Show #15: No Ordinary Inside Job: The 9/11 Psy-Ops

Robin said:
Hesher Sesher says (15:38:20): "You guys should all tune into The Pete Santilli Show on Monday, The Guerilla Media Network is going to expose Lisa to a real world wide audience"

Who is Peter Santilli? See: Santilli on Santilli @ _http://petersantilli.com/about/

Oh I will be tuning in on Monday all right. This pathological nonsense isn't going to be getting a free pass.
 
Joe, Jason, Niall, Pierre, Ark, Laura: I'd like to say thank you again for having me on. I'd hoped we could get more into the aftermath of 9/11 and the recent finding of plane wreckage and tampering of the 9/11 crime scene, removal of evidence, the ( almost total) blackout on dissemination of information relating to Israeli government involvement in 9/11, the dancing Israelis, and more along those lines with respect to the illegal invasions and occupations of the countries on Bush's rogue nations list since 9/11 happened.

I guess that wasn't meant to be today. I'm getting to listen to the show now in its entirety.

So, I'm going on the roaster again on Monday? Why? Because I disagreed with some points made by DOCTOR Wood? F-a-b-u-l-o-u-s.

I'll probably regret asking this question, but.....Has anyone here considered that Judy Wood might be part of the 9/11 psyop?
 
Hesper said:
Robin said:
Hesher Sesher says (15:38:20): "You guys should all tune into The Pete Santilli Show on Monday, The Guerilla Media Network is going to expose Lisa to a real world wide audience"

Who is Peter Santilli? See: Santilli on Santilli @ _http://petersantilli.com/about/

Oh I will be tuning in on Monday all right. This pathological nonsense isn't going to be getting a free pass.

Evidently SOTT is a pretend World Wide Audience?

I can't say I'm surprised. This is what Judykins has done since day one...attack anyone who doesn't agree with her.
 
Laura said:
Does anyone know when Judy Wood first came out with her ideas (i.e. published them)?

From Amazon:

"Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11"
Publication Date: 2010
Publisher: The New Investigation (2010)

From her website @ _http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

If you are among those who have called for a new, open, and independent investigation, today’s your lucky day! This is not only “The New Investigation,” it is the only comprehensive-forensic investigation to date in the public domain. As of this publication only one person —myself, Dr. Judy Wood— has conducted a comprehensive investigation to determine what happened to the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. This was part of the federal qui tam (whistleblower) case I filed (2007) in which I accused the defendants of science fraud.
 
QuantumLogic said:
I agree. She consistently repeated "it's about the evidence", but it sure seemed like a gross display of self importance. Perhaps it is due to all of the ridicule of her work, or maybe something else entirely. One thing came to mind, though. If she really was correct in her assessment that it was a directed energy weapon, would the PTB really just let her go around telling people that?

Sure it's about the evidence but that's just a foundation. That's certainly important. But it's not all there is. That's the impression I got from her. The objectivity and discenment that went into the building of this foundation must also be applied to any evidence that shows the intent of those who distort these facts for their own benefit and nefarious agenda. That's even more important!
 
On a side note, here at my house, IMMEDIATELY after Lisa found out Judy Wood was going to be promoted on the show, a bag of light bulbs just fell off my top kitchen shelf and 2 of the 3 broke. No one (or critter) was in the room, and no one was moving around, the bag that had been sitting there for quite some time, just fell to the floor all on it's own.
 
Guardian said:
Robin said:
Hesher Sesher says (15:38:20): "You guys should all tune into The Pete Santilli Show on Monday, The Guerilla Media Network is going to expose Lisa to a real world wide audience"

Really? Well if by "expose" they mean "attack" Lisa, then I will redefine Pete Santilli's entire concept of "expose" :mad:

I'm upset too, Guardian ... Time to do some "digging", something quite a few of Judy's fan club don't quite grasp ... As exampled by their many conclusions without ever doing any research.

Guardian said:
On a side note, here at my house, IMMEDIATELY after Lisa found out Judy Wood was going to be promoted on the show, a bag of light bulbs just fell off my top kitchen shelf and 2 of the 3 broke. No one (or critter) was in the room, and no one was moving around, the bag that had been sitting there for quite some time, just fell to the floor all on it's own.

LOL ... ;D
 
That's true. Nobody - human or animal - was anywhere near the bag of light bulbs. Next thing we heard was a crash on the floor.
It was very strange.
 
Lisa Guliani said:
I'll probably regret asking this question, but.....Has anyone here considered that Judy Wood might be part of the 9/11 psyop?

Actually, that is what I am wondering right now... after listening to her and her fanatical supporters. They remind me a lot of the fanatical attackers of SOTT and Lisa.... odd, that.

Anyway, that's why I asked about the date of her publication of her ideas. I remember the first time I heard about Judy Wood was when I published an article on my blog connecting 9-11 to hyperdimensional physics and some idiot came to attack me for "plagiarizing Judy Wood."

Well, I'd never heard of her.

And the fact is, our book about 9-11 was published in 2005 and the idea in question was written as follows:

Dr. Charles Hirsch, the chief medical examiner dealing with 9/11, informed relatives of 9/11 victims not to expect remains of their loved ones to be found since most bodies had been “vaporized” (his own word). This was the finding of the chief medical examiner at the WTC site. How can anyone explain that people, human beings, caught in a building collapse were completely “vaporized”, turned to dust, just like the concrete and fixtures of the WTC towers?

Most investigators point to evidence of “explosives” and “squibs” in video footage of the collapse of the two towers, yet to effect the complete destruction of so much concrete and office material and human beings, a massive quantity of explosives would surely have been required, and such a quantity is simply not evident in the available footage. As has been suggested by Professor Jones, an advanced and publicly unknown form of “superthermite” was probably used to cut the steel core beams of the WTC towers, which leaves open the possibility that other similarly advanced and publicly unknown technology was used to disintegrate the concrete that constituted the body of the towers. It this case, it would not be responsible or wise for us to theorize about what specific device or technique was used to turn the towers to dust, however, we will say that ‘light’ and “EM pulse” weapons have been developed in the past 20 years by the U.S. and Israeli military that are capable of ‘invisibly’ destroying hardened targets. To that we will add that part of the prepping of the WTC towers could have included the planting of ‘conductors’ to effect the propagation of such an induced wave throughout the buildings and thereby causing the vaporization of concrete and of fixtures and human bodies alike.

So really, it looks like Judy Wood is a psy-op to vector people toward rather nonsensical "free energy", Tesla, Bearden, and all that. As Ark pointed out to me later this evening, she talks and talks about "evidence, evidence, evidence," but there is not a single word in her book that is evidence that so-called "free energy" even exists.

The fact that she has so little mastery of herself that she actually turns reasonable people off is another point suggesting a psy-ops vector. It also suggests that she can be easily "handled" because she is little more than a programmed reaction machine.

And then, again, her coterie of "fans" who "travel with her" to make sure that everyone is properly intimidated to receive the gospel according to DOCTOR Judy strongly suggests something nefarious behind her whether she is aware of it or not. Her fans and her lack of self-mastery do nothing for her "cause." Evidence is worthless if it is not utilized to make a hypothesis that may lead to a theory.

So, all-in-all, it has been quite instructive.

Not to worry, Lisa, you'll be on again and we'll discuss more stuff.
 
I agree with many of the comments already mentioned by others. (Dr. Wood's self importance, over talking, defensiveness) I also felt that since not having read Dr. Wood's book, that the first 1.5 hours were a waste as far as valuable information pertaining to the actual manuscript. Like anart, it was difficult to garner ANY valuable information because of the way she was talking. (mainly in circles and repeating the same thing) I also don't understand why she didn't seem to understand Sott's position or have any idea that Sott has been doing this research for years!

However, I gleaned more insight into her psychological makeup as well as that of her 'fans'. Do I dare say they seemed 'cultish' in their behavior?! (Or as Jason mentioned 'Christian-esque) I have to hand it to the members of the Forum/Readers of Sott, we seemed to handle the 'trolls and haters' well enough without stooping to their level of ignorance/attack. Today's chat room reminded me of how much I value the Forum and what is being done here everyday.

The air I was breathing seemed to clear up quite a bit once Lisa was introduced, if you catch my drift! ;) As for Monday's show trying to once again defame Sott and Lisa, well I'll be listening. I may call in directly if it seems warranted.

Kudos to the Sott Team for handling today's show with professionalism. It was definitely the most chaotic of them yet! I think we're going to find out a whole lot more concerning DR. Judy Wood and her followers. As with anything else, time will tell and we will see.
 
I don't recall Judy Wood being around the 9/11 truth scene in 2005. Maybe in 2006. She was a member of the Scholars for 9/11 truth group for a while.
 
Quote from Laura:
Anyway, that's why I asked about the date of her publication of her ideas. I remember the first time I heard about Judy Wood was when I published an article on my blog connecting 9-11 to hyperdimensional physics and some idiot came to attack me for "plagiarizing Judy Wood."

Well, I'd never heard of her.

And the fact is, our book about 9-11 was published in 2005

Well since her qui tam case was filed in 2007 and her book was published in 2010, it sure would seem the other way around if there is any "plagiarizing" going on.
 
Robin said:
Quote from Laura:
Anyway, that's why I asked about the date of her publication of her ideas. I remember the first time I heard about Judy Wood was when I published an article on my blog connecting 9-11 to hyperdimensional physics and some idiot came to attack me for "plagiarizing Judy Wood."

Well, I'd never heard of her.

And the fact is, our book about 9-11 was published in 2005

Well since her qui tam case was filed in 2007 and her book was published in 2010, it sure would seem the other way around if there is any "plagiarizing" going on.

Maybe we were closer to the right idea than we thought and Judy Wood was brought out of the "woodwork" to deflect and vector??? Isn't the first time for us.
 
Laura said:
So really, it looks like Judy Wood is a psy-op to vector people toward rather nonsensical "free energy", Tesla, Bearden, and all that. As Ark pointed out to me later this evening, she talks and talks about "evidence, evidence, evidence," but there is not a single word in her book that is evidence that so-called "free energy" even exists.

Yes, and Ark quickly picked up on the books title and thought about that when he said it, and it does seem to be off somewhat, perhaps to vector the "free energy" crowed.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom