Sott.net "Black-listed" as Kremlin Propaganda according to the Washington Post

Scottie said:
I just tried it again recently, and it's much better than it used to be!

One little catch: If you want max privacy, don't search from the Chrome or Firefox search bar.

Searching directly from their web site is less revealing. See my blog post about GET vs POST requests with DuckDuckGo:

Search like a pro with DuckDuckGo: Better privacy + great search results

In short, if you search from your browser search bar with DuckDuckGo, the first search you do will use a GET request, which reveals your search terms even with HTTPS. Subsequent searches from their web site will change to POST requests and hide your search terms from the NSA + universe.

In any case, you should still change the settings to use POST requests... See the link above for what options to change (with screenshots)!

:ninja:

Hey Scottie, thanks for taking the time to explain!

I also downloaded duckduckgo last week and have been happily using it since, although I was using the Safari search bar which you recommend not to do. However, I do have a button to the left of the browser search bar which I think allows to search directly through the website (see screenshot). Would that be ok to use?


Screen_Shot_2017_03_05_at_17_42_48.png
 
Thanks Scottie, I followed your instructions . I have a question. I have a lot of sites saved on favorites and I'm wondering what happens when I click on those. Are they going through the same old process of being able to be tracked without the privacy features unlike when I use duckduckgo for serching? If so is there something I can do about this? Thanks
 
Eboard10 said:
I also downloaded duckduckgo last week and have been happily using it since, although I was using the Safari search bar which you recommend not to do. However, I do have a button to the left of the browser search bar which I think allows to search directly through the website (see screenshot). Would that be ok to use?

No. Well, at least in Chrome and Firefox, even if you search from the popup DuckDuckGo box, the first search still shows your search terms in the URL.

Of course, this isn't a totally big deal, but it does reveal to the alphabet soup people what you are searching for.

So, it just depends on how paranoid you want to be. ;D
 
SummerLite said:
Thanks Scottie, I followed your instructions . I have a question. I have a lot of sites saved on favorites and I'm wondering what happens when I click on those. Are they going through the same old process of being able to be tracked without the privacy features unlike when I use duckduckgo for serching? If so is there something I can do about this? Thanks

All bookmarks are just links, which means they are all GET requests.

GET = your browser says, "hey, give me this web page!"
POST = your browser sends data to the remote site, like for submitting a search form, POSTing a SOTT article, etc.

Example: searching on SOTT

Go to homepage. Search for "bush pants on fire"

The search box does a POST request, so the address bar always shows: https://www.sott.net/
Your search terms remain Top Secret.

But now if you click the grey copy icon at the top of the search results, you get a SOTT Search Link, which for this search is like so:

https://www.sott.net/?search=bush%20pants%20on%20fire&page=1

That's a GET request. It's the exact same search, but everything after the "?" is the search variables. In this case:
  • search = bush pants on fire
  • page = 1

That's the same data sent to the server when you search from the SOTT search box, only it's visible in the URL, and thus visible to your ISP and everybody else who might be watching.

This allows sharing of search results, but the only way to do that is as a normal link - but with all the "GET variables" appended after the "?".

So a SOTT Search Link with the search terms in the URL is a GET request, but modified:

GET + variables = your browser says, "get me this web page!" as usual, but the extra variables pass visible data along to make the search go

That's just kind of how web browsers work, so you can't really make bookmarks you visit more secure, unless you use something like Tor or whatever.
When you click a Search Link from SOTT, your search is known to the universe. For normal bookmarks, the best you can hope for is that HTTPS:// works if they are only HTTP:// prefixed links.

The interesting thing with Google searches is that they always do GET requests. So, even in Private Browsing Mode with Do Not Track turned on in your browser - and even when the site is encrypted via SSL (https://), all your search terms + other bits of data are still visible in the google URLs... which means somebody can still see what you're searching for.

DuckDuckGo has this POST request feature, which stops this "search term leakage", as they call it.
 
I am really sorry if I post this on the wrong section, but I sent an e-mail to revoltnet and got no answer.
I asked if there is a possibility of adding Montenegro to country list for shipping, as I'd like to order some shirts :)
 
Thanks so much Scottie for answering my question. This sort of lingo doesn't come easy to me at all. One of those things I need to read over a few times, like physics or computer physics in this case.
 
Check this out, sott.net is branded again as 'fakenews' Perhaps we could do the honest thing and vote this up. Though, it depends if that is really possible. Might be a total scam meant to defend the real fakenews outlets.

Scroll to the top, see: How Trustworthy is This News Source? And give it your best.

http://www.fakenewschecker.com/fake-news-source/signs-times?page=132#block-block-29

Added: I made a screenshot to see if that bar is moveable. 91 votes so far. If that bar doesn't move with an extra 100 votes or so. We know more than enough.
 
bjorn said:
Check this out, sott.net is branded again as 'fakenews' Perhaps we could do the honest thing and vote this up. Though, it depends if that is really possible. Might be a total scam meant to defend the real fakenews outlets.

Scroll to the top, see: How Trustworthy is This News Source? And give it your best.

http://www.fakenewschecker.com/fake-news-source/signs-times?page=132#block-block-29

Added: I made a screenshot to see if that bar is moveable. 91 votes so far. If that bar doesn't move with an extra 100 votes or so. We know more than enough.

I have just voted.
 
Gandalf said:
bjorn said:
Check this out, sott.net is branded again as 'fakenews' Perhaps we could do the honest thing and vote this up. Though, it depends if that is really possible. Might be a total scam meant to defend the real fakenews outlets.

Scroll to the top, see: How Trustworthy is This News Source? And give it your best.

http://www.fakenewschecker.com/fake-news-source/signs-times?page=132#block-block-29

Added: I made a screenshot to see if that bar is moveable. 91 votes so far. If that bar doesn't move with an extra 100 votes or so. We know more than enough.

I have just voted.

Same here!
 
Interestingly, their facts check page shows George Soro's opensecrets.org along with snopes, the sunlight foundation.
_http://www.fakenewschecker.com/fact-check-sites
 
I just voted as well. The number of votes is now at 103 and on the "trustworthy" scale, it appears to be around 6.5, with 10 being "most trustworthy".
 
Back
Top Bottom