Sun light pain relief

I think that there's both positive and negative effects from sunlight. Being exposed to sunlight when the UV-index is too high is carcinogenic. However, sunlight also contains Far Infrared Rays that have a very beneficial effect on the body - particularly the detox effects of using a Far Infra Red blanket as a detox method has been covered in many different threads on the forum (see Laura's mention of it here: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,17755.msg161112.html#msg161112).

Also it may be the case that all people do not react equally to exposure to sunlight. So while I know many people who find that they need to be exposed to sunlight every day if possible others may have less of a need - or maybe they're just not in contact with their physical body enough to notice?

Just my two cents :)
 
I've been thinking about this and there are a few variables: Genetics, Location, Personality/Essence/Experiences. Maybe more.

Because actually, where i live the maximum temp we are talking is 20C, though during heatwaves 25-30C, and i'm currently living by the coast where we get quite a lot of irregular cloud cover (ie. shade, or a break from direct heat) and a breeze. You can also get some decent sunshine from 6 - 7pm in the summer. And i can just see members in other countries gasping because their experiences tell them sunshine is very powerful but by comparison England has no idea, if you see what i mean.

I am white caucasian (well, i assume!) and during the winter months in England i can feel a yearning for sunshine, so is this may be because of my location or because of my 'make up'? Maybe both.

I would imagine certain people will acclimatise quicker due to genetics or personality, where some people - my greek friend for example - love cloudy, 'fresh' days; perhaps after a childhood in the sweltering heat this is understandable.

And i agree that sunlight can be carcinogenic if you aren't careful - as are many things - from personal experience recently, the sun felt blisteringly hot, much harsher than other days. I imagine there will be other changes in the atmosphere that we may not yet be registering which will also have an effect on it's pros/cons.

I'm on the diet and according the data i should be getting a nice punch of Vitamin D from the 75g of lard in my fat bomb, but i am also still enjoying the sunshine with the heatwave we're having.
 
Yeah, let's also consider the type of hair one has, for example black hair may receive the sunlight different than curly brown hair. Could this be related to why in the past people used long hair?

I take between 5,000 iu and 10,000 because of my training and the anti inflammatory benefits. I recently finished the bottle, but when I take 10,000 I feel so focus, is like a focus that lets you be calm.
 
Skyalmian said:
If one is predisposed to being nocturnal, then be nocturnal. Not everyone is diurnal, or can be.

On what research are you basing this on? As far as I know, the circadian rhythm is not a mechanism that has variations like you're suggesting.
 
A Jay said:
Skyalmian said:
If one is predisposed to being nocturnal, then be nocturnal. Not everyone is diurnal, or can be.

On what research are you basing this on? As far as I know, the circadian rhythm is not a mechanism that has variations like you're suggesting.

According to this article on SOTT: http://www.sott.net/article/280864-Readjust-your-body-clock-to-get-more-restive-sleep-improved-health-and-immune-function there seems to be two distinctly different chronotytpes - what normal people call Type A and Type B. If you consistently go against your chronotype, you may put your body in a stress-situation with possible detrimental consequences.

I'm not sure of the validity of the claims but they are being made.

FWIW.
 
itellsya said:
It seems sitting still is one of the plagues of society, and with all the studies being released showing how 25minutes of meditation a day is so good for your peace of mind. There was that Sott article 'people would prefer to be elctroshocked than be left with their own thoughts'; I'm not that bad but it's something i need to continue working on.

At first I found it almost impossible to sit for more than 5 minutes of meditation, now I can happily chill for up to an hour. Normally half though. The biggest thing for me was not to give up, I would get a routine of doing it at the same time every day and stick at it no matter how much trash whizzed through my mind. Slowly I worked up 5 minutes at a time over the course of about a year till I got to where I am now. Also I find it impossible to do it while sitting up, I can't even begin to get into a lotus position despite doing yoga. So just try what feels the most comfortable. Pillows pillows pillows! I wish you luck :)
 
Thor said:
A Jay said:
Skyalmian said:
If one is predisposed to being nocturnal, then be nocturnal. Not everyone is diurnal, or can be.

On what research are you basing this on? As far as I know, the circadian rhythm is not a mechanism that has variations like you're suggesting.

According to this article on SOTT: http://www.sott.net/article/280864-Readjust-your-body-clock-to-get-more-restive-sleep-improved-health-and-immune-function there seems to be two distinctly different chronotytpes - what normal people call Type A and Type B. If you consistently go against your chronotype, you may put your body in a stress-situation with possible detrimental consequences.

I'm not sure of the validity of the claims but they are being made.

FWIW.

From the article:

In other words, you may not be a night owl at all - you don't feel sleepy because you've confused your clock. And this could also mean other functions are disrupted, leaving the path open for disease.

Before electric lights the difference between larks and night owls would have been much less noticeable.

'We're no longer outside for most of our day, and can have light on all the time if we like, so we deprive our body clock of signals that synchronise it with the outside world,' says Professor Till Roenneberg, a chronobiologist and sleep researcher at the University of Munich.

He says this is to blame for more extreme differences in our body clocks. 'The genetic variation in our body clocks is becoming amplified.

'Some extreme larks start their biological day six hours earlier than most people and some extreme owls start their day six hours later.

'In the past, we would have been much closer together - maybe only a couple of hours apart.'

So the difference between the two before electric lights was the lark going to bed at 8 and waking at 5 and the owl going to bed at 10 and waking at 7?

That's not much of a difference at all.
 
A Jay said:
So the difference between the two before electric lights was the lark going to bed at 8 and waking at 5 and the owl going to bed at 10 and waking at 7?

That's not much of a difference at all.

Thanks A Jay - this is kinda what i was thinking, hence why am eager to readjust my 20+ year ingrained sleeping pattern. It's easier for me to do (short term) when i'm in a sunny location (seriously). And probably for some of the reasons already discussed.

I have looked into the possible variations in peoples rhythms and had diagnosed myself with: Delayed sleep phase disorder
Delayed sleep phase disorder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_sleep_phase_syndrome#Diagnosis

Delayed sleep-phase disorder (DSPD), also known as delayed sleep-phase syndrome (DSPS) or delayed sleep-phase type (DSPT), is a circadian rhythm sleep disorder affecting the timing of sleep, peak period of alertness, the core body temperature rhythm, hormonal and other daily rhythms, compared to the general population and relative to societal requirements. People with DSPD generally fall asleep some hours after midnight and have difficulty waking up in the morning.[1]

Now this would have been handy when i was at highschool, not sure my bosses would have ever bought it though!

For myself, my sleeping pattern is a struggle i will have to overcome. It will be hard going as i believe it's interlinked with trauma and general dissatisfaction with the world - perhaps when it's dark, it's easier to forget the other world exists? Like many 'night owls' i can get a lot of work done in the evening and we/they say it's easier to concentrate.

There may be something to the fact that some people *can* be more active at night, where as others are more capable with mornings. But i just can't shake the idea that actually this is preference, as with most things, and you should reach a point where you have enough control where you can be both when required.

Coming back to the original article posted. The idea was that:
Skin β-Endorphin Mediates Addiction to UV Light

Highlights

•UV exposure leads to elevated blood levels of β-endorphin in mice
UV causes systemic analgesia that is reversible with opioid receptor blockade
•Chronic UV causes dependency and “addiction”-like behavior
•Addiction-like behaviors require keratinocyte signaling and β-endorphin expression

_http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674%2814%2900611-4

I had a lot of muscular pain and i found significant release from exposure to sunlight. I wasn't sure if it was just the heat or something else, but it felt as though there was something 'other'.

According to the study, the reason is because UV activates (?) endorphins which in turn provide 'systemic analgesia' (pain relief).

So whilst it is interesting what we are discussing, i just would like to reiterate that the idea is that the skin behaves this way whether you like sunshine or not. I'm not discussing length of exposure, the differences for genetics or what time of the day is best, just that there was something to it and this could be helpful for anybody in a similar predicament as myself (all over muscular aches). Obviously your dislike of bright sunlight/heat/whatever can override any benefits - as Thor was alluding to.

I will look into this a bit more and see if i can find out information for what we are discussing in relation to any studies.

Overall though, there does appear to be a certain average which the great majority find 'pleasurable'.

It makes me think of when people were sent to the sea-side/highlands to recover from illness, though this was also due to the intense toxic pollution in English cities.

Reading through the transcripts i found this:

Laura said:
March 4, 1995

Frank, Laura, Terry and Jan, SV

Q: (L) It was stated that the earth once had a water vapor canopy. Was this one of the reasons for longevity in that time?

A: Yes, and already answered this. Review transcripts.

Q: (L) What are the effects of sunlight on the human body now as opposed to then?

A: Degenerative.

Q: (L) Does that mean that we should avoid sunlight because we no longer have our canopy?

A: You cannot avoid enough to matter.

Q: (T) It's everywhere, all day long. (F) When you are inside you are still exposed to radiation. The radiation in the air is leftover junk from the light rays coming in. (T) The radiation is everywhere, even at night. Speaking of which, did you see the article about the chunk of ice that broke off in Antarctica the size of Rhode Island. The scientists said: "We don't understand why." And Antarctica is where the major ozone hole has been for the last five years. (F) Well, they have been predicting that for years... (T) Hope it didn't fall on anybody's foot! (F) That would be heavy enough that you wouldn't feel it. (L) Has the woman, who is now known as Leah Haley, and I understand that she legally changed her name to protect her family, has she been harassed by the U.S. government, or it this a screen memory put in by aliens with concomitant confirmations?

So according to the C's, it is 'degenerative' but we should bear in mind a) Frank was involved b) this could be like smoking where it is beneficial at certain times for certain people, or it could even just be a generalisation that may agree with what many here are saying which is that they feel worse after exposure.

in addition, something i hadn't considered, as Thor said:
However, sunlight also contains Far Infrared Rays that have a very beneficial affect on the body - particularly the detox effects of using a Far Infra Red blanket as a detox method has been covered in many different threads on the forum

I have noticed that on the days the UV index is high, tolerance in direct sunlight is lessened. I think i read that, in general, white skin requires about 15 minutes a day (for vitamin D and to assist your circadian cycle) where as darker skin required about 5 - 10 minutes more.

Anyway, just wanted to add that. :)
 
I found this while browsing the net:
http://www.naturalnews.com/022315_cancer_skin_sunlight.html#
The time when one’s immediate natural impulse on the first sunny spring day was to get outside and enjoy it is long gone. Only the very courageous or “careless” who defy the grim warnings from medical mandarins and cancer specialists, wholeheartedly endorsed by the sunscreen industry, dare to venture forth into the “dangerous” sun. Unless they are covered head to toe with sun protection factor (SPF) 60, they gamble with their lives, or so they are made to believe, by those who serve their own vested interests. Fortunately, this view is beginning to crumble in the blatant absence of scientific proof that sunlight causes disease. What is being discovered instead is that lack of sun exposure is one of the greatest risk factors for disease. Very few people know that not getting enough sun kills 50,000 people from cancer deaths every year in the US alone. As shown later, these are deaths that are easily preventable through the Vitamin D produced by the body in response to regular sun exposure.

Unfortunately, it is the ultraviolet portion of sunlight that is the most easily eliminated by windows, houses, spectacles, sunglasses, sun lotions, and clothing. Before antibiotic drugs were discovered in the 1930s – penicillin having been the first one – the healing power of sunlight was favored by the medical community, at least in Europe. Sunlight therapy, called heliotherapy, was indeed considered to be the most successful treatment for infectious diseases from the late 19th to the mid-20th century. Studies revealed that exposing patients to controlled amounts of sunlight dramatically lowered elevated blood pressure (up to 40 mm Hg drop), decreased cholesterol in the bloodstream, lowered abnormally high blood sugar in diabetics, and increased the number of white blood cells, which people need to help resist disease. Patients suffering from gout, rheumatoid arthritis, colitis, arteriosclerosis, anemia, cystitis, eczema, acne, psoriasis, herpes, lupus, sciatica, kidney problems, asthma, and even burns, have all received great benefits from the healing rays of the sun.

The medical doctor and author, Dr. Auguste Rollier, was the most famous heliotherapist of his day. At his peak, he operated 36 clinics with over 1,000 beds in Leysin, Switzerland. His clinics were situated 5,000 feet above sea level, the high altitude allowing his patients to catch a lot more UV light than was possible at the lower levels of the atmosphere. Dr. Rollier used the UV rays of sunlight to treat diseases such as tuberculosis (TB), rickets, smallpox, lupus vulgaris (skin tuberculosis), and wounds. He followed in the footsteps of Danish physician Dr. Niels Finsen, who won a Nobel Prize in 1903 for his treatment of TB using ultraviolet light. Rollier found that sunbathing early in the morning, in conjunction with a nutritious diet, produced the best effects.

The miraculous complete cures of tuberculosis and other diseases facilitated by these doctors made headlines at the time. What surprised the medical community most was the fact that the sun’s healing rays remained ineffective if the patients wore sunglasses. [Sunglasses block out important rays of the light spectrum which the body requires for essential biological functions.] Note: your eyes receive these rays even if you are in the shade.

By the year 1933, there were over 165 different diseases for which sunlight proved to be a beneficial treatment. However, with the death of Rollier in 1954 and the growing power of the pharmaceutical industry, heliotherapy fell into disuse. By the 1960s, man-made “miracle drugs” had replaced medicine’s fascination with the sun’s healing powers, and by the 1980s the public was increasingly being bombarded with warnings about sunbathing and the risks of skin cancer.

Today, the sun is considered the main culprit for causing skin cancer, certain cataracts leading to blindness, and aging of the skin. Only those who take the “risk” of exposing themselves to sunlight find that the sun makes them feel better, provided they don’t use sunscreens or burn their skin. The UV-rays in sunlight actually stimulate the thyroid gland to increase hormone production, which in turn increases the body’s basal metabolic rate. This assists both in weight loss and improved muscle development. Farm animals fatten much faster when kept indoors, and so do people who stay out of the sun. Therefore, if you want to lose weight or increase your muscle tone, expose your body to the sun on a regular basis. The use of antibiotics, which has practically replaced heliotherapy, has in recent years led to the development of drug-resistant strains of bacteria, which defy any treatment other than the balanced use of sun, water, air, and food. Cutting out or substantially reducing any of these four essential constituents of life, results in disease.

Any person who misses out on sunlight becomes weak and suffers mental and physical problems as a result. His vital energy diminishes in due time, which is reflected in his quality of life. The populations in Northern European countries like Norway and Finland, which experience months of darkness every year, have a higher incidence of irritability, fatigue, illness, insomnia, depression, alcoholism, and suicide than those living in the sunny parts of the world. Their skin cancer rates are higher, too. For example, the incidence of melanoma (skin cancer) on the Orkney and Shetland Isles, north of Scotland, is 10 times that of Mediterranean islands.

UV light is known to activate an important skin hormone called solitrol. Solitrol influences our immune system and many of our body’s regulatory centers, and, in conjunction with the pineal hormone melatonin, causes changes in mood and daily biological rhythms. The hemoglobin in our red blood cells requires ultraviolet (UV) light to bind to the oxygen needed for all cellular functions. Lack of sunlight can, therefore, be held co-responsible for almost any kind of illness, including skin cancer and other forms of cancer. As you are about to find out, it may be highly detrimental to your health to miss out on sunlight.

Can UV-Radiation Prevent and Cure Skin Cancer?

A major concern of our scientists today is the dramatic increase of skin cancers around the world. There are three main types of skin cancer, two of which, basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma (non-melanomas), are increasingly prevalent, whereas the third, malignant melanoma, is much rarer but far more lethal. The most pressing question is why would the sun suddenly become so vicious and try to kill scores of people after thousands of years of harmlessness?

The medical community claims that ultraviolet light (UV) is the major cause of skin cancers. This theory is based on the assumption that our thinning ozone layer permits too much of the germicidal UV to penetrate to the surface of the earth and causes destruction of all kinds, including damage to our skin and eye cells. Yet the theory has major flaws and no scientific backing. Contrary to general belief, there is no evidence that reduction in the ozone layer, observed at the poles, has caused any increase in melanomas.

The germicidal frequency of UV is destroyed or is filtered out by the ozone layer in the Earth’s stratosphere, and only small amounts—necessary to purify the air we breathe and the water we drink— actually reach the surface of the earth. To that effect, a study of Punta Arenas, the largest South American city close to the Antarctic ozone hole, showed no increase in health problems related to depleted ozone. In fact, UV measures were too small to have any noticeable effect. Actual measurements taken in the United States since 1974 show that the amount of UV radiation reaching the surface of the earth is decreasing and continues to decrease slightly each year. This research was conducted to detect the frequency of UV radiation that causes sunburn. UV radiation had dropped an average of 0.7 percent per year over the period from 1974 to 1985 and continued to do so afterwards.

The fact that the number of skin cancers in the United States had doubled within this period of 11 years contradicts the theory that UV light is the reason behind the skin cancer epidemic. The number of malignant skin cancers (melanomas) discovered in 1980 in the United States was 8,000, and eight years later it had increased by 350 percent to 28,000. In 1930, the expectancy of developing melanoma was as low as 1 in 1,300 people. Since 2003, 45,000 to 50,000 new cases are diagnosed every year in the United States. Melanomas, which account for 75 percent of all skin cancer deaths, make up only 5 percent of all reported skin cancers. The most striking fact about this lethal form of cancer is that it can occur in parts of the body that are not necessarily exposed to the sun such as the eye, the rectum, vulva, vagina, mouth, respiratory tract, GI tract and urinary bladder.

Overall, since the beginning of the new millennium, each year one million Americans are being diagnosed with some form of skin cancer. There are millions of sufferers now, all of whom have been made to believe that the sun is the culprit for their skin diseases. But since UV radiation is decreasing every year and skin cancers were extremely rare 100 years ago when UV intensity was much higher and people spent much more time outdoors, what other factor could be held responsible for causing skin cancer?

The More UV, the Less Cancer

Even if UV penetration to the surface of the Earth did actually increase by, for example, one percent each year (which is not the case), such slight increases would still be hundreds, if not thousands, of times less than the normal variations which people experience because of differences in geography. Let’s assume that you move from an area near either one of the Polar Regions, e.g. Iceland or Finland, toward the equator, e.g. Kenya or Uganda in East Africa. By the time you reach the equator, you will have increased your body’s exposure to UV light by a whooping 5,000 percent! If you live in England and decide to move to Northern Australia you will increase your exposure by 600 percent! Calculations show that for every six miles you move closer to the equator, you increase your exposure to UV light by one percent.

Today, millions of people around the world travel from low exposure places to areas of high exposure near the equator. Many thousands of tourists travel to areas that are located at much higher altitudes than where they normally live. For every 100 feet of elevation there is a significant increase in UV radiation. But this does not prevent people from climbing mountains or living in countries like Switzerland or at the high altitudes of the Himalayan Mountains. According to the UV/cancer theory, most Kenyan, Tibetan, or Swiss residents should be afflicted with skin cancer today. Yet this is not the case at all. The fact is that those who reside at high altitudes or near the equator where UV radiation is the most concentrated are virtually free of all cancers, not just skin cancers! This shows that UV radiation does not cause cancer; in fact, it can even prevent it.

The human body has a unique ability to become accustomed to all kinds of variations in the environment. It is equipped with perfect self-regulating mechanisms that protect it against damage from the natural elements. Overexposure to swimming in the sea or in a lake can lead to extensive skin swelling, shivering, and circulatory problems. Our body will let us know when it is time to get out of the water. Getting too close to a fire will heat us up and encourage us to move away from it. Rainwater is natural, but standing in the rain for too long can drain our immune system and make us susceptible to catching a cold. Eating sustains our lives, but overeating can lead to obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Sleeping recharges our “batteries” and revitalizes the body and mind, yet too much of it makes us sluggish, depressed, and ill. Likewise, sunlight has healing properties unless we use it to burn holes into our skin. Why should any of these natural elements or processes cause us harm unless we abuse or overuse them?

Wouldn’t it make more sense to say that a preference for unnatural things like junk food, stimulants, alcohol, drugs, medical intervention (unless it is for an emergency), as well as pollution, irregular sleeping and eating habits, stress, excessive greed for money and power, and the lack of contact with nature, are more likely to cause such diseases as skin cancer and cataracts than natural phenomena that have ensured continued growth and evolution on the planet throughout the ages?

It is very encouraging to see that new treatments using light are increasingly being recognized as breakthrough methods for cancer and many other diseases. The US Food and Drug Administration recently approved “light therapy” to fight advanced esophageal cancer and early lung cancer—with fewer risks than are found with the use of surgery and chemotherapy. Although it has been known for over 100 years that light can kill diseased cells, it is only since a number of convincing research studies have been conducted that there has been a sudden resurgence of interest in light therapy. There is promising success with bladder cancer, infertility-causing endometriosis, advanced lung and esophageal cancers, skin cancer, and diseases leading to blindness, psoriasis, and autoimmune disorders. In one study, light therapy eliminated 79 percent of early lung cancers. Regular exposure to sunlight still seems to be one of the best measures one can take to prevent cancer, including cancers of the skin.

Now Even Doctors And Scientists Say, “It’s Not True!”

Like myself, there have always been some health practitioners who didn’t buy into the theory that the sun causes deadly diseases. It warms my heart to hear that now even some of the top authorities in the field are standing up for the truth, despite intense criticism from their colleagues. In an article written in the New York Times in August 2004, a high-profile dermatologist, Dr. Bernard Ackerman (a recent winner of the American Academy of Dermatology's prestigious, once-yearly Master Award), publicly questioned the commonly accepted assumption about the sunlight/melanoma link. According to Dr. Ackerman, who in 1999 founded the world's largest center for dermatopathology training, there is no proof whatsoever that sun exposure causes melanoma. To substantiate his arguments, he cites a recently published article in the Archives of Dermatology concluding that no evidence exists supporting the notion that sunscreen prevents melanoma, a claim the mega-million dollar sunscreen industry and those in the medical mainstream have falsely made for decades.

Dr. Ackerman didn’t stop at exposing this decades-long deception of the masses; he also cast doubt on the increase in the incidence of melanoma cases medical mainstream doctors insist is happening. He found that an expansion of the diagnostic definition of “melanoma” has allowed a much broader array of symptoms to be classified as the deadly disease compared to just 30 years ago. Melanoma has to a large extent “grown” to epidemic proportions because of statistical manipulations. In other words, if the same diagnostic definition applied 30 years ago were applied today, melanomas would have increased only insignificantly.

Furthermore, this respected physician challenged the medical mainstream to explain why nearly all cases of melanoma among certain races (black African, Asian and South American) occur in areas of the body that are almost never exposed to sunlight—places like the palms, soles of the feet, and mucous membranes. Should it not raise doubts among physicians and patients alike when even among pale-faces, the most common sites for melanoma (legs in women, torso in men) get significantly less sunlight exposure than other parts of the body? To make a point, based on this and other evidence, your best chance of avoiding melanoma is to move to areas of higher UV-concentration, such as mountainous regions or the equatorial tropics and become a nudist! Since sunlight boosts the immune system, you may find that such a move would also help with many other health issues from which you may be suffering. Naturally, all this data raises the question, what actually causes skin cancer? The answer may surprise you greatly.

More in the author's book, Timeless Secrets of Health and Rejuvenation, (www.amazon.com) or (www.ener-chi.com)


About the author

Andreas Moritz is a medical intuitive; a practitioner of Ayurveda, iridology, shiatsu, and vibrational medicine; a writer; and an artist. He is the author of the international bestseller, The Amazing Liver and Gallbladder Flush; Timeless Secrets of Health and Rejuvenation, Lifting the Veil of Duality, Cancer Is Not a Disease, It's Time to Come Alive, Heart Disease No More, Diabetes No More, Simple Steps to Total Health, Diabetes—No More, Ending the AIDS Myth. Feel Great - Lose Weight, Heal Yourself with Sunlight, and Vaccine-nation: Poisoning the Population, One Shot at a Time. For more information, visit the author's website: www.ener-chi.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/022315_cancer_skin_sunlight.html##ixzz38yd4gbXT

I thought it was quite interesting

And this wee one:
http://www.mindbodygreen.com/0-5999/10-Healing-Benefits-of-the-Sun.html

Atapa Snana is the yogic phrase for the healing science of sun bathing. We live in a modern world that is bombarded with paranoid messages about how dangerous the sun is. We should remember that the ancient yogis and many other cultures knew how to use the sun to heal all kinds of illnesses, and bring about radiant health.

In the West we also have a history of using sunlight therapy that dates back to the ancient Greeks. It was called heliosis. Today, the name for sunlight therapy is heliotherapy.

We evolved as a human race for millions of years under the warmth and love of the sun. Perhaps drenching ourselves in poisonous sunblock from head to toe is not the answer.

There are many worthwhile alternatives to sunblock. To read about them click here

Sunblock has many draw backs. Most brands are laden with toxic chemicals such as:
Oxybenzone, which is linked to hormone disruption and cell damage that may lead to skin cancer.
Retinyl palmitate, which has now been proven to be a carcinogen.
Octyl-methoxycinnamate causes oxidation damage of the skin, which ages your face.
Butyl-Methdiebenzoylmethane, which releases free radicals into the body.
Benzophenone 2 (BP2), decreases the function of the thyroid, in a population that is already seriously suffering from hypothyroidism (under active).
Furthermore, sunblock stops the sun's ultra violet rays from creating Vitamin D in the body, which is essential for many functions such as:
bone health
anti-cancer
supports the immune system
protects against dementia and brain aging
good for loosing excess fat
essential for decreasing symptoms of asthma
strengthens teeth
We are making a whole generation Vitamin D deficient with fear of the sun.

Ultra Violet light is just one frequency of light; there are eight others - infrared, and the seven spectrums of visible light. Each one has its own unique healing power!

Here are 10 benefits of getting a moderate amount of sun exposure:

1. Sunlight and whole foods send breast cancer into remission. The American physician Dr. Zane Kime used sunbathing and nutrition to cure his patients. Even in terminal cases, Dr. Kime was able to completely reverse the metastasized cancer.

2. The sun's light kills bad bacteria. The German solders after WWI knew of the discoveries that had been made in 1903 by the Nobel Prize winner, Niels Finsen. They used sunlight to disinfect and heal wounds.

3. Sunlight has a beneficial effect on skin disorders, such as psoriasis, acne, eczema and fungal infections of the skin.

4. Sunlight lowers cholesterol. The sun converts high cholesterol in the blood into steroid hormones and the sex hormones we need for reproduction. In the absence of sunlight, the opposite happens; substances convert to cholesterol.

5. The sun's rays lower blood pressure. Even a single exposure significantly lowers blood pressure in individuals with high blood pressure. On the other hand, pharmaceutical drugs such as Statins have side effects, such as robbing the body of Coenzyme Q10. CoQ10 is essential for cellular and heart energy.

6. Sunlight penetrates deep into the skin to cleanse the blood and blood vessels. Medical literature published in Europe showed that people with atherosclerosis (hardened arteries) improved with sun exposure.

7. Sunlight increases oxygen content in human blood. And, it also enhances the body's capacity to deliver oxygen to the tissues; very similar to the effects of exercise. The sun has a great effect on stamina, fitness and muscular development.

8. Sunlight builds the immune system. The white blood cells, which increase with sun exposure, are called lymphocytes, and these play a major role in defending the body against infections.

9. Regular sunlight exposure increases the growth and height of children, especially babies. Many cultures throughout history have recognized this fact. Studies have shown the amount of sun exposure in the first few months has an effect on how tall the person grows.

10. Sunlight can cure depression. The noon sunshine can deliver 100,000 lux. When we sit in offices for the best part of the day, out of the sun, under neon and artificial lights (150-600 lux), we are depriving ourselves of the illumination of nature. Sunlight deprivation can cause a condition called seasonal affective disorder (SAD), a form of depression. It is more common in winter months, but also common in people who work long hours in office buildings.

Exposure to the sun should be done SLOWLY! If you are not used to the sun, then your skin will be more sensitive to it. Avoid sunburn by building up your tolerance SLOWLY.
 
By the year 1933, there were over 165 different diseases for which sunlight proved to be a beneficial treatment. However, with the death of Rollier in 1954 and the growing power of the pharmaceutical industry, heliotherapy fell into disuse. By the 1960s, man-made “miracle drugs” had replaced medicine’s fascination with the sun’s healing powers, and by the 1980s the public was increasingly being bombarded with warnings about sunbathing and the risks of skin cancer.


This is somewhat off topic, but another thing that might be of interest, is the idea that it is not so much actual sunlight that is important, as much as the "vibration" or frequencies contained in sunlight.
For instance the idea of growing plants in total darkness, as long as they are connected to a wire leading to a copper plate outside in direct sunlight, is quite fascinating.



Cosmiculture
Dr Thomas G. Hieronymous

Dr Thomas put a thin copper plate on the roof of his house.
Connected wires to the copper plate and ran the wires down to his basement.

He connected the wires to a small piece of copper and put it in some dirt.
Then he put a zinc rod on the dirt too and connected the copper rod with a small piece of string.

The vibration of the sun filled the copper plate.... traveled down the wires into his PITCH BLACK basement... and the seeds he put in the dirt all grew as if they had sunlight.
Plants don't need the light... they need the VIBRATION!



Thomas G. Hieronymous discovered that a plant can be grown in complete darkness indoors if it is connected by an insulated wire to a large metal surface that is exposed to sunlight. The plant must be at least 6 feet above ground and insulated to generate a voltage potential or antenna effect. The optimal size of the metal sheet must be determined by experiment so as to avoid sunburn (too large) or yellowing (too small).
Plants cultivated in this manner will develop normally, while control plants (those not wired) will be stunted.

Dr. Wilhelm Reich (of Orgone fame) also found that plants could be grown without light if they were grown with magnetite that had been exposed to sunlight. The magnetite absorbs and reradiates solar energies that are utilized by plants.
 
About sunlight fatigue. My mother recalls a time when she would faint in the sunlight, had no energy, etc. She realized her diet had practically no salt. Once she bought some salt and started using it, the problem stopped.

I live in Texas where the sun is absurdly strong and the hills often turn completely brown as the grass dies from the heat and drought. Throughout my childhood here I was always lethargic and felt terrible in the heat. I trained myself to move in such a way that I wouldn't sweat, even while wearing a leather jacket. Of course it helped that I was usually dehydrated and had an electrolyte deficiency for sure. But if you are hot but not sweating, you are overheating internally.

After finding the health information on this forum I started to put 1/2tsp of sea salt in my mouth and chug it with a glass of water whenever I felt the effects of the heat. This stopped the lethargic feeling and I was able to go out in the sunlight and not feel fatigued. Just recently I was able to try out Celtic sea salt (as opposed to Real Salt) and the difference was surprising. It is the only brand of sea salt I've used that actually causes me to sweat. Using Celtic sea salt I can go out into the sun at the hottest part of the day and work for hours without any loss in energy.

Also - wasn't there some speculation that dark-skinned people had some ability to harvest energy directly from sunlight? It was many years ago and I don't know how to find that article again. I only found this, which is questionable - however it's interesting how the pineal gland is related to melanin production and that a calcified pineal gland can cause problems with this:

_http://www.modernghana.com/news/297269/1/why-the-sun-is-good-for-afrikan-people-dr-kwame-os.html

What if problems with our reaction to sunlight can be related to a calcified pineal gland? If the cause of this is fluoride, then the solution would be to find the right water filter (distillation or reverse-osmosis). Also, a dilute solution of boric acid (boron supplement) is said to detox fluoride and decalcify the pineal gland in cases where a boron deficiency is the cause of the body being unable to move calcium where it needs to be or to eliminate fluoride:

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?action=post;quote=462964;topic=9004.50;last_msg=475858

A Jay said:
So the difference between the two before electric lights was the lark going to bed at 8 and waking at 5 and the owl going to bed at 10 and waking at 7?

That's not much of a difference at all.

You are strangely misinterpreting what the article said. Read it carefully. Based on the article the number you're thinking of is actually 12 hours which is enormous.
 
Here's something I had never heard of until recently.

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crepuscular]Crepuscular[/url] said:
Etymology and usage
The word crepuscular is derived from the Latin crepusculum, meaning "twilight". Its sense accordingly differs from diurnal and nocturnal behavior, which respectively peak during hours of daylight and dark. The distinction is not absolute however, because crepuscular animals may also be active on a bright moonlit night or on a dull day. The use of the terms is often careless; for example, some animals that are casually described as nocturnal are in fact crepuscular.

Special classes of crepuscular behaviour include matutinal (or "matinal") and vespertine, denoting species active only in the dawn or only in the dusk, respectively. Those that are active during both morning and evening twilight are said to have a bimodal activity pattern.

[...]

A number of familiar mammal species are crepuscular, including some bats, hamsters, housecats, stray dogs, rabbits, ferrets, guinea pigs, and rats. Other crepuscular mammals include ocelots, prosimians, red pandas, bears, deer, moose, chinchillas, the common mouse, skunks, Australian wombats, wallabies, quolls, possums and marsupial gliders, spotted hyenas, bobcats, tenrecidae, capybaras, African wild dogs, sitatunga, and the extinct Tasmanian tiger. Crepuscular birds include the Common Nighthawk, Owlet-nightjar, Chimney Swift, American Woodcock, and Spotted Crake.

Many moths, beetles, flies, and other insects are crepuscular and in particular, vespertine.
 
Briefly in response to monotonic and the copper. It reminded me of Viktor Schauberger (inventor).

_http://www.permaculture-wales.org.uk/index.php/guest-writers/156-copper-tools-and-the-legacy-of-viktor-schauberger
" Decay is associated with heat, which is why compost heaps get hot. Growth, in his view, happens in cool conditions. From this perspective, copper is in many ways the opposite of iron, and so he considered it as a possible alternative material for agricultural implements. It doesn’t spark and causes less friction than iron. Copper can occur in its native form in the earth, whereas iron does not; it has to be smelted from ores. Iron or steel, therefore, have a proneness to decay which copper does not. And if you want young plants to grow, he reasoned, why cultivate the soil with a material that invites decay?

The idea was the tools didn't 'cut' the earth which meant it was more resilient to pests and the yields would be higher. So perhaps there's something to the resonance (?) of copper and sunlight? (a wild guess)
 
Back
Top Bottom