The "Rational Male and Female"? - Biology and Programs in Relationships

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Why did my girlfriend dump me, then want me back two weeks later, only to dump me again?

Probably because she knows deep inside that it isn't going to work, but she is emotionally attached and tried again, but came to the same realization.

The girl I'm dating cancels our dates at the last minute sometimes, but everything seems fine when we do go out, but she does not want to step up our relationship and we have been dating 3 months. Why?

Because she knows deep inside that there's no THERE there, and really, you are just a casual "occupation". Find someone else.

I have been dating this girl for 6 months, She has not invited me out socially with her friends or her family, but she spends a lot of time going out with her friends without me, why?

Because she's not that interested; you are just a side occupation; find someone else and stop being a weenie.

Thats funny, I could swear this woman is flirting with me and wants me to ask her out, but she's in a relationship, why? what should I do?

You are probably delusional; but in case she IS flirting with you, is it just casual or friendly, or is it serious? You don't really need to know. If it is serious, she's not worth your time; if she would cheat on her partner, she would cheat on you.

Why is this girl I just met, giving me a hard time about the clothes I'm wearing? Why is she even talking to me if she doesn't like me?

Who cares? If she gives you a hard time about anything, she's not for you; find someone else.

Why does Tomasi recommend younger guys spin plates? I thought guys should only date one girl at a time, It does not seem noble to date more than one girl at a time, why?, how can she be "special" If doing so? Whats the reasoning behind this?

Because Tomasi is promoting a pathological lifestyle.

Why does my girlfriend "bug" me about being in too good of shape?

Who cares? If it bothers you, talk to her about it directly and tell her so. If she doesn't agree to stop, find someone else.

I know this woman is married, I have seen her with her husband and young daughter, why is it I feel like she's coming onto me?

You are probably delusional; but in case she is flirting with you, ignore her; if she would cheat on her partner, she would cheat on you. Find someone else to fixate on.

After a month into a relationship, why does she ask me what my idea of a perfect woman is?

Maybe she is thinking about being serious and is testing the waters. Tell her frankly.
 

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Well this thread is off the rails now, IMHO. The title of the tread has been changed, and It seems that the people most unfamiliar with Tomasi's material, and other information in the "manosphere" have the strongest opinions against Tomosi. In my view, this thread has disintegrated and has become everything this forum strives to be against. Where is the attitude of digging through the "FACTS", no matter how uncomfortable, and get as close as we can to the truth? The thread has expanded into other issues which is great, But labeling Tomasi as a psychopath, is an easy way to disregard everything he says as a personal attack. The fact's Tomasi, and others in the manosphere talk about need to be looked at honestly and fairly before "judgement". If one digs down far enough into the manosphere, there is a positive message for men, one of hope, self improvement, confidence, how to have stronger more fufiling relationships with women, and how to choose women based on virtue instead of looks for example. Women who have integrity, virtue , and capability, do not need to be afraid of the manoshpere.

In my view, people who manage to find this forum and Laura's work have a higher amount of integrity than the average person in society, so it can be hard to relate to the average narcissistic person in society, and especially the dating/hook up culture that 20'ish year olds find themselves in. I have a number of 20'ish year old friends, and it is very surprising what is considered normal now.
So, it "went off the rails" because I entered the discussion and gave my considered opinion and view which is, apparently, quite opposed to your own? And yet, as you point out, this IS a forum where people come because of my work.... isn't that a bit contradictory?

There is just so much wrong with Tomassi that it's not worth the time and effort to weed through it. He appeals to a certain "loser type" of male and he does that deliberately to make money; it's that simple.
 

nature

Jedi Council Member
furryfrog,
I lived many years with a psychopath, a smart and successfull one. I can say you that he is very keen on making others admire him, follow him, listen to his advices. How is it possible? He uses truths (or at least ideologies widely admitted, even if not really morals ones) that make weird or amoral ideas passing very easily. Also, they seem to be "philosophical" with beautiful words: excellent in the form (surface) but empty in their bottom.
A smart psychopath is also charming. You have to look at the hole picture (cf Cs: paying attention right and left) in order to spot him/her.
 
Last edited:
I disagree, for me the conversation turned even more interesting. What happened is precisely what you say didn't happen, which is a process of digging through the facts, no matter how uncomfortable, and get as close as we can to the truth.
I did say the conversation had good interesting content. (I now realize we are in the work thread, I did not before, my mistake)I am saying people are shaming Tomasi personally, and then henceforth disregarding all the Material he presents, It leaves an impression that the material is not even worth looking into, I believe the material is worth looking into, especially for men, young men specifically. Perhaps not specifically for the "Work" though.


You see, this is what is most valuable about this discussion, the process of distilling the information presented and see what amount of value does it really have. And maybe you can indeed find some value in it, as many others did here, but it seems to me that everything that was added throughout this thread brings the necessary nuance and deeper understanding which apparently seems to be lacking in Tomassi's ideas (I don't know because I haven't read the books).
I agree it is a valuable discussion, just not valuable in the practical sense related to Tomasi work. it is not analyzing specific ideas or behaviors he presents, to give them validity or not.

I've been thinking about this thread a lot too, and what I said that there was no point in focusing on how detrimental it is for others to read or not and realised that I was wrong. I still think it might be innocent compared to other things, but I also have never seen this so called "menosphere" or those "red pillers" before, so maybe I'm blind to the influence they actually have.
Tomasi's work has a big influence in the manosphere, I am not trying to throw a curve ball to you or anyone else, but the manosphere is a good resource as well. The Manosphere is growing and covers a wide range of topics, beliefs, education, self improvement, diet ect. It also includes shallow/ vain topics, negative outlook areas. You can't put the manosphere in a nutshell, even the sub topics like MGTOW are very broad in themselves. I wish this information was available when I was a young lad, for example leading your life with a stoic outlook , confidence building, Tomasi's work ect.I have had a lot of time on my hands this last year because of illness, and have spent a lot of time in the manosphere, mostly youtube, I was too sick to read, Im much better now. [/QUOTE]

So, while I was searching the book, I found a downloadable folder which supposedly encompassed all the "red piller's books". Well, it was a compendium on how to get a woman, take her to bed, and all that... so that's what's most important to them? I mean, if you share a folder with the top 100 books you think men should read and 98% are about how to get a woman (I say 98% because they also had "The Art of War", by Lao Tzu and the first book by Tomassi, being discussed here -- aaand someone was apparently questioning why "The Art of War" was even there), then there's something not-so-red-piller about this, I think.
Sounds like Pick up artist material. (PUA) That material is in the manosphere, and I have watched some presentations on the topic. It never was something I was into, nor am I now, too old anyway,lol. I have looked into it superficially though and do remember It having something interesting that grabbed my attention. One particular presenter, at the end said something like "whats the point, is this just a shallow and vain exercise?" The presenter went on to explain, before he got into PUA he lacked confidence, and could not emotionally express himself, he could not even tell his mother he loved her. I remember asking myself if this idea could be useful for the work, and I think it has some merrit. Imagine a 22 year old super shy guy, starts talking to a girl and loses control of all his centers. body on auto pilot, head down, emotional center nervous, And his mind stuffed full of inner considering. Not saying his aim should be to bed girls, but getting a shy guy to the point when hes comfortable talking to women marks great progress. I have incorporated this Idea into my work philosophy.

So I had to ask myself if I would want my nephew to read this kind of books when he becomes a teenager/young adult and realised that, even though he will most likely read some of that as any other teenager, I would rather recommend other books/information if he ever asked me about relationships. Of course, some of it seems to be quite informative and has been for me, but I was also wondering, what part of it so far was informative (considering that I haven't read the book yet)? The thing about hypergamy and the fact that we have biological drives? Ok... Oxajil posted another 'basic' book from which we could get similar information about hypergamy, and others posted other sources of information and comments that were very helpful as well... so it doesn't seem like this guy is the only source of information about this kind of 'biologically-driven' strategy and what was actually the most helpful was the discussion it prompted.
I wished my uncle gave me the books, or familiarized me with the material. I think you nephew should familiarize himself with Tomasi's work and other material in the manosphere, like the dangers of getting into porn, emotional downside of having a large sexual history, not to lose confidence and self worth when your a 19-20 years old male in the dating world ect.

Yet, to think about how can the particular message delivered by this man and those 'red pillers' influence society in the sense that it foments division and putting in the context of how it seems to be similar to feminism, or the other side of the same coin, and how it seems to reduce all things to a very simplistic set of 'rules' which don't really reflect the complexity of the topic, brings a much broader and useful perspective... OSIT.
The manosphere is so big we could find parts that will both agree and disagree with you. I think the sexes have been divided before I arrived in this world.Personally, I won't follow the information like a cooking manual and baking a cake with my head down, when I get my health back perhaps I will start dating and use the information to help avoid energy draining relationships. Or when a confused guy at the gym brings up his relationship problems, I likely won't have to guess whats going on.

Finally, just something I thought while reading your questions furryfrog. Considering all that has been said here so far, don't you think that there are many different possible answers to those questions? Of course, Tomassi's material can give some possible answers, but would you accept them as the only possible truth knowing just how complex we are as human beings and that there are indeed many, many things which can influence the behaviour of a particular person in those specific contexts?
Most of those questions have straightforward explanations, the spinning plates one i would say is more variable, but the underlying reason for it is important. I would not say they are the only possible truth, some more than others.

I suppose that it isn't reassuring to think about this complexity, but that's after all our reality and you yourself said that this is what this forum is all about: coming as close to the truth as possible no matter how uncomfortable. And that is the danger in sources that simplify this complexity as if they are the only truth, they can give some comfort, but they can also misguide because in many cases, it might be the wrong explanation which will likely lead to the wrong action in response to a situation. Isn't it probably better to communicate as sincerely as possible with as much care as possible and try and figure out together with the other person what's really happening? Does Tomassi's material encourage that type of thing?
This is a great comment, I agree, and the question at the end is a good one too.! Tomasi's advice more revolves around leading by example. If you want to get your wife to lose a few pounds, get yourself in shape first, then it may inspire your wife to get healthy. He mentions talking about an issue like this can be difficult and risky. Some in the manosphere will suggest to bring it up with your wife right away before it gets out of hand. My view would be it depends on the people involved, and communication is always important, but you can't go wrong with leading by example, if that does not work, start the discussion.

Of course, some of the contexts you ask about don't allow for such communication to happen, but then again, are we talking about long term relationships or just flirting around?
Depending on the scenario, some just talking or flirting, but the dating ones, most guys would view as long term or potential long term relationships.
 

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
I am saying people are shaming Tomasi personally, and then henceforth disregarding all the Material he presents, It leaves an impression that the material is not even worth looking into, I believe the material is worth looking into, especially for men, young men specifically. Perhaps not specifically for the "Work" though.
Tomasi deserves "shaming". Sheesh, what a Lefty/Libtard thing to worry about! Based on the clues, he is very likely pathological and if you've read Ponerology, you should know how his influence on others will turn out.

I'm not "leaving an impression", I'm stating clearly that his material is not worth looking into mainly because it is corrupt and the average person cannot defend their minds against ponerological influences of this type. Again, read Ponerology.

If you think it is worth looking into, "especially for young men", then I'm afraid that you are exhibiting signs of the first criterion for ponerogenesis:

"One phenomenon all ponerogenic groups and associations have in common is the fact that their members lose (or have already lost) the capacity to perceive pathological individuals as such, interpreting their behavior in a fascinated, heroic, or melodramatic way. The opinions, ideas, and judgments of people carrying various psychological deficits are endowed with an importance at least equal to that of outstanding individuals among normal people. The atrophy of natural critical faculties with respect to pathological individuals becomes an opening to their activities, and, at the same time, a criterion for recognizing the association in concern as ponerogenic. Let us call this the first criterion of ponerogenesis."

The only thing that Tomassi will achieve is a concentration of individuals with various psychopathologies.
 
Last edited:

Joe

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
I did say the conversation had good interesting content. (I now realize we are in the work thread, I did not before, my mistake)I am saying people are shaming Tomasi personally, and then henceforth disregarding all the Material he presents, It leaves an impression that the material is not even worth looking into, I believe the material is worth looking into, especially for men, young men specifically. Perhaps not specifically for the "Work" though.
It doesn't apply to the 'Work' because it is based in an oversimplified mechanistic approach to relationships. It provides a set of rules that you apply in order to 'control' the relationship. For the very same reason, it is not good for young men, or old for that matter.

It is very appealing to people who do not want to do the hard work of understanding another person and giving what is needed, and it is especially appealing to men because many men have little to no understanding of their own emotional make up much less that of others. This is not a good thing for young men starting out in relationships. Yes, it gets the woman on their 'hook', but they are taught to keep her there. That is not a good relationship by any TRULY rational understanding of the word.
 
Last edited:

Pierre

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Why did my girlfriend dump me, then want me back two weeks later, only to dump me again?

Probably because she knows deep inside that it isn't going to work, but she is emotionally attached and tried again, but came to the same realization.

The girl I'm dating cancels our dates at the last minute sometimes, but everything seems fine when we do go out, but she does not want to step up our relationship and we have been dating 3 months. Why?

Because she knows deep inside that there's no THERE there, and really, you are just a casual "occupation". Find someone else.

I have been dating this girl for 6 months, She has not invited me out socially with her friends or her family, but she spends a lot of time going out with her friends without me, why?

Because she's not that interested; you are just a side occupation; find someone else and stop being a weenie.

Thats funny, I could swear this woman is flirting with me and wants me to ask her out, but she's in a relationship, why? what should I do?

You are probably delusional; but in case she IS flirting with you, is it just casual or friendly, or is it serious? You don't really need to know. If it is serious, she's not worth your time; if she would cheat on her partner, she would cheat on you.

Why is this girl I just met, giving me a hard time about the clothes I'm wearing? Why is she even talking to me if she doesn't like me?

Who cares? If she gives you a hard time about anything, she's not for you; find someone else.

Why does Tomasi recommend younger guys spin plates? I thought guys should only date one girl at a time, It does not seem noble to date more than one girl at a time, why?, how can she be "special" If doing so? Whats the reasoning behind this?

Because Tomasi is promoting a pathological lifestyle.

Why does my girlfriend "bug" me about being in too good of shape?

Who cares? If it bothers you, talk to her about it directly and tell her so. If she doesn't agree to stop, find someone else.

I know this woman is married, I have seen her with her husband and young daughter, why is it I feel like she's coming onto me?

You are probably delusional; but in case she is flirting with you, ignore her; if she would cheat on her partner, she would cheat on you. Find someone else to fixate on.

After a month into a relationship, why does she ask me what my idea of a perfect woman is?

Maybe she is thinking about being serious and is testing the waters. Tell her frankly.
What is Laura saying here? In a nutsheel: "this woman is obviously not made for you, so take your responsibility".

There are two ways to address such a problem. On one hand, like Laura suggested you can take your responsibilities, change what you can change particularly yourself, be aware of the role you play, make decisions.

This is the painful path where you have to face your own fears and illusions. Ultimately, you realize that your current situation is solely the result of your past choices.

There is also the easy path where you shift the responsibility to others, in this case evil women that become the cause of all your problem. You are the victim of females' manipulation.

That where the manosphere enters the stage. Beyond the politically correct gloss the manosphere depicts the women as evil manipulators and to not be their victims the only solution is to be even more manipulative!

So much hypocrisy in the manosphere while claiming to help built real men, brave, responsible and kind; it actually creates the opposite of what a real man is: manipulators that demonize the other sex.
 

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
People who see themselves as victims almost never have any hope of true happiness and fulfillment. It's all about blaming others for one's own failings; it is the "Criminal Mind" in action at a sub-criminal scale.
 

BlackCartouche

Jedi Master
I've had a few friends over the years sucked into the manosphere. Its starts off the same every time: Betrayed, mortally wounded by the "one true love" so they rebound into polygamy. The manoshere loves polygamy. Prolific polygamists are manosphere gods.
Once he becomes entrapped in the manosphere (the effect is immediate - which says a lot about him in the first place) he will wallow in it like a pig in shit! He won't be able get enough of it - to the detriment of any hope of drawing to him an actual genuine faithful and loving woman who digs him on a soul level, because his vibrations for such a soul attraction have now gotten waaaay out of sync.

The crux of every 'man' inside the manosphere can always be broken down to justifying the one-way street for the stirring of his loins. It really is that simple.

I hope we don't devote a further 15 pages glooping about another 'Rollo Tomassi' slurry pit looking for a dime that probably isn't even there.
 

BlackCartouche

Jedi Master
I suspect it comes from the idea that engaging in this kind of behaviour is and should remain men's sole prerogative due to biology, which tells men to "impregnate" as many females as possible. They're just infuriated that thanks to the glorious "sexual liberation", women are now allowed to do exactly the same thing without risking any repercussion (like being shamed and shunned by the community, as happened in the past). "How dare they encroach on our turf?". Can we say "gender war"?
The problem manotites can't seem to overcome with the biological prerogative argument is the rather relevant-yet-problematic issue of having a male-female population ratio near-abouts of 50:50 men/women. If all proper men should become alphas and mate with multiple women as nature demands, but each woman should, conversely, be governed by her biological prerogative to seek procreation with ONLY one man! - then how does that work out exactly??:nuts:

I tried to help an 'alpha' out a couple times wrestle with this inconvenient little fact.

I suggesting either;
  • the necessity for constant warfare between men to keep the ratio of male population very low thus ensuring harmony for each polygamous man to copulate with as many decent monogamous women aplenty as the ratio would generously allow.
  • Or another alternative, that could go in conjunction with the first: To encourage homosexuality within the male population of a high enough hetero-homo ratio imbalance to limit the need for mortal competition between red-blooded alphas.
In either of the prepositions put forward, needless to say, he needed some time to think on it.
 

genero81

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Tomasi deserves "shaming". Sheesh, what a Lefty/Libtard thing to worry about! Based on the clues, he is very likely pathological and if you've read Ponerology, you should know how his influence on others will turn out.
Right, Lobaczewski's hard won work didn't come to mind, but it should have. Once you mentioned it, it was like duh! (slaps hand on forehead) I had not read any of the online stuff, only about a third of the second book. I would like to think that my more normal world view (that I have one in the first place) had been at work adjusting what I was taking in under the excuse of 'creative latitude.' But it was simply a thinking error on my part. Once you pointed it out, it was obvious. This is precisely why a network like this is so valuable. Although, that was not a book I think I would have picked up and read in the first place had there not been such a lively discussion here. But, it has sparked perhaps a much needed discussion about the differences between men and woman and what a healthy and honest relationship should look like. OSIT
 

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
I've had a few friends over the years sucked into the manosphere. Its starts off the same every time: Betrayed, mortally wounded by the "one true love" so they rebound into polygamy. The manoshere loves polygamy. Prolific polygamists are manosphere gods.
I don't even think that some guys have to be "betrayed, mortally wounded by the one true love", they only need to have a beef with their partner and instead of dealing with things in a mature way, allow the beefs to grow and fester until the end result is almost the same as if they were "betrayed, mortally wounded." But it's all in their visceral system; they feel bad, and they create a narrative to explain why it's somebody else's fault. And god help the already wounded guy who needs to grow up and get over early infancy wounding if they get caught in the clutches of a Rollo Tomassi type! Those are the ones in whom this pathological perspective anchors most deeply and they really feel like they've found the answer! Something the Tomassi type says/writes will "resonate so strongly within that it just has to be true!" Well, it only resonates because the person is already twisted inside by wounding.

Once he becomes entrapped in the manosphere (the effect is immediate - which says a lot about him in the first place) he will wallow in it like a pig in shit! He won't be able get enough of it - to the detriment of any hope of drawing to him an actual genuine faithful and loving woman who digs him on a soul level, because his vibrations for such a soul attraction have now gotten waaaay out of sync.
Yup, exactly so.

And it is SO interesting that this particular "divide and conquer" thing between men and women comes along at exactly this point in time; and I mean, specifically, to this corner of the internet, our group, etc.

Exactly at the point in time when things are really heating up (or cooling down, as the case may be) in our environment, exactly the point in time when the Cs overall predictions are coming to bear on the planet in a serious way, exactly the point when the Cs cosmological perspective is getting a huge boost from current research, all of a sudden, there's a new, big lure to pull some people into confluence with the 4D STS materialist, Satanic, paradigm that is seeking to take over the planet.

Indeed, there is a program for everyone and without a network we are all lost.
 

Andi

Padawan Learner
I was thinking more about this and was asking myself - is Hypergamy even a real thing or is it just a made up fancy word to describe a twisted observation witch in reality that observation it's the result of the complex mommy/daddy issues, programs etc.
In order for Tomassi to make a buck, he had to make it such that "all women are like that" and on top of that mention nothing about men, as if men are not to be blamed because you know ..the immutable feminine nature. A recipy for conflict between genders where no one gets to learn about what is really the casue of all of the problems between sexes.
 

Pashalis

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
furryfrog, you might want to carefully reread Adaryn's post above and see if you can catch anything that sounds SERIOUSLY troubling. A natural reaction to this kind of pathological talk should be disgust and a dire need to get away from that stuff as fast as possible. There is hardly anything more needed to see just how pathological it is, what Tomassi is advocating. It is seriously and darkly messed up, to put it mildly.
 

ScioAgapeOmnis

The Living Force
Interesting thread! So while I haven't read Tomasi'sd books, I have been introduced to the "manosphere" or "red pill community" a few years ago, and have spent a decent amount of time trying to learn what that is all about. In my case, it started by watching something called "Blue Print Decoded" by a guy who calls himself Tyler Durden (real name Owen Cook), and he founded one of the most prolific "red pill" companies called "Real Social Dynamics". Luckily, I wasn't the demographic they're selling to, just like most on this forum are not (young, impressionable naive hormonal 20-something men desperate to get good with girls), so it was easier to see the manipulation, the inconsistencies. The irony is while they teach "game", they're utilizing just as much "game" to get men to buy-in, and I mean that literally, the amount of MONEY involved that they get out of these guys is mind boggling! I spent some time mulling it all over, and initially I started with some "AHA" moments, followed by just as many "something isn't right here.." moments, which started to make sense over time.

So here's my take-away:

First of all, you may have heard of "Real Social Dynamics" without realizing what it is - here is some info, including one of its main instructors, Julien Blanc:
Disgusting sexual predator: Julien Blanc, the 'female attraction' expert, glorifies sexual violence -- Sott.net
Leading UK pick up artist says he doesn't know how Julien Blanc sleeps at night

And here's a really nice and thorough investigation someone did on Reddit about their community and exactly the kind of behavior they're teaching and promoting. If this doesn't scream "psychopaths - run away, and fast", I don't know what will:

https://www.reddit.com/r/RBI/comments/9kx4ri
Granted, this is not Tomasi - but they are honestly in the same "larger group" - the red pill community, and "RSD" and Tomasi are big names in this community - different groups, authors, slightly personalized slants, but largely the same idea.

The thing is, the material isn't all incorrect - like others have mentioned, if applied and practiced, it works. And there are nuggets of truth there that certainly can be enlightening, and can teach you something about yourself to some degree. You gotta have that if you want to attract a huge following and make tons of money, you gotta have your truth sandwich. But you can say the same about the Bible, or Freud, or pretty much any scizhoid declaration out there - it's gotta be based around certain truths to "blow people's minds" with biological and behavioral facts they may not have thought of before, and then when you get their attention, you layer your bullshit right in.

Red-pill stuff tries to veil itself as "self development" - in other words, the "sophisticated" red-pill groups distance themselves from typical pick-up artists by claiming that they don't teach you techniques and behaviors, but help you clean out your conditioning and basically clean out your machine by getting rid of learned thoughts and behaviors that turned you into a "beta", to help reveal the natural alpha hiding on the inside! It sounds downright holistic if you buy the sales pitch! And as I mentioned, it doesn't mean there's nothing to be learned or it's all untrue or anything - it's just really evil stuff veiled in some actual self-development, but with a very particular slant, which kinda nullifies any actual development you'd get from these sources.

Bottom line - sex sells. Hormonal young guys want sex, and lots of it. This group promises to turn you into a "sex god" if you go to enough seminars, watch their videos, read their books, and pay them thousands of dollars to take you on "boot camps" - basically outings where they coach you in real-time and push you to approach women as they give you critical corrections. All you will get out of this is how to treat women as objects, and how to get really good at manipulating impressionable women, and let's be honest, they're looking for dumb impressionable women, not independent developer ones, who will see through it and find you wanting, despite your "alphaness".

None of this will teach you how to have a loving, stable, and mutually beneficial long-term relationship where both people grow together and achieve something higher over time. If all you want is to have meaningless sex with as many partners as possible, well, this will teach you how to manipulate people's machines to accomplish this. But if you're even remotely interested in self-development, don't let this material fool you into acting like this is what it will do - there are FAR better books/materials out there for that, that aren't made by pathological materialists.

If you want to read the material and get familiar with it, that's your choice, but my advice for what it's worth is to do so only if you're thinking with a hammer, if you can see the "line of force" and constantly ask yourself what is this trying to teach me and why? Who is the target audience, how does one apply this, and why? Honestly, a lot of this has already been dissected and mentioned in this thread, so I won't belabor the point.

But caveat lector! It doesn't just teach you to manipulate women, it will also do its best to manipulate you, because it tries to latch on to your own programs/issues/fears/desires to get you interested.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom