Some transcripts in 1998 are not posted?

[KristinLynne]

As I am reading the full transcripts, I noticed that some sessions in 1998 are posted but in black so there isn't a link. I also checked the threads to see if they were there but they aren't. I am almost through reading 1995's sessions so I am sure I have missed something.

 

[Palinurus]

Those 1998 sessions in black have not been transcribed yet and are therefore not publicly available. You'll have to wait until Laura can find the time to produce those transcripts in the first place - which will probably not be forthcoming soon since her 'opus magnum' clearly takes priority AFAIK.

My guess would be that this transcribing will be done when the book series of the annotated transcripts reaches the second half of 1998 (Vol. 7 ??). According to the list Vol. 4 (1997, Jan-May) is currently the latest one available. So that would take quite a while.

As far as I recall the sessions in question are problematical in several respects such as difficult circumstances, garbled source materials, tricky subject matter, and so on.

Meanwhile, I hope you noticed the following disclaimer:

We strongly discourage people from reading the Cassiopaean transcripts on their own, outside of the context provided by Laura's work, as in our experience people often misinterpret them and tend to project their own ideas, beliefs, and biases onto them. Therefore we advise the reader to read them in context, that is in the Wave and Adventures with Cassiopaea series.

 

[HyperdimensionalApe]

I checked on a website in my native language that posts translated transcripts and everything is there from 1998, idk why they are unavailable here. And it says it was uploaded in 2010.

 

[nicklebleu]

We strongly discourage people from reading the Cassiopaean transcripts on their own, outside of the context provided by Laura's work, as in our experience people often misinterpret them and tend to project their own ideas, beliefs, and biases onto them. Therefore we advise the reader to read them in context, that is in the Wave and Adventures with Cassiopaeaseries.

... or via the books, that Laura has annotated to make sure the transmissions are read in context and with explanations.

 

[Stoneboss]

We strongly discourage people from reading the Cassiopaean transcripts on their own, outside of the context provided by Laura's work, as in our experience people often misinterpret them and tend to project their own ideas, beliefs, and biases onto them. Therefore we advise the reader to read them in context, that is in the Wave and Adventures with Cassiopaeaseries.

I always thought that that applied more to the people on the 'outside', those that are not a part of this forum, but still have access to the transcripts because they have 'public' access to them.

I would think that someone who is part of this forum, who has 'faith in the process', who is committed to personal growth and striving to be a part of the 'unity' of this group -- that it's not just okay, but can be beneficial for them, and the whole group, to read and quote Cassiopaean transcripts from the past. I mean, they're referred to all the time by forum members, are they not?

And when past sessions are quoted, are they still not done in the context and 'spirit' of Laura's work?

 

[nicklebleu]

I think reading the sessions is OK, as long as you also read the ensuing discussion in the thread. But I suspect that some may just read the transcripts alone, in which case they’d miss a lot of cross-references that are discussed.

The other thing is that often you need to have read older sessions to make sense of the newer ones. And not being part of the forum prevents you from asking clarifications, which can be provided by members more familiar with the material.

Anyway, just my take on that.

 

[Arwenn]

@Stoneboss, it is my understanding that the earlier transcripts are best to read with the Wave & Adventure series, simply because there were other issues/people/contexts that affected either how the questions were phrased or what the meanings actually were of the answers received. There can sometimes be multiple meanings and layers of information in the Cs responses, that make more sense in hindsight. So it’s just a caution, perhaps more pertinent to people new to Laura/Cs who may not have the background information, which can then lead to the possibility of misconstruing what the Cs may have meant.

 

[Stoneboss]

@Stoneboss, it is my understanding that the earlier transcripts are best to read with the Wave & Adventure series, simply because there were other issues/people/contexts that affected either how the questions were phrased or what the meanings actually were of the answers received. There can sometimes be multiple meanings and layers of information in the Cs responses, that make more sense in hindsight. So it’s just a caution, perhaps more pertinent to people new to Laura/Cs who may not have the background information, which can then lead to the possibility of misconstruing what the Cs may have meant.

Yes, I understand what you're saying and I totally agree with it. I over reacted because I thought that the 'disclaimer' was mentioned to try and discourage KristinLynne from reading past and early sessions. I have read the Wave & Adventure series and certainly understand how easy it could be for someone, especially someone new to the Cass material, to take those early transcripts out of context. Thanks Arwenn.

 

[Palinurus]

I checked on a website in my native language that posts translated transcripts and everything is there from 1998, idk why they are unavailable here. And it says it was uploaded in 2010.

I strongly suspect those translations are based on the pirated edition which was released against Laura's will around the year 2000 by Vincent Bridges and Frank. Copies of those still linger somewhere on the web I think, but they certainly did around those
times.

As for citing the 'disclaimer' in my post (which may be a misnomer from me), I did that to emphasize the vital importance of proper context - not to discourage the reading of transcripts but to stress one shouldn't read them without cross references.

Hope that clarifies my position and I'm sorry I wasn't clear enough from the start

 

[KristinLynne]

Hi everyone! Thanks for the info and I wasn't sure if the links weren't just working for me since I could see they were included in the column. But I also understand that many have other pressing issues with current activities in the world so these older transcripts are being done when they can be.

Meanwhile, I hope you noticed the following disclaimer:

I did and thank you. I have read the Wave series and will again. When I read through the series the first time I did not read the transcripts so when I get a little further along, I will then start to re read all of the chapters again. Shoot, I may have to read them several times to even try to understand all the implications and details that are invariably missed the first time. I will say that it makes a difference when Laura's commentary is added before, during or after a session because it will remind me of certain explanations in the series.

 

[OutSky]

I checked on a website in my native language that posts translated transcripts and everything is there from 1998, idk why they are unavailable here. And it says it was uploaded in 2010.

Similar thing happens to me. I do have those sessions. I had access to those sessions about 6 years ago or so when also I first met the C’s transcripts. However, until reading this thread I could swear I had read those at the cassiopaea.org —in English. Well, I may be just mistaken and it was a pirate site, though my knowledge of such irregular sites comes basically from rare mentions in the forumites’ posts.

In this particular moment with all the Corona insanity running into the world, would be good to see those “old/new” sessions with C's wisdom available to the general public, however I certainly agree that things are best when done in proper manner.

 

[thorbiorn]

Published excerpts of transcripts from 1998 sessions that are not posted
In this thread, Cassiopaean Session Transcripts by date there are a few dates from 1998, that are listed but have no hyperlinks: 11 Jul, 18 Jul, 25 Jul,1 Aug, 8 Aug,15 Aug, 22 Aug, 29 Aug, 5 Sept, 12 Sept, 19 Sept, 3 Oct, 7 Nov, 14 Nov, 21 Nov, 28 Nov, 19 Dec. To look for segments that have been published in books and articles on Cassiopaea.org, I did a search for 1998. Below, there are quotes with some context and links to the sources. It will take more than one post and for some dates, 29 Aug, 5 Sept, and 28 Nov, there were no results

From Session 11 July 1998
There are two excerpts pertaining to this session.
1.
Link: Binary Stars: Does our Sun have a Dark Companion?
This article has excerpts from three sessions, all quite long, beginning with August 3, 1996, followed by July 4, 1998. Since they weave into each other closely, I copied all:

August 3, 1996

This session started off with a simple question about the Hale-Bopp comet, but led to some startling information...

Q: (L) This is kind of an off-the-wall question that just popped into my head. Did we ever ask anything about Hale-Bopp?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is Hale-Bopp going to turn planet Earth into a super-conductor? [As I had been told by a source on the internet.]
A: No.
Q: (L) Is Hale-Bopp the herald of the transition into 4th density? [Another rumor I had heard.]
A: No.
Q: (L) Is Hale-Bopp going to do anything other than pass by with a nice night-time show?
A: No.
Q: (T) Is all the brouhaha over Hale-Bopp a smoke screen?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, what is it then?
A: Hale-Bopp: Flopp!
Q: (T) Oh! The Kahoutek of the nineties! (J) The cosmic OJ Simpson trial! Something to keep us busy...
A: Since you have broached the subject: are you familiar with the " twin Sun " theory?
Q: (L) No. What is it? (T) Referring to our sun and the possibility of Jupiter being a sun in the making?
A: No.
Q: (T) Okay, what is the twin sun theory?
A: Theory that the sun is really a double star.
Q: (L) Well, if it is a double star, how come we don't see the other one? Where is the other one and why don't we see it? (T) I don't think I have ever heard of that, have you? (F) It seems vaguely familiar for some reason. (L) Is this factual, correct?
A: Wait a moment...
Q: (T) They are bringing in their twin sun expert... (L) No doubt! [planchette spins numerous times.]
A: Now, where were we?
Q: (L) We were talking about the twin sun phenomenon...
A: Theory.
Q: (T) Which is that Sol is one part of a twin system?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is this theory correct?
A: Not yet, you are "jumping the gun."
Q: (T) Okay. You brought this up. You indicated that, yes, our sun is one part of a dual system...
A: Yes...
Q: (T) ...and that there is another star, another sun here...
A: Yes...
Q: (L) Can we see it? (T) Can we see it at this point in time?
A: Can you?
Q: (L) No. Not that I am aware of. Is the reason we cannot see it because it is always on the other side of the sun from us? That it orbits in such a way that we can never see it?
A: Orbits, yes, assuming it is there, however, we did not confirm that, now did we?
Q: (T) Is Sol two stars combined?
A: No. What is "dark" matter, and what are dark stars?
Q: (L) Are dark stars something like black holes?
A: No.
Q: (T) Dark matter, that I have read about, is what the astronomical community calls all the loose stuff floating around out in the cosmos that must exist because of the equations, but they can't see it.
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Would dark stars be part of this?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So there is dark matter and dark stars?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) The dark matter they cannot see because it is dark.
A: Yes. How about "Brown stars?"
Q: (T) Okay, Brown stars I have heard of. There is yellow, red, blue, green... Okay, our star burns as a yellow star because of the matter it is composed of - hydrogen, etc.
A: Close.
Q: (T) Other stars burn different colors in the visible spectrum because of the make-up of the star...
A: Yes, but not "brown" ones. How easy is it to see brown against a black background?
Q: (T) Not easy at all! That is why they can't see the dark matter...
A: That is why scientists dubbed it "brown."
Q: (L) How does brown star connect to twin sun theory?
A: Guess!
Q: (T) Okay. Let's talk about this. For some reason we have to work through this to maintain free will. (L) Is this star small enough that it is orbiting with the planets?
A: No, we are leading you to something, if you will be patient.
Q: (L) Okay, lead on... we want to know about this. (T) They just asked if we understood what a brown star was.
A: Do you?
Q: (L) What is the significance of the brown star?
A: Dark star.
Q: (L) It is a dark star... okay...
A: If it is there.
Q: (L) Well, will you put me out of my misery and tell me? (T) Wait, a dark star is dark because it doesn't give off light. It is still a star, and acts like a star...
A: Yes. And if it has an elliptical orbit... would it, maybe, like, "come and go?"
Q: (T) What science, astronomy, has described as double stars, are two stars that are close together with some sort of interactive orbit. But that is not necessarily the only way two stars can exist.
A: Close. As you perceive from your vantage point. But how would you like to embark on a bicycle trip between them?
Q: (L) So the ones that we are aware of and see can be so far apart that there can be a lot between... (T) So our astronomers have not recognized this possibility?
A: Yes they have.
Q: (T) They know, but don't talk about it. So, we may have, in this theory, a dark star orbiting...
A: And what would happen if you did?
Q: (L) Well...
A: And it, like, comes and goes?
Q: (T) Like every 3600 years?
A: Maybe.
Q: (T) And maybe this dark star also has some planets orbiting it?
A: Ok, change of direction: Oort cloud and comet cluster and sun twin occasionally passing through the former like a bowling ball through pins.
Q: (L) How does the dark star passing through the Oort cloud relate to the comet cluster?
A: Cause and effect.
Q: (L) So, the comet cluster is caused by the dark star smashing through the Oort cloud? (T) Well, not necessarily smashing, but passing close enough for its gravity to change things... (L) But they said "like a bowling ball through pins." (T) The gravity of that star would cause the comets to be flung in all directions. (J) Is the earth like a pin? A bowling pin? (L) No, that's the Oort Cloud.
A: Now, think of how your Biblical prophecies speak of a very terrifiying period, followed by an apparent renewal of normalcy, followed by the "End."
Q: (T) We learned about a "comet cluster" very early on. Now you are going beyond that and giving us a reason as to why this comet cluster...
A: Laura, please clarify exactly what the prophecies say.
Q: (L) Well, in the prophecies it is said: "If those days were not shortened, would no flesh be saved. But, for the elects' sake, will those days be shortened." Now, can you tell me what this means?
A: Not yet.
Q: (T) Where are we? We have a dark star flinging comets like bowling pins...
A: Your Biblical prophecies speak of a period of terror and chaos followed by calm, and then, unexpectedly, amidst seeming overwhelming peace and renewal and prosperity, the end. What would happen if the brown star that is the sun's twin were to get close enough to be illuminated by the sun?
Q: (T) Well, if it were close enough to be illuminated, the obvious result is that it would be SEEN. People would panic...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Governments would fall...
A: And terror and chaos. And when it departs again?
Q: (L) Everything will seem to be fine! But, they won't realize that the Oort cloud has been hit! Oh, sugar!
A: And then what?
Q: (L) It is not the Oort cloud or the comets that is going to cause all this terror and carrying on, it is going to be the seeing of the illuminated brown star, which will go away, and then no one will see what is coming! And this IS talked about in both the Bible and Nostradamus - but it was incomprehensible before! Okay, how long will it take the comets to get from the Oort cloud to here?
A: Let us just say that the cluster travels much faster than the usual cometary itinerary.
Q: (T) And this is because they are traveling in the wake of a large sun sized gravity well...
A: And we have spoken of the comet cluster before, and we have told you that this time, it rides the Wave.
Q: (L) Is the wave the energy from this brown star?
A: No.
Q: (L) The Wave is the Wave. (T) So, the dark star is going to come through the Oort cloud, and it doesn't have to get too close. Any star that gets that close is TOO close. (L) Are they being "kicked" and then they get on the wave that is already on the move?
A: Yes. This time. You have had the comet cluster before in antiquity, but the wave was last here aeons ago.
Q: (L) Is this wave a gravity wave?
A: Interrelated.
Q: (L) Okay, now... (T) Well, the wave is a form of energy. (L) Yes, they once told us that it was "hyper-kinetic sensate."
A: Realm border, this is your quantum factor, Laura, so plug it into "Noah" accordingly, and check out the results.
Q: (L) Does this brown or dark star have planetary bodies of its own, other than sharing planets with Sol?
A: No.
Q: (T) Okay. No correlation to Sitchin and his "planet Nibiru." (L) If the wave is the quantum factor for the transition of the Solar System, what is the factor for the transition of an atom?
A: Electrons emit what?
Q: (L) Photons... (T) An electrical charge of some kind. (L)I thought that an electron didn't have any parts... that it is an elementary particle...
A: Right...
Q: (L) What the heck does an electron emit? Is gravity emitted by an electron?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What...
A: Electromagnetically.
Q: (L) What is it that causes a quantum transition? A collecting and dispersing of gravity. What is it about an atom that causes it to collect or disperse?
A: How does the electron fit into the equation of the "atom?"
Q: (L) Well, it orbits the nucleus... (T) Planets orbit the Sun. (L) The energy that an electron collects, or any other part of an atom collects, that causes a quantum transition, comes to it from outside of it? A wave?
A: How many electrons orbit the nucleus?
Q: (L) It depends on the atom. The number of electrons determine what an atom is an atom of... the number of particles it has orbiting...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And they orbit in specific shells...
A: Yes... And how does the sun relate to this macro-dynamically?
Q: (L) Okay, something from the nucleus of the atom acts upon the electrons to cause a transition?
A: How many electrons orbit the nucleus?
Q: (L) Of the sun? Are you asking how many electrons orbit the nucleus of the Sun? Different atoms have different numbers...
A: Of any atom?
Q: (L) Okay, it varies.
A: From what to what?
Q: (L) From one to somewhere in the nineties or hundreds...
A: And what determines the number?
Q: (T) Well, what determines the number?
A: Is it the composition of the nucleus?
Q: (L) Yeah. That's right. We forgot. What causes or determines the number of protons or whatever in the nucleus?
A: What composition would cause the orbiting of one electron?
Q: (L) One proton?
A: Now, think macro-dynamically.
Q: (L) Well, you once said that the sun is a window, or transition point to another density. Are you saying that the nucleus of an atom is also a window?
A: What we are saying is the sun is a proton and its twin is an electron!
Q: (L) Well, I am still trying to get at... the wave causes transitions in the macro-cosmic atom, what causes the microcosmic atom... what causes a quantum jump? What accumulates in an atom that causes it to transition?
A: Completion of Grand Cycle.
Q: (J) It just is. (L) No, no...
A: And who says that the Sun's twin appears every 3600 years?
Q: (L) Okay, we have the 3600 year comet cluster cycle, the Sun twin is another cycle altogether, and then we have the wave, which is a Grand Cycle. So, we have three things causing a transition in nature?
A: Like "biorhythms."
Q: (T) And we have a triple bad day coming up! Or a good day, depending on which way you look at it.
A: Bad day if you are John C. Rockefeller, good day if you are Mahatma Gandhi.
Q: (L) So, does something like a three cycle event also occur in sub-atomic transitions, like the biorhythm?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, there are three factors to be considered... or more than three?
A: Either, or.
Q: (L) Can it be a random, arbitrary number of events?
A: If you wish.
Q: (L) Is it partly the observer that adds one of the factors? Consciousness?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So, we see three separate cycles coming together here...
A: Everything reflects macrodynamically and microdynamically. We suggest you absorb for now; and, fear not! For it is not imminent! Good Night.

Just recently we came back to the subject:

July 4, 1998

Q: (A) I am trying to write down some things about a cosmology, and I have some questions mainly about the coming events. First there was the story of the sun's companion brown star which is apparently approaching the solar system, and I would like to know, if possible, details of its orbit; that is, how far it is, what is its speed, and when it will be first seen. Can we know it? Orbit: how close will it come?
A: Flat eliptical.
Q: (A) But how close will it come?
A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting orbit of locator of witness.
Q: (L) What is the closest it could come to earth... (A)Solar system... (L) Yes, but which part of the solar system? We have nine planets... which one? (A) I understand that this brown star will enter the Oort cloud... (L) I think they said it just brushes against it and the gravity disturbs it...
A: Passes through Oort cloud on orbital journey. Already has done this on its way "in."
Q: (A) You mean it has already entered the Oort cloud?
A: Has passed through.
Q: (A) So, it will not approach...
A: Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at distance of approximately averaged distance of 510,000,000,000 miles.
Q: (L) Well, 510 billion miles gives us some time! (A) Yes, but what I want to know... this Oort cloud is around the solar system, so this brown star, once it has passed through... (L) It must already be in the solar system? (A) No, it could have passed through and may not come closer. Is it coming closer or not? Is it coming closer all the time?
A: Solar system, in concert with "mother star," is revolving around companion star, a "brown" star.
Q: (A) So, that means that the mass of the companion star is much...
A: Less.
Q: (A) Less?
A: They are moving in tandem with one another along a flat, eliptical orbital plane. Outer reaches of solar system are breached by passage of brown companion, thus explaining anomalies recently discovered regarding outer planets and their moons.
Q: (A) But I understand that the distance between the sun and this brown star is changing with time. Eliptical orbit means there is perihelion and aphelion. I want to know what will be, or what was, or what is the closest distance between this brown star and the sun? What is perihelion? Can we know this, even approximately. Is it about one light year, or less or more?
A: Less, much less. Distance of closest passage roughly corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto from Sun.
Q: (A) Okay. Now, this closest pass, is this something that is going to happen?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) And it is going to happen within the next 6 to 18 years?
A: 0 to 14.
Q: (A) Okay, that's it. I have some idea about this. Now, I understand that, either by chance or by accident, two things are going to happen at essentially the same time. That is the passing of this brown star, and this comet cluster. These are two different things?
A: Yes. Different, but related.

We continued...

Q: (L) Is there a comet cluster that was knocked into some kind of orbit of its own, that continues to orbit...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And in addition to that comet cluster, there are also additional comets that are going to get whacked into the solar system by the passing of this brown star?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) I understand that the main disaster is going to come from this comet cluster...
A: Disasters involve cycles in the human experiential cycle which corresponds to the passage of comet cluster.
Q: (A) I understant that this comet cluster is cyclic and comes every 3600 years. I want to know something about the shape of this comet cluster. I can hardly imagine...
A: Shape is variable. Effect depends on closeness of passage.
Q: (L) So, it could be spread out... (A) We were asking at some point where it will be coming from. The answer was that we were supposed to look at a spirograph.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Now, spirograph suggests that these comets will not come from one direction, but from many directions at once. Is this correct?
A: Very good!!!
Q: (A) Okay, they will come from many directions...
A: But, initial visibility presents as single, solid body.
Q: (A) Do we know what is the distance to this body at present?
A: Suggest you keep your eyes open!
Q: (A) I am keeping my eyes open.
A: Did you catch the significance of the answer regarding time table of cluster and brown star? Human cycle mirrors cycle of catastrophe. Earth benefits in form of periodic cleansing. Time to start paying attention to the signs. They are escalating. They can even be "felt" by you and others, if you pay attention.
Q: (L) We have certainly been paying attention to the signs!
A: How so?
Q: (L) Well, the weather is completely bizarre. The fires, the heat...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) I notice that the tides are awfully high all the time with no ostensible explanation...
A: And low, too.
Q: (L) Yes. I have noticed that particularly. (F) I have too. Not too long ago I noticed that the tides were so incredibly low for this time of year. (L) And also the signs in people - these kids killing their parents, all these people going berserk - you know...
A: Spike.
Q: (L) What do you mean spike?
A: On a graph...
Q: (L) Just spikes, not the biggie...
A: Spikes are big.
Q: (L) Well, from what you are saying about this - I mean how are we supposed to do all these things you say we are supposed to do? I mean, we won't have time!
A: Who says?
Q: (L) That is kind of what it is sounding like. Unless our lives and experiences escalate in concert with all these other events... (A) I have a last question which I have prepared. So, we have these two physical disasters or events, the coming brown star and the comet cluster, but we have been told that this time it is going to be different because this time it is accompanied by a plane convergence.
A: Yes. Magnetic field alteration.
Q: (A) This plane convergence, or this magnetic field alteration, it's supposed to be related to realms crossing or passing. A realm border.
A: Realm. What is root of "realm?"
Q: (L) Reality.
A: Yes. How does the magnetic field "plug in?" We want to stay on this general subject matter through this session, for your sake.
Q: (L) Okay, in terms of these signs, these things going on on the planet, these fires and so forth - you never said anything about all these fires in Florida. You said Arizona was going to burn, but you never said Florida was going to burn...
A: We did not say it would not.
Q: (L) I know. But, it is really oppressive. I have read a couple of signs in the last day or so that we are going to have a change in the weather, a break, is my little method of predicting...
A: Reverse extreme?!?
Q: (L) Oh! Floods again! Well, I guess floods are better than fires... but, maybe not!
A: Italy and Greece are burning too.
Q: (L) Yes, we noticed that in the paper today. Is there a relationship between Italy and Greece and where we are on the planet? Some kind of psychic link?
A: Just same current malady.
Q: (L) Okay, you just said we are going to have a reversal in our weather. Are there any other conditions that we should be aware of at the present time?
A: Point is to watch, look, listen.
Q: (L) When we are watching, looking and listening, is there some particular thing we are supposed to be watching for that is to give us a clue about something?
A: All.
Q: (L) Is there something we are supposed to do at some point when we perceive a particular clue or event at some point?
A: What would you suggest?
Q: (L) I don't know that I would suggest anything except to keep a low profile and keep on working until we figure out the answer. It is like a race against time. We have to figure out the answer because, obviously, you are not going to tell us because such a violation of learning directive would cause soul weakness...
A: No. No race needed.
Q: (L) Well, I sometimes feel completely inadequate for all of this.
A: Stop thinking 3rd density!
Q: (L) Well, I don't want to just live in LaLa land and say, 'oh yes, I'm watching. I see the signs! I'm looking! I'm listening! And then count them off on my fingers and say: but I'm not gonna think about it because that's 3rd density!' See what I am saying here?
A: No, because you are still thinking 3rd density. Better to have a "front row seat," and enjoy!
Q: (L) But I feel like I am not supposed to be enjoying myself so much! I feel guilty!
A: Why not?
Q: (L) Well! I'm supposed to be DOING something!
A: You are.
Q: (A) When you watch, look and listen, you are getting some signals, and these signals cause a certain pattern of thinking which were not yet able to emerge, but now, after you receive certain signals, you start to think in a different way. So, you cannot now think in a different way, but when you learn this and this has happened, then you start to think in a different pattern. So, you cannot now do things, but you always have to be ready to change your thinking at any moment when you understand more, when you see more, when you notice more, when you put things together which are not yet together. Then, there may be a big change of perspective, a total change. And this we have to keep our minds and thinking patterns open and ready to change, and work and put the puzzle and mosaic together. And, this is all that counts. It is this work that we are now doing that counts, not some future big thing: oh! Now we go on a ship! No, it is only doing our best, and what is it? Our best? It will change. I believe so. That is the idea. So, everything depends on this.
A: Yes. You see, my dear, you cannot anticipate that which is not anticipatable.
Q: (L) Well, swell. Okay, you want to stay on this subject, so let us move another step.
A: We are glad you noticed this birth of the spike.
Q: (L) Is that a clue? Is this one of those obscure remarks? Yes, I noticed, the kids killing their parents, all the shooting going on, the weather... is this connected in some way to some other event?
A: 27 days of record heat out of 30, oh my oh my! Suggest you awaken your internet pals, as they are too busy chasing "goblins" to notice.
Q: (L) So, I should have something to say about this?
A: In Florida now, where to next? How about a shattering subduction quake in Pacific Northwest of U.S.? We estimate 10.4 on the Richter scale. We have warned of Ranier. Imagine a 150 meter high tsunami in Puget Sound...
Q: (L) Does this subduction quake have anything to do with that UFO that buried itself in the Pacific that I was told about by a correspondent?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (L) The information I got on that was that it was about 600 mile north and east of Hawaii. A couple of submersibles were sent down and disappeared or were destroyed or didn't come back... it is supposedly giving off a lot of energy. Any comment?
A: No.
Q: (L) Should I follow that direction?
A: All directions lead to lessons.
Q: (L) Now, you have mentioned this earthquake. I know that you don't usually give predictions, why have you done so now?
A: We do not give time tables.
Q: (L) Anything else other than a tsunami in Puget Sound and a big subduction quake... 10.4 on the Richter scale is almost inconceivable.
A: Ranier... caldera.
Q: (L) What about the caldera?
A: Expect one.
Q: (L) Other than floods, anything else for Florida upcoming?
A: All areas experience accelerating "freak weather patterns."
Q: (L) Okay, all of these freaky weather patterns and bizarre things going on on the planet, how does it relate to the comet cluster and the brown star? Is it related?
A: Human experiential cycle intersects.
Q: (L) Any specifice physical manifestation of either this brown star or this comet cluster or this realm border, that is related to these events on the planet?
A: Approach of wave stimulates precursor activity which in turn causes effects which in turn stimulates further "heating up" of activity...
Q: (L) I thought it was curious that you used the term 'birth of the spike.' Is there something or someone that was born at that particular time?
A: No. Spike is as on a graph...
Q: (L) Okay, is there anyway we could graph this ourselves, and if so, what types of events would we include to create the background data?
A: "El Nino, La Nina," etc...
Q: (L) Is this El Nino thing connected to sunspot cycles?
A: No.
Q: (L) It has its own cycle. I don't think it has been tracked for long enough to get...
A: Global warming, a part of the human experiential cycle.
Q: (L) I read where Edgar Cayce said that a sligth increase in global temperature would make hurricanes something like 5 times stronger... given a baseline temperature. Does this mean we are going to have stronger and more frequent hurricanes?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Will they hit land more frequently, or just spin out in the ocean?
A: Either, or. You may do as you wish, just keep one eye and one ear tuned to current events. And, very important, log dreams. Arkadiusz too!
Q: (L) Is there going to be some communication to us through our dreams?
A: Visions.
Q: (L) Where will these visions originate from?
A: Ether.
Q: (L) Now, when you were talking about the weather changing from one extreme to another, were you talking in a past sense or future sense?
A: Both.
Q: (L) Okay, point taken. None. Is there anything else that we should ask that we haven't asked, any subject...
A: To be continued... Good Night.

July 11, 1998
Q: (A) I want to continue questions from the previous session. First, about this companion star: where is it now; which part of the zodiac?
A: Libra Constellation.
Q: (A) Where is the periodic comet cluster?
A: Not visible. It approaches in "scatter pattern," indicating that one or two of the members may have already made the circuit.
Q: (A) We have been told that it will look like one solid object at first.
A: Yes, but not necessarily only one grouping. Will show up first in the region of the Magellanic Clouds.
Q: (A) So, we have the idea. Next question concerning this companion star; we were told that its mass is less than the sun, can we have a figure on how much less?
A: 56 percent of the mass of the sun.
Q: (A) Okay, if this is really so, then when it really starts to approach the solar system, and they rotate in tandem, it means that the sun will really start to feel its gravity, and because of this, the solar system will start to move with respect to other stars, so all the constellations will shift, is this correct?
A: More like a slight "wobble" effect.
Q: (L) Will that be perceptible to us here on the Earth?
A: Only through measurements.
Q: (T) There have been a lot of reports of late regarding major solar activity, solar flares, solar winds, etc. The surface of the sun has a whole lot going on. The last I heard, one of the two satellites observing the sun, one of them is gone. Is this an effect from the sun itself, or is this an effect of the approaching brown dwarf?
A: The sun.
Q: (T) As the brown dwarf approaches, will it intensify the solar flare activity?
A: The effect on the physical orientation of the sun from the periodic passage of its companion is to flatten the sphere slightly. This returns to its original spherical shape with the retreat.
Q: (L) Is this flattening of the sphere of the sun going to have any noticeable effects in terms of enhanced, accelerated, or magnified radiation from the sun?
A: No.
Q: (T) Solar flares or anything like that?
A: No.
Q: (T) So there is not going to be any appreciable effect on the planet from this as far as the sun goes?
A: The sun's gravity increases, thus inhibiting flares.
Q: (T) Inhibiting flares is good. (L) Not necessarily. Solar minimums have been periods of ice ages. (T) One of the recent crop circles this year shows what the crop circle interpreters say is an image of the sun with a large solar flare coming off of it. It is supposed to be a warning to us that the surface of the sun has become unstable...
A: All events intersect.
Q: (A) Okay, I would like to ask what kind of effects other than just gravity we should expect from the close passage of this star? Any particular electro-magnetic, gamma radiation, or what to look for? In which part of the spectrum?
A: Radiation emits from those cosmic bodies which radiate.
Q: (L) Are you saying that the brown star does not radiate?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) If it doesn't radiate, what does it do?
A: Its radioactive field is severely limited as the "fire" went out long ago. It does not give off light.
Q: (J) It's a brown star. (T) One or two steps away from being a collapsing black hole. (L) Well, that's friendly, especially after watching "Event Horizon" last night!
A: No. Black holes only form from 1st magnitude stars.
Q: (A) We have been told that there is going to be a change of the magnetic field of the earth. Does this mean that the magnetic pole will shift?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) About this shift of the poles, is it going to be a complete pole reversal?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) What is going to happen inside Earth that could cause this magnetic pole reversal?
A: Is caused by disturbances in the mineral content of the substrata rock, brought on by the interaction of Earth with outside forces.
Q: (L) What specific outside forces?
A: Those already discussed.
Q: (L) What is going to be the specific mechanism of this disturbance? Can you describe for us the steps by which this pole reversal will take place?
A: Pole reversal is cyclical anyway, these events merely serve as trigger mechanism.
Q: (L) Let me ask it this way: is there a charge that builds up in the mineral substrata that requires discharge, or that becomes excited to the point that it discharges and then reverses? Is this what we are talking about in terms of the mechanism?
A: Examine what is needed to magnetize metal. Ask Arkadiusz.
Q: (A) What is needed to magnetize metal. One has to align the spins of the atoms which means one has to strike the metal, or one has to bring a magnetic field close. (T) Strike as in annealing... heating and striking metal or rock which causes the crystalline structure to decompose so that the metal becomes pliable. Then, each time it is hit, it reforms until it cools again. (L) Is this what we are talking about here?
A: Close.
Q: (A) One can also have an external magnetic field to align. But, where is it going to come from?
A: Guess.
Q: (L) The wave?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (T) Now, this is just a thought: where would an external magnetic field strong enough to do something like that come from? On the earth, if you supercharge the ionosphere, you create an extremely intense magnetic field. That's what the ionosphere basically is. That is what the HAARP group of programs is about. That is what Tesla was into - the ionosphere - cause there is a large charge there. (L) Is the HAARP project involved here?
A: No.
Q: (T) They are monkeying around with that stuff. (L) Do the people in charge of the HAARP project know about all of this and are they constructing this HAARP array to utilize this energy in some way?
A: Those who know are at foundation.
Q: (T) To protect us?
A: HAARP is for mind control. It is hoped it can be successful in 4th density too!
Q: (L) Well, if these people are aware that this sort of thing is getting ready to happen... never mind. (A) We have been told that this magnetic disturbance is closely related to this realm border crossing, and you asked us the question 'what is the root of realm' and it is reality. Now, realm has an m at the end. Does this have something to do with magnetic?
A: Realm border is when the reality shifts for all.
Q: (A) Yes, but why is this reality shift related to magnetic field disturbance? What is the connection?
A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic state of your environment.
Q: (L) Okay, you said before that the magnetic field is going to reverse...
A: Magnetic poles reverse.
Q: (L) Okay, what is the magnetic field going to do. It is going to change in some way. Is it going to increase, decrease... is this to a degree - something other than direction - amplification? (T) Will anything change in the strength of the field?
A: Let us illustrate. Now: Earth. [A circle is drawn with radiating spikes all around fairly close to the surface.] Earth after: [A circle is drawn with double radiating spikes with those in polar regions considerably longer than the others.]
Q: (T) So, it is the same, except it is larger?
A: Close.
Q: (T) Are you indicating that the magnetic field will be stronger?
A: Broader and larger.
Q: (L) What is the cross in the middle?
A: Geodirectional grid reference. You incorrectly added circle on side. Lines of magnetic field alignment should be shown as longer at poles. "Crosshairs" in illustration are for directional reference only.
Q: (T) Does this mean it will be stronger also?
A: Larger and broader.
Q: (A) People work near strong magnets much stronger than the Earth's magnetic field, yet nothing happens to them that we can see.
A: Not true. Body chemistry is altered. Is not long term or permanent exposure.
Q: (L) So, apparently long term and permanent exposure can make a big difference.
Q: (A) Now, you say that this brown star and the comet cluster are coming into our solar system at the same time, and you have said that they are different events, but that they are related. Now, what is the relation, if not just the point in time, the deeper relation between these two phenomena?
A: Picture biorythm graph.
Q: (A) What is the period of pole shift?
A: 100,000 years, roughly.
Q: (A) Now, about the relation between the phenomenon of physical disasters that are going to happen and psychic changes related to the realm border. What is cause and what is effect?
A: One precedes the other.
Q: (L) Okay, so disasters happen and then the reality changes in psychic terms?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Is the approach of the realm border, is the change in the magnetic field... does the reversal of the poles and the broadening of the magnetic field, is that going to be before the realm border crossing?
A: Intersection.
Q: (L) So, in practical terms, it may be that, what we observe will be a series of cataclysms, disasters, the 'cleansing' of the Earth...
A: This has already begun.
Q: (L) So, it is already happening. It will accelerate and intensify. And what we will observe is all of these things happening. And, as a result of the intersecting of these various energies, this realm border, this reality change, this change in the magnetics because of the interaction with the comet cluster, the sun's companion, the realm border, and so forth, it will then have an effect upon the people left on the planet who will then change in some way as a result of this, is that correct?
A: Your Bible says that there will be many wonders on the Earth and in the Heavens in the last days.
Q: (L) Okay, this period of time after this realm border, is this period a preliminary to the total end of the Earth and all life on it?
A: No.
Q: (L) After all of this change, those people who continue to be on the Earth will be in a new environment, and it will be almost like having to grow gills to live in water, and some people will have the ability and some will not. Is that it? It will be more gradual in terms of individual physical structures and psychic structures?
A: No.
Q: (L) It will be a sudden, total change? Like flipping a switch and everything is going to be different?
A: The key is awareness.
Q: (L) Are there going to be people...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) You didn't let me finish asking my question!
A: But we knew it!
Q: (L) In other words, there are going to be people who are simply not going to see what is happening?
A: Lost lambs beying in the knight.
Q: (T) They are not getting it. They are lost sheep. That really describes it. (L) Why did you give that funny twist on the spelling?
A: Why not?
Q: (T) Now, didn't they tell us that when the transition occurs, those who are moving to 4th density will move, and those who aren't, won't. And that it is not a physical move. That we really would not notice a difference when we shifted because it's all right here. And, those who are going to shift will shift right where they stand, and they won't really notice a change, and the perception is not the issue, it is the awareness of the shift, because we will still be physical... am I heading anywhere in the right direction?
A: Variability of physicality.
Q: (L) Does this have anything to do with changing of DNA via awareness?
A: Both ways.
Q: (T) So, we will notice that we can control much more than we could before in terms of our environment and physical structure, but we will still be doing a lot of things we have always done.
Q: (L) Now, just this last week, on Thursday, we had two earthquakes, one in the Aleutians and one in the Azores. Is this related to this coming subduction quake?
A: No.
Q: (T) Is there some major Earth change going to happen some time around the end of this month or the beginning of next month?
A: ? Okay, that is all folks! Good Night...
Q: (L) But I was just getting started! Good Night!

See also: The Nemesis Hypothesis

Find also the above excerpt from 11 July 1998 in Cometary Showers, Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse?


2.
Link: The Wave Chapter 10: The Truth Is Out There, But Trust No One!
A bit of text both before and after the excerpt is included:

In other cases, the comments have indicated that the channel is not clear, as it were, saying that this or that individual is working with a fragmented transmission. I would think that this means that the channel is getting valid information mixed with noise or even deliberate disinformation. On other occasions, comments have been made that this or that channel is simply making it up at some level in their subconscious minds, even if they are sincere in their conscious thinking. In a couple of instances, the individuals in question were described as agents of disinformation and agents provocateur. Rarely have we found the answer to be that the individual was just simply acting fraudulently for purposes of monetary gain, though that has come up a time or two.

July 11, 1998

Q: (L) I want to ask about the Dan Winter web site. He uses a lot of keywords that are very familiar to us. His whole site is devoted to pyramids, golden ratio, geomagnetic grid, geometry, bees, bloodlines, etc. The question is: everything that happens, I consider that it happens for a purpose. What is the purpose of being directed to this site? Is this all his own nonsense, or is he channeling this?

A: Extract.

Q: (L) He extracts his stuff?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And we should extract from there the pertinent information?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Well, he seems to be real hung up with this Drunvalo Melchizedek guy...

A: No. No good.

Q: (L) Drunvalo is no good?

A: Yes.

July 4, 1998

Q: (L) Now, we want to ask about this “Zeta Talk” web material [by Nancy Leider].

A: Specifics.

Q: (L) Okay, we wanted to know if it was a legitimate source but corrupted by a lot of noise, or if it is a major disinformation campaign?

A: Not legitimate.

Q: (L) What is the energy behind this woman who claims to channel these Zetas?

A: Ego.

Q: (L) Well, from what I read, it is pretty much an amalgamation of stuff from other sources… I mean, there was nothing that would validate it as higher density material… There was stuff from Sitchin, Velikovsky, Cayce… There is nothing there she couldn’t have gotten from other sites. Ra, our stuff…

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And it is just a mishmash of all this stuff along with erroneous stuff that must have come right out of her own head.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And, there is a huge amount of garbage coming out of her own head…

A: Yes.

Q: (L) But, as Ark pointed out, it is a very well organized site, mirror sites, she obviously has supporters and fans and all of that.

A: Any one seeking this can accomplish it. Do you really believe the “Zetas” would expend energy warning humans about impending earth changes?

Q: (L) Well, if they wanted humans to perceive the gray aliens as the good guys they would! That’s what occurs to me when I think about it.

A: How much energy do you expend warning squirrels about fires?

Q: (L) Okay, point taken. None.

To be continued...

 

[thorbiorn]

From Session 18 July 1998
Two different topics, with the first is given in three versions, 1a and 1b and 1c of different length.
1a.
Link: The Cs Hit List 06: Let's Do the Planetary Twist to the Tune of the Brothers Heliopolis

I find it fascinating that the gravity changes observed by Allais, Mishra, Rao, et al., occurred during solar eclipses. As we know from James McCanney's work, during a new moon, the moon temporarily forms an electrical alignment between the earth, moon, and sun. The moon blocks the electrical connection between the sun and earth, causing us to get hit by a strong burst of solar energy when it passes out of alignment and triggering extreme weather effects. A total solar eclipse will most likely have the most extreme effects. It's also interesting that Allais was studying a link between gravity and magnetism. Here's what the Cs said on 18 July 1998:

Q: (L) Now, one question that we were discussing earlier is: how can the close approach of the companion star cause an increase in the Sun's gravity when there is no reason why it should change anything, since gravity is a function of mass?

A: But do you really know all there is to know about gravity?

Q: (A) No, we don't know. But, does this mean that this will be an effect that does not follow from the theory of gravity that we know already?

A: Gravity is the life force that binds all realities as one.

Q: (L) What are the mechanics of the increase in the Sun's gravity? What is going to cause this?

A: In order to understand this, you would need a reworking of the theorem.

Q: (L) Can you help us in this reworking of the theorem?

A: Waves. [...]

Q: (A) What wave, a gravitational wave, or an electromagnetic wave, or some other wave? What wave?

A: Arkadiusz, how do these intersect?

Q: (A) Gravity and electromagnetic?

A: Yes. And others.

Q: (A) How they are described within a theory, or how they intersect in space when they come together?

A: Both.

Q: (A) Okay, why does this increase in the Sun's gravity have anything to do with electromagnetism? We were told that the Brown star will not radiate any radiation, so, in particular, no electromagnetic radiation. So, where does electromagnetics come in? I do not understand...

A: Gravitational pull incites electromagnetic impulse.

While it may or may not be related to the Cs' linking of electromagnetics and gravity, in McCanney's model, the gravitational pull of the sun on objects entering the solar system (comets) results in them cutting through regions of electric charge, in turn causing them to 'ignite' and discharge the solar capacitor. This relates to the remark from the Cs above that the sun and earth activities are interconnected: changes in the sun's output affects the earth (and the whole solar system), and some specific changes in celestial bodies of the solar system affect the capacitor and thus the sun (which is why discharging comets often prompt CMEs, to give just one example).

But this excerpt brings us to another point: the possibility that our sun has a companion.

1b.
The excerpt above, but longer and with a very different commentary:
The Wave Chapter 22: The Nexus Seven Meet the Cassiopaeans

The Nexus Seven repeat the idea that the secret government, in some ways, may have humanity’s best interests at heart, but I think that is a baseless assumption. Denial is never acceptable. It seems that their own denial is being imposed on the masses. And, the consequences could be disastrous.

November 19, 1994
Q: (T) Is the government planning to stage an invasion by aliens to cause the populace of the world to go into such a fear state that they will accept total control and domination?
A: Open. But if so, will “flop”.
Q: (T) Why?
A: Many reasons: 1. Visual effects will be inadequate and will have “glitches”. 2. Real invasion may take place first. 3. Other events may intercede.
Q: (T) Such as what?
A: Earth changes.
Q: (T) Am I correct in assuming that some of these hotshot, bigwig guys in the government who have plans for taking over the whole world and making everything all happy and hunky-dory with them in charge, are just simply not in synch with the fact that there are some definite earth changes on the agenda? Are they missing something here?
A: Close. They are aware but in denial.
Q: (T) Are these earth changes going to occur prior to the arrival of the cometary cluster?
A: No. But “time” frame is, as of yet, undetermined.
Q: (T) Am I correct in saying that if they knew what was really going to happen that they would still continue with their stupid little plans to make money and try to control the world?
A: Yes. Greed is a sickness.

On the other hand, sharing knowledge and awareness might have an altogether different outcome:

July 18, 1998

Q: (L) Now, one question that we were discussing earlier is: how can the close approach of the theorized companion starcause an increase in the Sun's gravity when there is no reason why it should change anything since gravity is a function of mass?

A: But do you really know all there is to know about gravity?

Q: (A) No, we don't know. But, does this mean that this will be an effect that does not follow from the theory of gravity that we know already?

A: Gravity is the life force that binds all realities as one. In order to understand this, you would need a reworking of the theorem.

Q: (A) We have Einstein's theory of gravity, and the question is whether the effect of increasing the Sun's gravity is something that goes beyond Einstein's equations or not?

A: You must see the wave.

Q: (A) What wave, a gravitational wave, or an electromagnetic wave, or some other wave? What wave?

A: Arkadiusz, how do these intersect?

Q: (A) Gravity and electromagnetic?

A: Yes. And others.

Q: (A) How they are described within a theory, or how they intersect in space when they come together?

A: Both.

Q: (A) Okay, why does this increase in the Sun's gravity have anything to do with electromagnetism? We were told that the brown star will not radiate any radiation, so, in particular, no electromagnetic radiation. So, where does electromagnetics come in? I do not understand...

A: Gravitational pull incites electromagnetic impulse.

Q: (A) Okay, that means we go beyond gravitational theory, and this is part of Unified Field Theory?

A: Yes, exactly!! The complete UFT was withheld from you!

Q: (T) So, the complete UFT is known to someone here on the planet?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) And they are not making it available...

A: Oh no, because "The Truth Will Set You Free!" You may access hyperspatial truths with UFT.

Q: (A) Well, we started with the increased mass of the Sun, and we came to UFT, which is hidden from us because it would make us free; there is this tendency in me to follow this road because it is science and would open a new road. The question is whether such activity or knowing such things will lead to other densities? Is it just for satisfaction, or is there real value in knowing more in this direction?

A: Well, the Unified Field Theory unlocks the door completely to the higher densities... Grids.

Q: (L) What kind of grids...

A: The planet has been enshrouded with EM grid.

Q: (T) Are these the ley lines?

A: No.

Q: (L) Are they artificially generated?

A: Contoured.

Q: (L) They are artificially contoured. What is the result of this shrouding?

A: Manipulated for use by 3rd/4th Consortium.

Q: (A) What kind of EM grid? (L) The natural EM grid is being contoured...

A: Like a gently waving geometric "blanket".

Q: (T) Is it on the surface of the planet, through the planet, or where?

A: Above.

Q: (T) The gravity waves, whether they exist or not, are a controversy, yet they are part of the UFT, and someone already knows how it works. Therefore, it is only controversy to those who don't know what the answer is, and it is not a controversy to those who know. They know what it is and how to measure it and how to use it.

A: Of course.

Q: (A) Some power is used to sustain this grid. What is it?

A: Land and space based generators.

Q: (T) What can it be used for?

A: Multiple uses. Net. Calculates... You are dancing on the 3rd density ballroom floor. "Alice likes to go through the looking glass" at the Crystal Palace. Atlantean reincarnation surge brings on the urge to have a repeat performance.

Q: (T) The Atlanteans who have reincarnated are getting ready to do the same thing they did before with the crystals. So, this is an Atlantean type thing that is being done now? Different equipment, but the same type of thing?

A: All lessons must be learned before you can move onto bigger and better things.

Q: (L) Is that a general statement about the Atlanteans repeating the lessons, or that once we learn this lesson, we can move onto bigger and better things in counteracting this grid?

A: All that is present and future too.

Q: (A) I want to ask if there is something that we can and should do about this grid for ourselves?

A: Why? To know was all you need.

Q: (A) Well, it was said that this was for the purpose of control and manipulation. So, knowing is all that we need. Or, we could try to shield... (L) But, to know is the shield. I don't know how that works, but it seems to be so.

A: Yes.

Q: (A) Now, how did we come to this grid from UFT?

A: Grid construction represents application of...

Q: (L) Somehow we went from the increased gravity of the Sun, to UFT, to the grid...

A: UFT explains the "increased" gravity of Sol. But, is there not something in UFT about increase/decrease???

Q: (A) There is no reason for it to increase or decrease... but this is Einstein's theory, which we were told is incorrect...

(L) Well, maybe it is speed? When two things are rotating in tandem, when they come together, wouldn't it increase their speed, and doesn't speed increase gravity?

(A) No, we were told that there is some interaction between gravity and EM wave, and this is what UFT is about... If we use other dimensions, which we are supposed to use in this UFT, going with Kaluza-Klein, then the very concept of mass is something, which is not so clear, and mass can be variable...

A: Yes, variability of physicality.

Q: (T) Fourth density. (A) We were told earlier that this UFT opens the door to other densities...

A: Yes.

Q: (A) Can we have a UFT that unifies EM and gravity and does not include the concept of other densities? In other words, can we put in a textbook all about the gravity and electromagnetics, and a student could learn all of this and still know nothing about other densities?

A: No. Other densities become apparent when...

Q: (A) So, it means that Einstein and Von Neumann knew about these other densities?

A: Yes, oh yes!!!

Q: (T) Just a thought: having UFT and being able to manipulate different fields within it, creates different effects. So, as we understand it in the apparent present state of science, we have to spin something in space in order to create gravity. But, with the UFT, one small offshoot is that one could create real gravity without spinning anything. So, the problem of weightlessness is really already solved...

A: Elementary my dear T, elementary.

Q: (T) So, this whole thing with the space station and all the trouble they are having readapting to gravity when they come back, is all a game...

A: When you "let the cat out of the bag," you create an entire feline "nation".

Q: (T) So, we are capable of Star Trek right now?

A: In a sense, but there is so much more than that.

Q: (T) Of course. Most people would say that cutting edge science is 25 years ahead of what we see, and I say it is more like a hundred years, and I am even off? Cutting edge science on this planet is more like three or four hundred years ahead?

A: More like 30 to 40,000 years "ahead"!

Q: (L) Is that because of fourth density influence and information?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) 30 to 40 thousand years? Let me get that number right...

A: Yes, at least.

So, it seems that the secret government is not really protecting anything but their own interests. Of course, one of their interests is the control that is exercised via religion. The "Top Secret" document continues:

1c
For a shorter part of the above excerpt, see: The Wave Chapter 55: Albert Einstein, Free Energy and the Strange Deaths of Morris K. Jessup and Stefan Marinov

[
In order to maintain this control in the present day, if, indeed, anyone thinks about space-time manipulation seriously, they must be misled to look in the wrong direction. Obviously, control would be lost if people were aware of the true nature of time and the fifth mathematical dimension, i.e. fourth density. So we must understand that this is a very great secret. It cannot be allowed to be scientifically revealed and proven.

July 18, 1998
Q: (A) Can we have a UFT which unifies EM and gravity and does not include the concept of other densities? In other words, can we put in a textbook all about the gravity and electromagnetics, and a student could learn all of this and still know nothing about other densities?
A: No. Other densities become apparent when …
Q: (A) So, it means that Einstein and Von Neumann knew about these other densities?
A: Yes, oh yes!!!
Q: (T) Just a thought: having UFT and being able to manipulate different fields within it, creates different effects. So, as we understand it in the apparent present state of science, we have to spin something in space in order to create gravity. But, with the UFT, one small offshoot is that one could create real gravity without spinning anything. So, the problem of weightlessness is really already solved …
A: Elementary my dear Terry, elementary.
Q: (T) So, this whole thing with the space station and all the trouble they are having readapting to gravity when they come back, is all a game …
A: When you “let the cat out of the bag,” you create an entire feline “nation.”

Unfortunately, anybody who gets close, anyone who is not misled, generally ends up dead. And that’s a fact. They die with great regularity. Another half-dozen or so physicists of our acquaintance, working in similar directions, have died in the past few years, in the prime of life, suddenly and unexpectedly. Heart attacks and cerebral hemorrhages seem to be the affliction of choice – never mind that these are healthy guys for the most part, who generally don’t smoke, walk a lot and eat moderately.

2.
Link: The Floyd Void or, Hurricanes, Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and assorted Prophetic Considerations

Before I start getting serious, I want to confess that I am a Pink Floyd fan. I am somewhat amused at the name of the present hurricane that is threatening the coast of my home state, and I would like to share one of the segments from our often humorous sessions. We had been listening to "Time" just prior to sitting down at the board and I asked the following question:

07-18-98
Q: (L) Now, frivolous question number one: Do you guys like Pink Floyd?
A: "Like" is a bit off base.
Q: (L) What would be more 'on base?'
A: Absorb. We are Pink Floyd, and all other facets of your higher consciousness.
Q: (L) Well, cool! I would like to know if you could comment on what we were discussing earlier, the purported idea of mans' actions leading to the destruction of the planet. This is, of course, a disturbing aspect of mankind, but I wonder if mankind is as guilty as he is made to feel?
A: Mankind, so called, is one element of creation.
Q: (L) When you say 'one element of creation' in relation to the question about man's destruction of the planet, are you saying that this so-called destruction can, in a sense, be considered to be creative as in 'chaos leads to rebirth' as described in the Myth of the Eternal Return?
A: The "destruction" is merely one segment of all that exists in a long wave cycle.

Those of you who are frequent visitors to these pages have already have an idea about the Cassiopaean perspective on weather phenomena, i.e. that it is a reflection of, or an actual "intrusion" of, 4th density phenomena into our 3rd density world.

To be continued...

 

[thorbiorn]

From Session 25 July 1998
Link: 94% - Dave McGowan, Hurricane Katrina, Peak Oil and the Cassiopaeans
This excerpt is in the article, contextualized by a few others which are not included in the quote:

July 25, 1998
Q: (L) I read the new book by Dr. David Jacobs, professor of History at Temple University, concerning his extensive research into the alien abduction phenomenon. [Dr. Jacobs wrote his Ph.D. thesis on the history of the UFOs.] Dr. Jacobs says that now, after all of these years of somewhat rigorous research, that he KNOWS what the aliens are here for and he is afraid. David Jacobs says that producing offspring is the primary objective behind the abduction phenomenon. Is this, in fact, the case?
A: Part, but not "the whole thing."
Q: (L) Is there another dominant reason?
A: Replacement.
Q: (L) Replacement of what?
A: You.
Q: (L) How do you mean? Creating a race to replace human beings, or abducting specific humans to replace them with a clone or whatever?
A: Mainly the former. You see, if one desires to create a new race, what better way than to mass hybridize, then mass reincarnate. Especially when the host species is so forever ignorant, controlled, and anthropocentric. What a lovely environment for total destruction and conquest and replacement... see?
Q: (L) Well, that answered my other question about the objective. Well, here in the book, Dr. Jacobs says that there is ongoing abductions through particular families. I quote: 'Beyond protecting the fetus, there are other reasons for secrecy. If abductions are, as all the evidence clearly indicates, an intergenerational phenomenon in which the children of abductees are themselves abductees, then one of the aliens' goals is the generation of more abductees. Are all children of abductees incorporated into the phenomenon? The evidence suggests that the answer is yes. If an abductee has children with a non-abductee, the chances are that all their descendants will be abductees. This means that through normal population increase, divorce, remarriage and so on, the abductee population will increase quickly throughout the generations. When those children grow and marry and have children of their own, all of their children, whether they marry an abductee or non-abductee, will be abductees. To protect the intergenerational nature of the breeding program, it must be kept secret from the abductees so that they will continue to have children. If the abductees KNEW that the program was intergenerational, they might elect not to have children. This would bring a critical part of the program to a halt, which the aliens cannot allow. The final reason for secrecy is to expand the breeding program, to integrate laterally in society, the aliens must make sure that abductees mate with non-abductees and produce abductee children.' Now, this seems to suggest that there is a particular bloodline that is susceptible to...
A: We have told you before: the Nazi experience was a "trial run," and by now you see the similarities, do you not?
Q: (L) Yes, I do see...
A: Now, we have also told you that the experience of the "Native Americans" vis a vis the Europeans may be a precursor in microcosm. Also, what Earthian 3rd density does to Terran 2nd density should offer "food for thought." In other words, thou are not so special, despite thy perspective, eh? And we have also warned that after conversion of Earth humans to 4th density, the Orion 4th density and their allies hope to control you "there." Now put this all together and what have you? At least you should by now know that it is the soul that matters, not the body. Others have genetically, spiritually and psychically manipulated/engineered you to be bodycentric. Interesting, as despite all efforts by 4th through 6th density STO, this "veil remains unbroken."

To be continued...

 

[thorbiorn]

From Session 1 August 1998
Three excerpts:
1.
Link: 94% - Dave McGowan, Hurricane Katrina, Peak Oil and the Cassiopaeans

August 1, 1998
Q: (L) According to Dr. Jacobs and the stuff you told us last week, we are pretty well fried on this planet.
A: No.
Q: (L) What are our options?
A: Vague.
Q: (L) I know that. But, there does not seem to be any other way to ask this question...
A: Knowledge protects, remember, there are no limits with knowledge.

2a.
Link: The Wave Chapter 49: Frequency Resonance Vibration

Nevertheless, the fact that what was done to me as a child included a major attempt to gain physical control of me - that was obviously an act of desperation or so many risks of exposure would not have been taken - seems to suggest that my life was certainly in danger to the point that protective intervention was necessary.

August 1, 1998

Q: (L) I was also reading in some of the transcripts as I have been going through them getting them ready to print, that you once said that "supremely powerful" STS forces were responsible for kidnapping and programming me. My question is: if they had me, why did they bring me back?

A: Would you expect otherwise?

Q: (L) Well, you said that they tried to do some programming and that it didn't work and that STO forces intervened. So, I am just a little confused. If I was such a threat to them, why did they bring me back. Under the circumstances, I could have just disappeared forever and that would be that!

A: No.

Q: (L) What prevented that?

A: Occlusion.

Q: (L) Occlusion of what?

A: Best to research through meditation and hypnosis.

Occlude: to block or stop up (a passage or opening); obstruct. 2. (tr.) to prevent the passage of. To be occluded is to be veiled, or to be hidden behind a blocking wall or frequency envelope. Apparently, there are parts of myself that do things that the rest of me knows nothing about!

2b.
Link: The Wave Chapter 56 : Intolerance, Cruelty, and the Economics of Intelligence

Of course, the question at the time was how would it endanger me to know these things if the only other person present was Frank?

But even more pressing are the questions about why locks were placed on something in my superconsciousness, and why did that threaten the "supremely powerful STS consortium" so that they would take the risk of physically kidnapping me as a child in order to make sure that these locks were put on in the most thorough way possible? We already realize that attempts were made via the standard alien abduction and that didn't work because, as the Cs said, "you fight it." So it seems that the physical abduction and direct work via psychological programming was necessary. Of course, another question is: why didn't they just kill me if I was such a threat to them in the future?

August 1, 1998

Q: (L) I was also reading in some of the transcripts as I have been going through them getting them ready to print, that you once said that "supremely powerful" STS forces were responsible for kidnapping and programming me. My question is: if they had me, why did they bring me back?

A: Would you expect otherwise?

Q: (L) Well, you said that they tried to do some programming and that it didn't work and that STO forces intervened. So, I am just a little confused. If I was such a threat to them, why did they bring me back? Under the circumstances, I could have just disappeared forever and that would be that!

A: No.

Q: (L) What prevented that?

A: Occlusion.

Q: (L) Occlusion of what?

A: Best to research through meditation and hypnosis.

Occlusion obviously has something to do with being shielded, as well as the operation of the STS Achilles Heel itself: wishful thinking. STS always takes the path of least resistance, and their confidence that they could do some programming and that would fix the whole problem is apparently part of this occlusion process. It also suggests some sort of rules about violation of free will between densities. It seems that, without some sort of agreement, even if at a deep subconscious level, such things as ongoing abductions, physical harm and violations, cannot occur. If there was no agreement to that at the higher levels of which my subconscious mind and superconscious mind were aware, then the only way to access me was through physicality, while a child, before full seating of consciousness had taken place.

3.
Link: The Wave Chapter 51: The Psychomantium

Now, I want to add in this next little clip, even though it is off the subject of the psychomantium. I had been reading Dr. David Jacobs' book, The Threat, and based on many clues in there, Frank fit the profile of an alien hybrid. He had always claimed to be special, and this book seemed to confirm that claim. The only problem was, according to Jacobs, these hybrids were not positive beings at all, even if they could produce that impression.

August 1, 1998

Q: (L) I want to ask about Frank's type B-negative blood. Is Frank an alien hybrid?

A: Open.

Q: (L) Well, that's real encouraging!

A: Best to discover.

Q: (A) What is the test of being an alien hybrid. One is this blood type, what is another?

A: No criteria, but subjects of this nature seem "off-center" by terrestrial standards. However, the truest nature of this subject is as of yet undiscovered.

In this last remark, I wasn't quite sure if the Cs meant the subject of alien hybrids in general, or if they were referring to Frank when they said "this subject." But, since they said "subjects of this nature," meaning individuals that are hybrids, it stands to reason that the following remark, "the truest nature of this subject," was referring to Frank specifically. The instant this was transmitted, a shiver traveled through my body, though I immediately shoved the warning sensation under the rug. In point of fact, I had thought many things about Frank, but the one thing I had never thought was that he had been deliberately sent into my life to harm me. The above remark is completed with the remark made on January 10, 2002:

To be continued: