It is certainly interesting. Could it be a breach in the Realm veil and therefore does not exert gravitational effects on the planet?
The Universe: Nemesis, the suns evil twin.
- Thread starter maryjk_99
- Start date
It is certainly interesting. Could it be a breach in the Realm veil and therefore does not exert gravitational effects on the planet?
Jimmy Ssaz
Jedi
Is it because of Nemesis that many animals walked in circles? What other things does it do to the planet and people?
I think that Nemesis is not related to the phenomenon of animals walking in circles. To a greater extent, as the Cs have said, the presence of Nemesis affects more the Sun and the electromagnetic currents between it and the planets of the solar system.
According to the Cs the phenomenon of the animals is a consequence of wave manipulation:
Possibly radio waves like 5G
To me it looks like the solar disc. Perhaps at that moment the clouds were thicker just over the sun, but not so much around it, creating the illusion that the light came from elsewhere behind it.
But lets assume for a moment that it was not the sun. Then I think the only other possible explanation would be the moon. If it's in waning phase, it may be waning crescent, which is quite close to the sun from out perspective, as seen on this diagram. Indeed, the next phase is a new moon, when you can't see the moon because it's practically 'on top' of the sun - except not exactly on top of it because then you would have a solar eclipse.
In any case, I don't think it's Nemesis or anything anomalous. My understanding is that Nemesis never really enters the solar system as we think of it, but brushes its outer edges at its closest point, so if we could see it it wouldn't be larger than a star from our perspective. Also, consider that if the object you saw was something anomalous, it would have to be a pretty large object and/or be quite close to Earth, like the moon. Just the gravitational effect on us would be obvious by now, as in catastrophic. That's not even factoring in electric effects or effects on other solar system bodies.
Haiku
Jedi Master
Possible sighting ... I would say it's a poor explanation though. Haiku ...
NASA Citizen Scientists Spot Object Moving 1 Million Miles Per Hour - NASA Science
Most familiar stars peacefully orbit the center of the Milky Way. But citizen scientists working on NASA’s Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project have helped discover an object moving so fast that it will escape the Milky Way’s gravity and shoot into intergalactic space. This hypervelocity object is...
science.nasa.gov
This is an interview conducted by Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog and the speaker, Weston Warren, is essentially talking about Nemesis inbound!
Black Star Causing Change of Biblical Proportions – Weston Warren
There is much more in the 83-minute interview. To shop for air scrubbing bipolar ionization technology that kills everything from mold to spike proteins, click here: https://www.westonscientificllc.co
rumble.com
Interestingly, this post was lost in the forum database crash on the 15th. I've reconstructed it as best I can. @irjO pointed out an extra session excerpt in response, so I'm including that and also modifying my post based on that feedback.
The idea of electromagnetic changes affecting the Earth's magnetosphere and lithosphere through enhanced magma 'plasticity' is worth considering though, osit. Here are some relevant session excerpts:
If a larger estimate is used for the distance to the heliopause (150 AU instead of 120), then the result is 134 years. Either way, this seems to indicate that the strongest electromagnetic "grounding" effects of the sun's companion may influence the solar system for quite some time yet. Just out of curiosity, I asked about the potential visibility of the object and Grok responded that assuming the typical spectral qualities of a late T-type or early Y-type brown dwarf, the object should theoretically be brighter than Venus!
The C's did say that the radiance of the companion star was very low, so this might explain why it has only been seen with large scientific telescopes and not by thousands of backyard astronomers. However, if the "grounding" affects continue to increase for years yet, there could potentially be significant "flaring" that would make it much more visible.
Fascinating food for thought!
There's a broad similarity to the 'Nemesis' hypothesis and some interesting ideas discussed, but there's no data supplied and very little in the way of specifics, plus a colossal amount of trying to make the scenario fit Biblical prophecy. No mention of comets, and the mass and orbital parameters he discusses bear no resemblance to the hypothesized brown dwarf trajectory at all.
The idea of electromagnetic changes affecting the Earth's magnetosphere and lithosphere through enhanced magma 'plasticity' is worth considering though, osit. Here are some relevant session excerpts:
Session 4th July 1998 said:
Session 11th July 1998 said:
Session 30th January 2010 said:
Session 21st December 2012 said:
Session 6th July 2010 said:
Session 17th July 2022 said:
Session 10th December 2022 said:
As a thought experiment, I asked Grok:Session 23rd September 2023 said:
The answer (excluding a lot of math) was approximately 89 years. I then asked it to repeat the exercise using the perihelion of Pluto as the dwarf star's perihelion (~30 AU) and interestingly the answer was the same, only the companion star's velocity was calculated at 7.7 km/s instead of 6 km/s.Ryan said:
If a larger estimate is used for the distance to the heliopause (150 AU instead of 120), then the result is 134 years. Either way, this seems to indicate that the strongest electromagnetic "grounding" effects of the sun's companion may influence the solar system for quite some time yet. Just out of curiosity, I asked about the potential visibility of the object and Grok responded that assuming the typical spectral qualities of a late T-type or early Y-type brown dwarf, the object should theoretically be brighter than Venus!
The C's did say that the radiance of the companion star was very low, so this might explain why it has only been seen with large scientific telescopes and not by thousands of backyard astronomers. However, if the "grounding" affects continue to increase for years yet, there could potentially be significant "flaring" that would make it much more visible.
Fascinating food for thought!
Or a big telescope that could detect such faint objects. It is insane what kind of technology you need to do that. A -100°C!
The work is methodical and demanding, and involves interconnected systems that require a comprehensive understanding of the entire camera. Experts in vacuum systems, cooling, and electronics play a critical role in the process. It is not enough to be an expert in one specific area—one must have a deep, holistic knowledge of the camera. Every system, every component, every adjustment must be carefully anticipated to ensure perfect operation.
Preparing for the greatest cosmic movie ever made
High up on the top of Cerro Pachón in northern Chile, NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory is nearing completion. At the heart of the facility, a pivotal moment in the project's scientific adventure is unfolding. After more than 20 years of meticulous research and development, and weeks of testing...phys.org
Some people would like to discover Planet 9, but they might discover more than they hope for.
The only problem with this telescope, as far as I can see, is that it will only scan the southern sky, so if the Planet 9 or Nemesis is on the northern sky, Vera will not be able to see them. So we need another telescope like Vera in the northern hemisphere.
When a Telescope Is a National-Security Risk
How do you know what you’re not allowed to see?
In the early months of 2023, the astronomer Željko Ivezić found himself taking part in a highly unusual negotiation. Ivezić is the 59-year-old director of the Vera Rubin Observatory, a $1 billion telescope that the United States has been developing in the Chilean high desert for more than 20 years. He was trying to reach an agreement that would keep his telescope from compromising America’s national security when it starts stargazing next year.
This task was odd enough for any scientist, and it was made more so by the fact that Ivezić had no idea with whom he was negotiating. “I didn’t even know which agency I was talking to,” he told me on a recent video call from his field office in Chile. Whoever it was would communicate with him only through intermediaries at the National Science Foundation. Ivezić didn’t even know whether one person or several people were on the other side of the exchange. All he knew was that they were very security-minded. Also, they seemed to know a great deal about astronomy.
The Vera Rubin is housed in a sleek building on a mountaintop in the Atacama Desert. The chamber that holds its primary mirror juts up from the end of the elongated structure like the head of a sphinx. The observatory represents a freakish augmentation of human vision. Like the James Webb Space Telescope that NASA launched a few years ago, it will be able to see to the far edge of the universe. But the Webb can observe only a tiny region of sky. The Vera Rubin will be able to lock onto a tile of sky that is much larger and, after 30 seconds, return an image of that tile that extends 13 billion light-years into space. Then it will pan over and lock onto an adjacent tile of sky and do the same thing. After just three nights of going tile-by-tile like a handyman redoing a bathroom wall, it will have captured a deep image of the entire sky.
National-security types worry about what the Vera Rubin will be able to see. Ivezić told me that each of its full-sky images will contain more than 40 billion objects. That’s several times more than all previous surveys of this sort combined. When the Vera Rubin sees an object that it hasn’t seen before, it will alert astronomers. If a star explodes billions of light-years away, an algorithm will spot it, and the community will be notified. If a near-Earth asteroid comes hurtling right toward us, scientists will know to zoom into it, immediately, with other observatories. The problem is, if a spy satellite, or some other secret spacecraft, moves into view, that too could get flagged and have its location distributed, in real time, to people all across the world.
The Pentagon doesn’t like much of anything to be known about its satellites. During the Cold War, the United States was more secretive about what it did in space than what it did in the nuclear realm, says Aaron Bateman, a historian at George Washington University and the author of Weapons in Space. The U.S. acknowledges the general contours of its nuclear arsenal—how many weapons and delivery vehicles it has—but tends to be far more circumspect about its military space capabilities. Bateman told me that the very existence of the National Reconnaissance Office, the agency responsible for developing U.S. spy satellites, was classified until 1992. The NRO still operates a fleet of these satellites, but exact details about how many, and what kind, remain secret.
The Vera Rubin Observatory will likely make awkward eye contact with some of them. Many of them are telescopes in their own right, but instead of tilting up toward the sky, they point down at Earth. This dual nature of the telescope dates back to its inception; after inventing his, Galileo wrote to the ruler of Venice about its ability to spy enemy ships. He also vowed to keep the device a secret. During the early Cold War, the British government monitored Soviet satellites and missile tests with the Jodrell Bank Observatory, in Manchester.
Assistance of this kind has also flowed in the opposite direction, from the spies to the civilians. During the Apollo missions, NRO spy satellites captured images of potential landing sites on the moon. They also inspected damaged panels on SkyLab, NASA’s first space station. In 1981, during the space shuttle’s maiden flight, a NASA astronaut flipped the shuttle over so that an NRO satellite could grab a close-up of its heat shield, to see how it had held up through the atmospheric friction. Only a few people at the agency were aware of the operation.
The public learns about the true extent of the government’s seeing powers only after a long lag. The space historian Dwayne Day recently told me that the intelligence community operated large optics in space before NASA even started working on the Hubble, in 1977. He said that the technology helping today’s ground-based observatories see through the blur of the atmosphere was first developed by the military, and then later shared with civilian astronomers. The NRO may have all kinds of telescopes. In 2012, the agency even gave NASA a Hubble-class observatory as a surprise gift. It had just been lying around.
Ivezić knew that the Vera Rubin Observatory would need to avoid revealing the full extent of America’s space-based surveillance apparatus. He agreed to set up a system that would remove classified information from the telescope’s images, but he and his mysterious interlocutors did not initially agree about how it should work. Some of their concerns were easy to assuage. The Defense Intelligence Agency sometimes asks to be informed when foreign nationals use America’s most powerful radio observatories, in case those people were to point them at something sensitive, presumably. No such protocols would be necessary for the Vera Rubin’s Chilean operators, because the telescope has a fixed, 10-year observation plan. Ivezić said he showed it to his government counterparts and assured them that no one would be able to deviate from it.
Ivezić was most worried about the possibility that he would be made to adopt a system like one that he said the Air Force had imposed on a much less powerful astronomical survey called Pan-STARRS, about a dozen years ago. The images taken by that project’s telescopes in Hawaii were routed to a military facility—“the dark side,” as Ivezić put it—where they were edited before being sent on to astronomers. The edits weren’t especially surgical. “You would get back your image, and all the military assets would be blacked out,” Ivezić told me. “It looked like someone had streaked a marker across it, and it had a huge impact on the science that people were able to do.”
After some back-and-forth, Ivezić said, he and his counterparts came up with a less invasive way to remove secret American assets from the observatory’s instant alerts. A government agency—no one told him which one—would chip in $5 million for the construction of a dedicated network for moving sensitive data. Each time the telescope were to take one of its 30-second tile images of the sky, the file would be immediately encrypted, without anyone looking at it first, and then sent on to a secure facility in California.
Next, an automated system would compare the image with previous images of the same tile. It would cut out small “postage stamp” pictures of any new objects it finds, be they asteroids, exploding stars, or spy satellites. It would filter out the postage stamps that might depict secret U.S. assets and, one minute later, send all the rest, together with their coordinates, to an alert service available to astronomers worldwide. Three days and eight hours later, the entire tile image would be released to astronomers, untouched by black marker or any other technology of redaction.
By then, the spy satellites would likely have gone somewhere else. They are elusive, after all. Their orbits are irregular, and they shift direction often. Not even the world’s most accomplished astronomers would be able to infer their present locations from a line of light streaking through a three-day-old image.
Ivezić told me that the length of the data embargo was the most difficult term to work out. He had initially asked for the full images to be released after 10 hours. He said that his negotiating partners wanted it to be closer to seven days. In the end, Ivezić was happy with the middle ground that they settled on.
This account of the negotiation comes primarily from Ivezić. National Science Foundation and Department of Energy staff confirmed some of the general outlines of his story but would not disclose with whom he’d been negotiating, or the name of the agency that paid for the encrypted network. The Space Force declined to comment on the process. The NRO said that it had no information to offer me about any observatories.
Ivezić had nothing bad to say about his mysterious interlocutors. To the contrary, he told me that they seemed genuinely concerned about the risk of compromising the Vera Rubin’s science mission. “They did not come and say, ‘The law is on our side; you must do this, and that’s the end of it,’” Ivezić said. “After all, we are spending $1 billion of the government’s money,” he added, with a laugh.
When a Telescope Is a National-Security Risk
How do you know what you’re not allowed to see?www.theatlantic.com
axj
The Living Force
One thing I came across recently is that there is something in the outer solar system called the "Kuiper belt cliff" at 47.8 AU - an area of space between the transneptunian asteroid belt and the Oort Cloud where there are almost no large asteroids or dwarf planets:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_belt#Kuiper_cliff
Even the official stance is that this must be caused by a larger planet there, though they think that an Earth-sized planet could do it too.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_belt#Kuiper_cliff
Even the official stance is that this must be caused by a larger planet there, though they think that an Earth-sized planet could do it too.
Trending content
-
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 29K -
