.
Quote from godchaser:
One; it has to be said again, as we know, that sepertaton is illusory -so connectivity in and of ONE-SELF in occupancy of mutliple-chassis is the consequence of natural-law.
"Yes that's true, separation is illusory, and the fact that we cannot understand each other is the proof of the validity of your statement. You live in your own world, choosing your own words to give meaning to your own reality, and, until you are able to see yourself and us, there isn't and there will be no possible union, just because the barrier of your own and "singular world", your illusion is too high."
"It is amazing how wishfull thinking separates us irremediably."
-Ana
Quote from wishfull thinking, Ana posted in response to me above:
According to the Cassiopaeans, this is a fundamental property of the service to self orientation. The core idea of wishful thinking is that one prefers one's personal subjective preference over knowledge of the objective state of matters. This is a statement to the universe to the effect that the being does not wish to exist in said universe because the being's fantasies are preferred. This then ties with the idea of the thought center of non-being and separation of self from all which is.
In the third density wishful thinking does not physically bend reality, it only hampers perception. In the fourth density wishful thinking, so the Cassiopaeans suggest, has the effect of quite concretely forming a sort of reality bubble. In densities beyond the fourth, pure service to self cannot exist as active beings presumably because the increased freedom of these densities would make it so the entity simply collapsed on itself and ceased interacting, living fully in a solipsistic bubble or collapsing into inanimate matter.
___________
Hey Ana, and anyone else reading with their particular interest. I came to this thread to get some specific answers; and i have. Just not the answers i was expecting. It's {synchronous} you quoted the excerpt there, which i suppose is par for the course.
:)
-Before i try and respond, i want to pose two questions that will dispel the misunderstandings at hand, whether a supposed 'singularity' has been realized anywhere, to date; or not(?) I suspect they may well get a response.
-How many estimated "singularity" events, are presently counted?
-What are the invariably shared similarities among them?
To that, this film is very good:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1079797626827646234&ei=H5rTStGBA5LiqgKX8dWgBA&q=building+gods#
As it is, i had been considering some things along the lines of 'seperation' or OUR (subjective appreciation) of connection. Tiger mentioned to try and break things down into a few sentences, which i guess would be alright for my own text. But what you're speaking to and quoting above Ana, ties in with what i have posted, far more succinctly. Here again, posting on this thread wasn't my interest.
In any event i'll quickly outline my thinking, i've nevertheless been going over; to try and get at some substance. It motioned around in things you quoted, like, how do we (objectively view) 'pure service to self', or that of the World? -Other things like, Staying or going when the Wave rolls in? -Is staying or going synonymous (in a practical sense?) How could it not be, broadly speaking. -This was generally the meander of how i was looking at things. Which pushed me to thinking about something Laura mediated w/the C's, in asking whether we could help facilitate passage for those fixed in a loop, in other dimension-projection. (Flight 19, by ex.) The C's said sure; just build an electro-magnetic generator. Seems that for the them to try and orchestrate help in this regard would be like trying to teach a Gorilla how to fly a 747.
Which then had me at the Parent-Child depiction of US and the C's.
Point being when i read your post and saw this: "..pure service to self cannot exist as
[active beings] - [presumably] -because the [increased freedom] of these densities.." -i realized a few things. One is the C's have not experienced what a so-called singularity implies in either a manifest and or, ethereal-environment(?) (At least by the self-perspective from which they exchange w/us presently. Certainly perspectives change in an expansive motion.) And when i say 'what a singularity implies', i mean THEY haven't yet experienced a progressively sweeping connection in and of a societal-solidarity, or what is an omnipresent-connection among a society.
Which was a little shocking in the same way a child realizes for the first time that Mom and Dad are fallible, seemingly-vaunerable, and don't know everything. (Which clearly makes perfect sense and no doubt they have pointed this out, repeatedly.) And i well realize it is somewhat childish and gullible to view the C's as perfect, not that i saw it like this quite so literally. Neverthless, to try and draw up what i'm getting at: the 5D reality they speak of is what we will similarly be available to {presumably} in this worldly-dimension, through Viritual Reality-scenario. More to point, when they talk about "-in densities beyond the fourth - a pure service to self cannot exist as [active beings] - [presumably]" - {"because the increased freedom of these densities would make it so the entity simply collapsed on itself and ceased interacting.. living fully in a solipsistic bubble or collapsing into inanimate matter."}
This was really eye-opening and compelling, becasue they apparently have never experienced or viewed an emergent-reality, as well(?) Which simply means, and this will likely be a doosey of a run-on sentence. (Quick note on that: i went back and read my two earlier posts, and they didn't make any sense to me, either. LOL!!! -But true enough: they flowed real good when i didn't read so fast.) As it is; an 'emergent-reality' is the merger of a progressive, societal-interactive display - in and of a virtual reality-projection - in a seeming envelope, that is our real-reality, yet 'expansive' by consequence of this creative display -thus progressively culminating in a collage of the two realities - whereby no distinction clearly exists, or is found meaningful, between what is seemingly virtual-reality, or real-reality.. when such-societal interactive union is inextricably, cooperative.
{That's universe-dimension-creation, if i understandably lost anyone there.}
Simply put, it is quite literally the dynamic of "how {wishful thinking} separates us, irremediably" -not only finding a {remedy} - but has seemingly discovered its remedy; effortlessly, through the very entropic-activity that percipitated its perceived [seperation]. The "Work" of density maturation is effectively, {effortless}- by nature of OUR-collective predisposition to be of service to ONE/OURSELVES, even when WE seemingly are not aware of said predisposition of ONE is ALL & the same.
-I can envision OUR-SELVES looking in on us, at such times as that; and saying with a proud Mom & Pop-like grin ..WE know them.
HAAAAAAAAAAAAA-
Looking over more of the quote here:
"In the third density, wishful thinking does not physically bend reality, it only hampers perception."
Certainly for us to be able to facilitate the creation of manifest-dimension/projection; we'll need to have the 'knowledge' to do so. Programmable matter, nanorobotics, claytronics, and many technological interexchanges will succeed our present inability to "bend-reality" ..by consequence of our capacity in malleable-interface with-environment.
My sentiment earlier of the C's, reminds me of similar regard we must have all heard from family or friends; many times, over the phone. By using the phone, we closed the gap of supposed distance and seperation, and were enriched for the experience. ..Feeling that a [seemingly] expeditious pace in our experiential-"Work", that is fulfilled through the medium of 'technological integration'. (However natural this evolutionary progression obviously must be.) But is nevertheless found to be egoistic, or usurps higher appreciation- seems an equally natural response. All be it profoundly contrary the natural activity and momentum of successful, integrative-socialization.. finding a way. Technological momentum is exactly this, and nothing More or Less. Can't be anything else. It is what is, like all things are. Although i can't argue that apparently such an extraordinary display of unified societal success, in its infinte diversity, is [seemingly] atypical(?) Least as the C's have presently seen, heard or experienced from their vantage, right now.
{Remedy} is clearly present.. in is as much as WE presently perceive "wishful thinking"(?) -apparently.
In any event, a manifest ability to change one's own environment at their discretion, (all be it infallibly synchronous of ALL-directly participating, and indeed w/all those who are indirectly participating. After all, WE are OURSELVES, in and of infinite depiction.) ..Undoubtedly bespeaks and reflects the perpetual-activity of a 'Wave'. In other words, i project a reality in a seamless and seemingly anticipatory coexistence of what you project, and so on and so forth. Not unlike the synchronous dilagoue of the transcripts and general discourse we enjoy in our daily goings on. Yet with an appreciable-solidarity or connection beyond that of subjective interpretation; at least as we perceive {subjective-choice} - or practical assertion of {objectivity} -as we se it today.
So a so-called 'successful'-reality is literally an intractable cooperative. Which by definition, exhibits inalienable seventh-density prowess -once achieved -regardless of one's infinite choices of manifest and or projected depiction, they may or may not choose to inhabit. Fundamentally this may well be why the C's and others are so intently interested(?) A coalescence of malleable, progressive intelligence- seemingly functioning in an efforless manner of clarity. Admittedly must be quite a prospective show(?) One that WE are all very interested(?) Particulary so, given its apparent infrequency of maturation, to OUR present recognition(?)
Last question:
-Is a so-called 'singularity'-exercise, beyond the perception of the C's?
Cheers,
Chris
-
