The Russian Presidential Election 2018

I read British Government's Chemical Attack Narrative Falls Apart - Boris Johnson Lied About Russia and wondered how the British Government see the situation. They carry almost as if nothing has happened to their arguments:
_Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson responds to defeat of Russia’s proposals at OPCW - GOV.UK (April 4th)
_We cannot ignore what has happened in Salisbury: UN Security Council statement, 5 April 2018 - GOV.UK (April 5th
_Novichok nerve agent use in Salisbury: UK government response - GOV.UK (April 6th)
_Joint statement on anniversary of Khan Sheikhoun attack - GOV.UK (April 4th)
BBC focuses "Ex-spy "improving rapidly" after poisoning" Ex-spy 'improving rapidly' after poisoning

The Times writes: after repeating the BBC line: _Russia no longer plays by the old rules of the Cold War And it actually says "Putin is no longer playing by Cold War rules"
There is from the Guardian: _UK and US given case file on 'nerve agent made in Russian lab' which refers to: _Novichok: nerve agent produced at only one site in Russia, says expert

And the "News" is repeated in a Danish newspaper: _https://jyllands-posten.dk/protecte...vichok-fremstillet-i-sjikhany-ved-volgafloden and nothing changed in Germany: _Fall Skripal: Bundesregierung hält Sicht der Briten für "äußerst plausibel" - SPIEGEL ONLINE - Politik

The way the case is being presented in Britain and to the world what Boris Johnson said appears at the moment to be almost inconsequential, like a scratch. Knowing how many other campaigns, have worked just fine, for the majority of nefarious purposes, I'm not surprised.
 
Apr 6, 2018 - TV broadcasts ‘Yulia Skripal hospital call with cousin’ – VIDEO
TV broadcasts ‘Yulia Skripal hospital call with cousin’ - VIDEO - Fort Russ
(1:32 min.) (Russian)
(English sub-titles)

Published on Apr 6, 2018
Russian broadcaster VGTRK released a recording on Thursday of an alleged phone conversation between Yulia Skripal speaking from hospital and her cousin Viktoria Skripal in Moscow.

The recording was aired during 60 minutes TV program in Moscow.

Neither VGTRK nor Ruptly could verify the authenticity of the recording.


Published on Apr 6, 2018 - Maria Zakharova, Spokeswoman of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on "Novichok" case.
(13:06 min.)


06.04.2018 - Skripal's Niece alleges UK "Must Have something to Hide" after being Denied Visa
Skripal's Niece Alleges UK 'Must Have Something to Hide' After Being Denied Visa

UK authorities have denied an entry visa to the niece of ex-Russian spy Sergei Skripal saying her visa application as it "did not comply with the Immigration Rules."

Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said to Rossiya 1 TV channel that Moscow wants London to explain why it had refused to issue a visa to Victoria Skripal, who sought to visit her cousin Yulia who's in hospital in the UK town of Salisbury.

The Russian Embassy has also commented on the issue, saying that the UK authorities' justification to reject Victoria Skripal's visa application doesn't hold up against criticism.


06.04.2018 - A Month in Sergei Skripal's Health: From Critical Condition to Rapid Improvement
A Month in Sergei Skripal's Health: From Critical Condition to Rapid Improvement

Sergei Skripal is no longer in critical condition, according to the British medics’ Friday report. It has been almost a month since the former Russian spy has been poisoned in Salisbury, Britain. How has his condition progressed since March 4? Here is what we know so far.
  • On March 4, Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found unconscious on a bench near The Maltings shopping center in Salisbury. According to March 7 by Met police, the Skripals were being treated for suspected exposure to an unknown substance and both remained in a critical condition in intensive care.
  • On March 13, the Met police referred to reports of Mr. Skripal remaining in a critical condition in hospital "after being exposed to a nerve agent in a targeted attack."
  • March 17 and the Skripals still remained in critical condition in hospital, while British scientists determined this to be the result of a military grade nerve agent, as stated by the Met police.
  • On March 29, the British National Health Service (NHS) issued a statement saying that Julia Skripal was recovering.
  • On April 5, UK's Met police issued a statement on behalf of Yulia Skripal who said she "woke up over a week ago now" and is glad her strength is "growing daily." No mention, however, was made of the health condition of her father Sergei, who was still believed to be in critical condition in the hospital.
  • Finally on April 6, Christine Blanshard, Medical Director at Salisbury District Hospital, said in a statement that Sergei Skripal "is responding well to treatment, improving rapidly and is no longer in a critical condition."

06.04.2018 - Lavrov on Claims Novichok made in Saratov: UK trying to Confirm it's Stance
Lavrov on Claims Novichok Made in Saratov: UK Trying to Confirm Its Stance

Moscow will not trust London's data in the Skripal case, "we want to check it, but they don't allow us," Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said.

London has reported that the Novichok nerve agent, allegedly used to poison a GRU ex-employee, Sergei Skripal, and his daughter, was produced in a laboratory in the city of Shikhany (Saratov region), in an attempt to find justification for its unsuspecting version of the Salisbury incident, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told reporters on Friday.

"This once again shows that they are trying frantically and convulsively every day to seek some new confirmation of their absolutely unprofitable position," Lavrov said.

He noted that "this position will remain unprotected until the UK agrees frankly and honestly, in accordance with the procedure of the Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, to consult and [find a solution], putting all of their facts on the table, and not hold them in their pocket."


06.04.2018 - "Another Leak": Moscow Reacts as Fate of Skripal's Pets Finally Revealed
'Another Leak': Moscow Reacts as Fate of Skripal's Pets Finally Revealed

While one of the victims in the Salisbury poisoning case appears to be recovering from the ordeal, the family pets turned out to be a lot less fortunate, apparently dying of hunger and thirst after being sealed off inside the house by British investigators.

Commenting on recent media reports about the demise of pets belonging to Sergei and Yulia Skripal, victims of an alleged nerve agent attack in Salisbury, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zahkarova remarked that it’s strange that such important information was leaked to media instead of being officially released by British authorities.

"Another ‘leak’ in British media. By the way, do their government agencies’ press services operate at all? Why everything is being leaked via comments from ‘unnamed sources’?" Zakharova inquired on her Facebook page.

She also remarked that the pets could’ve become an important source of information for the investigators, considering the fact that the poisoning might’ve taken place in Skripal’s house, and that the way the animals were handled by the authorities

According to a British newspaper, the guinea pigs died of dehydration because they were left at the house. What’s that supposed to mean? The house was searched, but no one noticed the animals? They didn’t notice the pets of a man who was poisoned by a nerve agent?!", she wrote.

Zakharova added that the fate of Skripal’s cat that was taken to Porton Down lab and then put down, as well as the fact that the pets’ remains were cremated, look strange as "the animals could’ve become an important piece of evidence in the chemical poisoning case."

The Russian embassy in the UK also commented on this development via Twitter, wondering whether the animals' remains were disposed of as an "inconvenient piece of evidence."

Skripals' Pets Demise -
According to Daily Mirror, two guinea pigs and a cat owned by Sergei Skripal perished after being found malnourished inside his residence, which was sealed by the police.

The guinea pigs appeared to have died of thirst by the time they were found, while the cat was taken to the Porton Down lab for testing but was ultimately put down because the feline "was in so much pain," the newspaper adds.

The Russian embassy in the United Kingdom suggested on Friday that Sergei Skripal's pets were disposed of as an inconvenient piece of evidence in the high-profile poisoning case.

"The fact that the animals were locked inside the house for several days suggests that the police did not access the alleged crime scene, which would be very unusual for such a high profile investigation … Overall, it is difficult to avoid the impression that the animals have been disposed of as an inconvenient piece of evidence," the embassy said in a statement on its website.

The Russian diplomatic mission noted that such treatment of animals by the UK authorities violated local animals protection legislation as well as Skripal's rights as the pets' owner.

"Regarding the dead guinea pigs and the malnourished cat, it is said unofficially that they were taken to the Porton Down facility and incinerated there. But it remains unclear if their remains were ever tested for toxic substances, which would constitute useful evidence, and if not, why such a decision was made," the statement continued.

Earlier Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova expressed concern about the absence of information on the condition of Skripals’ pets, pointing out that information on the creatures’ fate could help the investigation.


06.04.2018 - New Sanctions Prove No One has been Tougher on Moscow Than Trump - White House
New Sanctions Prove No One Has Been Tougher on Moscow Than Trump - White House

The US Treasury Department has announced sanctions imposed on 38 Russian businessmen and senior government officials, as well as private and state-owned companies over what it called, was Russia's "destabilizing activities" around the world.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders stated on Friday that the new anti-Russian sanctions prove no one has been tougher on Russia than the Trump administration. The US president said that Washington seeks good relations with Moscow, but the improvement of ties depends on Russia's actions, according to the statement by Sanders.

Today’s sanctions and the totality of the administration’s actions which are in keeping with Congress’ wishes prove the president is absolutely correct when he says no one has been tougher on Russia," Sanders told reporters.
The latest sanctions US President Donald Trump imposed on Russia demonstrate his strong leadership and a clear message that the United States will not condone malign activity, Vice President Mike Pence said in a statement on Friday.

"The Trump administration continues to hold bad Russian actors accountable for their lawless actions on the international stage," Pence said. "Today's actions by [Trump] show strong leadership and send a clear message: malign activity won't be tolerated by the United States."

Some of the sanctioned government officials include the head of the Presidential Directorate for Social and Economic Cooperation with the Commonwealth of Independent States Member Countries Oleg Govorun; Tula Governor Alexey Dyumin; Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev; presidential aide Yevgeny Shkolov; and Deputy of the State Duma Andrei Skoch.

Moreover, the Treasury Department sanctioned energy giant Gazprom's CEO Alexey Miller and the heads of the company's subsidiaries; Gazprombank Chairman of the Management Board Andrey Akimov; and Gazprom Neft Board of Directors member Sergey Fursenko.

State Duma Deputy Speaker Pyotr Tolstoy said on Friday the new round of US sanctions is a malicious attempt to dictate Washington’s will to Moscow for pursuing an independent and sovereign policy, and the effort is doomed to fail.


06.04.2018 - US Intelligence had a Role in New Sanctions Against Russian Businessmen - Reports
US Intelligence Had Role in New Sanctions Against Russian Businessmen - Reports

Earlier, media reports suggested that between six and ten businessmen with ties to the Russian government may be affected in new sanctions expected to be announced on Friday.

Unnamed US officials speaking to NBC News have confirmed that US intelligence agencies "played a role" in compiling the so-called "Kremlin Report" list of 210 Russian officials and businessmen in January, as required under the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) signed into law signed last year.

Another unnamed official told NBC News that the individuals to be named Friday may be sanctioned directly under the provisions of CAATSA or by a different authority.

However, another individual familiar with the situation complained that the delay in introducing the sanctions gave the wealthy Russians plenty of time to restructure their US holdings, subsequently blunting the effect of the new restrictions. "They had to know these were coming," he said.

The Kremlin Report includes 114 Russian politicians, including members of the presidential administration and the government, as well as 95 businessmen. Inclusion on the list does not mean automatic sanctioning, but does mean that restrictions can be introduced sometime in the future. President Putin called the move an "unfriendly step" which would be certain to harm Russian-US relations.


06.04.2018 - Moscow Vows Harsh Response to US Sanctions, Future Hostile Moves
Moscow Vows Harsh Response to US Sanctions, Future Hostile Moves

Russia's Foreign Ministry stated Friday that it "will provide a harsh response to new US sanctions or any future hostile move against Russia."

The ministry's message to the administration of US President Donald Trump added that Russia wouldn't "be spoken to in the language of sanctions" and warned that thousands of US jobs depend on Russian firms hit by that latest wave of penalties.

"Of course, we will not leave the current and any future anti-Russian attack without a harsh response," the ministry's press service said in a statement. "However, we would like, first of all, to advise Washington to get rid of illusions that we can be spoken to in the language of sanctions."

By continuously using sanctions, including for removing rivals from foreign markets with the use of such administrative measures, Washington practically becomes an opponent of the market economy and fair competition," the statement noted.

As US democracy is "degrading," Washington is scrambling to "ensure the global hegemony of the United States by all means, including through pressure on countries that have an independent voice, unlike Washington's allies in NATO," the ministry alleged. However, "no pressure will make Russia swerve off its path."

Prior to the ministry's comments, the Russian embassy in the United States remarked that the sanctions would represent another blow to US-Russia relations.

"Washington again struck US-Russia relations," the Russian embassy's statement read. "Now, the captains of Russian businesses who refused to play by Washington's rules got targeted by the sanctions."
 
"It was a signal" and there is no proof: It’s wise to avoid rash decisions in UK-Russia spy scandal – ex-Austrian defense minister

Interview with Werner Fasslaben (past Austrian defense minister).

Video in link yet not sure how to (or if it can be) added.

Sophie Shevardnadze:
Werner Fasslabend, former Minister of National Defence of Austria, welcome to the show. It’s great to have you with us today. Austria refused to heed the call of UK’s Foreign Minister Boris Johnson to expel Russian diplomats over the ex-spy poisoning case. Mr. Johnson called for a “united global action” and your country right now, I’d imagine, must be enduring a lot of pressure for not being part of it?

Werner Fasslabend: There was one third of EU members who declared with all the others the clear solidarity with Great Britain, on the one hand. But one third didn’t decide over sanctions and Austria is one of those nine countries.


SS: But does it feel like you’re being pressured because you’re not united with Great Britain on this?
WF: No, I do not see it. Of course, the question was, I think, if that British presentation had a high plausibility, otherwise all the members of EU wouldn't have decided to make a unanimous declaration. But in the question of the sanctions opinions differed because, of course, there was no clear proof, on the one hand. And on the other hand, there was also the question whether it was very reasonable to react with sanctions and breaking the dialogue between Russia and the Western countries. And Austria is one of those countries that is firmly convinced that it is necessary and will be necessary to keep up this dialogue and to talk about all the security matters between Russia and the Western countries.
SS: Former Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt said Austria’s position is incompatible with EU membership, while former Latvian foreign minister Artis Pabriks sees this as ‘a bad joke’. Is there a risk Austria's relationship with Brussels will turn sour because of this?
WF: I do not think so because also the Belgian government had a similar position. Luxembourg - the country where the president of the European Commission comes from - did the same way as Austria, also Portugal, Greece, Slovakia, Cyprus, Malta and others. And so far there was a clear decision from the Austrian side, it was clear that we would not go into sanctions…
SS:
You’ve actually hit it on the nose, that was going to be my second question because there are other countries also that aren’t united with Great Britain on this issue. Why is your country singled out for criticism in this expulsion episode?
WF: We thought, you know, that, on the one hand, there was no proof and there is no proof up to the day. If the members of the EU Council probably got more information than we do have as observers and academics all over the world… Still there was no proof. Everybody afterwards said that there was a high plausibility for the case, but there was no proof. And if there’s no proof, of course, you also have to consider your reaction. This is one side. The other one is that Austria will take over the presidency of EU in the second half of this year. And I think that it will be one of the major tasks for Austria to not only try to make good contribution to the solution of the EU problems but also to the EU relations to our important neighbours, and Russia is one of them. And so far it was very clear for the Austrian government not to take part in any sanctions regime but to try to keep up good relations with Russia.
SS: Critics say Vienna selectively invokes its traditional neutrality whenever it feels that its interests are jeopardised. Do you feel that your country is fairly accused of being the EU’s ‘security policy freeloader’?
WF: I do not think so. Austria is a neutral country, but our neutrality is only military neutrality, it’s not an ideological one. And I do not see any ideological problem in this question. Of course, on the one hand, Austria always will try to act in solidarity with other EU members, but it will also go its own way and fight for its own position when it is convinced that it’s necessary. And our government was convinced that it was necessary in this case not to react spontaneously, too fast but to keep open all the channels of information, of dialogue, of speaking about the problem. And as I can see now, this is my personal analysis, due also to the development of the last days, I think, it was the right decision.
SS: So this whole diplomat expulsion business - do you think, it has any profound effect? I mean, you kick diplomats out one day, the situation becomes better and a new group comes in. Besides, half of those states that joined the UK’s measures expelled one single person each. What is one person’s departure really going to change?
WF: It is only a signal. I guess, poisoning of the agent was probably a signal for somebody, I don't know who. But also the reaction of the EU countries certainly was a signal, sanctions were a signal that there’s a red line in the relationship because we are not in the face of a Cold War. There should be not only better understanding, but also better co-operation between Russia and EU, and, of course, every side has to look at its actions and reactions. Therefore, as I see it, it was probably signaling a red line that the relationship even in troublesome cases shouldn’t go beyond a certain limit. And that was clear - this cannot be a nerve gas or chemical weapons.
SS: Despite the mutual diplomatic expulsions, projects like the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia to Germany (which Austria supports) are going ahead. Does this mean that the political gestures like kicking out diplomats are mostly for show?
WF: Maybe the question of Nord Stream 2 is also part of these discussions and these considerations about sanctions, easily could be. But I think that you have to look at it from a reasonable point of view, from a reasonable position, and the position that I see is that for Germany this is an important project. Germany has given up its nuclear capabilities. It is highly dependent on energy from all sides and, therefore, an efficient way of getting energy - and this is certainly North Stream 2 - is and will be important. Of course, you can discuss many things that are linked to it. But I can absolutely understand the German way of keeping the North Stream 2 project as one of the major contributions to its own energy security.
SS: NATO is boosting its military preparedness in Europe in case of a conflict with Russia, increasing the number of troops, aircraft and ships available for rapid deployment - that’s after the spy scandal broke out. Can NATO be using this row to build up its presence closer to Russian borders even more so?
WF: I do not see that there’s really a build-up of NATO forces against Russia. If you look at the strength of military forces in Russia and in neighbouring EU countries you can see that there are almost no soldiers, no tanks, no fighters in the Baltic states or in some other neighbouring states. And so far I do not see a real danger. What I see is that both sides should try to keep the common trust about their own ways and the common future. If you look back to the last exercises “Zapad” that Russia had last year, you could see the heavy reactions from the Baltic countries. Also, the way it was done in reality, of course, you can see that there’s quite a subjective sensitiveness of danger on the one side. Maybe also on the Russian side - you can judge much better than I can. But what I see - there’s no need to do so not in the moment and, I would also say, not in the foreseeable future.
SS: The EU is planning to create a so-called ‘military Schengen’ in Europe that would see inter-state borders scrapped for moving military equipment and troops. This is seen as a step forward towards accomplishing a European Defence Union that is supposed to reduce Europe’s dependence on NATO. Do you think Europe needs one?
WF: I’m absolutely convinced that NATO is important, on the one hand, but European autonomy will also be important because EU is not only an economic union, but also a political union and it can only be an efficient political union if it also can care about its security by itself. We’re only at the beginning. About 20 years ago I organised the first European Defence Ministers’ Meeting in Vienna. Since then there has been some progress, but the progress is not so strong and now we’re going into a new phase that the European countries with the lead of France and Germany will try to build up some own capabilities. But this will not mean that NATO will lose its function. On the contrary, I think, that old organisations are necessary and will be there also in the next decades.
SS: Austria sees itself as a bridge-builder between East and West. Does it have enough weight and clout to change something between Russia and the Western world?
WF: Because Austria is geographically situated right at the border line between Western Central Europe and Eastern Central Europe it has many links to Western Europe and to Southeastern Europe and, therefore, sometimes we do have a little bit more internal knowledge about what is going on. Maybe sometimes our understanding of people and politics is a little bit different to other Western European countries. But I’m sure that this specific knowledge of Austrian politicians about the situation in other regions is very important and can be a good contribution not only to a dialogue but also co-operation. And I’m convinced that co-operation is important and will be needed from both sides. It is important for Russia and it is important for EU because there is some interdependency between the countries politically, economically and otherwise. Politically - not only for European affairs, but also for the development in the Middle East. Economically - anyhow because Europe is dependent on Russia’s energy and Russia is dependent on industrial incentives and industrial development coming from the European side.
SS: So Austria has long been calling on the EU to ease its sanctions on Russia, and protested against adding more. The sanctions are hurting the Austrian economy; will business circles force Vienna to do anything to change this?
WF: Of course, sanctions in Austria are not looked upon with great pleasure. But on the other hand, Austria was always willing to carry out common decisions coming from EU, and Austria will do it in the future because a common European security policy is necessary. And even if you have different positions and opinions you have to follow that. And Austria will do it, because otherwise we also wouldn’t be able to influence European politics. We try to do so in a sense of more common projects and more dialogue between the two sides.
SS: Yours is not the only country in the EU that has a moderate look on sanctioning Russia - however, the sanctions get extended unanimously year after year. Can there be a real difference in opinion within the EU about sanctions, or the protests against them will never go beyond declarations?
WF: Those countries that have more intense economic relations with Russia, like Austria, but also bigger countries like Italy and so on, they are not so happy about it. But they will follow the common European line, this is very important. Otherwise the weight of the European Union and therefore the possibilities and capabilities of those countries within EU would be weakened. And, therefore, I guess, the sanction regime will not be changed just by discussion but by change on the ground.
SS: Now, as you mentioned, Vienna is presiding in the EU for the second half of 2018. How can this be used to improve EU’s relations with Russia? Would other EU states listen to you?
WF: Yeah, we will have the visit of President Putin in June, I guess, that certainly will bring an intense exchange of views and positions. We will try to use this opportunity already before the presidency in order to find out what are the moments, where are the fields where Austria could act. This is not easy because every side has relatively clear positions and you only can go step by step trying to improve the relations and try to find solutions for minor problems in order to do the next step and to have a bigger progress on the whole. And I think, this way is something Austrian diplomats and Austrian politicians are well aware of and, therefore, will try to do so.
SS: Chancellor Sebastian Kurz says the country is planning to use its presidency in the EU to work on securing its borders against new waves of migrants. Will this finally fix the spat between the Eastern and Western members over the refugee problem?
WF: I think that now almost all the European countries are aware of this high challenge of not only refugees but migrants coming from Africa and Asian countries. If you look at the demographic development this will not become a minor problem in the future, but the challenge will increase in the future. Therefore, it’s necessary to overthink the European politics and, also, to establish new instruments and tools in order to have a better control at the border. Of course, if you need the consensus of twenty seven countries, as we have to do in the European Union, this is a long way, this is difficult, this is a process that lasts. But there’s a clear will to do so because otherwise this would endanger the overall consensus within EU. Therefore, I’m sure that we will find solutions within the coming months and, I guess, Austria will contribute quite a bit during its presidency in the second half of this year.
SS: Your old government used to support the refugee quota system, and that's all changed now in Vienna. Does that mean the refugee quotas, the idea that countries have to accept a certain number of refugees - whether they like it or not - is gone for good?
WF: Well, nowadays the actual official ruling is that countries should take more or less a certain number. But, of course, you cannot enforce it within Europe against the will of the governments. As I said already, there are quite a lot of countries that are against taking a specific quota - Visegrad countries and others. You only can execute such a rule if there is an efficient border control. But if the border control is not efficient nobody knows how many migrants will come tomorrow and the day after tomorrow. They will not be ready to take it. And so far efficient border control, on the one side, and trying to get efficient rules for distributing migrants and finding solutions how to handle this challenge - of course, they go hand by hand.
SS: Part of Austria’s migrant integration strategy is a ban on face veils, but right now only a dozen or so people have been charged since it came into force - not so many people have been charged. But actually one person that was charged was wearing a giant bunny costume. It makes us smile a little. So I want to ask your opinion - how effective this ban really is?
WF: I think, this is not the most important problem that we have in the migration issue. Certainly the most important thing is that people who come to Austria have to learn the language, have to be able to communicate with the others, have to adapt Austrian rules and be ready to live here under the rules of the Austrian government, not only official rules, but the rules coming from the society. This is the most important one. The other one is that you have to differ between those people who have the rights to stay here - these are real refugees - and other migrants that only come to Austria due to economic reasons because they can’t find a better job or to earn more money than they can do at home. It’s not possible to take all those people from all the countries that haven’t a payment that is as high as we have in Austria. And, therefore, you have to differ very clearly between refugees and migrants. Refugees means people who have come to Austria out of security reasons. They have the right to stay here but they have to integrate. And all the others are selected or they have to go back because we cannot take millions and tens, hundreds of millions of people from Africa and other countries.
SS: Alright, thank you so much, Mr. Fasslabend, for this interview. We were talking to Werner Fasslabend, former Minister of National Defence of Austria, discussing the diplomatic rift between Russia and Britain and what role Austria can play here and in other European issues.
WF: Thank you. All the best.
 
07.04.2018 - Worthless Poison, Dead Pets, Deleted Tweets & Other Nonsense in the Skripal Case
Worthless Poison, Dead Pets, Deleted Tweets & Other Nonsense in the Skripal Case

New details revealed this week in the inquiry into the UK poisoning of a Russian ex-spy haven't clarified the situation, but did undermine London's claims of Russian culpability, while highlighting the folly of the British media's speculation-driven reporting. Sputnik recalls the four most absurd details the world learned about the case this week.

Miracle Healing - Definitely the biggest sensation in the Skripal story this week was the confirmation that both Yulia and her father are no longer in critical condition and making good progress in their recovery.

News of their improving condition must be especially surprising to the UK's chemical weapons experts, and to Prime Minister May and Foreign Secretary Johnson, who claimed following the attack that the Skripals were struck by a powerful Russian military-grade nerve agent which leaves little chance of survival.

British and US media described the nerve agent as "the most deadly ever made." A New York Times piece from March 13 shocked readers with the headline "The Nerve Agent Too Deadly to Use, Until Someone Did," accompanied by an image of a scowling Foreign Minister Lavrov against the backdrop of a Russian flag.

But the improvement to the Skripals' condition has forced these same media to backtrack, and to ask the uncomfortable question of how exactly the ex-spy and his daughter could possible survive such a deadly attack.

The Washington Post was the most blunt, asking "why aren't the Skripals dead?" Medical and toxicology experts told the newspaper and other media that the pair's "miraculous" recovery came down to the fantastic medical care they received at Salisbury Hospital.

Russian officials unanimously welcomed the news of the Skripals' improving condition, but joined in asking just how all this was possible if, as London claims, this was all a "'military-grade state-sponsored' assassination attempt" by Russia.

Three Real Victims: The Skripals' Pets - Another scandalous moment in the Skripal case came late in the week, and involved the family's pets – a cat named Nash van Drake and two guinea pigs. Officials told UK media that the cat was taken to the military lab at Porton Down, put down and cremated. As for the guinea pigs, they were left in Sergei Skripal's home long enough to starve to death.

News of the pets' death prompted animal rights activists to charge British police with animal cruelty.

Back in Moscow, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova suggested it was highly suspicious that the Skripal's cat, who "could have become an important piece of evidence in the chemical poisoning case," were not only starved to death and put down, but cremated as well. The Russian Embassy in the UK echoed this sentiment.

Embarrassing Tweets - London's case against Russia suffered another blow this week, after an admission by Porton Down defense lab chief Gary Aitkenhead that experts could not actually trace its origin. The scientist's remarks prompted the Foreign office to delete a tweet which said point-blank that the nerve agent came from Russia, and led British opposition lawmakers to attack Boris Johnson, who adamantly claimed that Porton Down had given him rock-solid evidence of Russian involvement.

Yasenevo, Saratov, The Kremlin Basement? - Even after Porton Down lab admitted that it could not trace the chemical agent's origin, some media continued to claim they knew the location of the "covert Russian lab" used to create it. The Sun cited unnamed 'security sources' who said that the poison came from an SRV foreign intelligence service lab in the Moscow district of Yasenevo. The Times, meanwhile, insisted that it was made in a lab in the town of Shikhany, Saratov, about 730 km southeast of Moscow.

The guessing game came to an end Friday after Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons representative Mikhail Babich issued a statement which said that chemical weapons were never produced or stored at the Shikhany research facility.

Altogether, the details revealed this week about the Skripal case have not only severely undermined London's claims about Russian involvement, but led the public in the UK and many Western countries to ask just what exactly happened in Salisbury on March 4.


07.04.2018 - Skripal's Niece Victoria Asks Theresa May To Reconsider UK Visa Issue - Reports
Skripal's Niece Victoria Asks Theresa May to Reconsider UK Visa Issue - Reports

On Friday, the UK authorities refused to issue a visa for Victoria Skripal on "the grounds that her application did not comply with the Immigration Rules;" the decision has caused harsh criticism from Russian authorities with the latter urging London to provide explanation.

Yulia Skripal's cousin, who has regained consciousness and the ability to talk after being poisoned in early March, has turned to UK Prime Minister Theresa May to reconsider the visa issue, according to Sky News.

In her address to the prime minister, Victoria Skripal said she wanted, first of all, to visit her uncle and cousin in order to pass information regarding their medical condition to her grandmother.

In her address to the prime minister, Victoria Skripal said she wanted, first of all, to visit her uncle and cousin in order to pass information regarding their medical condition to her grandmother.

"The whole world is now talking about an unprecedented political scandal, but real people are in the epicenter of this scandal. This is our family, which needs to be together now," she said to the channel in Russian.

Victoria Skripal said to Russian media that she had been informed by the Russian Embassy in the UK that the reason behind her visa refusal was that Yulia Skripal "seemingly" doesn't want to see her.

The UK Home Office has refused to issue a visa to Victoria Skripal, saying "her application did not comply with the Immigration Rules." While the former spy's niece believes that the "British must have something to hide," the Russian authorities have demanded that London provide an explanation on the refusal.

Meanwhile, reports have emerged stating that Sergei Skripal, a former GRU officer, has regained consciousness and his ability to speak. His daughter has been awake for several days. The medics have said that their health has been improving rapidly.


16.03.2018 - UK’s ‘highly likely’ argument on Russian involvement in Skripal case failed – envoy to UN
UK’s ‘highly likely’ argument on Russian involvement in Skripal case failed – envoy to UN

London and its allies would demonstrate their reluctance to get to the truth about the poisoning episode in the British city of Salisbury unless they support it, the Russian diplomat stated.

The failure by UK experts to establish the origins of the chemical agent used in the Salisbury poisoning has utterly eroded London’s claims about Moscow’s involvement, the Russian Ambassador to the UN, Vasily Nebenzya said on Thursday at an open meeting of the UN Security Council.

"Gary Aitkenhead, chief executive of the laboratory at Porton Down said in this connection his laboratory had established that a weapons-grade nerve agent had been utilized but they had failed to confirm its origins," Nebenzya recalled. "All of this means the main argument waved by the British side that the agent was overwhelmingly likely of Russian origin has crumbled to pieces right in front of our eyes."

"In the meantime, the whole system of so-called evidence was built exactly around the suppositions on the ‘highly likely’ big degree of Russia’s involvement in the case," he recalled.

"We must praise Mr. Aitkenhead, who didn’t sacrifice his professional standing for the purpose of suiting the schemes of the British authorities," he said. "Along with it, Aitkenhead indicated there was no way that anything like that would have come from them or would have left the four walls of their facility."

"The question is what is it?" Nebenzya said. "What precisely would have never left the lab? Does the Organization of the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons know about it?"

He said, however, that Aitkenhead’s confession only added to the murkiness of the Salisbury case.

Moscow has prepared a draft statement for the UN Security Council, Vasily Nebenzya said, adding that London and its allies would demonstrate their reluctance to get to the truth about the poisoning episode in the British city of Salisbury unless they support it. "We have prepared a draft statement for the Council. It will be a litmus test as to whether the UK and its allies are true to their words," he said. Rejecting that test will be a confirmation of their "dirty games," the diplomat added.

The Russian ambassador to the UN further castigated the UK’s ‘absurd and immoral’ allegations about Moscow’s involvement in the Salisbury poisoning.

UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson "has made absurd and immoral suggestions that the incident in Salisbury was allegedly advantageous for Moscow to unite people ahead of the election," the diplomat said.

"As immoral is his comparison between the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia and the 1936 Berlin Olympics, which unlike the Soviet Union, was attended by an impressive delegation from Britain, including high-ranked officials," he added.

Anti-Russian Propaganda - Moscow may discern the role of security services of a number of countries behind the case over the poisoning of the former Russian military intelligence officer and British spy Sergei Skripal and London's ruthless propaganda war against Russia, Vasily Nebenzya said.

"As substantiated proof of Russia's guilt, the British ambassador in Moscow demonstrated a six-page slide show to his colleagues, including the frontpage," Nebenzya said. "They pass off all these comic strips for its body of evidence, but there's nothing except the 'highly likely' proclamations in them."

"I think Prime Minister Theresa May showed this document to her counterparts in the EU, many of whom, but not everyone to their credit, accepted this as convincing proof of Russia's guilt," he said.

Nebenzya dismissed Boris Johnson's words about the 'dead cat' as red herring aimed at diverting attention from other problems.

"This exposes in bold relief the methods of propaganda warfare without any rules that the UK is conducting against Russia," he said.

Speaking of the methods of this warfare, Nebenzya did not rule out it was steered by еру secret services of a number of counties.

"We can suppose with a great degree of likelihood the role, which the secret service of a number of countries have played in this mega-provocation," Nebenzya said.

Moscow has not received any questions on Skripal case from London - The Russian side has not received from the UK a list of questions concerning the Salisbury incident, in fact, London comes up only with accusations, Russia’s UN Ambassador told.

"Boris Jonson continues convincing everybody that the British side has allegedly submitted to Russia a list of questions, to which it has received no answers as of yet. It’s exactly the other way around," he said.

"As I have already told you, there has not been and there is no list of questions to us," he said. "I am appealing to the British side - if you have them, list these questions, please, only without passing off as questions those charges categorically laid against us and demands to confess," Nebenzya said.

"Meanwhile, we have lots of questions for both London, the OPCW (Organization for Prohibition of Chemical Weapons - TASS) and also for France, which all of a sudden has rushed to assist in verifying the results of the British ‘express investigation’ under no obvious provisions of the CWC (Chemical Weapons Convention). In response to our question, the French side said that Britain had informed France about its investigation in detail. Now that London refuses to provide information to us, probably Paris will share it with us?" the diplomat questioned.


On another investigation:

16.03.2018 - UK Police Open Murder Investigation over Death of Russian Businessman Glushkov
UK Police Open Murder Investigation Over Death of Russian Businessman Glushkov

UK Metropolitan Police said that they had opened a murder investigation after the death of Nikolai Glushkov, a former top manager of Russian Aeroflot airline, in London.

"A murder investigation has been launched following the results of a post-mortem into the death of 68-year-old Russian businessman Nikolay Glushkov … A special post-mortem began on Thursday, 15 March and we received the pathologist report today (Friday, 16 March), which gave the cause of death as compression to the neck," the UK Metropolitan Police's statement read.

The UK police were called by the London ambulance service at 22.46 pm on Monday after Glushkov was found unconscious at his home in New Malden, south-west London.

On Tuesday, Russian Vedomosti newspaper owner Damian Kudryavtsev said that Glushkov, an associate of late Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky, had passed away. Later that day, London police said that they were investigating the unexplained death of a man in his 60s.


07.04.2018 - Murder of Russian National Glishkov in UK has Political Dimension for Moscow
Murder of Russian National Glushkov in UK Has Political Dimension for Moscow

The murder of former top manager of Aeroflot carrier Nikolai Glushkov has not only a criminal but also a political dimension for Moscow, the Russian Embassy in London said Saturday.

Glushkov, sentenced in absentia in Russia to eight years in prison for embezzling from Aeroflot, died in London in mid-March. Scotland Yard reported that at that stage that it considered his death to be "mysterious." At the same time, the police said that Glushkov had been choked, and the incident had been qualified as a murder. Russian investigators opened their own probe into Glushkov's murder.

"According to UK media reports, the death of a Russian citizen occurred in very strange and mysterious circumstances immediately after the poisoning of the Skripal family.

The ambassador plans to use the advice of the UK Foreign Office and request a meeting with the head of the London police in order to invite the British side to inform us in detail about the progress of the investigation. For Russia, this murder has not only criminal, but also a political dimension," the embassy said in a statement.

The embassy said that it had just received a note from UK Foreign Office regarding Glushkov's death, but that note was actually meaningless.

"The embassy is grateful for the answer, but the note does not contain any information, except for sending us to London police in case we have questions. The embassy only asked UK authorities one favor — to inform us in detail about the investigation of the death of the Russian citizen. The question has been answered neither by the police nor by the Foreign Office, which can not but cause regrets," the embassy said.

Almost a month has passed since Glushkov's death and, like with the poisoning of the Skripals, the UK side does not provide any information, the embassy noted.

"After our repeated appeals, we have nothing left but to assume that it is most likely has been done intentionally," the statement concluded.
 
What if ... this whole made up drama ... has food poisoning or a food allergy, not nerve agents - as the real culprit of the Skripal incident? And "what if" ... the Kremlin and Russia's Foreign Ministry ... highly suspect food poisoning/allergic reaction to shell fish as a probable cause? Could it be speculated that Theresa May and her backer's ... miss calculated (Big Time) and dug themselves into a black-hole abyss, that will eventually result in International implications and possible sever backlash, for themselves and the UK?

April 06, 2018 - The Best Explanation For The Skripal Drama Is Still ... Food Poisoning
MoA - The Best Explanation For The Skripal Drama Is Still ... Food Poisoning

Doctors at the Salisbury District Hospital announced today that Sergej Skripal's health is rapidly improving. He and his daughter Yulia will likely be well again.

It is unlikely that any targeted poisoning with a real 'military grade' nerve agent would have allowed for such an outcome. This brings us back to food poisoning as a possible cause of the Skripals' ordeal.

A friend of this blog, Tore, sent us his considerations which we publish below. He suggest that shellfish poisoning, which is caused by a neurotoxin known as Saxitoxin or STX, is the real culprit of the Skripal incident. He explains how this would fit to the observable behavior of the British government and other participants in the drama. In my view his theory has significant merit.

On Wednesday the niece of Sergej Skripal, Viktoria Skripal, received a phone call from Yulia Skripal. She was interviewed by a Russian TV station and suggested that food poisoning might have been the real cause of the calamities her relatives were in:
“Did they eat a dish that one cannot eat, or is it banned in England?
"The first signs when they were found were very similar to fish poisoning.”

Victoria intended to visit the UK and to bring Yulia back home to Moscow. The United Kingdom just rejected Victoria Skripal's visa application because she "did not comply with the immigration rules." No further explanation was given.

For those who have not read our previous posts on the issue we offer a short recap of the case. Regular readers may want to scroll down to Tore's part.

Sergej and Yulia Skripal were found on a public bench in Salisbury at about 4pm on March 4. They had collapsed, were conscienceless and were brought into emergency care at the Salisbury District Hospital. Local media wrote of a potential Fentanyl overdose.

Half an hour before the Skripal's collapsed they had eaten at Zizzi, a seafood and pizza outlet.

Over the next days the British government started to make a fuzz about the case. Sergej Skripal was a British spy who had been caught in Russia, put into jail and, in 2010, exchanged for Russian spies. The British government hinted of Russian involvement in the Salisbury incident.

But that story smelled fishy from its very beginning. To target an exchanged spy would guarantee that no further exchanges would ever happen. Sergej Skripal had links to the "dirty dossier" about Donald Trump that was created for the Hillary Clinton campaign. Russia had no good motive, others potentially had one. If there was something nefarious going on it seemed unlikely that Russia was involved.

I now believe that the British government jumped onto the case because it needed to divert attention from the seriously bad results of the Brexit negotiations in Brussels. There are local elections coming up in May and Theresa May's Tory party was lagging in the polls. (There may have been additional reasons related to a planed 'chemical weapon' surprise in the east-Ghouta campaign in Syria.)

Whatever it was - the spin-masters in Downing Street 10 saw a chance to convert the poisoning of the Skripals into something big that would help their political aims. The general push was to blame Russia. The idea to speak of the fearsome nerve-agent 'Novichok' came from a spy drama that had just run on British TV.

On March 12 the British Prime Minister Theresa May spoke in Parliament and claimed that the Skripals were 'attacked' with 'Novichok', a "military grade nerve agent of a type developed by Russia". It was her "45 minutes" moment. Russia was declared guilty without any evidence. Britain and other NATO countries expelled Russian diplomats.

'Novichok' is a name for a group of chemicals that are indeed deadly. But Russia never had a 'Novichok' program. It had worked on a different class of chemicals than the ones described in Vil Mirzayanov's 'Novichok' book. Moreover, if 'Novichok' chemicals were involved than Russia was only one of many suspect. The formulas for 'Novichoks' are known, various military laboratories have made some and any decent organic chemistry laboratory can create them too. The U.S., which had produced some of the 'Novichok' agents for itself, had long told its diplomats to avoid any discussions about them.

The first serious unraveling of the dubious case came on March 18 when a doctor at the Salisbury District Hospital publicly denied that any of its patients had been hurt by a nerve agent.

We wrote at that time:
Commentator Noirette had suggested here that the Skripal case was about food poisoning or a food allergy, not nerve agents. The Skripals had visited a fish restaurant one hour before they were found. The letter points into a similar direction. Food poisoning would also explain why a doctor who gave emergency help to the unconscious Yulia Skripal for over 30 minutes was not effected at all.​
To my best knowledge none of the main stream media picked up on the doctor's letter.

Then a miracle happened. On March 29, just in time for the Roman Christian Easter, the doctors in Salisbury said that Yulia Skripal was no longer in a critical condition. We headline: Last Act Of 'Novichok' Drama Revealed - "The Skripals' Resurrection":
It seems that the 'Novichok' fairy-tale the British government plays to us provides for a happy ending - the astonishing and mysterious resurrection of the victims of a "military grade" "five to eight times more deadly than VX gas" "nerve agent" "of a type developed by" Hollywood.
Happy Easter!​
The alleged nerve agent should have killed anyone who came even into slight contact with it. Survival did not fit to the earlier claims by the British government.

Now, just in time for the Orthodox Christian Easter, the condition of Sergej Skripal is reported to be rapidly improving. Another Resurrection! Hallelujah!

In my view all the stories we were told about 'Novichok', the 'doorknob' or a 'Russian attack' are fairy tales. They simply do not make sense.

Commentators of this blog, Noirette, TomGard and others, had discussed several theories of food poisoning. Food poisoning makes sense but none of the ones discussed here fitted the picture of the case. Last week Tore, a friend of this blog from Norway, sent me his theory which makes eminent sense to me.
---
Tore writes: Craig Murray's described the pressure on Porton Down to establish that a nerve agent was used in the alleged Skripal attack. I use 'alleged attack', because there is a fair chance that this was no attack, only a serious food poisoning from the very start.

The Skripals had a seafood risotto pesce with king prawns, mussels and squid rings at Zizzi, as reported here in the Daily Mail on March 6. This is a dish with a well known reputation as a source of shellfish poisoning. The Skripals were okay when they arrived, okay when they left, and passed out 40 minutes later on the bench with symptoms similar to a paralytic reaction from shellfish poisoning (PSP):
Symptoms of PSP could begin within a few minutes and up to 10 hours after consumption.
Symptoms of PSP can include:
...
Respiratory difficulty, salivation, temporary blindness, nausea and vomiting may also occur.
In extreme cases, paralysis of respiratory muscles may lead to respiratory arrest and death
within two to twelve hours after consumption. Seriously affected people must be hospitalized and placed under respiratory care.​
Another official PSP Fact Sheet (pdf) provides:
What is the treatment?
Unfortunately, there is no antidote for PSP toxins; however, supportive medical care can be life saving. For example, persons whose breathing muscles become paralyzed can be put on a mechanical respirator and given oxygen to help them breath, and people who develop a cardiac arrhythmia (abnormal heart rhythm) can be given medications to stabilize their heart rhythm.​
The similarity with symptoms and effect derived from a nerve agent are striking, but no surprise:

In fact the substance at work in a case of paralytic seafood poison is a neurotoxin called Saxitoxin (STX) which is among the most potent poisons found in nature. It works the same way as a nerve agent: It acts on the neurons, preventing normal cellular function and leading to paralysis and in worst case death. In fact Saxitoxin is so potent that it was weaponized by the U.S. and used as a chemical weapon - a nerve agent.

The U.S. developed Saxitoxin into a chemical weapon in the 1960s. The U.S. military designation is TZ. It was also used by the CIA for covert operations and liquidations as evidenced by the Church commission - see: Excerpts of CIA inventory 1, 2.

Serotoxin is registered by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) as evidenced in the Wikipedia article Saxitoxin. The agent stays active even after boiling or steaming.

Now back to Porton Down and the pressure to come up with the 'traces of a nerve agent'. The Saxitoxin could obviously pass as a nerve agent, because it is a nerve agent - but without mention of its origin - the food poisoning.

The nerve agent claim was released by police on March 7, three days after the incident.

According to the Daily Mail article mentioned above, the hospital alarmed the police the day after, on March 5, when the staff became aware of Skripal's 'spy credentials', probably through BBC which first brought the news. This means Porton Down at the most had two days from first tests to the conclusion 'nerve agent' announced on the 7th.

This also implies that the hospital probably treated the Skripals for a food poisoning from the start, until they became aware of Skripals credentials the day after. This fits with the letter to the Times from Stephen Davies, the hospital doctor.

(The timeline used above is from the Associated Press' Key moments in the case of former spy Sergei Skripal.)

The media storm had been going on for a week when Theresa May on March 12 entered parliament and announced the 'Novichok'. The blame had been on Russia from the first moment.

Speculation: Now suppose the government in the meantime had become aware they had a weak case from the start - because they had rushed Porton Down to a premature conclusion?

There would be no way back for May. The die had been cast. The government had walked out on a limb from the start, now they had to continue the theater by naming the agent.

No nerve agent would suit their narrative better than 'Novichok'. Developed in USSR, a substance with some foggy features and many variants - as opposed to other more well known agents with distinct features. And most important an agent that is not listed in OPCW and which was deliberately chosen to confuse. [b adds: 'Novichok' was also known to the British and U.S. public as a 'fearsome Russian agent' through a current spy drama on TV. It increased the propaganda value.]

The initial reluctance to involve the OPCW also fits into this picture: the decision to involve OPCW came after May had landed the Novichok claim in parliament on March 12.

The day before, on March 11, police found traces of a nerve agent in the Zizzi restaurant.

Did they find the mussel in the risotto? Or 'Novichok'?

More than three weeks into the investigation this is, as far as I know, the only confirmed police find of traces of the nerve agent. Zizzi fits in perfectly as the origin of the poisoning considering the 40 minutes it took before the Skripals passed out on the bench. Though I wonder how a "military grade nerve agent", destined to kill instantly on the battlefield, took that long to incapacitate the Skripals.

I am no doctor, nor a specialist in chemistry - only a retired journalist working with open sources. There are so many curiosities with this case, so many speculations, ...

Here in Norway we have an expression called blodtåke - best translated as blood fog - when all the media are rushing blindly in one direction, without asking the most elementary questions.

After I wrote this they found 'Novichok' on the door of the Skripals' home, which makes it even more unlikely, considering the time frame.

Did they have to divert attention from the restaurant as origin of the poisoning?

There are of course some holes in the above - just regard this as an idea to go along the line of food poisoning.

End of Tore's deliberations.
---
b here: - Tore's theory of food poisoning with Saxitoxin makes sense. It is a fitting explanation for what happened in Salisbury and for the murky tale the British government tries to sell.

(update) - Commenters noted that the theory does not immediately explain what happened to Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey, who was also treated in the hospital but less severely effected than the Skripals. Off-Guardian noted on March 23:
It was announced today that Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey – allegedly the third victim of the alleged “nerve agent” poisoning in Salisbury, UK – has been released from hospital.
Bailey did not speak to the press, and no photographs or film of him leaving the premises and going home have yet emerged.
...
Where Bailey was poisoned, and how he was poisoned is still not clear – which is puzzling of itself. Was it while attending the Skripals as a first-responder, as claimed by Theresa May (improbable on the face of it, since CID officers in Britain do not act as first-responders). Or did he, on the contrary,“have no direct contact with the Skripals”, as put out by the Daily Mail? Was he poisoned while searching the Skripals home? Or was it somewhere else entirely?
And why did he become poisoned when no one else at the scene, and indeed no one else anywhere in Salisbury fell ill, or even showed signs of contamination in their bloodwork?​
If Bailey was on the scene on Sunday afternoon, it was likely not because he was on duty, but because he happened to be in the area. Did he have a private lunch? At Zizzi's? With mussels? We do not know and the government won't say.





 
10.04.2018 - Brits Apologize to Russian Embassy for London's Political Offensive on Moscow
Brits Apologize to Russian Embassy for London's Political Offensive on Moscow

The Russian Embassy in the UK tweeted a few letters of support, sent by British nationals, amid London's ongoing smear campaign against Moscow over the Skripal case.

The Russian Embassy in London has been receiving letters of support from British people in relation to the UK government’s premature measures to the alleged poisoning attack on Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury.

One of the letters suggested that in 2003 the UK was “tricked into supporting an illegal war in Iraq” after fake evidence of the presence of weapons of mass destruction in the country was presented. He/she proceeded to say that there was no trust in reports covered by the mainstream media, calling the behavior of the government “inexcusable” when referring to the mass expulsion of Russian diplomats.

Another person wrote that the UK government was “harassing” Russia, trying to “divert public attention” away from existing problems.

Twitter users from the UK also spoke out to support Moscow amid mounting “Russophobic” sentiments across the globe, apologizing for their government’s actions…

…and thanked Moscow for its patience: People are sick and tired of anti-Russian propaganda on television:


10.04.2018 - Russian Embassy: London Failed to give "Verifiable" Info on Yulia Skripal health
Russian Embassy: London Failed to Give "Verifiable" Info on Yulia Skripal Health - Sputnik International

The Russian Embassy in the United Kingdom has underlined the importance of Yulia Skripal's interview in the probe, sending a note to the UK Foreign Office with the request to arrange a meeting between Yulia and Russian Council in the country. The embassy has also expressed concern over reports on Yulia Skripal's transfer to a "safe place", calling it suppression of evidence and an obstruction of justice.

"Careful analysis of K. Davis (the policeman) letter and a number of statements by K. Blanchard (director of the hospital) from March 29 and April 6 and 10 shows that the hospital has never directly confirmed that Sergei and Yulia Skripal had any symptoms of nerve agent poisoning and that they were treated specifically for the poisoning," the Russian embassy wrote in a comment, published on the embassy's website.

They stressed that on Tuesday "K. Blanchard has only abstractly said what symptoms there were in general and how they were usually treated."

The Russian embassy has underlined that the Salisbury hospital, where Yulia and her father, former Russian GRU agent Sergei Skripal, were treated after the alleged attack, has failed to confirm that they had been treated for chemical poisoning or that they were treated precisely for these symptoms.


10.04.2018 - Proof needed Yulia Skripal Discharged from Hospital on her own Will - Embassy
Proof Needed Yulia Skripal Discharged From Hospital on Her Own Will - Embassy

The Russian Embassy in London has reacted to the report, Yulia Skripal, who was poisoned in England along with her father, had been discharged from the hospital.

Salisbury District Hospital medical director Christine Blanshard confirmed that Yulia had been discharged from the facility, adding that she hoped, her father Sergei would leave the hospital in due course as his health had been improving.

Yulia has now been discharged from Salisbury District Hospital… This is not the end of her treatment, but marks a significant milestone. Her father [Sergei] has also made good progress. On Friday, I announced that he was no longer in a critical condition. Although he is recovering more slowly than Yulia, we hope that he too will be able to leave hospital in due course,"
Blanshard said in a statement.

Following the announcement, the Russian Embassy in London said on Twitter, it needed urgent confirmation that what was being done to Yulia was done on her own free will.


Russian Embassy, UK @RussianEmbassy
https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/status/983629262845562881
We congratulate Yulia Skripal on her recovery. Yet we need urgent proof that what is being done to her is done on her own free will.
4:54 AM - Apr 10, 2018

Commenting on the issue, Russian Ambassador to the UK Alexander Yakovenko said that Russian diplomats in London had learned that Yulia had been discharged from a hospital from media reports, as there was no official notification.

“We have learned about it from mass media, there were no official notifications from the UK side,” Yakovenko said.

Earlier in the day, Sky News broadcaster reported that Yulia was due to be discharged on Monday.

At the same time, a spokesman for Salisbury District Hospital gave no update on the condition of Yulia in an interview to Sputnik. "We will update on our website, when there’re developments we can update on," NHS England’s press office said at that time.


10.04.2018 - Details of High-Profile Probes involving Russians in UK revealed
Details of High-Profile Probes Involving Russians in UK Revealed

Officials from the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office revealed at a briefing on Monday the United Kingdom's unwillingness to cooperate in high-profile cases, and to disclose materials in the cases of late Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky and former Russian security officer Alexander Litvinenko.

Both cases have been investigated by both London and Moscow, amid London's accusations against Russia of having a role in the poisoning of ex-spy Sergei Skripal.

UK Unwillingness to Cooperate -
The Russian prosecutors believe that the killing of Litvinenko was beneficial for the United Kingdom as a way of getting rid of one of the key witnesses who could have testified in the Berezovsky case.

Russian Deputy Prosecutor General Saak Karapetyan said that London’s actions in the Skripal case had forced Russia to disclose data on the lack of UK willingness to cooperate with Moscow on earlier high-profile cases.

"In the case of the attack on the Skripals, the United Kingdom simply forced us to do this [disclose data in the cases of Berezovsky and Litvinenko], we would not have done so [otherwise]. We were forced to do this to show the level of cooperation, the attitude toward cooperation and the refusal to engage in cooperation," Karapetyan said.

Over the past 15 years, has Russia submitted 83 extradition requests to UK authorities, Karapetyan continued. Seventy-two individuals on this list are accused of committing, or have already been sentenced for the embezzlement of a total of over $8.5 billion, the official added.

"As of today, 60 out of 83 requests have been declined. I would like to point out that in 55 cases the requests were declined as these individuals had been granted the status of a refugee or a victim of politically motivated persecution," Karapetyan pointed out.

The official added that the largest number of denials had been issued in the period between 2010 and 2016 when incumbent UK Prime Minister Theresa May was the country's home secretary.

Similar Pattern of High-Profile Cases -
The cases of Skripal, Litvinenko, and Berezovsky have been unfolding under the same scenario, whereby unfounded accusations are followed by demands for sanctions against Moscow, Karapetyan suggested.

The Russian prosecutors also noted that in these three cases, the UK authorities had classified the course and results of the investigation, thus violating international law.

Advisor to Russian Prosecutor General Nikolai Atmonyev noted that London had been voicing unfounded accusations against Russia in the Skripal case on the basis of unsubstantiated comparisons with the poisoning of Litvinenko.

Terlyuk Could Have Been Attacked Instead of Skripal -
The Russian Prosecutor General’s Office representatives said that a stateless individual or Vladimir Terlyuk who is of Kazakh origin could have been considered by the UK security services as possible targets for an attack instead of Skripal.

In 2006, Terlyuk submitted a written address to the Russian General Prosecutor’s Office. The letter read that between May and September 2003, Berezovsky, Litvinenko, and Alexander Goldgarb, the vice-president of the International Foundation for Civil Liberties, funded by Berezovsky, and their UK lawyers had tried to persuade Terlyuk to lie to the UK law enforcement that he was a Russian security officer, tasked with killing Berezovsky, to create a false basis for receiving refugee status for the latter.

Terlyuk, however, refused to do so, despite threats from these individuals. Berezovsky subsequently addressed the UK law enforcement himself saying that Terlyuk was a Russian security officer instructed to kill him.

In 2003, Terlyuk denied these claims during questioning by the UK police, revealing to law enforcement all the details of the campaign on the alleged planned assault of Berezovsky, organized by the businessman, as well as the actions of his accomplices. In 2010, Terlyuk confirmed the same details in his testimony to a UK court.

The same year, the UK Home Office said that it was closing the investigation into the alleged planned attack on Berezovsky over a lack of evidence, however, the businessman was granted asylum in the United Kingdom.

During Monday's briefing, Russian Prosecutor General's Office spokesman Alexander Kurennoy revealed the copy of a letter by Terlyuk to Russia's Prosecutor General Yury Chayka dated April 6. Since January, Terlyuk has been addressed by Scotland Yard asking him to "clarify [his] position on cooperation with the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office which is threatening the United Kingdom," the letter, revealed by the Russian prosecutors, read.

In the same document, Teryuk also said he feared for his life, amid the poisoning of Skripal, and noted that his unwillingness to provide false evidence in Berezovsky’s case might affect his citizenship status.

Kurennoy suggested that the UK authorities had been using the lack of certainty in Terlyuk's citizenship status to pressure him into yet another attempt to defame the Russian authorities.

London Ignoring Moscow's Requests -
The UK authorities ignored 39 requests by the Russian authorities concerning ensuring Terlyuk’s safety between August 2006 and December 2011, the representative of the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office said.

These requests also concerned the questioning of Berezovsky and his accomplices, which had participated in the campaign, related to granting of a refugee status to Berezovsky by the UK authorities, Atmonyev said.

London has not yet found the perpetrators of an assault on Terlyuk and his wife in 2010, which was committed after he had testified against Berezovsky in a UK court, Armonyev recalled. The UK Home Office denied Russia’s requests to protect witnesses in the case of Berezovsky, the official pointed out.

Above all, Moscow has not received any response to its repeated requests to the United Kingdom about the reasons for granting refugee status to the businessman, Atmonyev also stated.

UK Interested in Murder of Litvinenko -
Litvinenko, who received asylum in the United Kingdom, died in London in November 2016. Forensic findings suggested that the Russian ex-security officer had been exposed to the radioactive substance polonium-210. However, the circumstances of his death have not been determined.

Atmonyev suggested that the United Kingdom was capable of questioning Litvinenko and ensuring his security, however, this had not been done. London’s claims that Russian citizens Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitry Kovtun had a role in the poisoning of Litvinenko have been refuted by Hamburg prosecutors (Hamburg being the city from which Kovtun arrived the United Kingdom), as well as by the Russian investigators.

Polonium-210 had been stored in London before Lugovoy arrived there, Atmonyev pointed out, adding that traces of the substance were found in Berezovsky’s office.

"I have every reason to assert that Berezovsky was interested in eliminating Litvinenko at that time," Atmonyev added.

Karapetyan also noted that the UK authorities had classified the materials in Litvinenko’s case, and had not provided any evidence in the case to Russia.
 
Mentioned before was Russias post election maneuvering; the who and such. Here John Helmer looks at some of the people, particularly Alexei Kudrin who has come up against Dmitry Medvedev in the past. It's curious as each decision has a line of force, and I don't profess to know each of these people (history) well enough and what could be working behind the scenes; especially as Kudrin is being promoted in the West (Finiancial Times article) and yet wields, or appears to hold sway in positioning. Kudrin was the CEO of Sberbank, which is highly important in many transactions to the East at the moment.

Perhaps someone might have some other ideas on this, yet it appears that things are 'open' and may formulate on what the West's true intentions will be - some of what is said here, if remotely solid, provides for even more speculation of where things could go. It would not surprise me either if these words are somewhat planted to create a reactions in separate groups in the West. Something seems afoot.

VICE PRESIDENT FOR CAPITULATION – PUTIN DECIDES WHAT JOB TO GIVE KUDRIN


By John Helmer, Moscow
President Vladimir Putin is considering whether to appoint a vice president for negotiating an end to sanctions with the US and the European Union (EU), and an about-turn in Russia’s foreign and defence policy.

In the scheme proposed by former finance minister Alexei Kudrin (lead image, centre), the job would hold more power than the prime minister, allowing Dmitry Medvedev to remain in his place, but subordinate him to the new man. Kudrin’s idea is that he would become this de facto vice president; the dominant policymaker of the government after Putin; and his likely successor.

Vice president is the term being used among Kremlin officials and advisors. Not since the constitutional crisis of 1993, when Vice President Alexander Rutskoi led the Russian parliament in rebellion against President Boris Yelstin, has the position of vice president existed in Russia, with the power to succeed or replace the incumbent president. It is an arrangement for which Kudrin claims to have the backing of the US and the EU. Kudrin would also draw on the support of the Russian oligarchs, inside and outside the country.

The Kudrin scheme is being opposed as capitulation by the leadership of Russia’s defence, military and security forces. The Defence Minister, Sergei Shoigu, the chief of the General Staff, General Valery Gerasimov, the deputy prime minister in charge of the military-industrial complex, Dmitry Rogozin, and other senior officials have been trying to persuade Putin to appoint a new prime minister to fight the military, economic and information war which they believe the US intends to wage against Russia until the Kremlin accepts the West’s terms. For the story of their Stavka, read this.

These officials are fiercely opposed to Kudrin, and to his attempt to make an alliance with Medvedev to claim the legal succession to Putin, should Putin agree to relinquish the powers and policies against which the NATO powers have planned regime change.

Igor Sechin, the chief executive of Rosneft and a presidential succession contender himself, is not in the running for the so-called vice presidency. Sources close to him say he is opposed to the ambitions of Kudrin and Medvedev but he is biding his time. As deputy chief of the Kremlin staff when Putin was president between 2000 and 2008, Sechin was the de facto vice president for domestic policy, and dwarfed Medvedev.

The Russian Constitution of December 1992 provided for a vice president as the second ranking official of the state. He was to be elected with the president on the same ticket, American style. The Constitution’s Article 121-7 said: “The vice-president of the Russian Federation carries out his separate powers at the request of the President of the Russian Federation. The vice-president of the Russian Federation replaces the President of the Russian Federation in case of his absence.”

There has been only one – Alexander Rutskoi (right), a major-general in the Soviet

Air Force
and decorated combat veteran of the Afghan War. After he led the rebellion against Boris Yeltsin in 1993, he was suspended by Yeltsin in a decree the Constitutional Court ruled to be illegal. With a vote of parliament Rutskoi became acting president on September 22, 1993. Two weeks later he was defeated in the Yeltsin-ordered attack on the parliament building, and imprisoned. Yeltsin then arranged for a new constitution which was ratified by a fraudulent referendum in December 1993. In the new Yeltsin charter the vice president’s post was erased. In its place, a subordinate prime minister, named by the president but not voted by a general election, was substituted.

Kudrin’s ambition to take power is so well-known, in September 2011 it brought him into open conflict with Medvedev, then president and hoping for a second term. Kudrin declared his power grab in Washington. When he returned to Moscow, Medvedev gave him a tongue-lashing on television and sacked him. Putin, then the prime minister and intent on recovering the presidency for himself in 2012, defended Kudrin by saying “our very personal and my good friend” had suffered an “emotional breakdown”.

Three months later, at Putin’s national call-in television show, he was restored. “Aleksei Leonidovich Kudrin has not left my team. We are old comrades, he’s my friend. He did a lot for the country. I’m proud that this man worked in my government. Such people are needed and will be needed in current and future governments.” The US state broadcaster RFE/RL headlined the rehabilitation: “Putin And Kudrin: Russia’s Real Tandem”.

Source: Putin And Kudrin: Russia's Real Tandem

Kudrin, a St. Petersburg economist with Putin in the mayoral administration of Anatoly Sobchak in the mid-1990s, has been Putin’s Svengali for austerity budgeting, privatization of state assets, and oligarch control of the economy for twenty years. His record for enriching himself has been attested by sources inside Alrosa, the state diamond miner, whose board Kudrin controlled when he was finance minister. Start reading the backfile here.

Last week Kudrin advertised his readiness for promotion to Putin’s official deputy, briefing the press on his proposals for “a fair parity — after six years of growth in unproductive spending, move to a six-year increase in productive spending.” Kudrin meant six years since his dismissal from office. He also means to implement sharp cuts in defence spending, and a policy of withdrawal from the Ukraine and Syrian fronts on the terms demanded by Washington. He favours a massive sell-off of state assets to the oligarchs, whose capital export Kudrin has long protected, and whose bailout by the state banks Kudrin directed in 2008 with his longtime ally, German Gref (lead image, 2nd from left), chief executive of Sberbank. When Kudrin uses the word reform, he means a privatization of the state’s assets to the oligarchs, and nationalization of the oligarchs’ losses and liabilities.

Last week too, Kudrin advertised that he and Medvedev had met for a discussion, which the prime minister’s spokesman characterised as focusing on “his proposals on improving the system of public administration.” In fact, they discussed how to form a united front in the bidding for Putin’s decision.

To show Putin he has the support of the anti-Russian alliance in the West, Kudrin arranged for the Financial Times to report yesterday that his promotion is a near certainty.

5-2.png

Source: Subscribe to read

The newspaper calls the proposed job “a heavyweight post in charge of economic strategy and outreach to Europe and the US, said people briefed on the plans….His title could be something like: the president’s representative for international economic co-operation.”

A Kudrin spokesman is also quoted by the newspaper as revealing his boss’s calculation that with Putin’s mandate he will “reform” Russia’s foreign policy. “If Kudrin joined the administration or government, it would indicate that they have agreed on a certain agenda of change, including in foreign policy, because without change in foreign policy, reforms are simply impossible in Russia… Kudrin is the only one in the top echelons with whom they will talk in the west and towards whom there is a certain trust.”

The Financial Times calls the struggle to promote Kudrin with presidential authority to dismantle Russia’s defence capabilities and reverse its foreign strategy, “an effort to repair relations with the west as sanctions and growing international conflict obstruct attempts to reinvigorate Russia’s stagnant economy.”

The London newspaper has been notoriously mistaken in the past, reporting its wishful thinking as if it had already been decided in Moscow. Once, the newspaper’s Moscow correspondent – married to a lawyer in a firm working with Yegor Gaidar on state asset sales to foreign investors — announced that Gaidar had been elected prime minister. In fact, he had been defeated in the parliamentary vote, and Victor Chernomyrdin voted in his place. That was in December 1992.

Sources familiar with Kudrin’s campaign against the General Staff say the tension has been running higher than they can remember since then. They claim Putin has decided not to dismiss Medvedev, but has yet to decide between Kudrin’s scheme for the future and the policies urged by the Stavka.

NOTE: Key to lead image, from left to right, Mikhail Fridman, German Gref, Alexei Kudrin. Missing from the illustration, but included in Kudrin's plan, is Dmitry Peskov, who has been hoping to move from Kremlin spokesman to replace Sergei Lavrov as Foreign Minister. Also in the capitulation faction, Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov announced to the press last week that he doesn't want to be reappointed to his current job. "I want to work where the President will say. I am glad of any work that the President will give".The original of the lead image was a poster by Kukriniksy, the collective of three famous Soviet cartoonists, Mikhail Kupriyanov, Porfiri Krylov and Nikolai Sokolov. Their cartoon, published in Moscow in October 1938, showed the British betraying the Czechs by handing over the Sudetenland to Adolph Hitler, as Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain had agreed with Hitler in Munich on September 30, 1938.
 
Все уже, кажется, написали. Вставлю свои 5 копеек и тему можно закрывать. Президент приехал на церемонию на новой машине. Теперь на отечественной. Мерседесам дали отставку.

Translation
All already, seems, wrote. I'll put my 5 cents and topic can be closed. The President came to the ceremony with a new car. Now on domestic. Mercedes was dismissed.
ScreenShot_20180507132957.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ca.
Russians see return of superpower status as Putin’s main achievement in previous term while 45% consider uneven distribution of wealth as the main failure. This is one of the things that Putin promises to tackle during this term: Putin prioritizes economic breakthrough, quality of life in swearing-in speech.

The West is falling apart and can't even see it due to its own madness. Meanwhile in Russia: Putin plan: Russia to halve poverty, join world’s five biggest economies, increase life expectancy and Putin Sworn in: 'Russia as Country of Opportunities for the People is Our Goal'.

All that anti Russian hysteria has backfired in multiple ways. The sanctions hurt the West more than they hurt Russia and the Number of Foreign Tourists in Moscow Increased by 40% Over Past 7 Years - Mayor:

MOSCOW (Sputnik) - The number of foreign tourists visiting Moscow has increased by 40% over the past seven years despite the tense relations between Russia and the West, Mayor of Moscow Sergei Sobyanin said.

"The flow of tourists since 2010 has grown from 12 million to 21 million. Moreover, not only Russians are heading to Moscow now. Despite everything that is happening and the world being constantly intimidated by Moscow, the number of foreigners in these seven years has increased by 40 percent," Sobyanin told Rossiiskaya Gazeta in an interview published on Monday.

According to the mayor, tourism revenues in Moscow's economy now amount to "over 700 billion rubles [$11.4 billion] a year," which is in part due to the city's development, event tourism, and festivals.

Sobyanin also expressed confidence that the number of foreign tourists in Moscow would continue to increase.

Russian-Western relations deteriorated in 2014 over Moscow's alleged involvement in Ukrainian domestic affairs and Crimea's reunification with Russia. The relations got even worse due to Russia's support for Syrian President Bashar Assad, which contradicts the West's stance. Most recently, the ties were affected by Russia's alleged involvement in the poisoning of a former intelligence officer in the United Kingdom. Russia has repeatedly denied all allegations.
 
Putin’s Inaugural Address - The President Outlines the Immense Challenges Facing Russia

Great speech. I think he really nails the balance between "order" and "chaos", conservatism and the necessity for change, that Peterson always talks about.
 
Strong Russia with powerful leader essential to achieve global peace, says Moldovan leader
May 07, 15:29 UTC+3
According to Dodon, the policy pursued by the Russian president offers hope that "instead of brute force politicians will begin to resolve disagreements at the negotiating table"

CHISINAU, May 7. /TASS/.
A strong Russia led by a strong leader is necessary to achieve peace around the globe, Moldovan President Igor Dodon told TASS commenting on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s inauguration ceremony held on Monday.

"A strong Russia led by a strong President Vladimir Putin is necessary to ensure peace around the globe where more and more conflicts have emerged recently and tensions are rising," Dodon said. He recalled that in recent decades alone wars had been unleashed in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and many other countries.

Moldova’s president stressed that "Western politicians used to blame the USSR for these misfortunes, in fact [US President Ronald] Reagan even dubbed it ‘the evil empire.’ However, after the world actually became unipolar in the 1990s, wars did not disappear. On the contrary, they continued unabated," he pointed out. According to Dodon, the West was not particularly enthusiastic about Russia’s return to the international stage with the advent of Putin, who began to actively uphold its legitimate interests. Yet, that offered hope that peace was possible.

"The policy pursued by the Russian president offers hope that, instead of brute force that some countries are often banking on now, politicians will begin to resolve disagreements at the negotiating table," Dodon noted. He stressed that Moldova is interested in dialogue between Russia and the West and was hopeful that the current geopolitical standoff could come to an end after Putin assumed office.

He also hoped that Russia and the West would be able to reach a consensus, since nothing good will come out of the current confrontation. "Moldova is interested in that, as we want to develop relations with Russia, the EU and the US. We need that in order to tackle the pressing Transnistrian issue," Dodon emphasized, adding that "resolving the Transnistrian problem can serve as a good example for cooperation between Moscow and the West."

On Monday, May 7, 2018, Vladimir Putin officially assumed office as Russia’s president for his fourth term, which will expire on May 7, 2024. He first took office in 2000, having served two terms until 2008 when Dmitry Medvedev was elected the nation’s head of state.

In 2012, Putin again got the opportunity to run for the presidency and, after winning the presidential race, he became the first head of state whose term of office lasts for six years.

 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom