Stories of Covid vaccination side effects or worse

[Ellipse]

Vaccine studies in South Korea find a comprehensive catalogue of harm​

THREE studies which compared millions of Covid-19 vaccinated people with unvaccinated people have concluded that the unvaccinated are less likely to suffer from many diseases including inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders, gynaecological disorders, and blood disorders. Findings also showed that those who had received Covid vaccinations were at risk of developing immune-related adverse events.

The study which investigated musculoskeletal disorders (injuries or disorders of the muscles, nerves, tendons, joints, cartilage, and spinal discs) said: ‘All Covid-19 vaccines were identified as significant risk factors for each inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder. This cohort study found that individuals who received any Covid-19 vaccine were more likely to be diagnosed with inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders than those who did not.’

The studies looked at all mRNA and viral vector vaccines delivered in South Korea. These included Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, Janssen (Johnson & Johnson), Novavax (from a US company), and AstraZeneca. More than 194million doses were injected; Pfizer was the most used with 67million doses delivered and Janssen the least with 7million. Forty million doses each of AstraZeneca, Novavax and Moderna were used.

Three separate South Korean universities combed millions of records from the country’s National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database, a compulsory health insurance scheme covering the whole population (52million) which is used to produce various health statistics. The results are startling and shocking. They tally with what many of the vaccine injured are reporting. Despite mounting evidence, authorities are still in denial and intent on gaslighting them.

One team of doctors and scientists from Ewha Womans University, Seoul, concluded that ‘the three-month risks of incidental, non-fatal adverse events (AEs) are substantially higher in the Covid-19 vaccinated subjects than in non-vaccinated controls’.

The lead author, Dr Jee Hyun Suh from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at Ewha Womans University, examined the incidence rate and risk in several medical areas including gynaecology (reproductive system disorders), haematology (blood disorders), dermatology (skin-related diseases), ophthalmology (eye-related disorders), otology (ear-related disorders), and dental problems. They said that vaccination significantly increased the risks of all non-fatal AEs, with the risk of inner ear disease being the highest.

Many complain that they developed tinnitus post vaccination, and it is already accepted that medication can cause a constant ringing in the ears, described by some as white noise. These include antidepressants, some antibiotics and anti-malaria medications.

The university found increased risks across all areas except for endometriosis and visual impairment. In fact visual problems were raised but numbers were small and considered not statistically significant. That does not mean that the vaccine does not cause eye problems.

A team from Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, led by Hye Sook Choi from the Department of Internal Medicine, looked at blood disorders in more than 4.2 million people aged 20-plus. They found many abnormalities affecting the production of red and white blood cells as well as damage to the bone marrow.

These include nutritional anaemia, which is iron deficiency, hemolytic anaemia, when your red blood cells are destroyed faster than they are replaced, aplastic anaemia, a rare condition that stops the body producing enough new blood cells which usually develops because of bone marrow damage, coagulation defects, the most common of which is vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), a blood clotting disorder characterised by low platelets, and neutropenia, which is an abnormally low count of white blood cells called neutrophils also caused by damage to the bone marrow. Neutrophils help your immune system fight infections and heal injuries.

They said that the risk of coagulation defects increased regardless of whether someone received mRNA vaccines such as Pfizer and Moderna, or viral vector vaccines such as AstraZeneca, Novavax, and Janssen (Johnson and Johnson).

The orthopaedic surgery department at Korea University Guro Hospital in Seoul looked at inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders in more than 2.2million people. The team led by Dr Young Hwan Park noted that earlier research into Covid-19 vaccines identified a range of adverse reactions that caused inflammation and an excessive immune response.

They also discovered increased incidence of plantar fasciitis, a painful condition of the foot in the soft tissue connecting your heel bone to your toes, rotator cuff syndrome: an injury or degenerative condition affecting the rotator cuff, a group of muscles and tendons that surround the shoulder joint, adhesive capsulitis or frozen shoulder, herniated intervertebral disc or slipped disc, spondylosis, a term used to describe osteoarthritis (degeneration of the joint cartilage) of the spine, bursitis, inflammation of the cushions (bursae) at the joints, Achilles tendinitis (the Achilles tendon connects the calf muscle to the heel bone) and De Quervain tenosynovitis, a painful condition affecting the tendons on the thumb side of the wrist.

Only 15.1 per cent had not received two vaccines. As well as looking at mRNA, and viral vector vaccines, they also studied those who mixed both types of vaccine. They concluded: ‘All Covid-19 vaccines were identified as significant risk factors for each inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder, except for mixing and matching vaccines for De Quervain tenosynovitis. This cohort study found that individuals who received any Covid-19 vaccine were more likely to be diagnosed with inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders than those who did not.’

For some reason, none of the studies looked at heart conditions. The mRNA vaccines are known to cause myocarditis and pericarditis, most commonly in young males.

The studies have not yet been peer-reviewed and opposition to their findings will be fierce. However, the results are clear at this stage: the vaccinated who report health problems only to be told they are nothing to do with the vaccine are not going mad after all.

Vaccine studies find a comprehensive catalogue of harm - The Conservative Woman

Vaccine studies find a comprehensive catalogue of harm

www.conservativewoman.co.uk

 

[Ellipse]

https://twitter.com/tburages

(2021)

 

[Niall]

Two 52-year-old British Airways air stewards 'die suddenly' in the space of a week

British Airways has been rocked by the sudden death of two flight attendants.

A 52-year-old worker died in a hotel room during a stopover and another steward, also 52, collapsed and died while on duty, The Sun reports.

The first man was found dead on December 23 after failing to report for duty. His flight from Newark to London Heathrow was cancelled, with passengers re-booked onto later flights. Devastated colleagues were flown home as passengers after raising the alarm.

The second steward collapsed and died while on duty in front of shocked passengers on New Year’s Eve. He tragically collapsed as the busy flight from London Heathrow to Hong Kong prepared to depart.

A source said: “Crew are frantic. These were two healthy people who suddenly dropped dead. There were no reported underlying health issues."

 

[EmeraldR]

 

[Aeneas]

Please if you post a youtube video, then also say what it is about and perhaps why you thought to post it.

A lot of us don't have time to see every single video so a description is of help. Secondly then as we know videos are sometimes taken down especially if they no longer fit the zeitgeist. So if youtube or twitter decides to take something down, there will only be a placeholder but no information what it was about. It might be found on other social media sites like odyssee or rumble, but in order to search for it, it is necessary to have some information to know what one is looking for and also why it was interesting.

 

[EmeraldR]

Please if you post a youtube video, then also say what it is about and perhaps why you thought to post it.

A lot of us don't have time to see every single video so a description is of help. Secondly then as we know videos are sometimes taken down especially if they no longer fit the zeitgeist. So if youtube or twitter decides to take something down, there will only be a placeholder but no information what it was about. It might be found on other social media sites like odyssee or rumble, but in order to search for it, it is necessary to have some information to know what one is looking for and also why it was interesting.

apologies- point taken -thanks Aeneas.

Professor Angus Dalgleish, physician, oncologist, pathologist, medical researcher and author discusses excess deaths in UK and world due to vaccination in an interview with N Farrage.



0:00
well a warm welcome to today's talk now
0:02
yesterday we recapitulated the alarming
0:05
number of excess deaths in the United
0:07
Kingdom and we know that this is true in
0:09
many countries of the world and recently
0:11
we had the pleasure on this channel of
0:13
interviewing Professor Angus da gich one
0:16
of the country's leading Doctors Medical
0:18
oncologist consultant professor of
0:20
medicine and various other things like
0:22
that and he was on the uh Nigel farage
0:26
show so let's look at what he said about
0:27
excess deaths it's good to know that
0:29
it's not just just me talking about this
0:31
there's other people of extremely high
0:33
reputations talking about
0:35
it I'm wondering about this Angus
0:38
because I'm looking at excess deaths
0:40
during the
0:42
pandemic but equally before that I mean
0:45
clearly the rate of death in Britain
0:46
will grow with an aging
0:48
population yes it will but these figures
0:51
are meant to be adjusted for that meant
0:53
to be adjusted for that and age adjusted
0:55
as well and I mean I've seen the the
0:58
very raw figures and they are they are
1:00
quite worrying because there's excess
1:02
deaths of the younger people going on
1:04
not just in the older population but in
1:07
the people under 40 and the real Peaks
1:10
between 40 and 64 65 now this this is
1:13
something that is highly unusual and
1:15
highly alarming it was initially
1:18
dismissed as due to people not getting
1:21
statins remember Chris witty said this
1:23
which I thought was really quite
1:24
alarming because you don't get off at
1:26
statins till you're over 55 60 so it
1:28
can't possibly be involved with that
1:30
group now the one major thing we said
1:33
was lockdown the effect of lockdown and
1:35
everything it did this would go B on to
1:38
uh excess deaths due to cancer and
1:40
various other things because of
1:41
misdiagnosis misdiagnosis mistreatments
1:44
everything but there's something far
1:46
worse than this now when you actually
1:48
look at these these figures that we have
1:50
they're the same in uh in Europe in
1:53
Australia in other places too and one of
1:56
the things that I flagged up and
1:57
nobody's taken any real notice of and
1:59
it's even more pertinent now is that
2:02
others have pointed out this excess
2:04
death started and correlates with the
2:06
vaccine program so it doesn't mean to
2:09
say It's associated but why hasn't it
2:11
been looked at why hasn't it been really
2:14
really Sly looked at and it hasn't
2:17
because myself and other colleagues have
2:19
raised this ad nauseum and we get
2:21
absolutely nothing but to say it's all
2:24
expected I mean the claim is Angus the
2:26
claim is from The Establishment claim is
2:29
that having the vaccine saved a huge
2:31
number of lives and that whilst there
2:33
are some who suffer from side effects
2:35
they are a tiny percentage that is what
2:37
they claim well I I personally don't
2:39
believe it at all because one of the
2:41
things that you get taught when you're
2:42
at medical school if you know two people
2:44
with a condition then it's very common
2:46
well I I find it very difficult to find
2:49
people who don't know uh someone who's
2:51
had an adverse effect from the vaccine
2:53
campaign the vaccine program and the
2:56
bottom line it wouldn't matter so much
2:58
if the vaccines were doing something
3:00
against something which was killing us
3:02
but it's not the co against which the
3:04
vaccines were against it's long since
3:07
left the Earth it left the possibly
3:08
getting on two years ago but hang on a
3:11
second we're told that CO's coming back
3:13
and but it it's a different one and it
3:15
will not be affected by the vaccine
3:17
whatever they tell you the uh the
3:19
companies tell you that they've got B
3:21
veent vaccines which will protect
3:23
against vaccine well I can assure you
3:25
they don't I mean they got passed in
3:27
eight mice and uh you can't tell
3:30
anything from eight mice only when you
3:32
can do those uh programs properly in a
3:35
community can you uh make those sort of
3:37
claims but I I disagree that any of
3:39
those claims can be justified does your
3:42
skepticism about this vaccine make you a
3:44
par in in academic and and and medical
3:47
circles yes of course it does it does
3:49
because there there is a uh a group
3:52
think that thinks an accepted it's very
3:54
good it's safe and effective when uh I
3:57
was trained as a clinical scientist to
3:59
look at facts and to con constantly
4:01
change my opinion depending on the facts
4:04
and this is what's going on the facts
4:06
are changing and at some stage well I I
4:09
point out in the big American flu
4:11
vaccine flu crisis of 1977 when they
4:15
were dying people the soldiers were
4:17
dying in their 30s they rushed out a
4:19
vaccine program 42 million people were
4:22
vaccinated and then there were reports
4:24
of gilean bar which is this assembling
4:26
paralysis which is is not uncommon with
4:28
a lot of AC
4:30
and instead of denying it they sent
4:32
people out into the field and they came
4:34
back and said yes it definitely goes and
4:37
you know what they did they turned
4:38
around they said well no one's dying of
4:40
the flu anymore let's get rid of the
4:43
vaccine we should have done that I
4:44
believe a couple of years well Angus
4:46
it's fascinating as I say you know I
4:48
could get a lot of people on from
4:49
Academia and the medical world who take
4:51
a very different View and I've had them
4:53
on this program trying to convince me to
4:55
get the booster wow um hero of the
4:58
people Professor Ang D GLE young and
5:02
middle-aged deaths he thinks this is
5:05
unusual it is unusual he thinks it's
5:07
alarming it is alarming Chris witty our
5:10
chief medical officer in the United
5:11
Kingdom comment about people not getting
5:13
statins is
5:15
just pro pro probably less than a full
5:18
explanation um first of all I know of no
5:20
evidence that people weren't getting the
5:22
statins and even if they were would it
5:25
account for the excess deaths um
5:28
probably not probably not
5:30
increasing cancers but then increasing
5:32
other complications as well like heart
5:34
disease and liver disease and heart
5:37
failure that he didn't mention but he
5:39
did mention in Europe and Australia all
5:41
over there's increased deaths United
5:44
States correlations are there to be
5:46
looked at why don't we examine all
5:49
possible correlations Austin Bradford
5:51
Hill criteria why is this not being done
5:55
it is inexplicable that we are not
5:57
looking at all possible reasons for the
5:59
excess
6:01
deaths now um Professor D there if you
6:05
know two people with the condition it's
6:06
common um I know more than two people
6:09
with a particular adverse
6:12
reaction um group think change opinions
6:16
as the evidence changes Do no
6:19
harm
6:21
just great to see someone of Professor
6:23
daish's stature talking about this now
6:25
the second part is about cancer Let's uh
6:27
let's listen to him now about cancer
6:30
your absolutely specialist field of
6:33
oncology now the Times newspaper going
6:36
very big today yes on on several issues
6:39
to do with cancer the first one we
6:41
touched on a moment ago lack of
6:43
diagnosis for cancer during the pandemic
6:46
how serious is that I think it was very
6:48
very serious and that's why I said at
6:50
the time with lockdown that anybody's
6:52
lives saved from Lockdown would be more
6:54
than tripled in people who died because
6:57
of lockdown and if they had had the
6:59
Services I mean the NHS became a covid
7:01
service so everything was shut down and
7:04
we know that within cancer getting early
7:06
diagnosis is absolutely crucial for cure
7:08
I mean it's really amazing how well
7:11
we've improved over the last 20 years we
7:13
can cure a lot of cancers that couldn't
7:15
be cured before but only if we get them
7:18
early and what we are witnessing is uh
7:21
people uh who've actually had the
7:23
symptoms they've tried to get a tests
7:25
and they've been cancelled two three
7:27
times and then by the time it sorted and
7:29
they go for their treatment they've been
7:31
treated for a stage three stage four
7:33
cancer when they should have been stage
7:35
two potentially completely curable and
7:38
that is the problem now the other thing
7:40
that's come on there that we're dealing
7:42
with is the number of people who are now
7:44
been susceptible to cancer because of
7:47
their lifestyle and one of the biggest
7:49
is actually obesity I mean we've
7:51
recognized this this obesity for a long
7:53
long time but it is a major cause it was
7:56
picked up initially with renal cancer
7:58
then endom cancer but actually when you
8:01
look back it's all Cancers and there was
8:03
a report in the times it was costing us
8:05
100 billion which is nearly the cost of
8:07
the NHS year we're going to have to
8:10
start tackling this sort of thing to
8:12
bring down the cancer I mean they were
8:14
suggesting and it's it's modeling and it
8:16
could be completely wrong but they were
8:17
suggesting by 2040 there could be one
8:19
diagnosis per minute in the United
8:21
Kingdom so so that the the the
8:24
regularity the percentage of cancers as
8:27
as a percentage of the population is
8:28
growing in our country without a doubt
8:30
when I started uh doing oncology it was
8:32
one in 10 people were going to get
8:34
cancer and needing treatment and then
8:36
within 20 years it was one in three and
8:39
now one in two patients will get cancer
8:42
in their lifetime so the the demand just
8:45
from the current population let alone
8:47
the excess population uh is just
8:50
enormous and I don't feel that we've
8:52
actually planned to deal with that
8:54
that's the other thing well there are
8:55
two points here one is how we deal with
8:56
it we clearly going be a huge problem uh
8:59
but but the other is of course the best
9:00
medicine of all is the medicine that can
9:02
actually educate people and stop them
9:03
getting it in the first place we fought
9:05
huge battles with drinking excess
9:09
drinking smoking but you're suggesting
9:11
actually diet is now playing as big a
9:14
factor as anything else I know there are
9:16
some experts more expert than me in
9:18
these fields who actually say that the
9:20
the diet and obesity is now a bigger
9:23
cause of cancer than smoking and
9:25
anything else put together so we we it's
9:28
beholden not to ignore that and to act
9:32
our policies because it could save us so
9:34
much in the long term in the long run
9:36
and it's not just cancer you get the
9:38
obese you get uh all the other things go
9:40
with it diabetes
9:42
hypertension no no well think the
9:44
education system's got a very big role
9:46
to play Angus never boring thank you for
9:49
coming on and joining us on GB news this
9:52
is really Qui so true Professor D gich
9:55
is
9:56
never boring
9:59
cancers lockdowns could cause three
10:02
times more deaths than the saved early
10:04
warning in cancer is completely uh early
10:08
diagnosis is completely essential often
10:10
curable if you get it early more cancers
10:13
being diagnosed in the latest stage now
10:15
we need to cut down on the
10:16
susceptibilities of cancer obesity
10:19
tackle the causes of cancer whatever
10:21
those can causes are when Professor
10:24
dowle started training it was one in 10
10:26
people got cancer then it went to 1 in3
10:28
now it's 50% of as one in two fewer
10:31
people smoke now diet is a key factor
10:35
and uh I'm sure he could have gone on to
10:37
identify more possible risk factors for
10:39
cancer um if it'd been given time and
10:42
actually I have just to let you in on a
10:44
bit of a preview uh Professor dowle has
10:47
agreed to come back on this channel and
10:48
talk about the causes of cancer in some
10:50
detail so we look forward to that now
10:54
the next thing is particularly
10:56
interesting uh now you probably know
10:58
that there's going to be this debate in
11:00
the UK Parliament about excess deaths
11:04
led by uh Andrew
11:06
brigen he's going to lead that debate in
11:09
the houses of Parliament in the UK but
11:11
it turns out he's been given another
11:17
offer an invitation arrived today to
11:19
speak at this plush sounding event in
11:22
Davos on January the
11:24
16th the day I'm due to lead a debate in
11:27
the House of Commons about worrying
11:29
Trends in excess
11:31
deaths what a
11:33
coincidence it concerns me that MPS are
11:36
being offered this sort of Jolly which
11:38
some might argue could amount to uh an
11:42
advantage as defined by the bribery act
11:49
2010 you now have to choose between
11:52
Davos or
11:54
Westminster so quite interesting there
11:58
is he going to be going no Mr bridg is
12:00
going to carry on with the debate in the
12:02
House of Commons about excess deaths
12:04
needless to say I won't be
12:07
going and this was the event to which he
12:10
was uh
12:13
invited well I'm pleased to see that Mr
12:15
brid is going to be doing the job he's
12:17
paid for to represent his constituents
12:20
in Parliament rather than going off to
12:23
Davos but I'm sure he will be missing a
12:25
very nice dinner but there you go that's
12:28
the the cost of public service now
12:32
obviously the next question on your mind
12:34
is will I be going to Davos uh well it's
12:37
another 10 days yet so my invitation
12:39
might well arrive let's wait and see
12:41
unless of course they don't consider me
12:43
a stakeholder but yeah we we we'll see
12:45
I'll I'll keep you informed on that
12:48
strange thing is I can't remember voting
12:50
for any of the
12:52
delegates what's it talking about let's
12:54
have a quick look at this Davos thing
12:56
just before we
12:57
finish
13:00
so here we see the website for the
13:03
exciting countdown to the world economic
13:05
Forum annual meeting entitled or
13:09
subtitled I guess rebuilding trust 15th
13:13
to the 19th of January
13:16
2024 little bit about the meeting there
13:20
the world economic Forum provides a
13:22
global impartial and not for-profit
13:24
platform for meaningful connection
13:26
between stakeholders to EST Lish trust
13:29
and build initiatives for cooperation
13:31
and progress for more than 50 years the
13:34
program has developed historic
13:36
initiatives industry breakthroughs
13:38
economic Solutions and thousands of
13:41
collaborations improving the state of
13:44
the
13:50
world well that sounds great rebuilding
13:54
trust that's really a good idea
13:56
improving the state of the world what a
13:58
good idea here let me know in the
14:00
comments if you think this is the best
14:01
way to achieve it via the world economic
14:04
Forum but for now thank you for watching
14:07
and thank you Mr bridan for going to the
14:09
debate thanks Professor Dar Galan thanks
14:11
to Nigel farage for a really great
14:14
interview

 

[Aeneas]

apologies- point taken -thanks Aeneas.

No need for apologies and it wasn't specifically directed at you though I took your post as the impetus to respond. We have to all just make sure that the Forum doesn't just become like social media where things are often passively dumped without much discussion or active thinking about what is posted. As it is then our attention is already being assaulted from so many areas which tries to distract our thinking capacity, whether it be advertising, cute animals on social media or fear mongering headlines in MSM etc. So don't feel that it is necessary to post a full transcript every time you post

 

[Jefferson]

No need for apologies and it wasn't specifically directed at you though I took your post as the impetus to respond. We have to all just make sure that the Forum doesn't just become like social media where things are often passively dumped without much discussion or active thinking about what is posted. As it is then our attention is already being assaulted from so many areas which tries to distract our thinking capacity, whether it be advertising, cute animals on social media or fear mongering headlines in MSM etc. So don't feel that it is necessary to post a full transcript every time you post

@Emerald Rob Just agreeing with Aeneas here, thanks for posting the video however a transcript isn't needed - just a paragraph or two giving the highlights and some of your thoughts is enough.

 

[SOTTREADER]

apologies- point taken -thanks Aeneas.

Professor Angus Dalgleish, physician, oncologist, pathologist, medical researcher and author discusses excess deaths in UK and world due to vaccination in an interview with N Farrage.



0:00
well a warm welcome to today's talk now
0:02
yesterday we recapitulated the alarming
0:05
number of excess deaths in the United
0:07
Kingdom and we know that this is true in
0:09
many countries of the world and recently
0:11
we had the pleasure on this channel of
0:13
interviewing Professor Angus da gich one
0:16
of the country's leading Doctors Medical
0:18
oncologist consultant professor of
0:20
medicine and various other things like
0:22
that and he was on the uh Nigel farage
0:26
show so let's look at what he said about
0:27
excess deaths it's good to know that
0:29
it's not just just me talking about this
0:31
there's other people of extremely high
0:33
reputations talking about
0:35
it I'm wondering about this Angus
0:38
because I'm looking at excess deaths
0:40
during the
0:42
pandemic but equally before that I mean
0:45
clearly the rate of death in Britain
0:46
will grow with an aging
0:48
population yes it will but these figures
0:51
are meant to be adjusted for that meant
0:53
to be adjusted for that and age adjusted
0:55
as well and I mean I've seen the the
0:58
very raw figures and they are they are
1:00
quite worrying because there's excess
1:02
deaths of the younger people going on
1:04
not just in the older population but in
1:07
the people under 40 and the real Peaks
1:10
between 40 and 64 65 now this this is
1:13
something that is highly unusual and
1:15
highly alarming it was initially
1:18
dismissed as due to people not getting
1:21
statins remember Chris witty said this
1:23
which I thought was really quite
1:24
alarming because you don't get off at
1:26
statins till you're over 55 60 so it
1:28
can't possibly be involved with that
1:30
group now the one major thing we said
1:33
was lockdown the effect of lockdown and
1:35
everything it did this would go B on to
1:38
uh excess deaths due to cancer and
1:40
various other things because of
1:41
misdiagnosis misdiagnosis mistreatments
1:44
everything but there's something far
1:46
worse than this now when you actually
1:48
look at these these figures that we have
1:50
they're the same in uh in Europe in
1:53
Australia in other places too and one of
1:56
the things that I flagged up and
1:57
nobody's taken any real notice of and
1:59
it's even more pertinent now is that
2:02
others have pointed out this excess
2:04
death started and correlates with the
2:06
vaccine program so it doesn't mean to
2:09
say It's associated but why hasn't it
2:11
been looked at why hasn't it been really
2:14
really Sly looked at and it hasn't
2:17
because myself and other colleagues have
2:19
raised this ad nauseum and we get
2:21
absolutely nothing but to say it's all
2:24
expected I mean the claim is Angus the
2:26
claim is from The Establishment claim is
2:29
that having the vaccine saved a huge
2:31
number of lives and that whilst there
2:33
are some who suffer from side effects
2:35
they are a tiny percentage that is what
2:37
they claim well I I personally don't
2:39
believe it at all because one of the
2:41
things that you get taught when you're
2:42
at medical school if you know two people
2:44
with a condition then it's very common
2:46
well I I find it very difficult to find
2:49
people who don't know uh someone who's
2:51
had an adverse effect from the vaccine
2:53
campaign the vaccine program and the
2:56
bottom line it wouldn't matter so much
2:58
if the vaccines were doing something
3:00
against something which was killing us
3:02
but it's not the co against which the
3:04
vaccines were against it's long since
3:07
left the Earth it left the possibly
3:08
getting on two years ago but hang on a
3:11
second we're told that CO's coming back
3:13
and but it it's a different one and it
3:15
will not be affected by the vaccine
3:17
whatever they tell you the uh the
3:19
companies tell you that they've got B
3:21
veent vaccines which will protect
3:23
against vaccine well I can assure you
3:25
they don't I mean they got passed in
3:27
eight mice and uh you can't tell
3:30
anything from eight mice only when you
3:32
can do those uh programs properly in a
3:35
community can you uh make those sort of
3:37
claims but I I disagree that any of
3:39
those claims can be justified does your
3:42
skepticism about this vaccine make you a
3:44
par in in academic and and and medical
3:47
circles yes of course it does it does
3:49
because there there is a uh a group
3:52
think that thinks an accepted it's very
3:54
good it's safe and effective when uh I
3:57
was trained as a clinical scientist to
3:59
look at facts and to con constantly
4:01
change my opinion depending on the facts
4:04
and this is what's going on the facts
4:06
are changing and at some stage well I I
4:09
point out in the big American flu
4:11
vaccine flu crisis of 1977 when they
4:15
were dying people the soldiers were
4:17
dying in their 30s they rushed out a
4:19
vaccine program 42 million people were
4:22
vaccinated and then there were reports
4:24
of gilean bar which is this assembling
4:26
paralysis which is is not uncommon with
4:28
a lot of AC
4:30
and instead of denying it they sent
4:32
people out into the field and they came
4:34
back and said yes it definitely goes and
4:37
you know what they did they turned
4:38
around they said well no one's dying of
4:40
the flu anymore let's get rid of the
4:43
vaccine we should have done that I
4:44
believe a couple of years well Angus
4:46
it's fascinating as I say you know I
4:48
could get a lot of people on from
4:49
Academia and the medical world who take
4:51
a very different View and I've had them
4:53
on this program trying to convince me to
4:55
get the booster wow um hero of the
4:58
people Professor Ang D GLE young and
5:02
middle-aged deaths he thinks this is
5:05
unusual it is unusual he thinks it's
5:07
alarming it is alarming Chris witty our
5:10
chief medical officer in the United
5:11
Kingdom comment about people not getting
5:13
statins is
5:15
just pro pro probably less than a full
5:18
explanation um first of all I know of no
5:20
evidence that people weren't getting the
5:22
statins and even if they were would it
5:25
account for the excess deaths um
5:28
probably not probably not
5:30
increasing cancers but then increasing
5:32
other complications as well like heart
5:34
disease and liver disease and heart
5:37
failure that he didn't mention but he
5:39
did mention in Europe and Australia all
5:41
over there's increased deaths United
5:44
States correlations are there to be
5:46
looked at why don't we examine all
5:49
possible correlations Austin Bradford
5:51
Hill criteria why is this not being done
5:55
it is inexplicable that we are not
5:57
looking at all possible reasons for the
5:59
excess
6:01
deaths now um Professor D there if you
6:05
know two people with the condition it's
6:06
common um I know more than two people
6:09
with a particular adverse
6:12
reaction um group think change opinions
6:16
as the evidence changes Do no
6:19
harm
6:21
just great to see someone of Professor
6:23
daish's stature talking about this now
6:25
the second part is about cancer Let's uh
6:27
let's listen to him now about cancer
6:30
your absolutely specialist field of
6:33
oncology now the Times newspaper going
6:36
very big today yes on on several issues
6:39
to do with cancer the first one we
6:41
touched on a moment ago lack of
6:43
diagnosis for cancer during the pandemic
6:46
how serious is that I think it was very
6:48
very serious and that's why I said at
6:50
the time with lockdown that anybody's
6:52
lives saved from Lockdown would be more
6:54
than tripled in people who died because
6:57
of lockdown and if they had had the
6:59
Services I mean the NHS became a covid
7:01
service so everything was shut down and
7:04
we know that within cancer getting early
7:06
diagnosis is absolutely crucial for cure
7:08
I mean it's really amazing how well
7:11
we've improved over the last 20 years we
7:13
can cure a lot of cancers that couldn't
7:15
be cured before but only if we get them
7:18
early and what we are witnessing is uh
7:21
people uh who've actually had the
7:23
symptoms they've tried to get a tests
7:25
and they've been cancelled two three
7:27
times and then by the time it sorted and
7:29
they go for their treatment they've been
7:31
treated for a stage three stage four
7:33
cancer when they should have been stage
7:35
two potentially completely curable and
7:38
that is the problem now the other thing
7:40
that's come on there that we're dealing
7:42
with is the number of people who are now
7:44
been susceptible to cancer because of
7:47
their lifestyle and one of the biggest
7:49
is actually obesity I mean we've
7:51
recognized this this obesity for a long
7:53
long time but it is a major cause it was
7:56
picked up initially with renal cancer
7:58
then endom cancer but actually when you
8:01
look back it's all Cancers and there was
8:03
a report in the times it was costing us
8:05
100 billion which is nearly the cost of
8:07
the NHS year we're going to have to
8:10
start tackling this sort of thing to
8:12
bring down the cancer I mean they were
8:14
suggesting and it's it's modeling and it
8:16
could be completely wrong but they were
8:17
suggesting by 2040 there could be one
8:19
diagnosis per minute in the United
8:21
Kingdom so so that the the the
8:24
regularity the percentage of cancers as
8:27
as a percentage of the population is
8:28
growing in our country without a doubt
8:30
when I started uh doing oncology it was
8:32
one in 10 people were going to get
8:34
cancer and needing treatment and then
8:36
within 20 years it was one in three and
8:39
now one in two patients will get cancer
8:42
in their lifetime so the the demand just
8:45
from the current population let alone
8:47
the excess population uh is just
8:50
enormous and I don't feel that we've
8:52
actually planned to deal with that
8:54
that's the other thing well there are
8:55
two points here one is how we deal with
8:56
it we clearly going be a huge problem uh
8:59
but but the other is of course the best
9:00
medicine of all is the medicine that can
9:02
actually educate people and stop them
9:03
getting it in the first place we fought
9:05
huge battles with drinking excess
9:09
drinking smoking but you're suggesting
9:11
actually diet is now playing as big a
9:14
factor as anything else I know there are
9:16
some experts more expert than me in
9:18
these fields who actually say that the
9:20
the diet and obesity is now a bigger
9:23
cause of cancer than smoking and
9:25
anything else put together so we we it's
9:28
beholden not to ignore that and to act
9:32
our policies because it could save us so
9:34
much in the long term in the long run
9:36
and it's not just cancer you get the
9:38
obese you get uh all the other things go
9:40
with it diabetes
9:42
hypertension no no well think the
9:44
education system's got a very big role
9:46
to play Angus never boring thank you for
9:49
coming on and joining us on GB news this
9:52
is really Qui so true Professor D gich
9:55
is
9:56
never boring
9:59
cancers lockdowns could cause three
10:02
times more deaths than the saved early
10:04
warning in cancer is completely uh early
10:08
diagnosis is completely essential often
10:10
curable if you get it early more cancers
10:13
being diagnosed in the latest stage now
10:15
we need to cut down on the
10:16
susceptibilities of cancer obesity
10:19
tackle the causes of cancer whatever
10:21
those can causes are when Professor
10:24
dowle started training it was one in 10
10:26
people got cancer then it went to 1 in3
10:28
now it's 50% of as one in two fewer
10:31
people smoke now diet is a key factor
10:35
and uh I'm sure he could have gone on to
10:37
identify more possible risk factors for
10:39
cancer um if it'd been given time and
10:42
actually I have just to let you in on a
10:44
bit of a preview uh Professor dowle has
10:47
agreed to come back on this channel and
10:48
talk about the causes of cancer in some
10:50
detail so we look forward to that now
10:54
the next thing is particularly
10:56
interesting uh now you probably know
10:58
that there's going to be this debate in
11:00
the UK Parliament about excess deaths
11:04
led by uh Andrew
11:06
brigen he's going to lead that debate in
11:09
the houses of Parliament in the UK but
11:11
it turns out he's been given another
11:17
offer an invitation arrived today to
11:19
speak at this plush sounding event in
11:22
Davos on January the
11:24
16th the day I'm due to lead a debate in
11:27
the House of Commons about worrying
11:29
Trends in excess
11:31
deaths what a
11:33
coincidence it concerns me that MPS are
11:36
being offered this sort of Jolly which
11:38
some might argue could amount to uh an
11:42
advantage as defined by the bribery act
11:49
2010 you now have to choose between
11:52
Davos or
11:54
Westminster so quite interesting there
11:58
is he going to be going no Mr bridg is
12:00
going to carry on with the debate in the
12:02
House of Commons about excess deaths
12:04
needless to say I won't be
12:07
going and this was the event to which he
12:10
was uh
12:13
invited well I'm pleased to see that Mr
12:15
brid is going to be doing the job he's
12:17
paid for to represent his constituents
12:20
in Parliament rather than going off to
12:23
Davos but I'm sure he will be missing a
12:25
very nice dinner but there you go that's
12:28
the the cost of public service now
12:32
obviously the next question on your mind
12:34
is will I be going to Davos uh well it's
12:37
another 10 days yet so my invitation
12:39
might well arrive let's wait and see
12:41
unless of course they don't consider me
12:43
a stakeholder but yeah we we we'll see
12:45
I'll I'll keep you informed on that
12:48
strange thing is I can't remember voting
12:50
for any of the
12:52
delegates what's it talking about let's
12:54
have a quick look at this Davos thing
12:56
just before we
12:57
finish
13:00
so here we see the website for the
13:03
exciting countdown to the world economic
13:05
Forum annual meeting entitled or
13:09
subtitled I guess rebuilding trust 15th
13:13
to the 19th of January
13:16
2024 little bit about the meeting there
13:20
the world economic Forum provides a
13:22
global impartial and not for-profit
13:24
platform for meaningful connection
13:26
between stakeholders to EST Lish trust
13:29
and build initiatives for cooperation
13:31
and progress for more than 50 years the
13:34
program has developed historic
13:36
initiatives industry breakthroughs
13:38
economic Solutions and thousands of
13:41
collaborations improving the state of
13:44
the
13:50
world well that sounds great rebuilding
13:54
trust that's really a good idea
13:56
improving the state of the world what a
13:58
good idea here let me know in the
14:00
comments if you think this is the best
14:01
way to achieve it via the world economic
14:04
Forum but for now thank you for watching
14:07
and thank you Mr bridan for going to the
14:09
debate thanks Professor Dar Galan thanks
14:11
to Nigel farage for a really great
14:14
interview

I couldn't help but chuckle to myself. Posted the whole transcript rather than a summary

 

[Ellipse]

Nathalie Marquay, wife of French television news presenter Jean-Pierre Pernaut, asserts that Jean-Pierre "did not die of cancer" and points the finger at the Covid vaccine, "After the 3rd vaccination"​

"But then, very quickly, he had to be hospitalised because his heart valve had been damaged, whereas less than three weeks earlier, everything had been perfectly fine".

The former Miss France revealed that her husband had received a third injection of the Covid-19 vaccine without his knowledge.

"Eight days after the third vaccination, he had his first stroke. Then two, three... twelve! The thirteenth was fatal"

From now on, Nathalie Marquay will devote herself to her role as a mother and assures us that she has no desire to start a new life with another man. "That's absolutely not in my plans. Even if he's no longer around, I still feel like I'm married to him. Besides, I'm not interested. You can imagine, it would really take an extraordinary person to replace Jean-Pierre!" says the former beauty queen, still just as attached to the man she loved for 15 years.

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[Tuatha de Danaan]

her husband had received a third injection of the Covid-19 vaccine without his knowledge.

That struck me as rather strange. How would this happen without his knowledge?

And 13 strokes...... Thank DCM he is out of his misery.

 

[Natus Videre]

her husband had received a third injection of the Covid-19 vaccine without his knowledge.

That struck me as rather strange. How would this happen without his knowledge?

And 13 strokes...... Thank DCM he is out of his misery.

Yeah, I immediately thought of all the kids that received the injection without their parents' consent.
But in this case, was Pernaut unconscious when they gave him the third jab? Did he become an "experimental dumpster" as doctors "ran out" of solutions? I mean, my friend was offered Remdesivir and accepted it because he was desperate (thank God, he survived).

 

[Adobe]

A well worth the watch, Tucker and Bret Wienstein interview. Wienstein explains the new hard to read and a bit shapeshifting WHO document, which if not stopped by this May, could amount to game over for the US, as well as the entire global community. And many other points.

A well done interview worth passing on if you know anybody who is still listening. (26 minutes)

Bret Weinstein Exposes the World Health Organization’s Dark Agenda​

 

[Ellipse]

Yeah, I immediately thought of all the kids that received the injection without their parents' consent.
But in this case, was Pernaut unconscious when they gave him the third jab? Did he become an "experimental dumpster" as doctors "ran out" of solutions? I mean, my friend was offered Remdesivir and accepted it because he was desperate (thank God, he survived).

I think he was in the hospital for the stroke and they inject him. Part of the treatment.

An other option is something like that: "Mr Pernaut we need to jab you before able to do some exams OK?". And this asked when you're semi-conscious or in a rush.

When you're confronted with the reality, events does not happen necessarily in the right order or as you though they should. At least for us, not for the PTB. And so the importance of the knowledge and better, having a group with the knowledge how things can really turn.

 

[Ellipse]

Soccer player Andy Delort, 32, collapse in the middle of a match in Qatar​

Fortunately, he regained consciousness a few minutes later.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1743686589220376893