From Session 8 Aug 1998
Several excerpts found in two chapters of The Wave:
1.
Link: The Wave Chapter 34: The Channel
Link: The Wave Chapter 51: The Psychomantium
Several excerpts found in two chapters of The Wave:
1.
Link: The Wave Chapter 34: The Channel
2.Having begun writing about the matters contained in this volume, we have received many emails from readers who have thanked us for bringing these issues to the fore. As one reader pointed out, for those who resonate strongly with most of the material, this now gives a platform from which they can "revisit the concepts with a mental filter allowing for new interpretations." I have noted before there are many instances when the experiences behind the scenes had a great deal to do with the direction of the questions, and now we begin to understand exactly how the internal drives of the participants could act to skew that 30 percent of material that felt "off" even to the casual reader. On August 8, 1998, an interesting series of remarks were made that seem to be almost a prediction about the present events:
Notice that above, Cs are pointing out that it is only "largely" accurate, and this is the statement upon which the next comments are predicated.Q: We have been discussing the strange visitors to our website. [This referred to an extremely high number of .mil and .gov organizations. We tried to just pass it off as the fact that even people who work for the military and government have interests in channeling, but this really didn't explain the daily visits from certain sites, and even from some sites that had IP numbers that resolved into servers where public access to information about them was restricted.] It seems that there is a lot of interest from groups that are connected with intelligence and military organizations. Can you tell us what their interest is in our material?
A: Material is largely accurate.
This remark refers specifically to me (Laura) and Ark, since the question related specifically to our efforts to publicize the material on the website. The Cs repeatedly, throughout the sessions, talked about a certain "destined" activity for the two of us in concert with others we had yet to meet. I once asked specifically about this destiny and the answer was very curious, especially the reference to Frank's role:Q: Do they understand that this material is largely accurate, and is this the reason for their interest?
A: Yes.
Q: Do we have to be concerned about any ramifications as a result of their interest?
A: If so, the need for concern began with your respective births!
Q: Why did the interest begin with our births?
A: Not interest we speak of; destiny.
The remark about being put in touch with those of "rare ability" (clearly plural) undoubtedly referred to Frank with the agenda of his controllers to extract information and destroy, and Terry with his role as protector and Ark with his role in the mission. It is quite clear that even though the agenda of those operating behind Frank was not favorable, as noted in the January 10 session, the effect was to "wake me up." I am still somewhat uncertain about the last remark: which individuals are the Cs referring to as not having had a recent past life on third density earth? Ark, or Frank or Terry? We had started out discussing Ark's role in the mission, and the Cs brought up the issue of their having put me in contact with those of rare ability in order to communicate, and then they came back to "recognizing signs ... " which takes us back to Ark. For the moment, my interpretation is that Ark is the only one with a recent past life on the earth, and that of the three, neither Terry nor Frank had recent past lives on earth.August 31, 1996
Q: (L) What do these guys [the folks in the underground bases and laboratories with designs on taking over the world] plan on doing?
A: This is where "The Master Race" is being developed.
Q: (L) And what is the timeframe they have planned for this activity?
A: Never mind.
Q: (L) Is Ark going to be able to help us with technology, to help other people, or to protect ourselves in some way? In this really bizarre stuff going on on our planet?
A: Too much, too soon, my dear. Curiosity killed the cat.
Q: (L) Well, satisfaction brought him back!
A: Not in this case!!!
Q: (T) You've got to let this go along. It's picking up momentum every day, it seems. So, just let it roll along and let it see where it goes. (L) All right, let's ... (T) He's coming to protect you. That's what he said.
A: Maybe, but there is so, so, so much more in store than that!!!!!!
Q: (L) Stop! ... Is that an ominous, "maybe, but there's so, so, so much more in store?" Or is that a positive, "there is so, so, so much more in store?"
A: Why would you think it ominous?
Q: (L) Well I don't know ... because I'm scared of what I don't know! (T) Faith, we're back to faith again.
A: What have we helped you to discover so far? Would you rather discontinue this operation?
Q: (L) Oh, hell no! (T) After two years, you know she's always going to ask those kinds of questions!
A: Not two years, eternity. [...] We have helped you build your staircase one step at a time. Because you asked for it. And you asked for it because it was your destiny. We have put you in contact with those of rare ability in order for you to be able to communicate with us. Again, because you desired it, in order to realize your path. By now, you should recognize the signs ... Those who display thinking patterns which in many ways deviate from that which is considered ordinary. The more unusual, the more telling. They have past lives on 3rd density earth, but not recently, but for this one. And they are not oriented to the earth frequency vibrations.
So my question as to whether Frank was the channel was effectively answered. The material that came through when Terry was present to counterbalance the negative agenda of Frank was obviously far more reliable, and we will encounter this factor more than once as we go along. Going back now to the prediction given in August of 1998:Q: (T) ... It is destiny for you to find out what your path was, you had to make this contact, because it was what you were supposed to do. (L) Are we not talking about Frank in terms of being put in contact with someone who enables me to communicate with you, so you can put me on my path, which is building the staircase, etc., etc.? Is that not what we've got going here?
A: He is one, but not the only one, just the one who awakened your sense of recognition.
Now, the interesting thing about the website at this particular point in time, i.e. 1998, was that we carefully avoided any distinction of persons in talking about the work of the Group. At this point in time, we simply referred to the Cassiopaean Group, with no distinction as to persons, and certainly no hint that all of us felt funny about Frank's claims and participation. I refused to make any one person the "source," referring to it always as a group, and that irritated him to no end. Frank had been agitating a very long time for us to proclaim him as the channel, and to attribute all of the material to him. This process had been an ongoing theme of manipulation on his part for several years, at that point, and I strenuously resisted making the Cs a cult of personality for Frank, which he clearly resented, but attempted (ineffectively) to conceal. There were numerous instances in the transcripts where it was his agenda, or the agenda of his controllers, to proclaim him as the channel, but usually this occurred when Terry was absent, or when there were not sufficient others of positive energy present in the room to counterbalance what we now see was a very powerful STS force.Q: Well, since we have revamped the website, there has been a huge amount of interest, so we have decided that it would be a good idea to get a book out since I can already see signs of plagiarism on other sites, and they are taking whole chunks of our material and passing it around on some of the news groups. I need to put the whole thing together. Any advice about the book? Anything you would like to add or suggest?
A: Be careful to make attributions valid.
Q: I don't think that will be a problem. Anything else?
A: Resist urge to place credit/onus on yourself. E.G. if "you know what hits the fan," do you wish to be in the line of fire?
In the above excerpt, it seems that there is a hint of an accusation that we are taking credit away from Frank, and that is certainly the way Frank felt; but his view was largely constructed in his own mind and had no basis in reality. Since he did not have a computer, he did not have an opportunity to view and read the website (though we often suggested to him that he ought to do it at our house, and even write and contribute to it, which he never did because it took time away from his watching of sports on television). The facts were that no one individual was being credited with the Cs material. It was presented as a group effort. That was all. So, at one and the same time, we see a personal prejudice of Frank's skewing the response, but the Cs managed to turn it into a save by inserting the word "onus" and giving the warning about something "hitting the fan."
I ought to make it clear that my own view of Frank was very sympathetic. And that is one of the chief things that can be learned from this account that I am sharing. The fact is, those with powerful STS agendas can and do utilize all kinds of ways and means of manipulating emotions and perception in order to make themselves appear to be helpful, benevolent, giving, kind, and usually to evoke pity and sympathy. They can speak or channel truth in order to insert a single twist that leads the uncritical thinker off-track, and that is why we have always promoted the idea of critical channeling.
We received a post from an individual who says that telling the story of the behind the scenes dynamics "discredits the entire channeled material from beginning to end." And such a view, of course, relates directly to the Cs remark above: "Resist urge to place credit/onus on yourself. E.G. if 'you know what hits the fan,' do you wish to be in the line of fire?"
By "saving" the remark this way, the Cs were warning us that there would be an operation put in motion to discredit that portion of the material that was "largely accurate," as they put it. And this is most certainly what has been identified as the current activity of Bridges and Williams and Co. And indeed, by not telling this story of the background earlier, we have most certainly left ourselves open to these attacks.
The Cs are very precise in their use of words, and the remark included the word "onus." This is a word that generally refers to a dirty task, or a burden or the burden of proving something. The evidence will show that we certainly were not claiming credit for the material ourselves, but we were most definitely protecting Frank by not sharing the issues that we are now discussing. In this way, we had taken upon ourselves the onus of defending corrupted material that was indefensible. And, by taking on ourselves the burden of this defense, by not dealing with the issue of what we already suspected to be a source of corruption, by continuing to keep the door open for Frank to make a different choice, even though, by that point in time, we knew that his days with the group were numbered, we still continued to protect him. This protection even extended to the point of giving him a pseudonym in Amazing Grace so that I could compromise between telling the story as accurately as possible, and still protect Frank. As one observer on the sidelines once remarked (and it incensed me greatly because I was protecting Frank), "Frank plays on your sympathy like a Stradivarius."
As to whether our decision to try to give Frank every chance possible to make a different choice was the correct one, and whether the present "hitting of the fan" of the operation suggested by the Cs in the above excerpt will permanently damage and discredit all of the material, will have to be up to the reader. We think that telling the truth is the only way. It is then up to the reader to decide what he/she wants to credit and what not. One learn lessons, one learns truth, and one tells truth. That is how we see it. We do believe that the truth will survive the attacks.
Getting back to the August, 1998 excerpt, since I had been so careful to not make the material a cult of personality, I simply did not see what the Cs were trying to tell me. I brushed aside their remark about something "hitting the fan" if I did not make clear who was doing what in the project.
And regarding how I ought to deal with telling the story, the Cs clearly said: "Tell the story as it happened." This made me a little uncomfortable because I knew that I would have to tell about the many issues with Frank, and I tried to squeak out of doing that:Q: I don't think that's a problem either.
A: Oh, but it could be!
And that was the thing that the Cs wanted me to tell: the whole story, and the material as part of the story, and the dynamics of the individuals in the interaction of bringing through material that was "largely accurate," needed to be told "as it happened." Thus I began to write the Wave series. And oh, did the stuff hit the fan. But, I am getting ahead of myself here. Let's go back and pick up some threads that need to be discussed before we get to the events that led to the writing of this recapitulation.Q: I had thought that I would limit the story and concentrate on the material.
A: The material is part of the story. So are the participants.
Link: The Wave Chapter 51: The Psychomantium
Getting back to the psychomantium, finally, after months of trying with no real success, being stuck in a claustrophobic little closet that became hotter than an oven in a very short time with just a single candle, I decided that this was not going to work. There was no way I could even get comfortable, much less survive such an ordeal a sufficient number of times for anything to manifest!
Well! How about that? Nothing like letting me spin my wheels doing all that closet business when, all the while, it was obvious that it wasn't going to work. But heck, by now I knew that the Cs very often let me do such things just to make a point. And yes, there was an idle room in my house. But I darn sure wasn't going to paint a whole room in my house black! Also important to note was the comment about imagination being a "bridge" to the Akashic records.August 8, 1998
Q: (A) OK. Now, I want to ask a question about the medium. We have been repeatedly told that we should get a better medium which can convey more information. We were experimenting with psychomantium without success ...
A: Because you did not do it correctly.
Q: I thought I was doing everything that had been suggested.
A: Light must be placed properly so as to illuminate black depth sufficiently. Also, chamber must be large enough to stimulate relaxed meditative state. And no seams or ripples must be evident in reflection. Lastly, patience must reign supreme, with as little anticipation as possible.
Q: So, you are saying that the closet we are using is not large enough ...
A: We never suggested a closet.
Q: How large should the chamber be?
A: 10 by 10 by 8.
Q: (L) Well, that's almost a whole room!
A: Yes. One room idly sits ...
Q: (A) I have the idea that one should go with a given question and then come out with an answer instead of waiting and waiting ...
A: My dear Arkadiusz, by now, you know imagination is the bridge to the Akashic.
Q: (L) So, you are saying that his idea is a bridge to the Akashic, and when he gets such ideas, they are important clues?
A: Good!