SummerLite said:I wasn't sure where to post this, here or the Alex Jones thread but decided here since there has been discussion about NASA announcing life on Mars.
Robert David Steele on The Alex Jones Show. June 30,2017
Nasa has been forced to deny a bizarre conspiracy theory that it is running a child slave colony on Mars. The theory was cooked up by ex-CIA case officer who spouted the wild allegations on a US national radio show on Thursday
Ex-CIA officer Robert David Steele made the comments on The Alex Jones Show
He claimed that children have been secretly shipped to Mars to work as slaves
In response, a Nasa spokesman said that 'there are no humans on Mars'
Earlier this week, Nasa was forced to deny that it was soon to announce the discovery of alien life
"We actually believe that there is a colony on Mars that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride,' Mr Steele said.
So that once they get to Mars they have no alternative but to be slaves on the Mars colony.'
Mr Jones agreed, saying 'clearly they don't want us looking into what is happening' because 'every time probes go over they turn them off.'
'Look, I know that 90 per cent of the Nasa missions are secret and I've been told by high level Nasa engineers that you have no idea. There is so much stuff going on,' he said.
The agency's statement comes just days after a rumour surfaced that it was soon to announce the discovery of alien life.
The hacker collective Anonymous set conspiracy theorists abuzz this week after it claimed Nasa is on the verge of announcing the discovery of alien life.
In a video, shared to an unofficial YouTube channel said to be affiliated with the vigilante group, a masked presenter cited snippets of a recent talk by Nasa Associate Administrator Dr Thomas Zurbuchen to support their prediction.
But shortly afterwards Nasa confirmed that no such announcement is on the way.
Dr Zurbuchen took to Twitter on Tuesday to assure that the reports were false, and said that we still do not know if we are alone in the universe.
_http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4654288/Nasa-denies-running-child-slave-colony-Mars.html
Going back to this claim by Steele that "children have been secretly shipped to Mars to work as slaves" I think this whole UFO business is not what our 3D technology is capable of achieving.
In one of the Linda Mouton Howe videos she used the phrase "Trojan Horse" to describe the technology allowed to fall into the hands of the MIC.
She speculates we were only allowed to have technology that would be beneficial to the aliens who gave it to us. I think the deep state/secret government/NASA is touting fantastic claims to impress us with interstellar or galactic space travel that they don't really have. That is not to say they don't have some very high technologies but I don't think they have been to Mars.
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic said:Q: (T) Is the book Courtney Brown wrote, "Cosmic Voyage," concerning the Martian population...
A: It is true that there are underground bases on Mars, but they are Orion STS.
Q: (T) Are there Martians as portrayed by Courtney Brown?
A: Not exactly. He is portraying the Orion STS as the Martians.
Q: (T) Is Courtney Brown a government disinformation agent?
A: More as an "agent provocateur."
Q: (T) Is he working for the government?
A: Not directly, and remember, the government is not one entity.
Q: (L) Who is primarily backing Courtney Brown?
A: Rockefeller group.
Q: (L) Is Mike Lindemann and company part of this Rockefeller group at this time?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Linda Howe?
A: No.
Q: (T) Did Courtney actually do remote viewing to obtain the information in the book?
A: Not really. Not needed.
Q: (T) Does this mean that the whole story is concocted on his part?
A: Semi. Elements of it are factual.
Q: (T) Yes. I could see that there were factual elements. I could also see that there was a LOT that was questionable. that conflicts with EVERYTHING else that has come out from other researchers. This is all totally twisted and different.
A: Close.
Q: (T) Is Courtney able to do remote viewing?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) But he did not use it with this book?
A: No.
Q: (T) So, the book was made up the way it is. It is a story. Some factual information, some invented information, some pure BS thrown in to fluff it out. So, the book is NOT an account of work that has come from remote viewing sessions?
A: No, but not needed.
Q: (L) You have said twice that remote viewing was not "needed." Where did he get his information?
A: Secret sources. Agents of the “nation of the third eye."
Q: (J) What or who - is the "Nation of the Third Eye?"
A: Terran civilization under the surface.
Q: (L) Now, wait a minute. I remember that when they said the Aryans were brought from Kantek, and that they were "sturdier," or something like that, and I remarked that it seemed that they would be less sturdy - and the C's answered "on the surface." Now, that has always bothered me. I don't think they meant "surface appearances." Have the Aryans been glorified as the "master race" because they are more suited to living underground?
A: Close. All types there are "Aryan."
Q: (L) Okay, is this a Terran underground civilization that has been 'managed' by Orions, or did it develop on its own?
A: One at a time.
Q: (L) Did the underground civilization develop on its own?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is it managed or manipulated by Orions as well?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Are these "managers" Orions from other densities?
A: Yes and no.
Q: (L) I don't understand. Are there some that are 4th and some that are 3rd?
A: The human types there are "bi-density."
Q: (L) Holy Shiite Moslems!
A: Grays and Lizards are 4th density. They can "visit" 3rd density, but they must keep returning to 4th in order to "regenerate."
Q: (T) Are you saying that the human/Aryan types can exist as long as they want in any density?
A: In 4th and 3rd.
Q: (L) They can move back and forth, existing with equal ease on either density?
A: Well, not with "equal ease," because 4th density is easier, naturally.
Q: (T) So, the information Courtney Brown was given to write this quasi fiction book, is about the Aryans and not about the Martians?
A: "Martians" is easier to understand for the less well- informed, not to mention any discussion of the densities!
Q: (T) Absolutely. Martians are easier to accept. A lot easier to understand than densities! (L) Okay, Third Eye. What is this?
A: That is what they call themselves when pressed for an explanation by surface types, such as yourselves. They were the inspiration for Masonic lore and Illuminati, too.
Q: (L) Does this "Third Eye" designation have a connotation of third eye abilities as we understand them?
A: Psychic.
Q: (T) Does Courtney know he has been had?
A: He has not been "had." He is under the employ of those who pull the levers, so to speak.
Q: (L) You said "pull the levers." Is Courtney Brown a robot, Greenbaumed, mind-controlled, implanted, or any or all of the above? (T) Or is he just foolish?
A: No. Not so foolish, he does not worry about paying the power bill. As Forest Gump said: "Stupid is as stupid does."
Q: (L) Are you implying that I am foolish or stupid because I DO worry about paying the power bill?
A: No, we are not implying that you are stupid, or foolish, for that matter... But, Courtney Brown is not either. Who is he hurting? And, he has hit the jackpot with this one. Knowledge can be procured by reading literature, then analyzing it.
Q: (T) Is the time-table that he has given correct?
A: Close.
Q: (T) So, the powers that be are going to follow this time table and present the Aryans as Martians?
A: No.
Q: (L) Are the Aryans going to present themselves as Martians?
A: Initially. In order for the Terrans to get used to the idea of EBEs.
Q: (T) But, they are not the good guys. Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.
A: Some of the "good guys" are identical in appearance.
Q: (T) Is this a subterfuge on the part of the Aryans so that they can slide in quietly and take over?
A: No, they do not need that at all. It is a way for the "government" to introduce everyone to the new reality of the existence of intelligent life all over the place, not just here.
Q: (T) So, they have their own agenda, but it is not what Courtney presented in the book.
A: It does not matter. The book is a somewhat altered "New Reality 101."
I think we are just being set up to expect these Martians or "Blue Avians?" to show up.
Also, another aspect is the "Hyperdimensional" nature of where some of this technology is coming from as this thread and this session reminded me:
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=29988.msg387170#msg387170 said:Q: (L) Okay, we've got this Denver UFO thing. Obviously, it's a UFO, which means it's what?
A: Hyperdimensional as we have discussed before.
Q: (L) Is this anything new, or is this something that's been going on for a long time?
A: Longer than you suspect.
Q: (L) Well, obviously it doesn't show up on cameras unless you slow the film down...
A: That is typical as we have discussed in the past.
Q: (L) Does this mean that we're heading for being invaded by aliens?
A: We have also covered densities and that sort of thing. Your planet is definitely moving through a
transition as all the many things you note and discuss point toward. However what is apparent now is
temporary.
Q: (L) So, the things like sinkholes, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, the strange noises in the sky,
electrical charges... All of that stuff are symptoms of this transition? Is that what you're saying?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And that's only temporary?
A: Yes. And UFOs become more obvious during such transitions.
Q: (Perceval) Why is this Denver thing even unusual? (L) I didn't think it was that unusual either.
A: It exits and enters via a "time lock".
Q: (L) There is one question I want to ask about this UFO thing. Kind of what I get from what you're
saying is that extra or excessive or highly visible UFO activity is only a temporary or transitory thing
when the planet is going through some kind of density transition? Is that what you're suggesting?
A: Yes
Q: (L) What about this invasion that was supposed to happen for, what was it? Up to 18 years from
1994? When would that be? (Kniall) This year. (L) Right about now. So, what about this invasion?
A: In case you forgot, we once explained to you about the symbolic nature of communications between
densities. Also, in case you have forgotten your own words: Who needs aliens when you have
psychopaths? And how many clues have you been given? The bottom line is that you have already been
invaded!
Q: (Perceval) Alien zombies... (L) Aliens are hyperdimensional, so they don't really... (Andromeda)
Invade... (L) They've invaded! (Perceval) Through their proxies, the psychopaths. (Perceval) When they
talked in 1994 about an invasion, they really were talking about the takeover or imposition of
psychopathic ideas. (L) So basically 9/11 was kind of like the invasion?
A: Indeed, and even using supersecret tech.
Q: (Kniall) That's interesting because there was a session where they described what happened at the
WTC as being a dome of the timelock or something. And they just mentioned "time lock" in reference to
this. (Ailen) But then why do they become more visible during a time of transition?
A: Difficult to control matching frequencies when the frequencies of the multilevel environment keeps
changing.
Q: (L) There was something else I wanted to ask about. (Andromeda) What about that humming sound
that we all heard awhile back in the office?
A: Electrical charge.
Q: (L) How come we can't measure things like that?
A: Everything else including instruments are within the system.
Q: (Perceval) They said electrical charge... (L) Then you can't tell that a charge is different from
anything... (Perceval) What we heard in the office was coming from the computer amp, but... (Mr.
Scott) Well, but it's like if you measure the voltage between something and the earth, if the charge of
both is increased, the voltage will be the same but the total charge on both can be much higher. But
you can't tell because you're using a device that can only measure the difference between two points.
(L) Belibaste, what's your question about the companion star grounding that you mentioned earlier?
(Belibaste) In a previous session, it was said that the companion star coming closer induced a
grounding of the sun. I simply wanted to know more precisely how this grounding occurs. For example,
is there some kind of electric connection between the sun and the companion star, and if so, which kind
of current transits between those two celestial bodies?
A: Indeed, but that occurs "outside" the system.
Q: (Belibaste) That's what you said, Ark. That it's a kind of wormhole...
A: Wormhole is good!
Q: (Belibaste) At the level of the sun, can we say that the reason for this grounding is the reduced
positive overall charge?
A: Yes.
Q: (Belibaste) Okay, this reduced positive charge induces a reduced field that increases gravity?
A: Yes.
Q: (Belibaste) And this increase in gravity explains why there are less solar winds expelled from the
sun although there is increased cometary activity?
A: Yes.
Q: (Belibaste) Okay, that's what we thought. (L) Next question? (Perceval) They made a comment in
there about assassinations. They made a reference to major steps being like assassinations that are
accepted by the masses. Is that what the Sandy Hook massacre was?
A: Well, we had in mind things like JFK, RFK, John Lennon, Diana, and others of note. Of course the
Sandy Hook affair was an assassination of sorts, but more along the line of psyops with an objective.
Q: (Perceval) You said that it was more along the line of psyops with a specific goal…
A: Remind people how much they need the chancellor and his pals!
Q: (L) Like the scene in “V for Vendetta”. (Perceval) How many individuals were involved in the killings
of the people at Sandy Hook?
A: 5
Q: (Perceval) Was the younger guy, Adam, involved? Did he shoot anybody?
A: He shot but did he hit anything???
Q: (L) I would say they involved him. They had him mind-controlled or hypnotized, he had a gun in his
hand, ya know... He's undoubtedly pulling the trigger and shooting. (Belibaste) Like Sirhan Sirhan. He
was shooting, but he wasn't the real killer. (L) He was there making a lot of noise. Like that French
military disaster where they were showing off for the public and supposed to be using blanks, and
somebody had live ammunition. Well, he may have had blanks. (Perceval) Did the people who planned
Sandy Hook, did they have a plan to include his brother Ryan?
A: Not necessarily.
Q: (Perceval) Did none of the staff that survived or anybody see that there were five people, and not
just one?
A: No. But even if they did, remember the Pentagon and Flight 77.
Q: (L) I would say that the ones who actually saw them were dead. They were the ones who were
killed. (Perceval) And the people that did this, were they part of an overt US government agency like
the CIA or something? Or was it something more murky and hidden?
A: Murky is right. By the way, 5 people includes support, not all shooters with visibility.
Q: (Perceval) It was pretty sick. (L) So was 9/11. So was JFK's assassination. So was Bobby Kennedy's.
So was Martin Luther King's. So was Diana's. So was John Lennon's. (Perceval) I know, but you're
talking about shooting 20 6-year-old children. (L) Well, look at what they did here in France.
Mohammed Merah. (Perceval) But this is just... There are 20 of them. (L) How many were killed up
there in Norway? (Thorbiorn) 78, I think. Yeah, with the Breivik shooting, how many shooters were
there with that one? (L) Well, that one was pretty much a crazy guy, because they've got him on trial.
When they get somebody on trial, it's usually because it's a crazy guy. When the shooter is dead, you
can bet that something else was going on. (Ailen) Well, Sirhan... (Perceval) There's a level of personal
involvement... Well, I shouldn't be surprised. (L) Well, yeah, why would any of us be surprised? That's
the thing. (Thorbiorn) For Breivik, there have been some rumors that there were other people involved.
He was framed as the only one. (Belibaste) 78 is a lot for one person to shoot. (L) Yeah. Maybe we
should ask. Was there anybody else involved with this Breivik shooting?
A: Out of sight, yes.
Q: (Perceval) Snipers. (Belibaste) Scopes and rifles...
Q: (Perceval) Snipers. (Belibaste) Scopes and rifles...
A: Practice run!
Q: (Andromeda) On the same day as Sandy Hook, and the following day, there were a lot of other
attacks. There was the slashing of school children in China, and there were a couple of other people
with boxcutters, and the guy who was picked up who had 47 guns and had claimed he was gonna do a
school shooting or something. What was up with that?
A: All of these types of events are "covered" by HAARP and that cannot be restricted at will.
Q: (L) So in other words they turn on the HAARP thing to muddle people's brains. While they're brains
are all turned into tapioca, they do their deed. Then, of course, the thing being turned on and people's
brains being muddled, people who are already on the edge or susceptible go off the deep end along
with the targets. Is that it?
A: Exactly.
Q: (Andromeda) What about all the coincidences with the Batman movie, with the Sandy Hook
reference in the Batman movie? (Perceval) Is that something like that 9/11 mass consciousness
signaling to itself?
A: Yes. The cosmic mind sends many clues, but who is listening? And you know what the result of not
listening is!
Q: (Perceval) It shouts very loudly at you! (Kniall) On September 13, something was seen above
mainly Arizona and New Mexico. It was claimed it was the US Army test firing rockets, some kind of
rocket booster, and then they fired two patriot missiles at it to shoot it down. I wrote an article about it
suggesting that it was the cover-up of a celestial event? (Perceval) Was that a fireball?
A: Yes.
Q: (Andromeda) What about the gas leak explosion in Indiana? (L) Oh, yeah! (Perceval) What caused
that? That's the question. It's as short as I can make it. [laughter]
A: It wasn't a gas leak!
Q: (Perceval) So, was it for example, caused by a fireball? A space rock?
A: Close.
Q: (Perceval) A micro fireball? (L) Well, I don't think that's it. I think probably it's more like a comet
fragment? (Perceval) Was it a discharge from a comet fragment?
A: Air burst, but very low and highly charged.
Q: (Perceval) Something in the universe didn't like those two houses.
A: It wasn't the houses, it was the location.
Q: (Perceval) Something underground that attracted it?
A: Yes.
Q: (Belibaste) What was it?
A: Charge.
Q: (Belibaste) Electric charge.
A: Yes.
Q: (Belibaste) But coming from an underground...
A: Opening up!
Q:
As you can see in the above session the 4D UFOs are "hyperdimensional" requiring a "time lock" to enter and exit 3D. Our secret government UFOs are not capable of the same antics that 4D UFOs but are probably much more limited technology although impressive I imagine.
Also HAARP is being used to muddle our brains while we wait. Some of these phenomena are only "temporary" until the transition to the 4th density is complete. 4D STS are trying to set up complete control before the transition to control us in 4D.
That is my assessment so far anyway.
While we are looking various investigators we see some are more credible than others but none describe things the way the Cs explain the hyperdensionality of a "density transition".
