Laura said:
At the hyperdimensional levels of being, negative entities understand certain rules which are that, in order for them to 'dominate' truly, the other must 'choose' to be dominated.
p249
The logical extension of this idea is that if the true negative agenda is to 'dominate' our reality, the only way they can really do it from those realms ... is to manipulate the mass conscienceness of our planet to choose this domination.
...agenda & mode of operation of the hyperdimensional controllers of the matrix... to create a completely artificial environment composed of thoroughly predictable human behaviors - made predictable because they have been programmed to respond to the cues of conditioning.
Read that on the flight this morning and it 'clicked.' That's me, and likely the whole rest of our species though the specifics as to how will vary from individual to individual. My 'social program' was fined tuned to include all the justifications and rationalizations thus displayed. Therefore to focus or dwell on those issues as opposed to seeing the deeper reality - that of choice, responsibility & 'intentional suffering' is to lie to myself, to accept the domination willingly, to choose STS.
p 113
A: Oh terry, the battle is always, it's when you choose that counts.
On one hand this was all known, I've read it all before & I've been told it repeatedly and I've always accepted it as truth. I think it's kinda how the C's will deliberately remain vague if someone isn't ready to hear something, my mind subconsciously selected the bits and pieces of the data I wanted to hear. It's only when we're ready to see it that a concept unveils itself, becoming awareness which is rooted in prior knowledge, thus yielding us the free will to choose an alternative. It's amazing how when I read ponerology I knew other people subconsciously selected and substituted data, but I had no inkling that I was doing it. In retrospect it's amazing how I missed it: being raising in America I'm ponerized, so all the descriptions he uses are equally applicable to myself as others.
Self-importance is also connected in a major way, and a lesson of mine has been non-interference in the lessons of others. I can't stand to see my friends and loved ones suffer.
Laura said:
p 155 We think our emotional reactions to the cruelties of others is evidence of our 'spiritual nature.'
Though here she's referring to her emotional reactions to Frank's manipulations it's as if I can see myself in her shoes, my drama a crude facsimile of hers. Instead of my desire to help others being a virtue, as I had believed, it is merely my own desire to be a Hero, driven by my narcissism, ego and self-importance. No doubt cartoons, movies and books were used to install the programming and I gobbled it all up.
By being around my friends, who obviously have no inclination for spiritual growth - and hoping to 'rub off ' or otherwise 'influence by association' I'm feeding their descent into STS. Only by dissociating and allowing them to learn their lessons at their own pace - can I truly help them a la STO. Further, by increasing my own free will I increase free will for all others.
p158 said:
Q: When you give pity, when you send love & light to those in darkness, or those who complain and want to be 'saved' without effort on their own part, when you are kind in the face of abuse and manipulation, that you essentially are giving power to their further disintegration or contraction into selfishness? that you are powering their descent into STS?
A: You know the answer!
Q: Yes. I have seen it over and over again. Were the individuals in our lives chosen for the extremely subtle nature of their abilities to evoke pity, or were we programmed to respond to pity so that we were blind to something that was obvious to other people?
A: Neither. You were selected to interact with those who would trigger a hypnotic response that would ultimately lead to a drain in energy.
Thus it is clear that, for my situation, I need to divorce myself from all my 'friends' that 'trigger a hypnotic response leading to a drain in energy,' unfortunately there are many more of them then I wanted to consider such. Since I am aware of it, and they are not, I have to be the 'adult' and say 'no.' What I've been doing is to turn off my phone during times I can expect them to call, this was fairly effective last week after I got shocked, but by no means did I succeed 100% of the time. As I'm in Albuquerque for the weekend it will give me time to pause, reflect and read - giving me awareness and thus a smidge of free will to endure solitude when I return, osit. There's also the question as to how to do it strategically, I've had some excuses lined up - I was sleeping/reading/my phone was on silent - and those work for now.
Either the challenge will be doing this in PA or moving to Albuquerque & remaining aware of it as the matrix introduces new 'hypnotic vectors.' I'm not even sure if my suppositions are accurate, or if they're still the ravings of a machine with which everything 'happens'. I guess the question is how one makes the jump from being a machine to acquiring free will? I've supposed it is gathering knowledge that yields awareness and thus giving you the 'choice' to stop 'dancing with the devil' so to speak. I guess only time will tell.
SAO said:
We can only be mechanical as long as we're still not aware of what we really are. You think you're aware because you read Gurdjieff and this site, but you're not, "awareness" is different than casual acknowledgment because it makes sense. Awareness requires active and conscious SEEing, only then can you say you are aware. But SEEing forces you to DO, and this is what we're so afraid of.
Is it sort of like the scenario I have described? Where the choice is revealed?
SAO said:
Then there is the flip-side to delusion of being more than you really are - we are attached to our own fears and "imperfections". Self-pity is the flip-side of self-importance, and is used for the same kinds of lies and rationalizations. In your case Cyre, it would be when you use something like "I felt like an outcast" as an excuse to rationalize any of your actions. You do "stuff", you have no idea why you do any of it, so you grasp for plausible-sounding rationalizations to try to explain the stuff you do. You still have no idea why you do it - but you cling to those lies/explanations because you WANT them to be true, otherwise you'd have to admit that you have no idea what you're doing or why, that you're just following mechanical urges without any deeper meaning or reason whatsoever. And this is exactly what those sheep are doing - they cannot accept that they are a bunch of sheep eating grass and absolutely NOTHING more than that. They simply cannot, otherwise they'd be forced to change. But they don't have the will to change, they are too comfortable with the lies, the truth is much too "painful" as it requires too much of them.
Pity me! I'm an outcast! Heh, it's kind of apropos that Laura writes alienation in book 6:
Laura p126 said:
The questions "what is an alienated person?" and "what is the philosophical significance of alienation?" are two entirely different order of questions, and a failure to recognize this fact breeds confusion. What is this thing that SETI is calling "alienation?" How does it come about? What is its constitution, origin and history? What is the importance of alienation?
First of all, we want to exclude what may be truly 'pathological alienation', which expresses itself as destructive acts undertaken against the shortcomings of our culture. These destructive acts can include felonious behavior as well as self-destructive processes, including self-medicated escape into drugs and alcohol, magical thinking, etc. Here we are interested in alienation as a process of expanding the dictionary of reality from the juvenile dictionary (to) one that defines our environment. Do we view our reality as a Cartoon World where all the characters suffer all kinds of dreadful experiences which are instantly erased from view and memory in the next frame, or, have we acquired a more spiritually adult perception of the realities of life that tell us that when a huge boulder is dropped on the character, he will be crushed and will not reappear in the next frame without a wrinkle or a bruise. Are we living our lives as Comic Book Characters, or as Response-Able Perceivers of a broader reality?
The answer to the first question - what is an alienated person - amounts to an existential judgment. How a person becomes "Alienated" can simply be a matter of historical fact. We can learn the facts of that person's life, and we can learn what that person thinks from what they say or write. Based on this information, we may decide that they are alienated because they have suffered trauma.
The answer to the second - what is the philosophical significance - is a proposition of value; in other words, a spiritual judgment. What alienation ultimately means in this sense can only be deduced in terms of the record of the inner experiences of the soul wrestling with the crises of fate.
So my alienation was pathological, the way I deal was to seek friends and self medicate, whether it be with alcohol, movies, video games or simply hanging out pretending we're all 'hot stuff.' - Triggering hypnotic responses that ultimately lead to a drain in energy.
She continues and on p 131 we see that:
The alienated person has extarordinary emotional susceptibility. HIs conceptions tend to pass immediately into action; and when he gets a new idea, he has no rest until he either tells it, or 'works it off.' The ordinary person asks 'what shall i think of this?' The alienated person asks 'What must I do about it?' Such people are not critics and commentators; their ideas take hold of them, and they do something.
In the alienated person, we find the emotionality that is the condito sine qua non of the moral perceptionl there is intensity and a tendency to emphasis which are the essence of moral vigor and virtue; and we find the love of mystiscism and metaphysics that lift the person beyond the surface of the ordinary world of the five senses. In short, the alienated temperament furnishes the chief condition of receptivity to higher states of being.
C's: Emotion that limits is an impediment to progress. Emotion is also necessary to make progress in 3rd density. It is natural. When you begin to seperate limiting emotions base don assumptions from emotions that open one to unlimited possibilities, that means you are preparing for the next density.
Thus I'm charged with separating my feelings of deficiency, in adequacy etc. to those that lead me towards actions which can benefit the species. Empathy, sympathy, love for all those who suffer and the will to do that comes with it, osit.
SAO said:
You cannot SEE and not DO. If you SEE you must DO. But DOing will destroy you - will destroy everything you "think" you are. This is a very horrible proposition to your mechanical self - which at the moment is all that you are. It is extremely easy to underestimate just how bad of a proposition it is, and how much power your mechanical self has over every aspect of your being - your thoughts, feelings, actions.
That's it exactly. I want to destroy my mechanical self, to 'die' metaphorically speaking so I can be a 'real boy.' It is interesting to observe myself when I turn off my phone. How many times I feel empty & alone. How I pity myself! And then to catch that feeling and to stare at it unblinking and to know it is 'not real' just as I am not real. It always amazes me how strange the goings on of this place are, and how that feeling catches me at seemingly random times.
SAO said:
I think part of the problem here is you reading the cassiopaea website and participating in this forum. It gave you a false sense of security...
Thats definitely a part of it. But more then that, I convinced myself I was 'capped' by not being in the discussion group, and in a sense I was, but in another I have the forum and I haven't been utilizing it as a surrogate as much as I should have, osit.
Ruth said:
Could it be the commonalities that drives a person to form friendships with other people or to hang out with certain people?
Oh but of course! However I think that the 'hypnotic response that ultimately leads to a drain in energy' is more the deeper reality behind it.
Hope that gives an indication of where I'm at, to everyone else that replied thanks for your thoughts, I'm considering everything said carefully.