Hutchinson effect, that if the mass involved was big enough, the effects are ongoing, even long after the event. It's interesting to note that the major structures that have gone up or are planned, have footprints offset from the original building locations...with the sole exception of WTC 7. So either the mass of WTC 7 was not big enough, or they've found ways to artificially quenched the lingering effects.

The second point has to do with interferometry, the interaction of different waves and their corresponding effects. It was her expertise in this specialized field that helped her understand the phenomenon of toasted cars. It gave her insights into what she saw in those vehicles. A most valuable analytical tool.

I suspect in the near future, interferometry may play a significant role in our lives as well. As THE WAVE cometh...it will interfere and interact with our own little individual wavelets. Depending on our frequency, purity, coherence, etc., each experience may be very different. Interferometry at work!

It's interesting to note that even in the WTC event, differing results were observed from wave interference. It was either lift or disruption. The cars that were lifted were barely damaged, while the cars that were disrupted were badly mangled. Perhaps this is a hint of what may be in store for us. Just a thought.

 

[Guardian]

That's been done - the Santilli thread is here - http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,31273.msg413766.html#msg413766 - though there is a lot of overlap with this thread (since he's her handler it's hard to really separate them easily) - but his thread is where further information on him should go from here on out.

Thanks! Would it be ok to make the Topic "Pete Santilli and Dr. Judy Wood" since they overlap and it would help with the google bots?

 

[Laura]

As for limiting the scope of her investigation, it could be as simple as life preservation. And in fairness, one person should not be expected to carry the ball the full distance. Additionally, she may simply be unaware. Her technical background can be her shortcoming as well as her strength.

Did you listen to the show and the fan-bots? It's not just "life preservation" and nobody is expecting her to carry the ball. She is basically saying "you don't need anything but the evidence to know something weird happened and not to worry about any bad people in the government - they have these cool toys and there must be good guys there who are planning to help humanity with them.

Right.

 

[anart]

You know, her behavior was so bizarre, I really wonder if she hasn't been thoroughly psychologically dismantled. Assuming that she was initially sane, Santilli (and others, his behavior indicates that he's not smart enough to be the lead on this) have obviously handled her and primed her and done serious damage. If Santilli's behavior in this situation is any indication, and it necessarily must be an indication considering his behavior, then he works very hard to control the conversation and Wood's emotional state.

It was a bizarre listening experience because I found myself agreeing with her thought processes in several instances (when I could make them out) - of course people cannot solve a problem they don't understand, we say that here every day. Or course we must examine evidence without allowing the lens of our own assumptions to get in the way, we say that here every day. Of course some technology was used on September 11th that none of us fully understand - that is glaringly obvious and SOTT has said that since the beginning and published it in '911 The Ultimate Truth' in 2005. So, it was a truly bizarre experience to hear her say things that were obviously true while simultaneously blabbering defensively, being exceedingly rude and telling people to "let her finish" when she would not allow others to get a word in edgewise. It really was a very bizarre thing to listen to which leaves me with the strong impression that either this poor woman has had her noodle baked severely by people like Santilli who've been assigned to make sure she sounds like a lunatic on the air - or - she is playing a role to sound like a lunatic on the air in order to keep the truth of the matter forever obfuscated by her rather abrasive personality.

I can even understand the rabid, cultic followers if they've also been primed by seeing the truth in what she says while simultaneously experiencing the insanity of her behavior and Santilli's control - that's enough to drive people over the edge if only subtly, so they come to rabid defense of her personality rather than focusing on the ideas - because the focus has already been taken off of the ideas due to her bizarre (by design or conditioning) personality. What a trap for people who really want the truth and see that some of what she's saying makes perfect sense. That is the definition of a Psy-Op.

It's just bizarre and as someone who has tried to steer clear of the bulk of the 911 'truth movement' I can only say that no wonder it's been dead in the water for so long with that much psychological manipulation, utter B.S. and interference going on.

 

[Mike]

Did you listen to the show and the fan-bots? It's not just "life preservation" and nobody is expecting her to carry the ball. She is basically saying "you don't need anything but the evidence to know something weird happened and not to worry about any bad people in the government - they have these cool toys and there must be good guys there who are planning to help humanity with them.

Right.

Her assertion that the technology used on the WTC complex would later be used to benefit humanity and that humanity had to first be conditioned to its existence was just bizarre. I mean 9/11 is the seminal event leading toward the total enslavement of humanity and some how the technology is then going to used for good later? Just bizarre.

 

[anart]

Did you listen to the show and the fan-bots? It's not just "life preservation" and nobody is expecting her to carry the ball. She is basically saying "you don't need anything but the evidence to know something weird happened and not to worry about any bad people in the government - they have these cool toys and there must be good guys there who are planning to help humanity with them.

Right.

Her assertion that the technology used on the WTC complex would later be used to benefit humanity and that humanity had to first be conditioned to its existence was just bizarre. I mean 9/11 is the seminal event leading toward the total enslavement of humanity and some how the technology is then going to used for good later? Just bizarre.

Yep, it's beyond bizarre - it indicates a total break with the reality we can see in front of our noses every single day.

 

[Guardian]

That said, her engineering analysis of the mechanics of the WTC event is impeccable.

Are you serious? I don't see how anyone could come to this conclusion after hearing that interview?

She completely discounted all the data (some from different countries) relating to heat levels and called obvious fires "Cheetos" ...claiming it was all faked, and then she turns right around and offers up the seismic records as absolute proof of her pet theory. If one dB report is faked, how can she rely on another dB report coming from the same government sources? She can't, she's just cherry-picking through the available data and only including what fits with her OPINION.

That's not "impeccable" ....that's someone collecting bits and pieces of a story so they can SELL A BOOK.

I've just started digging, but from what I'm seeing so far, this woman is a crappy scientist and a complete failure in her life and chosen career. She even failed as a College Professor in South Carolina for gawd's sake, and that's where really dumb people with PhD's go to die.

Personally, I would not wipe my behind with her book! Ok, well that's not entirely true, I probably would use it to wipe my behind if I was out of toilet paper, but only if I was out of paper-towels too.

 

[sitting]

Did you listen to the show and the fan-bots?

Hi Laura,

Yes. I listened to the show. And I've also listened (and suffered through) almost all of her other show appearances as well. She's not easy to take...to put it mildly. What I wanted to do was to simply point out her written research has merit. It's not the whole picture but a very useful part of the picture. It is material worthy of serious examination...for those who have not done so.

 

[dant]

@ PS: "Be gone, before somebody drops a house on you, too!"

 

[dant]

I have attached a .txt file of the chat room log that has been trimmed of all of the room traffic timestamps(entering and quitting) for anyone that wants it.

THANK YOU!!!

Now I can read this and catch up!

 

[Laura]

Are you serious? I don't see how anyone could come to this conclusion after hearing that interview?

She completely discounted all the data (some from different countries) relating to heat levels and called obvious fires "Cheetos" ...claiming it was all faked, and then she turns right around and offers up the seismic records as absolute proof of her pet theory. If one dB report is faked, how can she rely on another dB report coming from the same government sources? She can't, she's just cherry-picking through the available data and only including what fits with her OPINION.

That's not "impeccable" ....that's someone collecting bits and pieces of a story so they can SELL A BOOK.

I've just started digging, but from what I'm seeing so far, this woman is a crappy scientist and a complete failure in her life and chosen career. She even failed as a College Professor in South Carolina for gawd's sake, and that's where really dumb people with PhD's go to die.

Personally, I would not wipe my behind with her book! Ok, well that's not entirely true, I probably would use it to wipe my behind if I was out of toilet paper, but only if I was out of paper-towels too.

Let's just say that she has collected a lot of data together and drawn some interesting conclusions about what was used that day and it wasn't just nano-thermite. I think that her point - not made very well - was that nano-thermite would produce a certain, consistent, heat signature and the signature was not that though certainly, there were serious hot spots as a result of whatever it was. I'm thinking that nano-thermite was used, but something else was also going on that produced some serious high strangeness.

It would have been cool if she could have listened to Ark a few minutes, had a real discussion about the topic, and given the listeners some real meat. But I guess we'll never be able to talk about some of these things with Judy because she's such a scrambled egg.

 

[Cosmos]

Mods, will you move the Pete Santilli discussion to it's own thread so we can stick to Judy's book here?

I just want to say this: Judy's book is probably one of the best collections of evidence out there and that is probably why she has a coterie of "handlers" collected around her - to try to make sure that her work gets sidelined. It's really sad because we had planned for her to present her work, we had Ark on hand to give some physics support, but she was so primed to be attacked by someone in the background in her life, that no one could get a word in edgewise and give her the support she deserves. And then, that Pete Santilli guy comes along and really makes her look bad, not to mention the "fan-antics."

But so goes the 9-11 Truth Movement.

If it is true that Judy Wood was in a coma for 6 years (comments from her students seem to testify that) that certainly would point to the direction that she is suffering of somekind of brain damage. Since those comments from her students were posted in 2005 (If those comments are real) I think it is reasonable to suspect that this coma state was before 911 (She repeatedly stated in her interviews that she watched 911 happen on TV, wich suggest that she was not in a coma state at that time. And since those comments from her students were made in 2005, it means she was in that coma state sometime before 911). So I think there might be serious brain defect playing a role here, when she is communicating with others...

Let me repeat, her research in the book is more then compelling and good...
I don't think it is fair to through the baby out with the bathwater in Judy's case. I really think that she has made a terrific inquiry into what happened physically that day. As Laura said "Judy's book is probably one of the best collections of evidence out there" if not the best...
I think we are dealing with a very damaged person, both physically and mentally do to brain damage caused by the coma and psychopathic handlers who only worsen the situation.

I somehow get the impression that Judy Wood has made a groundbreaking scientific inquiry into what happened physically on 911 and then was quickly co-opted and intimidated by a bunch of hired Psychos...

Nothing really new...

Also let us not forget that Michael Zebuhr, a pretty close student of her, who also started to research 911, was murdered. The guys who shot him, were quickly realised again. (From what I've gathered from her statements it seems that Michael Zebuhr was close to Judy).
How would you feel if the murderers of one of your closest students, who happened to also research 911, were realised, even though the evidence against them was obvious?

Kind of intimidating don't you think?

At this point I think she is more of an victim than anything else.