QuantumLogic
Jedi
Guardian said:
You're right. BlogTalkRadio calls it "Comments". Sorry for the confusion.
Show #15: No Ordinary Inside Job: The 9/11 Psy-Ops
- Thread starter Niall
- Start date
You're right. BlogTalkRadio calls it "Comments". Sorry for the confusion.
I watched the video on Judy's website before the show as I wondered what she has to say. that made her points on radio show understandable, but she wants to talk. I felt that she has some good points. she got agitated with Ark's entry and this pete sentilli guy was a bully in the chat room. pete and 'blah blah blog' guys literally hijacked the thread and frantically posted saying they want to protect us from the psy-op's . At one point they confessed that they are the psy-op. page admin can look at the chat text, if admin's have the chat log.QuantumLogic said:
reading further on the links posted before here it is smelling bad .
_http://911blogger.com/node/18474
straw men setup ?
Now this link
It is sounding like Judy wood is the boss who pulls the strings not the pete. these guys are no longer about the truth. they are about self interest. they are good as long as their point is taken else they go into agitated/bully mode.
Lisa Guliani
The Living Force
I tried to warn you, Joe.
QuantumLogic
Jedi
seek10 said:
The chat log web address is in post#90, the first post on page 7. I copied it to a text file and am removing all of the "enter room" and "leave room" entries so the conversations are more understandable.
QuantumLogic
Jedi
I have attached a .txt file of the chat room log that has been trimmed of all of the room traffic timestamps(entering and quitting) for anyone that wants it.
Laura said:
In the classical music world there is a similar phenomena. Those individuals with PhD, or DMA or some other doctorate, 9 times out of 10, insist on being called by their title, yet as far as proficiency on their given instrument, would never - at least in a super-majority of cases - be able to win and keep a performance job. It seems to be a case of 'form over substance'.
Kris
I suggest to the assembled multitude that we not throw away good questions along with those rude, overly self-important people who are asking them, even if they do have unpleasant camp followers with them.
I listened to about 10 minutes of the SoTT Radio stream before I abandoned it. It did not go very well.
However, I've viewed Dr. Woods' presentation, and she asks a critically important question about the 9/11 events: What caused the World Trade Center twin towers to fall and *turn into dust* in NYC on 9/11?
I won't defend her behaviour on the SoTT Radio show, or those of her followers on the online chat.
However, her fundamental question is a good one.
I listened to about 10 minutes of the SoTT Radio stream before I abandoned it. It did not go very well.
However, I've viewed Dr. Woods' presentation, and she asks a critically important question about the 9/11 events: What caused the World Trade Center twin towers to fall and *turn into dust* in NYC on 9/11?
I won't defend her behaviour on the SoTT Radio show, or those of her followers on the online chat.
However, her fundamental question is a good one.
Lan8r
Jedi Master
I haven't had the time to read this whole thread and unfortunately I was unable to listen to this show live today, had to catch the re-run when I got home from work, so I am a little late here. I don't have much time to post, gotta get up with the roosters tomorrow, but I just want to say a few things if I may.
First, I have been reading Judy Wood's book (for awhile actually, I am by no means a scientist). And I am finding it very interesting, at least what I can understand of it. I was very surprised to hear her speak. I found her defensive attitude unsettling. It was very disappointing that she would not even engage Ark in any conversation or even rational debate. She wouldn't even let him speak. So, no scientific peer review allowed? And she irked me with her analogies and her giggles. At one point I even found myself praying, 'Jesus save me from Dr Woods followers'. But respectfully, maybe she is just accustomed to having to defend her work?
I do agree with her statement that we can't we find the answers without first knowing what is the Question. (or something similar) And I applaud her that she would do such due diligence in investigating the evidence. But 9/11 is not Just a Scientific investigation. This is also a Criminal investigation. And in a Criminal investigation the first and foremost question is WHO DONE IT?. And all the evidence is collected for that end. It is more important to find out Who done it and Why. This goes to motive. The Big Fives Who, What, When, Where, Why. And in my opinion the Who and Why supersede the How. Not to say that the How in not important, and can certainly aid in leading the way to the Who and maybe even the Why. But it does no good to find out how the towers (et al) came down without further investigation/thought into who and why. And by the way, she contradicted herself when she stated that she knows who is responsible. The same people that took her to court. The "They" that Joe, or maybe Niall, one of you guys asked her about. But let's not assume without evidence?!
Second, I would like to thank you guys for having Lisa G on the show. It seems that maybe it didn't play out as well as planned (with all the Judy followers interrupting and all) so unfortunately not enough time left to address the more important issues surrounding the Big False Flag known as 9/11. Maybe another show in the future for more of that?
Anyway, Thank you all ...Joe, Niall, and a special thanks to Jason for his humor and for 'keeping it real'. And Pierre for your patience, you had a special way with Dr Judy.
First, I have been reading Judy Wood's book (for awhile actually, I am by no means a scientist). And I am finding it very interesting, at least what I can understand of it. I was very surprised to hear her speak. I found her defensive attitude unsettling. It was very disappointing that she would not even engage Ark in any conversation or even rational debate. She wouldn't even let him speak. So, no scientific peer review allowed? And she irked me with her analogies and her giggles. At one point I even found myself praying, 'Jesus save me from Dr Woods followers'. But respectfully, maybe she is just accustomed to having to defend her work?
I do agree with her statement that we can't we find the answers without first knowing what is the Question. (or something similar) And I applaud her that she would do such due diligence in investigating the evidence. But 9/11 is not Just a Scientific investigation. This is also a Criminal investigation. And in a Criminal investigation the first and foremost question is WHO DONE IT?. And all the evidence is collected for that end. It is more important to find out Who done it and Why. This goes to motive. The Big Fives Who, What, When, Where, Why. And in my opinion the Who and Why supersede the How. Not to say that the How in not important, and can certainly aid in leading the way to the Who and maybe even the Why. But it does no good to find out how the towers (et al) came down without further investigation/thought into who and why. And by the way, she contradicted herself when she stated that she knows who is responsible. The same people that took her to court. The "They" that Joe, or maybe Niall, one of you guys asked her about. But let's not assume without evidence?!
Second, I would like to thank you guys for having Lisa G on the show. It seems that maybe it didn't play out as well as planned (with all the Judy followers interrupting and all) so unfortunately not enough time left to address the more important issues surrounding the Big False Flag known as 9/11. Maybe another show in the future for more of that?
Anyway, Thank you all ...Joe, Niall, and a special thanks to Jason for his humor and for 'keeping it real'. And Pierre for your patience, you had a special way with Dr Judy.
Vulcan59 said:
From the above link:
I think I tracked down the earliest post for janedoe at DU - Jun-28-05.
_http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1893131&mesg_id=1893199
Fun if it was her on DU considering the show today with SOTT that the message is:
I tried to create an account and log into DU, so that I could view janedoe's profile and maybe all the posts, but got this error "Sorry, user registration has been temporarily turned off by the administrator of this website. Please try again later," Looks like the error is due to updating of the website and maybe someone could find a way to janedoe's posts from the updated site.
Also, the earliest date for an article or video I could find on her webpage is dated April 2005 _http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html
QuantumLogic
Jedi
Guardian said:
You are welcome. I just thought it would be good to have for those who did not have the opportunity to listen to the show live and be involved in the chat room. In searching for more on this guy Santilli it would seem he has had battles with all the other major disinfo sites- Alex Jones, Before it's News, The Real News Online- the list goes on and on. In his company Santilli & Associates, I'm wondering who his "associates" are. There might be some interesting links there.
Off to bed- it's been an interesting and enlightening day.
Humility is not a strong point in Mrs. Wood. Also communication. Maybe her book is excellent but after listening to her I doubt I will pay for it. 
Laura has a point that tells alot, the fact that Judy Wood wanted to be called Doctor; and Ark was clear, humble and human. When you are a scientist you have to try to give your thinking as simple as possible for normal and ignorant people like me if you want to give a message, your knowledge, etc. It was by the way a very interesting show and I congratulate the interviewers for their good sense of humor, their patience, their humility and good education. Under my humble point of vue, Mrs. Wood was not well educated in this program, forgetting the basic law of an interview that is: respect for the other, listening other points of thinking, listening and trying to clarify as most as possible. And yes, the book of Laura and Joe it is for me the most educational research about this subject, that is not just a fascinating subject but the cause of this horrible world situation that we are living now.
Listening to Mrs. Wood was like being in a big mass of fog, without air or light then suddenly, when she went, fog disappeared and cleared away and then we were again humans trying to understand something, exchanging ideas, communicating. Thanks to all of you.
Laura has a point that tells alot, the fact that Judy Wood wanted to be called Doctor; and Ark was clear, humble and human. When you are a scientist you have to try to give your thinking as simple as possible for normal and ignorant people like me if you want to give a message, your knowledge, etc. It was by the way a very interesting show and I congratulate the interviewers for their good sense of humor, their patience, their humility and good education. Under my humble point of vue, Mrs. Wood was not well educated in this program, forgetting the basic law of an interview that is: respect for the other, listening other points of thinking, listening and trying to clarify as most as possible. And yes, the book of Laura and Joe it is for me the most educational research about this subject, that is not just a fascinating subject but the cause of this horrible world situation that we are living now. Listening to Mrs. Wood was like being in a big mass of fog, without air or light then suddenly, when she went, fog disappeared and cleared away and then we were again humans trying to understand something, exchanging ideas, communicating. Thanks to all of you.
