Tried both, I prefer slow cooking (I use a regular pot on a gas stove). Not much difference in my case, but somehow I feel the broth is richer doing it the slow way, tho I only used the pressure cooker for about an hour so perhaps it wasn't long enough. Also, I'm a bit nervous around the pressure cooker, even tho realistically it shouldn't explode, I just don't trust the damn thing. I cook mine for about 24 hours.SummerLite said:Hello! I have a few questions and if you have any answers I'd appreciate a little advise. I'm getting ready to make my first bone broth. On this topic, I see most people here are using a slow cooker. There is some talk of using a pressure cooker but not to much. For those who have tried both methods, do you have a preference and why? At what length of time cooking do the bones disintegrate in the pressure cooker? Times given here span 2 to 4 hours. Is there a difference in taste? Maybe the slow cooker tastes better. Is time the only factor here? I'm leaning toward the pressure cooking method because its so fast. Is the amount of water added the same as the slow cooker?
I constantly keep adding water as it evaporates. I don't think this changes the broth in any way, I think only water is evaporating but everything else stays in the pot, so you're just replacing lost water. I use distilled water in the broth, it makes it very clean and perhaps even helps extract more minerals from the bones because distilled water is mineral-free itself.I also see some make enough broth for a whole week. I can't understand how that much can be made while only using 3 marrow, beef bones for instance with a inch of water above the bones. Maybe more bones(or BIG bones) and a bigger pot are used. In a slow cooker water needs to be added sometimes I assume. Hopefully that doesn't dilute the broth because its condensed somewhat.
Yup you can adjust that to taste. I do like mine fatty, but some prefer it more watered down. I also sometimes chop up some boiled eggs and put them into a broth (during serving) to eat it like a soup. If the said 84 year old isn't used to a high fat diet, I'd go slow with the broth at first - let her adjust to high fat content so she can tolerate it better, then she can have bigger servingsAlso, I have a friend who is 84 years old and could really use some good nutrition. The broth with the dissolved bone may be to strong for her I'm considering. I suppose just adding extra water to her cup would thin that out.
Also, generally it's not a good idea to mix fat with carbs. Carbs are bad, but I think they're even worse when combined with high fat. So some broth is always good - but be careful with too much fat if she's on a carby diet. If she's willing to fully switch diets, it's best for you (and possibly her) to read the diet-related books and be very well-versed in potential problems and how to prevent them. At her age her body is slow to adapt to new things, and you have to keep in mind any existing health conditions as well. Basically there's a lot to consider and it should be approached carefully. But without major diet changes, it's probably safe to add some broth, in reasonable quantities.